Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front Mech Eng    2011, Vol. 6 Issue (1) : 136-150    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-010-0126-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Solving topology optimization problems by the Guide-Weight method
Xinjun LIU(), Zhidong LI, Liping WANG, Jinsong WANG
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering, Department of Precision Instruments and Mechanology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(541 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Finding a good solution method for topology optimization problems is always paid attention to by the research field because they are subject to the large number of the design variables and to the complexity that occurs because the objective and constraint functions are usually implicit with respect to design variables. Guide-Weight method, proposed first by Chen in 1980s, was effectively and successfully used in antenna structures’ optimization. This paper makes some improvement to it so that it possesses the characteristics of both the optimality criteria methods and the mathematical programming methods. When the Guide-Weight method is applied into topology optimization, it works very well with unified and simple form, wide availability and fast convergence. The algorithm of the Guide-Weight method and the improvement on it are described; two formulations of topology optimization solved by the Guide-Weight method combining with SIMP method are presented; subsequently, three numerical examples are provided, and comparison of the Guide-Weight method with other methods is made.

Keywords Guide-Weight method      topology optimization      SIMP method     
Corresponding Author(s): LIU Xinjun,Email:xinjunliu@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 05 March 2011
 Cite this article:   
Xinjun LIU,Zhidong LI,Liping WANG, et al. Solving topology optimization problems by the Guide-Weight method[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(1): 136-150.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-010-0126-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2011/V6/I1/136
Fig.1  Calculation procedure
Fig.2  Design domain with working conditions for the (a) 2D problem and (b) 3D problem
ParameterValueMeaning
E02.06×1011Young’s module
μ0.3Poisson’s ratio
p3.3penalty factor
α0.5step factor
f0.3weight fraction
ρ0[1,1,...,1]initial values of the design variables
Tab.1  Parameters for topology optimization for problem in Fig. 2
Fig.3  Process of compliance variation for the (a) 2D problem and (b) 3D problem
Fig.4  Process of weight variation for the (a) 2D problem and (b) 3D problem
Fig.5  Optimal topologies for the 2D problem of Fig. 2(a) at iterations (a) 2, (b) 6, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 30, and (f) 40 solved by the Guide-Weight method
Fig.6  Optimal topology for the 3D problem of Fig. 2(b)
Fig.7  Design domain with working conditions for problem with multiple displacement constraints
ParameterValueMeaning
E02.06×1011Young’s module
μ0.3Poisson’s ratio
p3.4penalty factor
α0.5step factor
ρ0[1,1,...,1]initial values of the design variables
Tab.2  Parameters for topology optimization for problems in Fig. 7
Fig.8  Convergence process of the problem in Fig. 7
Fig.9  Optimal topology for the problem of Fig. 7
ParameterValueMeaning
E02.06×1011Young’s module
μ0.3Poisson’s ratio
p3.3penalty factor
f0.3weight fraction
η0.4damping coefficient
?0.2move limit
ρ0[1,1,...,1]initial values of the design variables
Tab.3  Parameters for topology optimization solved by the fixed point method
Fig.10  Process of compliance variation for the problem in Fig. 2(a) solved by fixed point method
Fig.11  Process of weight variation for the problem in Fig. 2(a) solved by fixed point method
Fig.12  Optimal topologies for the problem in Fig. 2(a) at iterations (a) 2, (b) 6, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 30, and (f) 40 solved by the fixed point method
1 Bendsoe M P, Kikuchi N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 1988, 71(2): 197-224
doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
2 Grujicic M, Arakere G, Pisu P, Ayalew B, Seyr N, Erdmann M, Holzleitner J. Etc. Application of topology, size and shape optimization methods in polymer metal hybrid structural lightweight engineering. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures , 2008, 4(4): 305-330
doi: 10.1163/157361108785963028
3 Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Topology Optimization: Theory,Methods and Applications. Springer Berlin, 2003
4 Eschenauer H A, Olhoff N. Topology optimization of continuum structure: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews , 2001, 54(4): 331-390
doi: 10.1115/1.1388075
5 Sigmund O. Manufacturing tolerant topology optimization. Acta Mechanica Sinica , 2009, 25(2): 227-239
doi: 10.1007/s10409-009-0240-z
6 Xie Y M, Steven G P. A Simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures , 1993, 49(5): 885-896
doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C
7 Bendsoe M P, Sigmund O. Material interpolation schemes in topology optimization. Archive of Applied Mechanics , 1999, 69(9-10): 635-654
doi: 10.1007/s004190050248
8 Rozvany G I N. A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2009, 37(3): 217-237
doi: 10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0
9 Sui Y K, Yang D Q. etc. Uniform ICM theory and method on optimization of structural topology for skeleton and continuum structures. Chinease Journal of Computational Mechanics , 2000, 17(1): 28-33
10 Peng X R, Sui Y K. Topological optimization of continuum structure with static and displacement and frenquency constraints by ICM method. Chinease Journal of Computational Mechanics , 2006, 23(4): 391-396
11 Rozvany G I N, Zhou M. The COC algorithm, part I: cross-section optimization or sizing. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 1991, 89(1-3): 281-308
doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90045-8
12 Rozvany G I N, Zhou M. The COC algorithm, part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 1991, 89(1-3): 309-336
13 Zhou M, Rozvany G I N. DCOC: an optimality criteria method for large systems part I: theory. Structural Optimization , 1992, 5(1-2): 12-25
doi: 10.1007/BF01744690
14 Zhou M, Rozvany G I N. DCOC: an optimality criteria method for large systems part II: algorithm. Structural Optimization , 1992, 6(3): 250-262
15 Schmit L A Jr, Farshi B. Some approximation concepts for structural synthesis. AIAA Journal , 1974, 12(5): 692-699
doi: 10.2514/3.49321
16 Barthelemy JFM, Haftka RT. Approximation concepts for optimum structural design-a review. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 1993, 5(3)
17 Fleury C. A unified approach to structural weight minimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 1979, 20(1): 17-38
doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(79)90056-2
18 Chen S, Ye S A. Guide-Weight criterion method for the optimal design of antenna structures. Engineering Optimization , 1986, 10(3): 199-216
doi: 10.1080/03052158608902537
19 Chen S. Some modern design methods of precise and complex structures (In Chinese). Press of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 1992
20 Chen S.Analysis, Synthesis and Optimization of Engineering Structural Systems (In Chinese). China Science Culture Publishing House, Hongkong, 2008
21 Beckers M. Topology optimization using a dual method with discrete variables. Structural Optimization , 1999, 17(1): 14-24
doi: 10.1007/BF01197709
22 Jog C S. A dual algorithm for the topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 2009, 77(4): 502-517
doi: 10.1002/nme.2422
23 Hammer V B, Olhoff N. Topology optimization of continuum structures subjected to pressure loading. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2000, 19(2): 85-92
doi: 10.1007/s001580050088
24 Levy R. Fixed point theory and structural optimization. Engineering Optimization , 1991, 17(4): 251-261
doi: 10.1080/03052159108941074
25 Svanberg K. The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering , 1987, 24(2): 359-373
doi: 10.1002/nme.1620240207
26 Bruyneel M, Duysinx P, Fleury C. A family of MMA approximations for structural optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. , 2002, 24(4): 263-276
doi: 10.1007/s00158-002-0238-7
27 Duysinx P. Layout optimization: a mathematical programming approach. Danish Center for Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, DCAMM Report No. 540 (March1997)
28 Chang H. Research of auto-solving Guide-Weight functions and develop of auto-optimization software SOGA1 (In Chinese). University of Guangxi, Guangxi China, 2008
[1] Peng WEI, Wenwen WANG, Yang YANG, Michael Yu WANG. Level set band method: A combination of density-based and level set methods for the topology optimization of continuums[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(3): 390-405.
[2] Emmanuel TROMME, Atsushi KAWAMOTO, James K. GUEST. Topology optimization based on reduction methods with applications to multiscale design and additive manufacturing[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 151-165.
[3] Xianda XIE, Shuting WANG, Ming YE, Zhaohui XIA, Wei ZHAO, Ning JIANG, Manman XU. Isogeometric topology optimization based on energy penalization for symmetric structure[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 100-122.
[4] Manman XU, Shuting WANG, Xianda XIE. Level set-based isogeometric topology optimization for maximizing fundamental eigenfrequency[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 222-234.
[5] Jikai LIU, Qian CHEN, Xuan LIANG, Albert C. TO. Manufacturing cost constrained topology optimization for additive manufacturing[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 213-221.
[6] Mariana MORETTI, Emílio C. N. SILVA. Topology optimization of piezoelectric bi-material actuators with velocity feedback control[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 190-200.
[7] Junjie ZHAN, Yangjun LUO. Robust topology optimization of hinge-free compliant mechanisms with material uncertainties based on a non-probabilistic field model[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 201-212.
[8] Long JIANG, Yang GUO, Shikui CHEN, Peng WEI, Na LEI, Xianfeng David GU. Concurrent optimization of structural topology and infill properties with a CBF-based level set method[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 171-189.
[9] Markus J. GEISS, Jorge L. BARRERA, Narasimha BODDETI, Kurt MAUTE. A regularization scheme for explicit level-set XFEM topology optimization[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 153-170.
[10] Yu-Chin CHAN, Kohei SHINTANI, Wei CHEN. Robust topology optimization of multi-material lattice structures under material and load uncertainties[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 141-152.
[11] Jiadong DENG, Claus B. W. PEDERSEN, Wei CHEN. Connected morphable components-based multiscale topology optimization[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 129-140.
[12] Yingjun WANG,David J. BENSON. Geometrically constrained isogeometric parameterized level-set based topology optimization via trimmed elements[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2016, 11(4): 328-343.
[13] Shutian LIU,Quhao LI,Wenjiong CHEN,Liyong TONG,Gengdong CHENG. An identification method for enclosed voids restriction in manufacturability design for additive manufacturing structures[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2015, 10(2): 126-137.
[14] Xinjun LIU, Xiang CHEN, Zhidong LI. Modular design of typical rigid links in parallel kinematic machines: Classification and topology optimization[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2012, 7(2): 199-209.
[15] Xinjun LIU, Zhidong LI, Xiang CHEN. Structural optimization of typical rigid links in a parallel kinematic machine[J]. Front Mech Eng, 2011, 6(3): 344-353.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed