Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (5) : 61    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1821-6
Toward a rapid and convenient nanoplastic quantification method in laboratory-scale study based on fluorescence intensity
Ruiqi Yan1, Sen Lin1, Qian Ding1, Lei Zhang1, Xia Yu1, Wentao Zhao2,3, Qian Sui1,3()
1. State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Risk Assessment and Control on Chemical Process, School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3. Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China
 Download: PDF(3307 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Performance of optical analysis was assessed for nanoplastic (NP) quantification.

● Fluorescence intensity (FI) had high correlation coefficient with NP concentration.

● Quantification limit of the method is below environmental concentrations of NPs.

● Quantification limit only slightly increased with increased matrix in water samples.

● The analytical method offered advantages in both convenience and cost-effectiveness.

The thorough investigation of nanoplastics (NPs) in aqueous environments requires efficient and expeditious quantitative analytical methods that are sensitive to environmentally relevant NP concentrations and convenient to employ. Optical analysis-based quantitative methods have been acknowledged as effective and rapid approaches for quantifying NP concentrations in laboratory-scale studies. Herein, we compared three commonly used optical response indicators, namely fluorescence intensity (FI), ultraviolet absorbance, and turbidity, to assess their performance in quantifying NPs. Furthermore, orthogonal experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of various water quality parameters on the preferred indicator-based quantification method. The results revealed that FI exhibits the highest correlation coefficient (> 0.99) with NP concentration. Notably, the limit of quantification (LOQ) for various types of NPs is exceptionally low, ranging from 0.0089 to 0.0584 mg/L in ultrapure water, well below environmentally relevant concentrations. Despite variations in water quality parameters such as pH, salinity, suspended solids (SS), and humic acid, a robust relationship between detectable FI and NP concentration was identified. However, an increased matrix, especially SS in water samples, results in an enhanced LOQ for NPs. Nevertheless, the quantitative method remains applicable in real water bodies, especially in drinking water, with NP LOQ as low as 0.0157–0.0711 mg/L. This exceeds the previously reported detectable concentration for 100 nm NPs at 40 μg/mL using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. This study confirms the potential of FI as a reliable indicator for the rapid quantification of NPs in aqueous environments, offering substantial advantages in terms of both convenience and cost-effectiveness.

Keywords Nanoplastic quantification      Fluorescence intensity      Drinking water      Limit of quantification (LOQ)      Matrix effects     
Corresponding Author(s): Qian Sui   
Issue Date: 28 February 2024
 Cite this article:   
Ruiqi Yan,Sen Lin,Qian Ding, et al. Toward a rapid and convenient nanoplastic quantification method in laboratory-scale study based on fluorescence intensity[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 61.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1821-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I5/61
LevelpHSalinity (%)SS (mg/L)HA (TOC, mg/L)
150.110.5
270.552
391105
Tab.1  Orthogonal factors and their levels
Fig.1  Calibration curves for NPs in ultrapure water based on fluorescence intensity (a)?(d), UV-ABS (e)?(h), and turbidity (i)?(l).
SampleCblank (mg/L)nSDLOQ (mg/L)
100-PS0.0007100.00180.0229
500-PS0100.00210.0236
100-PMMA0.011100.00140.0584
500-PMMA0100.00080.0089
Tab.2  LOQ result for various types of NPs based on FI in ultrapure water
Fig.2  The LOQ values of NPs in simulated water samples labeled 1?9, corresponding to orthogonal test 1?9 (a); The distribution of relative deviation value of LOQs for each type of NP in different simulated water samples compared to the LOQ in ultrapure water (b).
Parameter100-PS500-PS
SSDDfMsFSSDDfMsF
pH0.05820.0293.1960.91020.455211.388*
Salinity1.99720.998109.698*1.51120.755350.761*
SS10.24725.123562.918*8.85624.4282056.305*
HA0.03020.0151.6480.19720.09845.732*
Error0.164180.0090.039180.009
SASS>Salinity>pH>HASS>Salinity>pH>HA
Parameter100-PMMA500-PMMA
SSDDfMsFSSDDfMsF
pH0.02120.0113.871*0.04520.0231.605
Salinity0.43920.21979.793*0.15120.0755.344*
SS0.56320.281102.317*0.28920.14510.249*
HA0.26220.13147.672*0.18020.0906.398*
Error0.049180.0030.254180.014
SASS>Salinity>HA>pHSS>HA>Salinity>pH
Tab.3  The results of variance analysis for the orthogonal test
Fig.3  Fluorescence intensity and LOQ of different NPs under three suspended solid conditions. Different symbols positioned above the points indicate significant differences among the fluorescence intensity corresponding to different factor levels, as determined by a one-way ANOVA at p < 0.05. (a) 100-PS; (b) 500-PS; (c) 100-PMMA; (d) 500-PMMA.
Fig.4  The LOQ values of NPs in various representative water bodies.
1 M Al-Sid-Cheikh , S J Rowland , K Stevenson , C Rouleau , T B Henry , R C Thompson . (2018). Uptake, whole-body distribution, and depuration of nanoplastics by the scallop Pecten maximus at environmentally realistic concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology, 52(24): 14480–14486
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05266
2 A Aynard , C Courrèges , J Jiménez-Lamana , A Raad , C Miqueu , B Grassl , S Reynaud . (2023). Trace metal sorption on nanoplastics: an innovative analytical approach combining surface analysis and mass spectrometry techniques. Environmental Pollution, 323: 121229
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121229
3 W Chen , H Q Yu . (2021). Advances in the characterization and monitoring of natural organic matter using spectroscopic approaches. Water Research, 190: 116759
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116759
4 Z Chen , L Li , L Hao , Y Hong , W Wang . (2022). Hormesis-like growth and photosynthetic physiology of marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum Bohlin exposed to polystyrene microplastics. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(1): 2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1436-0
5 Z Chen , J Liu , C Chen , Z Huang . (2020). Sedimentation of nanoplastics from water with Ca/Al dual flocculants: characterization, interface reaction, effects of pH and ion ratios. Chemosphere, 252: 126450
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126450
6 da Costa J P, Santos P S M, Duarte A C, Rocha-Santos T (2016). (Nano)plastics in the environment: sources, fates and effects. Science of the Total Environment, 566−567: 15−26
7 A A de Souza Machado , W Kloas , C Zarfl , S Hempel , M C Rillig . (2018). Microplastics as an emerging threat to terrestrial ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 24(4): 1405–1416
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14020
8 J H Dekiff , D Remy , J Klasmeier , E Fries . (2014). Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in sediments from Norderney. Environmental Pollution, 186: 248–256
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.11.019
9 F Dubaish , G Liebezeit . (2013). Suspended microplastics and black carbon particles in the Jade system, southern North Sea. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 224(2): 1352
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1352-9
10 E Dümichen , A K Barthel , U Braun , C G Bannick , K Brand , M Jekel , R Senz . (2015). Analysis of polyethylene microplastics in environmental samples, using a thermal decomposition method. Water Research, 85: 451–457
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.002
11 E Dümichen , P Eisentraut , C G Bannick , A K Barthel , R Senz , U Braun . (2017). Fast identification of microplastics in complex environmental samples by a thermal degradation method. Chemosphere, 174: 572–584
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.010
12 M Eriksen , N Maximenko , M Thiel , A Cummins , G Lattin , S Wilson , J Hafner , A Zellers , S Rifman . (2013). Plastic pollution in the South Pacific subtropical gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 68(1–2): 71–76
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.12.021
13 X Fan , Y Zou , N Geng , J Liu , J Hou , D Li , C Yang , Y Li . (2021). Investigation on the adsorption and desorption behaviors of antibiotics by degradable MPs with or without UV ageing process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 401: 123363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123363
14 E Fries , J H Dekiff , J Willmeyer , M T Nuelle , M Ebert , D Remy . (2013). Identification of polymer types and additives in marine microplastic particles using pyrolysis-GC/MS and scanning electron microscopy. Environmental Science. Processes & Impacts, 15(10): 1949–1956
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00214d
15 B T Hart , P Bailey , R Edwards , K Hortle , K James , A McMahon , C Meredith , K Swadling . (1991). A review of the salt sensitivity of the Australian freshwater biota. Hydrobiologia, 210(1–2): 105–144
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00014327
16 L M Hernandez , E G Xu , H C E Larsson , R Tahara , V B Maisuria , N Tufenkji . (2019). Plastic teabags release billions of microparticles and nanoparticles into Tea. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(21): 12300–12310
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02540
17 A Isobe , S Iwasaki , K Uchida , T Tokai . (2019). Abundance of non-conservative microplastics in the upper ocean from 1957 to 2066. Nature Communications, 10(1): 417
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08316-9
18 M Kooi , E H v Nes , M Scheffer , A A Koelmans . (2017). Ups and downs in the ocean: effects of biofouling on vertical transport of microplastics. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(14): 7963–7971
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04702
19 M Lapointe , J M Farner , L M Hernandez , N Tufenkji . (2020). Understanding and improving microplastic removal during water treatment: impact of coagulation and flocculation. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(14): 8719–8727
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00712
20 H LeeW J ShimJ H Kwon (2014). Sorption capacity of plastic debris for hydrophobic organic chemicals. Science of the Total Environment, 470-471: 1545-1552
21 H A Leslie , M J M van Velzen , S H Brandsma , A D Vethaak , J J Garcia-Vallejo , M H Lamoree . (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International, 163: 107199
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199
22 S Li , H Liu , R Gao , A Abdurahman , J Dai , F Zeng . (2018). Aggregation kinetics of microplastics in aquatic environment: Complex roles of electrolytes, pH, and natural organic matter. Environmental Pollution, 237: 126–132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.042
23 W Li , C Wu , Z Xiong , C Liang , Z Li , B Liu , Q Cao , J Wang , J Tang , D Li . (2022). Self-driven magnetorobots for recyclable and scalable micro/nanoplastic removal from nonmarine waters. Science Advances, 8: eade1731
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ade1731
24 S Lin , H Zhang , C Wang , X L Su , Y Song , P Wu , Z Yang , M H Wong , Z Cai , C Zheng . (2022). Metabolomics reveal nanoplastic-induced mitochondrial damage in human liver and lung cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(17): 12483–12493
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c03980
25 W Liu , H Tang , B Yang , C Li , Y Chen , T Huang . (2023). Molecular level insight into the different interaction intensity between microplastics and aromatic hydrocarbon in pure water and seawater. Science of the Total Environment, 862: 160786
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160786
26 Y Luo , L Li , Y Feng , R Li , J Yang , W J G M Peijnenburg , C Tu . (2022). Quantitative tracing of uptake and transport of submicrometre plastics in crop plants using lanthanide chelates as a dual-functional tracer. Nature Nanotechnology, 17(4): 424–431
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-01063-3
27 L Lv , L He , S Jiang , J Chen , C Zhou , J Qu , Y Lu , P Hong , S Sun , C Li . (2020). In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for detecting microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments. Science of the Total Environment, 728: 138449
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138449
28 Y Mao , H Li , X Huangfu , Y Liu , Q He . (2020). Nanoplastics display strong stability in aqueous environments: Insights from aggregation behaviour and theoretical calculations. Environmental Pollution, 258: 113760
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113760
29 MEE (2020). Technical Guideline for the Development of Environmental Monitoring Analytical Method Standards, HJ 169–2020. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese)
30 J P G Minella , G H Merten , J M Reichert , R T Clarke . (2008). Estimating suspended sediment concentrations from turbidity measurements and the calibration problem. Hydrological Processes, 22(12): 1819–1830
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6763
31 A Murray , B Örmeci . (2020). Removal effectiveness of nanoplastics (< 400 nm) with separation processes used for water and wastewater treatment. Water, 12(3): 635
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030635
32 K Rajala , O Grönfors , M Hesampour , A Mikola . (2020). Removal of microplastics from secondary wastewater treatment plant effluent by coagulation/flocculation with iron, aluminum and polyamine-based chemicals. Water Research, 183: 116045
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116045
33 L Ramirez Arenas , S Ramseier Gentile , S Zimmermann , S Stoll . (2021). Nanoplastics adsorption and removal efficiency by granular activated carbon used in drinking water treatment process. Science of the Total Environment, 791: 148175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148175
34 M Sarcletti , H Park , J Wirth , S Englisch , A Eigen , D Drobek , D Vivod , B Friedrich , R Tietze , C Alexiou . et al.. (2021). The remediation of nano-/microplastics from water. Materials Today, 48: 38–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.02.020
35 M SendraE StaffieriM P YesteI Moreno-GarridoJ M GaticaI CorsiJ Blasco (2019). Are the primary characteristics of polystyrene nanoplastics responsible for toxicity and ad/absorption in the marine diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum? Environmental Pollution, 249: 610–619
36 M Sgroi , E Gagliano , F G A Vagliasindi , P Roccaro . (2020). Inner filter effect, suspended solids and nitrite/nitrate interferences in fluorescence measurements of wastewater organic matter. Science of the Total Environment, 711: 134663
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134663
37 M Shams , I Alam , I Chowdhury . (2020). Aggregation and stability of nanoscale plastics in aquatic environment. Water Research, 171: 115401
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2019.115401
38 S A Strungaru , R Jijie , M Nicoara , G Plavan , C Faggio . (2019). Micro- (nano)plastics in freshwater ecosystems: Abundance, toxicological impact and quantification methodology. Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 110: 116–128
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.10.025
39 M StutterJ J C DawsonM GlendellF NapierJ M PottsJ SampleA VintenH Watson (2017). Evaluating the use of in-situ turbidity measurements to quantify fluvial sediment and phosphorus concentrations and fluxes in agricultural streams. Science of the Total Environment, 607−608: 391−402
40 S Tang , L Lin , X Wang , A Feng , A Yu . (2020). Pb(II) uptake onto nylon microplastics: interaction mechanism and adsorption performance. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 386: 121960
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121960
41 R C ThompsonY OlsenR P MitchellA DavisS J RowlandA W G JohnD McGonigleA E Russell (2004). Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science, 304(5672): 838
42 C Tian , I Akhtar , Q Wang , Z Li , B Shi , C Feng , D Wang . (2023). Effects of electrostatic neutralization of Keggin Fe13 on the removal of micro and nano plastic. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 443: 130175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130175
43 M Trifuoggi , G Pagano , R Oral , D Pavičić-Hamer , P Burić , I Kovačić , A Siciliano , M Toscanesi , P J Thomas , L Paduano . et al.. (2019). Microplastic-induced damage in early embryonal development of sea urchin Sphaerechinus granularis. Environmental Research, 179: 108815
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2019.108815
44 USEPA (2023). Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants, 40 CFR Part 136. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency
45 A Weber , A Schwiebs , H Solhaug , J Stenvik , A M Nilsen , M Wagner , B Relja , H H Radeke . (2022). Nanoplastics affect the inflammatory cytokine release by primary human monocytes and dendritic cells. Environment International, 163: 107173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107173
46 R Yan , S Lin , W Jiang , X Yu , L Zhang , W Zhao , Q Sui . (2023). Effect of aggregation behavior on microplastic removal by magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Science of the Total Environment, 898: 165431
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165431
47 H Yuan , X Zhou , Y L Zhang . (2013). Degradation of acid pharmaceuticals in the UV/H2O2 process: effects of humic acid and inorganic salts. CLEAN-Soil, Air, Water, 41(1): 43–50
https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201200107
48 R Zhang , Y Chen , X Ouyang , L Weng , J Ma , M Shafiqul Islam , Y Li . (2023). Resolving natural organic matter and nanoplastics in binary or ternary systems via UV-Vis analysis. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 632: 335–344
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.11.050
49 W Zhang , M Pasquinelli , Y Li . (2022). Microplastic and nanoplastic pollution: characterization, transport, fate, and remediation strategies. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(1): 12
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1446-y
[1] FSE-24003-OF-YRQ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Yating Wei, Dong Hu, Chengsong Ye, Heng Zhang, Haoran Li, Xin Yu. Drinking water quality & health risk assessment of secondary water supply systems in residential neighborhoods[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 18-.
[2] Wiley Helm, Shifa Zhong, Elliot Reid, Thomas Igou, Yongsheng Chen. Development of gradient boosting-assisted machine learning data-driven model for free chlorine residual prediction[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 17-.
[3] Seo Won Cho, Haoran Wei. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy for emerging contaminant analysis in drinking water[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 57-.
[4] Weiying Li, Yu Tian, Jiping Chen, Xinmin Wang, Yu Zhou, Nuo Shi. Synergistic effects of sodium hypochlorite disinfection and iron-oxidizing bacteria on early corrosion in cast iron pipes[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 72-.
[5] Jinkai Xue, Seyed Hesam-Aldin Samaei, Jianfei Chen, Ariana Doucet, Kelvin Tsun Wai Ng. What have we known so far about microplastics in drinking water treatment? A timely review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 58-.
[6] Zhiling Wu, Xianchun Tang, Hongbin Chen. Seasonal and treatment-process variations in invertebrates in drinking water treatment plants[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 62-.
[7] Danyang Liu, Johny Cabrera, Lijuan Zhong, Wenjing Wang, Dingyuan Duan, Xiaomao Wang, Shuming Liu, Yuefeng F. Xie. Using loose nanofiltration membrane for lake water treatment: A pilot study[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 69-.
[8] Yue Hu, Ding Dong, Kun Wan, Chao Chen, Xin Yu, Huirong Lin. Potential shift of bacterial community structure and corrosion-related bacteria in drinking water distribution pipeline driven by water source switching[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 28-.
[9] Xuewen Yi, Zhanqi Gao, Lanhua Liu, Qian Zhu, Guanjiu Hu, Xiaohong Zhou. Acute toxicity assessment of drinking water source with luminescent bacteria: Impact of environmental conditions and a case study in Luoma Lake, East China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 109-.
[10] Ting Zhang, Heze Liu, Yiyuan Zhang, Wenjun Sun, Xiuwei Ao. Comparative genotoxicity of water processed by three drinking water treatment plants with different water treatment procedures[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 39-.
[11] Kun Wan, Wenfang Lin, Shuai Zhu, Shenghua Zhang, Xin Yu. Biofiltration and disinfection codetermine the bacterial antibiotic resistome in drinking water: A review and meta-analysis[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 10-.
[12] Qiaowen Tan, Weiying Li, Junpeng Zhang, Wei Zhou, Jiping Chen, Yue Li, Jie Ma. Presence, dissemination and removal of antibiotic resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes in urban drinking water system: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 36-.
[13] Nathalie Tanne, Rui Xu, Mingyue Zhou, Pan Zhang, Xiaomao Wang, Xianghua Wen. Influence of pore size and membrane surface properties on arsenic removal by nanofiltration membranes[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 19-.
[14] Feng Wang, Weiying Li, Yue Li, Junpeng Zhang, Jiping Chen, Wei Zhang, Xuan Wu. Molecular analysis of bacterial community in the tap water with different water ages of a drinking water distribution system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(3): 6-.
[15] John C. Radcliffe, Declan Page, Bruce Naumann, Peter Dillon. Fifty Years of Water Sensitive Urban Design, Salisbury, South Australia[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 7-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed