Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2023, Vol. 18 Issue (4) : 52    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-023-0768-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Multiresolution and multimaterial topology optimization of fail-safe structures under B-spline spaces
Yingjun WANG1,2,3,4, Zhenbiao GUO1,2,3, Jianghong YANG1,2,3, Xinqing LI1,2,3()
1. National Engineering Research Center of Novel Equipment for Polymer Processing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
2. The Key Laboratory of Polymer Processing Engineering of the Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Technique and Equipment for Macromolecular Advanced Manufacturing, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
4. State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
 Download: PDF(5381 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This study proposes a B-spline-based multiresolution and multimaterial topology optimization (TO) design method for fail-safe structures (FSSs), aiming to achieve efficient and lightweight structural design while ensuring safety and facilitating the postprocessing of topological structures. The approach involves constructing a multimaterial interpolation model based on an ordered solid isotropic material with penalization (ordered-SIMP) that incorporates fail-safe considerations. To reduce the computational burden of finite element analysis, we adopt a much coarser analysis mesh and finer density mesh to discretize the design domain, in which the density field is described by the B-spline function. The B-spline can efficiently and accurately convert optimized FSSs into computer-aided design models. The 2D and 3D numerical examples demonstrate the significantly enhanced computational efficiency of the proposed method compared with the traditional SIMP approach, and the multimaterial TO provides a superior structural design scheme for FSSs. Furthermore, the postprocessing procedures are significantly streamlined.

Keywords multiresolution      multimaterial      topology optimization      fail-safe structure      B-spline     
Corresponding Author(s): Xinqing LI   
Issue Date: 22 December 2023
 Cite this article:   
Yingjun WANG,Zhenbiao GUO,Jianghong YANG, et al. Multiresolution and multimaterial topology optimization of fail-safe structures under B-spline spaces[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2023, 18(4): 52.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-023-0768-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2023/V18/I4/52
Fig.1  Multimaterial interpolation model based on ordered solid isotropic material with penalization.
Fig.2  Ordered solid isotropic material with penalization-based multimaterial cantilever under surface damage: (a) traditional topology optimization (TO) design and (b) fail-safe TO design.
Fig.3  Schematic diagram of the bivariate B-spline function with a degree of 2: (a) top perspective and (b) 3D perspective.
Fig.4  Schematic diagram of the multiresolution.
Fig.5  2D cantilever beam diagram.
Fig.6  Optimization results for the 2D cantilever of multi-resolution and multi-material topology optimization method using B-spline: (a) B-spline surface and (b) density distribution.
Fig.7  Distribution diagrams of the materials (a) A, (b) B, and (c) C.
Fig.8  Postprocessing of a 2D multimaterial cantilever beam.
Fig.9  3D cantilever beam diagram.
Fig.10  Optimization results of the 3D cantilever: (a) B-spline hypersurface and (b) density mesh distribution.
Fig.11  Distribution diagrams of the materials (a) A, (b) B, and (c) C.
Fig.12  Postprocessing of a 3D multimaterial cantilever beam.
MaterialNormalized density ρNeNormalized elastic modulus ENeColor
Void0.00.0White
A0.40.5Blue
B0.70.7Red
C1.01.0Black
Tab.1  Implementation of three material parameters
Fig.13  Schematic illustration of 2D damage in a cantilever beam.
Method Element-based model Post-processing Iteration Compliance
MMTOBS I t = 158, t = 331.68 s, t p = 2.10 s C max = 540.03, C ave = 397.65
Ordered-SIMP-B I t = 150, t = 1105.23 s, t p = 7.37 s C max = 542.53, C ave = 398.20
Tab.2  Comparison between MMTOBS and ordered-SIMP-B
Fig.14  Iterative changes in topological configuration and objective function values.
Fig.15  Damage modes: (a) PA1 and (b) PA2.
Method Element-based model Post-processing Iteration Compliance
MMTOBS I t = 170, t = 331.68 s, t p = 1.01 s C max = 1046.16, C ave = 914.42
Ordered-SIMP-B I t = 170, t = 1105.23 s, t p = 2.23 s C max = 1043.83, C ave = 908.85
Tab.3  Comparison of MMTOBS and ordered-SIMP-B under PA1
Method Element-based model Post-processing Iteration Compliance
MMTOBS I t = 160, t =257.91 s, t p = 1.61 s C max = 1116.42, C ave = 843.39
Ordered-SIMP-B I t =150, t = 766.32 s, t p = 5.11 s C max = 1128.53, C ave = 845.97
Tab.4  Comparison of MMTOBS and ordered-SIMP-B under PA2
Fig.16  Iterative changes in topological configuration and objective function values: (a) PA1 and (b) PA2.
Materials Optimization results Compliance
Element-based model Post-processing C max C ave
ABC 1046.16 914.42
BC 1051.14 917.15
AC 1132.68 995.45
C 1094.12 959.58
Tab.5  Comparison of optimization results under various material combinations
Fig.17  Iteration curves of objective function values under different material combinations.
Fig.18  Schematic illustration of 3D damage in a cantilever beam.
Results Element-based model Post-processing Iteration Compliance
MMTOBS I t = 160, t = 917.73 s, t p = 5.74 s C max = 18724.39, C ave = 16951.60
Ordered-SIMP-B I t = 148, t = 10866.45 s, t p = 73.42 s C max = 18487.87, C ave = 16611.20
Tab.6  Comparison of MMTOBS and ordered-SIMP-B under PA2
Fig.19  Iterative changes in topological configuration and objective function values.
Abbreviations
CADComputer-aided design
FSSFail-safe structure
GPUGraphics processing unit
MMTOBSMultiresolution and multimaterial topology optimization method using B-spline
Ordered-SIMPOrdered solid isotropic material with penalization
SIMPSolid isotropic material with penalization
STLSTereoLithography
TOTopology optimization
Variables
AeArea of the analysis element
Bk,p (ξ), Bl,q (η)Univariate B-spline basis functions in directions of ξ and η, respectively
BStrain?displacement matrix
c(s)Structural compliance under the sth damage case
CaveAverage compliance
CmaxMaximum compliance
DConstitutive matrix
D0Constitutive matrix with the elastic modulus of solid material
EElastic modulus of interpolated material
E0Elastic modulus of solid material
EjSolid elastic modulus of material j
EjNeNormalized elastic modulus of material j
EmaxMaximum elastic modulus of all materials
HWeight factor in sensitivity filter
JMaximum structural compliance under all damage cases
JJacobi matrix
keStiffness matrix of analysis elements
KGlobal stiffness matrix
mNumber of B-spline control points in directions of η
MMass of the structure
M0Mass when all materials within the design domain possess a density of 1
nNumber of B-spline control points in direction of ξ
ndNumber of density elements
neNumber of elements used in finite element analysis
niNumber of Gauss integration points in a density element
NNumber of control points
NdTotal number of damage cases
NeNumber of elements
Nr (ξ, η)Bivariable B-spline basis function for the represented as a tensor product
p, qDegrees of the B-spline in directions of ξ and η, respectively
SEScale coefficient
TETranslation coefficient
ueNode displacement vector of analysis elements
UGlobal node displacement vector
xControl points’ coefficient vector of B-spline
β Penalty factor
ρe Relative density of the element e
ρj Solid density of material j
ρjNeNormalized density of material j
ρmax Maximum density of all materials
εMSpecified mass fraction
ξiCenter point coordinate of density element i in direction of ξ
ξigCoordinate of the Gauss integration point in direction of ξ
ηiCenter point coordinate of density element i in direction of η
ηigCoordinate of the Gauss integration point in direction of η
γ Parameter in KS equation
θigWeight of the Gauss integration point
ΩrSet of control points ωδ whose distance Δrδ from control point ωr is less than the filtering radius rmin
  
1 M P Bendsøe , N Kikuchi . Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1988, 71(2): 197–224
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2
2 H P Mlejnek , R Schirrmacher . An engineer’s approach to optimal material distribution and shape finding. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1993, 106(1−2): 1–26
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(93)90182-W
3 Y M Xie , G P Steven . A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers & Structures, 1993, 49(5): 885–896
https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90035-C
4 J A Sethian , A Wiegmann . Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 2000, 163(2): 489–528
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6581
5 X Guo , W S Zhang , W L Zhong . Doing topology optimization explicitly and geometrically—a new moving morphable components based framework. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2014, 81(8): 081009
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4027609
6 Y Sato , H Kobayashi , C Yuhn , A Kawamoto , T Nomura , N Kikuchi . Topology optimization of locomoting soft bodies using material point method. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(3): 50
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03502-2
7 H G Kim , S H Kim , S Wang , J H Lee . A framework for eigenvalue-based topology optimization of torsional resonant microscanner to improve dynamic stability. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2023, 37(1): 25–30
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1204-5
8 S Ozguc , T F G Teague , L Pan , J A Weibel . Experimental study of topology optimized, additively manufactured microchannel heat sinks designed using a homogenization approach. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2023, 209(1): 124108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124108
9 B Rogié , C S Andreasen . Design complexity tradeoffs in topology optimization of forced convection laminar flow heat sinks. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(1): 6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-022-03449-w
10 T Ooms , G Vantyghem , T Thienpont , R Van Coile , W De Corte . Compliance-based topology optimization of structural components subjected to thermos-mechanical loading. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(6): 126
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03563-3
11 M Habashneh , M M Rad . Reliability based topology optimization of thermoelastic structures using bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization method. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2023, 19(3): 605–620
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-023-09641-0
12 Y C Chan , K Shintani , W Chen . Robust topology optimization of multi-material lattice structures under material and load uncertainties. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 14(2): 141–152
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-019-0531-4
13 X Q Li , Q H Zhao , K Long , H X Zhang . Multi-material topology optimization of transient heat conduction structure with functional gradient constraint. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 2022, 131: 105845
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105845
14 Y J Wang , X Q Li , K Long , P Wei . Open-source codes of topology optimization: a summary for beginners to start their research. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2023, 137(1): 1–34
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.027603
15 X Wang , Y K Shi , V N Hoang , Z Meng , K Long , Y S Wang . Reliability-based topology optimization of fail-safe structures using moving morphable bars. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2023, 136(3): 3173–3195
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2023.025501
16 P F Sun , J S Arora , E J Haug . Fail-safe optimal design of structures. Engineering Optimization, 1976, 2(1): 43–53
https://doi.org/10.1080/03052157608960596
17 M Jansen , G Lombaert , M Schevenels , O Sigmund . Topology optimization of fail-safe structures using a simplified local damage model. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(4): 657–666
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-1001-y
18 M Zhou , R Fleury . Fail-safe topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 54(5): 1225–1243
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1507-1
19 H X Wang , J Liu , G L Wen , Y M Xie . The robust fail-safe topological designs based on the von Mises stress. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2020, 171: 103376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.103376
20 H Hederberg , C J Thore . Topology optimization for fail-safe designs using moving morphable components as a representation of damage. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2021, 64(4): 2307–2321
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02984-2
21 K Long , X Wang , Y X Du . Robust topology optimization formulation including local failure and load uncertainty using sequential quadratic programming. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design, 2019, 15(2): 317–332
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-018-9411-z
22 Y P Cui , Y Yu , S L Huang , S Y Cheng , M X Wei , Z M Li , J X Yu . Novel methodology of fail-safe reliability-based topology optimization for large-scale marine structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(7): 168
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03614-9
23 J H Yang , H L Su , X Q Li , Y J Wang . Fail-safe topology optimization for multiscale structures. Computers & Structures, 2023, 284: 107069
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2023.107069
24 T S Kim , J E Kim , Y Y Kim . Parallelized structural topology optimization for eigenvalue problems. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004, 41(9−10): 2623–2641
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.11.027
25 N Aage , T H Poulsen , A Gersborg-Hansen , O Sigmund . Topology optimization of large scale stokes flow problems. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2008, 35(2): 175–180
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-007-0128-0
26 E A Träff , A Rydahl , S Karlsson , O Sigmund , N Aage . Simple and efficient GPU accelerated topology optimization: codes and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 410: 116043
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116043
27 R Stainko . An adaptive multilevel approach to the minimal compliance problem in topology optimization. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2006, 22(2): 109–118
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.800
28 P L Karuthedath , A Gupta , B Mamindlapelly , R Chowdhury . A continuous field adaptive mesh refinement algorithm for isogeometric topology optimization using PHT-splines. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2023, 412: 116075
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2023.116075
29 Y J Wang , W Zheng , Y F Zheng , D C Da . A new three-level mesh method to accelerate the structural topology optimization. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2022, 109: 374–400
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2022.05.012
30 T H Nguyen , G H Paulino , J H Song , C H Le . A computational paradigm for multiresolution topology optimization (MTOP). Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 41(4): 525–539
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0443-8
31 T H Nguyen , G H Paulino , J H Song , C H Le . Improving multiresolution topology optimization via multiple discretizations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2012, 92(6): 507–530
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4344
32 V Keshavarzzadeh , M Alirezaei , T Tasdizen , R M Kirby . Image-based multiresolution topology optimization using deep disjunctive normal shape model. Computer-Aided Design, 2021, 130: 102947
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2020.102947
33 F Mezzadri , X P Qian . Density gradient-based adaptive refinement of analysis mesh for efficient multiresolution topology optimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2022, 123(2): 465–504
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.6863
34 Z J Chen , G L Wen , H X Wang , L Xue , J Liu . Multi-resolution nonlinear topology optimization with enhanced computational efficiency and convergence. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2022, 38(2): 421299
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-021-09028-x
35 D Bender , A Barari . Using 3D density-gradient vectors in evolutionary topology optimization to find the build direction for additive manufacturing. Journal Of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2023, 7(1): 46
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7010046
36 K Long , X Wang , X G Gu . Local optimum in multi-material topology optimization and solution by reciprocal variables. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57(3): 1283–1295
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-017-1811-4
37 T T Banh , Q X Lieu , J Lee , J Kang , D Lee . A robust dynamic unified multi-material topology optimization method for functionally graded structures. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2023, 66(4): 75
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-023-03501-3
38 K Q Zhang , G D Cheng . Three-dimensional high resolution topology optimization considering additive manufacturing constraints. Additive Manufacturing, 2020, 35: 101224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101224
39 J Park , A Sutradhar . A multi-resolution method for 3D multi-material topology optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 285: 571–586
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.10.011
40 R Tavakoli , S M Mohseni . Alternating active-phase algorithm for multimaterial topology optimization problems: a 115-line MATLAB implementation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(4): 621–642
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0999-1
41 J Park , T Zobaer , A Sutradhar . A two-scale multi-resolution topologically optimized multi-material design of 3D printed craniofacial bone implants. Micromachines, 2021, 12(2): 101
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12020101
42 Q X Lieu , J Lee . A multi-resolution approach for multi-material topology optimization based on isogeometric analysis. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 323: 272–302
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.05.009
43 Q X Lieu , J Lee . Multiresolution topology optimization using isogeometric analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2017, 112(13): 2025–2047
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5593
44 B X Du , Y Zhao , W Yao , X Wang , S L Huo . Multiresolution isogeometric topology optimisation using moving morphable voids. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2020, 122(3): 1119–1140
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmes.2020.08859
45 Z B Guo , H L Su , X Q Li , Y J Wang . Multi-resolution topology optimization using B-spline to represent the density field. Advances in Engineering Software, 2023, 182: 103478
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2023.103478
46 W J Zuo , K Saitou . Multi-material topology optimization using ordered SIMP interpolation. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2017, 55(2): 477–491
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-016-1513-3
47 X P Qian . Topology optimization in B-spline space. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 265: 15–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.06.001
48 Y J Wang , M Xiao , Z H Xia , P G Li , L Gao . From computer-aided design (CAD) toward human-aided design (HAD): an isogeometric topology optimization approach. Engineering, 2023, 22: 94–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.07.013
49 O Sigmund. Morphology-based black and white filters for topology optimization. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2007, 33(4‒5): 401–424
[1] Yi YAN, Xiaopeng ZHANG, Jiaqi HE, Dazhi WANG, Yangjun LUO. Achieving desired nodal lines in freely vibrating structures via material-field series-expansion topology optimization[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2023, 18(3): 42-.
[2] Aodi YANG, Shuting WANG, Nianmeng LUO, Tifan XIONG, Xianda XIE. Massively efficient filter for topology optimization based on the splitting of tensor product structure[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(4): 54-.
[3] Jie GAO, Mi XIAO, Zhi YAN, Liang GAO, Hao LI. Robust isogeometric topology optimization for piezoelectric actuators with uniform manufacturability[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(2): 27-.
[4] Aodi YANG, Xianda XIE, Nianmeng LUO, Jie ZHANG, Ning JIANG, Shuting WANG. Implicit Heaviside filter with high continuity based on suitably graded THB splines[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(1): 14-.
[5] Pai LIU, Yi YAN, Xiaopeng ZHANG, Yangjun LUO. A MATLAB code for the material-field series-expansion topology optimization method[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(3): 607-622.
[6] Kai LONG, Xiaoyu YANG, Nouman SAEED, Ruohan TIAN, Pin WEN, Xuan WANG. Topology optimization of transient problem with maximum dynamic response constraint using SOAR scheme[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(3): 593-606.
[7] Liang XUE, Jie LIU, Guilin WEN, Hongxin WANG. Efficient, high-resolution topology optimization method based on convolutional neural networks[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(1): 80-96.
[8] Peng WEI, Wenwen WANG, Yang YANG, Michael Yu WANG. Level set band method: A combination of density-based and level set methods for the topology optimization of continuums[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(3): 390-405.
[9] Emmanuel TROMME, Atsushi KAWAMOTO, James K. GUEST. Topology optimization based on reduction methods with applications to multiscale design and additive manufacturing[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 151-165.
[10] Xianda XIE, Shuting WANG, Ming YE, Zhaohui XIA, Wei ZHAO, Ning JIANG, Manman XU. Isogeometric topology optimization based on energy penalization for symmetric structure[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2020, 15(1): 100-122.
[11] Manman XU, Shuting WANG, Xianda XIE. Level set-based isogeometric topology optimization for maximizing fundamental eigenfrequency[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 222-234.
[12] Yu-Chin CHAN, Kohei SHINTANI, Wei CHEN. Robust topology optimization of multi-material lattice structures under material and load uncertainties[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 141-152.
[13] Long JIANG, Yang GUO, Shikui CHEN, Peng WEI, Na LEI, Xianfeng David GU. Concurrent optimization of structural topology and infill properties with a CBF-based level set method[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 171-189.
[14] Jiadong DENG, Claus B. W. PEDERSEN, Wei CHEN. Connected morphable components-based multiscale topology optimization[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 129-140.
[15] Markus J. GEISS, Jorge L. BARRERA, Narasimha BODDETI, Kurt MAUTE. A regularization scheme for explicit level-set XFEM topology optimization[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2019, 14(2): 153-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed