Please wait a minute...
Shopping Cart Email List Chinese
Advanced Search Fig/Tab
Frontiers of Engineering Management

ISSN 2095-7513

ISSN 2096-0255(Online)

CN 10-1205/N

Postal Subscription Code 80-905

Featured Articles  |  Most Downloaded  |  Most Reading
Online Submission Subscribe to Our RSS Content Feed
Front. Eng    2015, Vol. 2 Issue (3) : 287-292    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2015041
Engineering Management Theories and Methodologies
Dynamic Coordinated Management Model of Programme in Large-Scale Construction Company
Feng Guo(),Yi-qi Chen,Yi-qing Cai
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China
 Download: PDF(221 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Large-scale construction companies develop rapidly when facing more and more opportunities and challenges of programme contracting. However, project management technology, not meeting the requirements of firm growth, still stands proud, while relevant programme management methods have not been well studied. Therefore, this paper commences innovative application of coordinated management theory to programme management according to the need of changing the existing management mode in large-scale construction companies, then puts forward the dynamic coordinated management model composed of the dynamic coordination of function module, interface module, support module and evaluation module. Besides, coordination degree was introduced to make auxiliary analysis, so that companies can utilize internal and external resources more effectively to realize the goals of programme management as well as enterprise strategy.
Keywords large-scale construction company      programme      dynamic coordinated management      model     
Corresponding Author(s): Feng Guo   
Online First Date: 13 October 2015    Issue Date: 21 March 2016
 Cite this article:   
Feng Guo,Yi-qi Chen,Yi-qing Cai. Dynamic Coordinated Management Model of Programme in Large-Scale Construction Company[J]. Front. Eng, 2015, 2(3): 287-292.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/10.15302/J-FEM-2015041
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/Y2015/V2/I3/287
Programme management model (methods) Theoretical basis Management objectives Management content Key point
Collaborative management model Synergistics,programme theory Generating synergistic symbiotic effect, coevolution effect, collaborative innovation effect and synergistic economies effects in scale in order to obtain exceeded profits Controlling and organizing programme structure, process, elements, functions and relations well Strengthening synergies among multiple projects
Integrated management method Systems theory, information theory, cybernetics Maximize the overall interests of programme In programme level, doing integrated management of subprojects; in sub-project level, doing the integrated management of quality, cost, schedule, and other elements Taking the programme as a system
WSR method WSR systems theory, coordinated management Combining all kinds of knowledge and parties’ interests to find the satisfactory solution, ensuring the integrity of programme management Integration of MR, TR and HR, making coordination throughout the process of project management Emphasis on the integrity of thing as well as linkage between the whole and the part
CCPM model Critical chain method, theory of constraints Making business benefits maximized, and making the most use of resources and the shortest time Determining the relationship and distributing resources well among multiple projects; coordinate the competition for limited resources within the enterprise Complying with the overall optimization rather than local optimization absolutely
Tab.1  Comparison of Programme Management Model
Fig.1  Dynamic coordinated management model of program.
Coordination degree C 0?0.09 0.10?0.19 0.20?0.29 0.30?0.39 0.40?0.49
Coordination level Extremely uncoordinated Seriously uncoordinated Moderatelyuncoordinated Mildlyuncoordinated Nearly uncoordinated
Coordination degree C 0.50?0.59 0.60?0.69 0.70?0.79 0.80?0.89 0.90?1.00
Coordination level Barely uncoordinated Primarily coordinated Intermediatelycoordinated Finecoordinated Wonderfully coordinated
Tab.2  The Classification of Coordination
1 Burke, R. (2013). Project management: planning and control techniques (5th ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2 David, P., & Sergio P. (2005). Attributes and levels of programme management competence: an interpretive study. International Journal of Project Management, 23(2), 87–95
3 Ferns, D. (1991). Developments in programme management. International Journal of Project Management, 9(3), 148–156
4 Gao, X. (2012). Research on programme management based on WSR system methodology. Project Management Technology, 10(10), 65–70
5 Guo, F. (2008). Discussion on coordinated management. Journal of Changsha Railway University (Social Sciences Edition), 9(6), 75–79
6 Guo, F. (2009). Coordinated management of construction projects. Beijing: Science Press
7 Guo, F. (2013). Coordinated management and system design. Beijing: Science Press
8 Liu, X. (2011). Research on programme management model and application analysis. Project Management Technology, 9(8), 37–42
9 Lu, J., & Zhao, L. (2004). Review on construction programme management. Journal of Engineering Management, 24(4), 442–446
10 Miao, X. (2009). Research on integrated management under the situation of programme. Project Management Technology, 7(5), 29–32
11 Pellegrinelli, S. (1997). Programme management: organising project-based change. International Journal of Project Management, 15(3), 141–149
12 PMI. (2000). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Newtown Square: Project Management Institute
13 Sergio, P. (2011). What’s in a name: Project or programme. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 232–240
14 Shi, W. (2010). Collaborative management model of South-to-North Water Diversion programme construction and mechanism analysis. Science and Technology Management Research, 30(5), 188–191
15 Sun, H., & Zhou, Y. (2011). Critical chain method and its application in programme management. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 28(3), 48–51
16 Turner, J. (1999). The handbook of project-based management (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
17 Wang, Y. (2004). Research on programme management model. Journal of Xidian University (Natural Science Edition), 14(3), 75–79.
18 Zhang, C. (2008). Collaborative management model of programme construction and mechanism analysis. Science &Technology Progress and Policy, 25(2), 49–52
19 Zhou, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2007). Combing for the development of management thought-coordinated management. China Economist, 22(8), 223–224
[1] Xinzheng LU, Qingle CHENG, Zhen XU, Chen XIONG. Regional seismic-damage prediction of buildings under mainshock–aftershock sequence[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 122-134.
[2] Zhe SUN, Cheng ZHANG, Pingbo TANG. Modeling and simulating the impact of forgetting and communication errors on delays in civil infrastructure shutdowns[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 109-121.
[3] Mingyue LI, Zhuoling MA, Xi TANG. Owner-dominated building information modeling and lean construction in a megaproject[J]. Front. Eng, 2021, 8(1): 60-71.
[4] Qiang ZHANG, Baoyu LIAO, Shanlin YANG. Application of blockchain in the field of intelligent manufacturing: Theoretical basis, realistic plights, and development suggestions[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(4): 578-591.
[5] Gjorgji SHEMOV, Borja GARCIA de SOTO, Hoda ALKHZAIMI. Blockchain applied to the construction supply chain: A case study with threat model[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(4): 564-577.
[6] Yongkui LI, Qing YANG, Beverly PASIAN, Yan ZHANG. Project management maturity in construction consulting services: Case of Expo in China[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(3): 384-395.
[7] Fupei LI, Minglei YANG, Wenli DU, Xin DAI. Development and challenges of planning and scheduling for petroleum and petrochemical production[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(3): 373-383.
[8] Katharina DENK, Ben DJERROUD, Luis SECO, Mohammad SHAKOURIFAR, Rudi ZAGST. Option-like properties in the distribution of hedge fund returns[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(2): 275-286.
[9] Mahdi JEMMALI, Bassem SALHI. Corporate governance impact on banking risk[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(2): 182-195.
[10] Žiga TURK, Andreja ISTENIČ STARČIČ. Toward deep impacts of BIM on education[J]. Front. Eng, 2020, 7(1): 81-88.
[11] Hans VOORDIJK. Building information modeling and its impact on users in the lifeworld: a mediation perspective[J]. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(2): 193-206.
[12] Qian ZHAO, Xiang JIA, Zhi-jun CHENG, Bo GUO. Bayes estimation of residual life by fusing multisource information[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(4): 524-532.
[13] Albert P. C. CHAN, Xiaozhi MA, Wen YI, Xin ZHOU, Feng XIONG. Critical review of studies on building information modeling (BIM) in project management[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(3): 394-406.
[14] Pekka Leviäkangas, Yanbing YE, Oluwole Alfred OLATUNJI. Sustainable public-private partnerships: Balancing the multi-actor ecosystem and societal requirements[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(3): 347-356.
[15] Muhammad Tariq SHAFIQ, Jane MATTHEWS, Steve LOCKLEY, Peter E.D. LOVE. Model server enabled management of collaborative changes in building information models[J]. Front. Eng, 2018, 5(3): 298-306.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed