Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (10) : 1438-1459    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2166-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Newly-modeled graphene-based ternary nanocomposite for the magnetophotocatalytic reduction of CO2 with electrochemical performance
Zambaga Otgonbayar1, Kwang Youn Cho2, Chong-Hun Jung3, Won-Chun Oh1,4()
1. Department of Advanced Materials Science & Engineering, Hanseo University, Seosan-Si 31962, Korea
2. Korea Institutes of Ceramic Engineering and Technology, Jinju-Si 660031, Korea
3. Decommissioning Technology Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daejeon 305-600, Korea
4. Anhui International Joint Research Center for Nano Carbon-based Materials and Environmental Health, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Anhui University of Science & Technology, Huainan 232001, China
 Download: PDF(34773 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The development of CO2 into hydrocarbon fuels has emerged as a green method that could help mitigate global warning. The novel structured photocatalyst is a promising material for use in a photocatalytic and magneto-electrochemical method that fosters the reduction of CO2 by suppressing the recombination of electron−hole pairs and effectively transferring the electrons to the surface for the chemical reaction of CO2 reduction. In our study, we have developed a novel-structured AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 to analyze its catalytic activity toward the selective evolution of CO2. The selectivity of each nanocomposite substantially enhanced the activity of the AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 ternary nanocomposite due to the successful interaction, and the selectivity of the final product was improved to a value 3 times higher than that of the pure AgCuZnS2 and 2 times higher than those of AgCuZnS2–graphene and AgCuZnS2–TiO2 under ultra-violet (UV)-light (λ = 254 nm) irradiation in the photocatalytic process. The electrochemical CO2 reduction test was also conducted to analyze the efficacy of the AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 when used as a working electrode in laboratory electrochemical cells. The electrochemical process was conducted under different experimental conditions, such as various scan rates (mV·s–1), under UV-light and with a 0.07 T magnetic-core. The evolution of CO2 substantially improved under UV-light (λ = 254 nm) and with 0.07 T magnetic-core treatment; these improvements were attributed to the facts that the UV-light activated the electron-transfer pathway and the magnetic core controlled the pathway of electron-transmission/prevention to protect it from chaotic electron movement. Among all tested nanocomposites, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 absorbed the CO2 most strongly and showed the best ability to transfer the electron to reduce the CO2 to methanol. We believe that our newly-modeled ternary nanocomposite opens up new opportunities for the evolution of CO2 to methanol through an electrochemical and photocatalytic process.

Keywords ternary nanocomposite      photocatalytic      electrochemical CO2 reduction      UV-light      magnetic core     
Corresponding Author(s): Won-Chun Oh   
About author:

Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.

Online First Date: 30 June 2022    Issue Date: 17 October 2022
 Cite this article:   
Zambaga Otgonbayar,Kwang Youn Cho,Chong-Hun Jung, et al. Newly-modeled graphene-based ternary nanocomposite for the magnetophotocatalytic reduction of CO2 with electrochemical performance[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(10): 1438-1459.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-022-2166-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2022/V16/I10/1438
Fig.1  
Fig.2  (a) XRD pattern; (b) FTIR spectra; (c) photoluminescence (PL) spectra; (d) electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS); (e) photocurrent; (f) quantum efficiency (η) value of the electrode; (g) reflectance spectra; (h) diffuse reflection spectroscopy (DRS); (i) Mott–Schottky plots; (j) Raman of AgCuZnS2, AgCuZnS2–graphene, AgCuZnS2–TiO2, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 nanocomposite.
Catalyst Bandgap/eV Efb/(V vs NHE) ECB/(V vs NHE) EVB/(V vs NHE)
ACZS 3.18 0.857 –2.323 0.857
ACZSG 2.80 0.801 –1.199 0.801
ACZSGT 2.63 0.838 –1.792 0.838
ACZST 3.08 0.819 –2.261 0.819
TiO2 3.20 [17] –0.036 –0.236 2.964
Tab.1  The bandgap and the positions of the CB and VB
Fig.3  (a–c) TEM images, (d–f) SEM images, (g) EDX analysis result of the AgCuZnS2, AgCuZnS2–graphene, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2 nanocomposite.
Fig.4  (a, b) HRTEM images, (c–f) particle size histogram of the AgCuZnS2, AgCuZnS2–graphene, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2, AgCuZnS2–TiO2 nanocomposite.
Fig.5  (a) XPS survey spectra and the high-resolution XPS spectra of AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2, (b) Ag3d, (c) Cu2p, (d) Zn2p, (e) S2p, (f) C1s, (g) Ti2p, (h) O1s.
Fig.6  Photocatalytic CO2R to methanol on as-prepared AgCuZnS2, AgCuZnS2–graphene, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2, AgCuZnS2–TiO2 nanocomposite. (a) Scavenger effect under the UV-light irradiation (λ = 254 nm) for 48 h and (b) stability test under the UV-light irradiation (λ = 254 nm) for 288 h.
Fig.7  TOC analysis result of the methanol from photocatalytic CO2R on AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2.
Fig.8  CV test of (a) AgCuZnS2, (b) AgCuZnS2–graphene, (c) AgCuZnS2–graphene-TiO2, (d) AgCuZnS2–TiO2 electrode in 0.04 mol·L–1 NaHCO3 electrolyte (–1.0 to 0.9 V vs Ag/AgCl) under different scan rates (10, 80, 100 mV·s–1).
Fig.9  CV test of (a) AgCuZnS2, (b) AgCuZnS2–graphene, (c) AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2, (d) AgCuZnS2–TiO2 electrode in CO2 electrolysis to methanol (–1.0 to 1.5 V vs Ag/AgCl) under different scan rates (10, 80, 100 mV·s–1).
Fig.10  CV test of AgCuZnS2, AgCuZnS2–graphene, AgCuZnS2–graphene–TiO2, AgCuZnS2–TiO2 nanocomposite in CO2 electrolysis to methanol under the UV-light irradiation (λ = 254 nm) and 0.07 T magnetic core (–1.0 to 1.5 V vs Ag/AgCl) under 100 mV·s–1 scan rate.
  Scheme1 Schematic representation of charge carrier dynamics in electrochemical CO2R in 0.04 mol·L–1 NaHCO3 electrolyte.
Fig.11  Faradaic efficiency of the formed reduction product: (a) with 0.07 T magnetic core, (b) under the UV-light (λ = 254 nm) irradiation, (c) 100 mV·s–1 scan rate, (d) 80 mV·s–1 scan rate, and (e) 10 mV·s–1 scan rate.
No. Vibrational state Mode Experimental/cm–1 Theoretical/cm–1
1 Hydroxyl group O–H 3289.96 3400–3300
2 Methyl group C–H 1644.98 1640
3 Alcoholic group C–O–H 1407.78 1450–1230
4 Aliphatic ether group C–O 1022.08 1300–1000
Tab.2  The functional group of the methanol (photocatalytic and electrochemical) from FTIR analysis
  Scheme2 Schematic illustration of the (a) photocatalytic CO2R with Z-scheme mechanism, (b) electrochemical CO2 reduction, experiment setup with electrode preparation (by Doctor. Blade method).
1 H L Jae, I K Sung, M P Sun, K Misook. A p-n heterojunction NiS-sensitized TiO2 photocatalytic system for efficient photoreduction of carbon dioxide to methane. Ceramics International, 2017, 43 : 1768– 1774
2 W Zhang, R Xu. Surface engineered active photocatalysts without noble metals: CuS–ZnxCd1−xS nanospheres by one-step synthesis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34 : 8495– 8503
3 Q Shen, Z Chen, X Huang, M Liu, G Zhao. High-yield and selective photoelectrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to formate by metallic copper decorated Co3O4 nanotube arrays. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49 : 5828– 5835
4 X Li, J Wen, J Low, Y Fang, J Yu. Design and fabrication of semiconductor photocatalyst for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to solar fuel. Science China Materials, 2014, 57 : 70– 100
5 H Peng, Z Mo, S Liao, H Liang, L Yang, F Luo, H Song, Y Zhong, B Zhang. High performance Fe- and N-doped carbon catalyst with graphene structure for oxygen reduction. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3( 1): 1765
6 D Diptiman, M A Estak, M Sumit, M Biswajit, K S Shyamal. Amorphous molybdenum sulfide quantum dots: an efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst in neutral medium. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 2016, 40 : 15486– 15493
7 X Li, J Yu, M Jaroniec, X Chen. Cocatalysts for selective photoreduction of CO2 into solar fuels. Chemical Reviews, 2019, 119( 6): 3962– 4179
8 F Xu, J Zhang, B Zhu, J Yu, J Xu. CuInS2 sensitized TiO2 hybrid nanofibers for improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2018, 230( 15): 194– 202
9 Z Liang, R Shen, Y Hau Ng, P Zhang, Q Xiang, X Li. A review on 2D MoS2 cocatalysts in photocatalytic H2 production. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2020, 56 : 89– 121
10 R C Shen, D D Ren, Y N Ding, Y T Guan, Y H Ng, P Zhang, X Li. Nanostructured CdS for efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution: a review. Science China Materials, 2020, 63 : 2153– 2188
11 Y Yang, W Que, X Zhang, X Yin, Y Xing, M Que, H Zhao, Y Du. High-quality Cu2ZnSnS4 and Cu2ZnSnSe4 nanocrystals hybrid with ZnO and NaYF4: Yb, Tm as efficient photocatalytic sensitizers. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2017, 200 : 402– 411
12 W Xue, W Chang, X Hu, J Fan, E Liu. 2D mesoporous ultrathin Cd0.5Zn0.5S nanosheet: fabrication mechanism and application potential for photocatalytic H2 evolution. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42 : 152– 163
13 K Li, S Zhang, Y Li, J Fan, K Lv. MXenes as noble-metal-alternative co-catalysts in photocatalysis. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42 : 3– 14
14 T Inoue, A Fujishima, S Konishi, K Honda. Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders. Nature, 1979, 277 : 637– 638
15 N Roy Y Hirano P Sudhagar N Suzuki K Katsumata K Nakata T Kondo M Yuasa I Serzawa T Takayama. Boron-doped diamond semiconductor electrodes: efficient photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction through surface modification . Scientific Reports, 2016
16 Y Liu, S Chen, X Quan, H Yu. Efficient electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to acetate on nitrogen-doped nano diamond. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2015, 137 : 11631– 11636
17 L Cheng, D Zhang, Y Liao, J Fan, Q Xiang. Structural engineering of 3D hierarchical Cd0.8Zn0.2S for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2021, 42 : 131– 140
18 H Xiong, X Xie, M Wang, Y Hou, X Hou. CVD grown carbon nanotubes on reticulated skeleton for brine desalination. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36( 9): 1912008 (in Chinese)
19 G Eda, G Fanchini, M Chhowalla. Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nature Nanotechnology, 2008, 3 : 270– 274
20 H Tian, C Wan, X Xue, X Hu, X Wang. Effective electron transfer pathway of the ternary TiO2/RGO/Ag nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic activity under visible light. Catalysts, 2017, 7 : 156
21 Q Xie, W He, S Liu, C Li, J Zhang, P K Wong. Bifunctional S-scheme g-C3N4/Bi/BiVO4 hybrid photocatalysts toward artificial carbon cycling. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2020, 42 : 140– 153
22 S Duan, S Wu, L Wang, H She, J Huang, Q Wang. Rod-shaped metal organic framework structured PCN-222(Cu)/TiO2 composites for efficient photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2020, 36 : 1905086 (in Chinese)
23 B Zeng, W Zeng. Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide loaded ZnS/Ag2S quantum dot heterostructures via ion-exchange for high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 2017, 12( 1): 215– 222
24 G Surekha, K V Krishnaia, N Ravi, R P Suvarna. FTIR, Raman and XRD analysis of graphene oxide films prepared by modified Hummers method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2020, 1495 : 012012
25 S Yu, X Wang, R Zhang, T Yang, Y Ai, T Wen, W Huang, T Hayat, A Alsaedi, X Wang. Complex roles of solution chemistry on graphene oxide coagulation onto titanium dioxide: batch experiments, spectroscopy analysis and theoretical calculation. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7 : 39625
26 J M Coronado F Fresno M D Hernández-Alonso R Portela S Suárez R S García la Peña O’Shea V A de. Design of advanced photocatalytic materials for energy and environmental applications. In: Green Energy and Technology. Heidenberg: Springer, 2013
27 D Reyes-Coronado, G Rodríguez-Gattorno, M E Espinaso-Pesqueira, C Cab, Coss R de, G Oskam. Phase-pure TiO2 nanoparticles: anatase, brookite and rutile. Nanotechnology, 2008, 19 : 145605
28 A Ferrari, D Basko. Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nature Nanotechnology, 2013, 8 : 235– 246
29 L B Pitna, L Kavan, M Zukalova, K Mocek, O Frank. In situ Raman spectroelectrochemistry as a useful tool for detection of TiO2 (anatase) impurities in TiO2(B) and TiO2(rutile). Monatshefte für Chemie, 2016, 147 : 951– 959
30 F Watanabe, Z Nima, T Honda, M Mitsuhara, M Nishida, A S Biris. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy analysis of silver-coated gold nanorods designed for bio nanotechnology applications. Nanotechnology, 2017, 28 : 025704
31 T Ghodselahi, M A Vesaghi, A Shafiekhani, A Baghizadeh, M Lameii. XPS study of the Cu@Cu2O core-shell nanoparticles. Applied Surface Science, 2008, 255( 5): 2730– 2734
32 X F Sun, S G Wang, X M Zhang, J P Chen, X M Li, B Y Gao, Y Ma. Spectroscopic study of Zn2+ and Co2+ binding to extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from aerobic granules. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2009, 335( 1): 11– 17
33 S Kim, L Britcher, S Kumar, H J Griesser. XPS study of sulfur and phosphorus compounds with different oxidation states. Sains Malaysiana, 2018, 47( 8): 1913– 1922
34 R Al-Gaashani, A Najjar, Y Zakaria, S Mansour, M A Atieh. XPS and structural studies of high quality graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide prepared by different chemical oxidation methods. Ceramics International, 2019, 45( 11): 14439– 14448
35 W Mai, F Wen, D Xie, Y Leng, Z Mu. Structure and composition study of carbon-doped titanium oxide film combined with first principles. Journal of Advanced Ceramics, 2014, 3( 1): 49– 55
36 A Kovtun, D Jones, S Dell’Elce, E Treossi, A Liscio, V Palermo. Accurate chemical analysis of graphene-based materials using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Carbon, 2019, 143 : 268– 275
37 O Zambaga, C H Jung, W C Oh. New modeling of AgFeNi2S4−graphene−TiO2 ternary nanocomposite with chelate compounds and its photocatalytic reduction of CO2. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Electronics, 2021, 32 : 9804– 9821
38 X Wang, Z Jiang, H Chen, K Wang, X Wang. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction with water vapor to CO and CH4 in a recirculation reactor by Ag-Cu2O/TiO2 Z-scheme heterostructures. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2021, 896 : 163030
39 M Tahir, B Tahir. Constructing S-scheme 2D/0D g-C3N4/TiO2 NPs/MPs heterojunction with 2D-Ti3AlC2 MAX cocatalyst for photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CO/CH4 in fixed-bed and monolith photoreactors. Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2022, 103 : 195– 210
40 A Raza, H Shen, A A Haidry, L Sun, R Liu, S Cui. Studies of Z-scheme WO3-TiO2/Cu2ZnSnS4 ternary nanocomposite with enhanced CO2 photoreduction under visible light irradiation. Journal of CO2 Utilization , 2020, 37 : 260– 271
41 A R Park, M G Nam, A Y Kim, K S Kim, J Y Lee, W J Kim, P J Yoo. Si/Co-CoSi2/reduced graphene oxide ternary nanocomposite anodes for Li-ion batteries with enhanced capacity and cycling stability. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2017, 724 : 1134– 1142
42 X Fei H Tan B Cheng B Zhu L Zhang. 2D/2D black phosphorus/ g-C3N4 S-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts for CO2 reduction investigated using DFT calculations . Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, 2021, 37(6): 2010027 (in Chinese)
43 H Quan, K Qian, Y Xuan, L L Lou, K Yu, S Liu. Superior performance in visible-light-driven hydrogen evolution reaction of three-dimensionally ordered macroporous SrTiO3 decorated with ZnxCd1−xS. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021, 15 : 1561– 1571
44 Y Yang, D Zhang, Q Xiang. Plasma-modified Ti3C2Tx/CdS hybrids with oxygen-containing groups for high-efficiency photocatalytic hydrogen production. Nanoscale, 2019, 11 : 18797– 18805
[1] FCE-21100-OF-OZ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Jianxin Chen, Yupeng Li, Jihui Li, Jian Han, Guijun Zhu, Liang Ren. Crystal design of bismuth oxyiodide with highly exposed (110) facets on curved carbon nitride for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants in wastewater[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 1125-1138.
[2] Njud S. Alharbi, Baowei Hu, Tasawar Hayat, Samar Omar Rabah, Ahmed Alsaedi, Li Zhuang, Xiangke Wang. Efficient elimination of environmental pollutants through sorption-reduction and photocatalytic degradation using nanomaterials[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 1124-1135.
[3] Jianwei Lu, Lan Lan, Xiaoteng Terence Liu, Na Wang, Xiaolei Fan. Plasmonic Au nanoparticles supported on both sides of TiO2 hollow spheres for maximising photocatalytic activity under visible light[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 665-671.
[4] Jin Yang, Xuelian Liu, Hongbin Cao, Yanchun Shi, Yongbing Xie, Jiadong Xiao. Dendritic BiVO4 decorated with MnOx co-catalyst as an efficient hierarchical catalyst for photocatalytic ozonation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 185-191.
[5] Xiaojie Zhang,Lei Wang,Shuqing Chen,Yi Huang,Zhuonan Song,Miao Yu. Facile synthesis and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of Ti3+-doped TiO2 sheets with tunable phase composition? ?[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 349-358.
[6] Paramasivan GOMATHISANKAR,Tomoko NODA,Hideyuki KATSUMATA,Tohru SUZUKI,Satoshi KANECO. Enhanced hydrogen production from aqueous methanol solution using TiO2/Cu as photocatalysts[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2014, 8(2): 197-202.
[7] Weixin ZHANG, Jie XING, Zeheng YANG, Mei KONG, Hongxu YAO. A chemical etching route to controllable fabrication of TiO2 hollow nanospheres for enhancing their photocatalytic activity[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2013, 7(2): 192-201.
[8] Dishun ZHAO, Jialei WANG, Zhigang ZHANG, Juan ZHANG. Photocatalytic degradation of omethoate using NaY zeolite-supported TiO2[J]. Front Chem Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 206-210.
[9] XIAO Xinyan, ZHANG Huiping, CHEN Huanqin, LIAO Dongliang. Synthesis of TiO2 nano-particles and their photocatalytic activity for formaldehyde and methyl orange degradation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(2): 178-183.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed