Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (1) : 1-23    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0790-0
REVIEW
On the added value of multi-scale modeling of concrete
Jiaolong ZHANG1, Eva BINDER2, Hui WANG3, Mehdi AMINBAGHAI4, Bernhard LA PICHLER4, Yong YUAN1, Herbert A MANG1,4()
1. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2. Department of Building Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö 35195, Sweden
3. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
4. Institute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien, Vienna 1040, Austria
 Download: PDF(7540 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This review of the added value of multi-scale modeling of concrete is based on three representative examples. The first one is concerned with the analysis of experimental data, taken from four high-dynamic tests. The structural nature of the high-dynamic strength increase can be explained by using a multi-scale model. It accounts for the microstructure of the specimens. The second example refers to multi-scale thermoelastic analysis of concrete pavements, subjected to solar heating. A sensitivity analysis with respect to the internal relative humidity (RH) of concrete has underlined the great importance of the RH for an assessment of the risk of microcracking of concrete. The third example deals with multi-scale structural analysis of a real-scale test of a segmental tunnel ring. It has turned out that multi-scale modeling of concrete enables more reliable predictions of crack opening displacements in tunnel segments than macroscopic models taken from codes of practice. Overall, it is concluded that multi-scale models have indeed a significant added value. However, its degree varies with these examples. In any case, it can be assessed by means of a comparison of the results from three sources, namely, multi-scale structural analysis, conventional structural analysis, and experiments.

Keywords experiments      multi-scale analysis      conventional structural analysis      concrete      reinforced concrete     
Corresponding Author(s): Herbert A MANG   
Just Accepted Date: 07 December 2021   Online First Date: 21 January 2022    Issue Date: 07 March 2022
 Cite this article:   
Jiaolong ZHANG,Eva BINDER,Hui WANG, et al. On the added value of multi-scale modeling of concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(1): 1-23.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-021-0790-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2022/V16/I1/1
Fischer et al. [12] tested cement paste samples (6 months old) Kühn et al. [15] tested concrete samples (5 months old) Zhang et al. [16] tested mortar samples with two different sizes
small specimens large specimens
fu lt(MPa) ε˙ (1/s) fu lt (MPa) ε˙ (1/s) fu lt (MPa) ε˙ (1/s) fu lt (MPa) ε˙ (1/s)
74.15 700 95.1 136.6 70.66 49.46 64.45 37.01
42.01 200 104.2 150.1 73.82 71.01 71.22 69.67
74.41 500 119.2 185.5 74.75 85.09 71.47 76.68
48.6 500 125.7 190 75.11 130.74 75.02 56.43
65.4 500 142.5 202.7 75.61 153.16 72.13 89.38
114.26 500 79.67 183.52 76.01 126.2
132.73 1900 81.66 219.90 77.00 152.86
164.39 2100 86.57 205.48 79.14 126.2
156.36 2100 90.43 295.02 82.03 165.04
133.73 2100 96.52 337.87 88.8 192.39
152.64 2100 98.16 345.6 93.34 165.04
143.78 1900 99.45 322.94 93.75 228.61
101.67 330.32 98.62 261.43
109.04 453.30
Tab.1  Selected experimental data from high-dynamic compression tests in the literature
reference Tang et al. [26] Gebbeken and Greulich [27] Brara and Klepaczko [28] Li et al. [29] Fischer et al. [12]
C (MPa) D (MPa/s) Fm (MPa) Wx Wy(MPa) S tC0 (s) ξ B3 B4 B5 Fh
Fischer et al. [12] 72.33 0.021 143.4 2.912 96.47 5.27 9.323e–6 1.95 –1.256 9.46 –14.78 0.59
Kühn et al. [15] 6.986 0.638 1463 1.876 30.65 0.17 2.193e–5 0.06 56.47 –241 261 0.49
Zhang et al. [16] (large specimens) 61.11 0.142 166.2 2.6 116.1 1.95 3.296e–5 3.73 0.5787 –1.60 2.373 0.74
Zhang et al. [16] (small specimens) 64.11 0.099 124.8 2.527 98.5 3.32 2.839e–5 3.69 0.684 –2.01 2.608 0.74
Tab.2  Identified fitting parameters of various models for the investigated experimental test series
Fig.1  Dynamic increase factor of the ultimate stress depending on the strain rate: model of Li et al. [29], in orange, of Gebbeken and Greulich [27], in green, of Brara and Klepaczko [28], in red, of Tang et al. [26], in dark blue, and of Fischer et al. [12], in light blue; Markers represent the experimental results of (a) Fischer et al. [12], (b) Kühn et al. [15], (c) Zhang et al. [16], small specimens, (d) Zhang et al. [16], large specimens.
experimental data sets and content of comparison sum of squared errors (SSE)
M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 M6
Fischer et al. [12] 5.57 0.99 3.31 2.07 6.68 86.15
Kühn et al. [15] 0.13 0.16 0.13 0.07 0.19 15.59
Zhang et al. [16] (large specimens) 0.06 0.06 0.09 0.07 0.16 4.39
Zhang et al. [16] (small specimens) 0.04 0.03 0.11 0.11 0.24 10.19
ΣSSE 5.8 1.3 3.6 2.3 7.3 116.3
number of fitting parameters 2 4 2 3 1 0
prediction without high-dynamic test yes yes
Tab.3  Differences between modeled values and experimental results: the sum of squared errors (SSE) is calculated individually for each model and each experimental data set; the sum of all errors (Σ SSE) according to Eq. (7) for the different experimental data enables a comparison of the different models
Fig.2  Dynamic increase factor of the ultimate stress depending on the strain rate: the black curve shows the fib Model Code prediction, the gray-shaded area illustrates the model prediction according to Fischer et al. [12], and the markers represent the experimental results of (a) Fischer et al. [12], (b) Kühn et al. [15], (c) Zhang et al. [16], for small specimens, (d) Zhang et al. [16], for large specimens.
Fig.3  Pavement plate resting on an elastic Winkler foundation, loaded by a temperature change.
Fig.4  Thermal expansion coefficient of the cement paste, depending on the internal RH, see Ref. [43]; the curve refers to a fitting function used by Emanuel and Hulsey [40] and the markers represent the experimental results of Meyers [44], Mitchell [45], and Dettling [46].
Fig.5  (a) Distribution of the temperature change over the thickness of the pavement plate and decomposition of the resulting thermal eigenstrains into those related to the eigenstretch, the eigencurvature, and the eigendistortion for a pavement, with internal RH amounting to (b) 50%, (c) 65%, and (d) 100%, respectively.
material volume fraction bulk modulus (GPa) shear modulus (GPa) thermal expansion coefficient (10−6 °C–1)
RH=50% RH=65% RH=100%
concrete 17.8 13.2 11.5 12.1 9.8
mortar 17.4 14.0 14.2 15.1 11.1
cement paste 0.30 10.2 7.7 18.0 20.2 10.5
fine aggregate 0.28 33.8 30.8 11.5
coarse aggregate 0.42 18.5 12.2 8.0
Tab.4  Properties of concrete and its constituents: volume fractions, elastic constants, and thermal expansion coefficients; with output highlighted in bold face
Fig.6  Macroscopic thermal stresses resulting from (a) the constrained eigencurvature and (b) the prevented eigendistortion.
Fig.7  Total thermal stresses of the pavement plate, loaded by a daily temperature evolution.
Fig.8  Thermally loaded concrete: macroscopic stresses of concrete and microscopic stresses of its constituents (con = concrete, cagg = coarse aggregates, mor = mortar, fagg = fine aggregates, cp = cement paste), with internal relative humidity amounting to (a) and (b) 50%; (c) and (d) 65%; as well as (e) and (f) 100%, respectively.
Fig.9  Set-ups of real-scale tests of segmental tunnel rings at Tongji University: (a) single ring [55] and (b) three rings allowing consideration of ring-to-ring interaction [64].
Fig.10  Test of a single ring, reported in Ref. [55]: (a) geometric dimensions of the ring [67] and (b) layout of the hydraulic jacks, producing the loads P1, P2, P3 [68].
Fig.11  Stress-strain relations of the concrete of tunnel segments of the tested ring in Ref. [1], obtained by means of formulae in (a) the fib Model Code [69]; (b) the JSCE Guidelines for Concrete [70]; (c) the GB50010-2010 [71]; (d) by the multi-scale model.
cement fly ash slag water sand aggregates
323 67 57 152 631 1169
Tab.5  Mix design of the concrete of the segments (kg/m3)
Fig.12  Comparison of convergences obtained from experimental measurements with those from conventional structural analysis based on (a) the fib Model Code [69]; (b) the JSCE Guidelines for Concrete [70]; (c) the GB50010-2010 [71]; and from (d) multi-scale structural analysis.
Fig.13  Development of bending-induced crack openings at the segment surface, obtained from conventional structural analysis by means of (a) the fib Model Code [69]; (b) the JSCE Guidelines for Concrete [70]; (c) the GB50010-2010 [71], and from (d) multi-scale structural analysis; the green arrows point to P1= 0.117M N, corresponding to the experimentally-observed onset of cracking; the line segments in green color represent the experimentally measured range of the maximum crack opening.
content of comparison fib code JSCE code GB50010 code multi-scale model
input fc fc strength grade composition and maturity of concrete
prediction of crack initiation overestimation by 55% overestimation by 27% reliable reliable
prediction of crack opening overestimation reliable
Tab.6  Input for different approaches for determination of the tensile strength and of softening of concrete, and prediction quality of the corresponding structural analyses
1 M G D Geers, V G Kouznetsova, W A M Brekelmans. Multi-scale computational homogenization: Trends and challenges. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2010, 234( 7): 2175– 2182
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2009.08.077
2 P Wriggers, S O Moftah. Mesoscale models for concrete: Homogenisation and damage behavior. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 2006, 42( 7): 623– 636
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2005.11.008
3 C Oskay, J Fish. Eigendeformation-based reduced order homogenization for failure analysis of heterogeneous materials. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 196( 7): 1216– 1243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2006.08.015
4 H Moulinec, P Suquet. A numerical method for computing the overall response of nonlinear composites with complex microstructure. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1998, 157(1–2): 69– 94
5 A Zaoui. Continuum micromechanics: Survey. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 128( 8): 808– 816
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:8(808
6 J L Auriault. Heterogeneous medium. Is an equivalent macroscopic description possible? International Journal of Engineering Science, 1991, 29( 7): 785– 795
https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(91)90001-J
7 K Popper. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge, 2014
8 Y Zhang, C Pichler, Y Yuan, M Zeiml, R Lackner. Micromechanics-based multifield framework for early-age concrete. Engineering Structures, 2013, 47 : 16– 24
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.015
9 M Irfan-ul-Hassan, B Pichler, R Reihsner, C Hellmich. Elastic and creep properties of young cement paste, as determined from hourly repeated minute-long quasi-static tests. Cement and Concrete Research, 2016, 82 : 36– 49
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.11.007
10 B Pichler, S Scheiner, C Hellmich. From micron-sized needle-shaped hydrates to meter-sized shotcrete tunnel shells: Micromechanical upscaling of stiffness and strength of hydrating shotcrete. Acta Geotechnica, 2008, 3( 4): 273– 294
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0074-z
11 S Ullah, B Pichler, S Scheiner, C Hellmich. Influence of shotcrete composition on load-level estimation in NATM‐tunnel shells: Micromechanics-based sensitivity analyses. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2012, 36( 9): 1151– 1180
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1043
12 I Fischer, B Pichler, E Lach, C Terner, E Barraud, F Britz. Compressive strength of cement paste as a function of loading rate: Experiments and engineering mechanics analysis. Cement and Concrete Research, 2014, 58 : 186– 200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2014.01.013
13 E Binder, R Reihsner, Y Yuan, H A Mang, B L A Pichler. High-dynamic compressive and tensile strength of specimens made of cementitious materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 2020, 129 : 105890–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105890
14 Hlobil M. Micromechanical analysis of blended cement-based composites. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Vienna: Tu Wien and Prague: Czech Technical University, 2016
15 T Kühn, C Steinke, Z Sile, I Zreid, M Kaliske, M Curbach. Dynamic properties of concrete in experiment and simulation. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete, 2016, 111(1): 41– 50 (in German)
16 M Zhang, H J Wu, Q M Li, F L Huang. Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Part I: Experiments. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36( 12): 1327– 1334
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.009
17 H Mihashi, F H Wittmann. Stochastic approach to study the influence of rate of loading on strength of concrete. Heron, 1980, 25( 3): 5– 54
18 Z P Bažant, F C Caner, M D Adley, S A Akers. Fracturing rate effect and creep in microplane model for dynamics. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126( 9): 962– 970
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(962
19 X F Wang, Z J Yang, J R Yates, A P Jivkov, C Zhang. Monte Carlo simulations of mesoscale fracture modelling of concrete with random aggregates and pores. Construction & Building Materials, 2015, 75 : 35– 45
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.069
20 G Gary, P Bailly. Behaviour of quasi-brittle material at high strain rate. Experiment and modelling. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 1998, 17( 3): 403– 420
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0997-7538(98)80052-1
21 Y Hao, H Hao, Z X Li. Influence of end friction confinement on impact tests of concrete material at high strain rate. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 60 : 82– 106
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.04.008
22 E A Flores-Johnson, Q M Li. Structural effects on compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials in a split Hopkinson pressure bar test. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109 : 408– 418
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.08.003
23 T Kühn. Experimental fundamentals for the meso and macroscopic modeling of concrete at high loading velocities: A critical review of the strain rate effect. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Dresden: Technische Universität Dresden, 2020
24 D Lu, G Wang, X Du, Y Wang. A nonlinear dynamic uniaxial strength criterion that considers the ultimate dynamic strength of concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 103 : 124– 137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.011
25 X Q Zhou, H Hao. Modelling of compressive behaviour of concrete-like materials at high strain rate. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2008, 45( 17): 4648– 4661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.04.002
26 T Tang, L E Malvern, D A Jenkins. Rate effects in uniaxial dynamic compression of concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 1992, 118( 1): 108– 124
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1992)118:1(108
27 N Gebbeken, S Greulich. A new material model for SFRC under high dynamic loadings. In: Proceedings of 11th International Symposium on Interaction of the Effects of Munitions with Structures (ISIEMS 2003). Mannheim: ISIEMS, 2003
28 A Brara, J R Klepaczko. Experimental characterization of concrete in dynamic tension. Mechanics of Materials, 2006, 38( 3): 253– 267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.06.004
29 Q M Li, Y B Lu, H Meng. Further investigation on the dynamic compressive strength enhancement of concrete-like materials based on split hopkinson pressure bar tests. Part II: numerical simulations. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36( 12): 1335– 1345
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.04.010
30 MATLAB. Version R2018. Natick, MA: MathWorks. 2018
31 Etymology Dictionary Online. Predict (v.). Available at the website of Etymology Dictionary Online. 2021
32 1992-1-1 EN. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2011
33 Committee for Concrete Euro-International. CEB-FIP model code 1990: Design Code. London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 1993
34 Cooperative Highway Research Program National. Guide for Mechanistic-empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final Report NCHRP Project 1-37A. 2004
35 H Huang, M An, Y Wang, Z Yu, W Ji. Effect of environmental thermal fatigue on concrete performance based on mesostructural and microstructural analyses. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 207 : 450– 462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.072
36 D Chen, J Zou, L Zhao, S Xu, T Xiang, C Liu. Degradation of dynamic elastic modulus of concrete under periodic temperature-humidity action. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13( 3): 611–
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030611
37 M An, H Huang, Y Wang, G Zhao. Effect of thermal cycling on the properties of high-performance concrete: Microstructure and mechanism. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 243 : 118310–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118310
38 Y F Fu, Y L Wong, C S Poon, C Tang, P Lin. Experimental study of micro/macro crack development and stress–strain relations of cement-based composite materials at elevated temperatures. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34( 5): 789– 797
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.08.029
39 B Pichler, C Hellmich. Estimation of influence tensors for eigenstressed multiphase elastic media with nonaligned inclusion phases of arbitrary ellipsoidal shape. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 136( 8): 1043– 1053
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000138
40 J Emanuel, J Hulsey. Prediction of the thermal coefficient of expansion of concrete. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 1977, 74( 4): 149– 155
41 H Wang, H Mang, Y Yuan, B Pichler. Multiscale thermoelastic analysis of the thermal expansion coefficient and of microscopic thermal stresses of mature concrete. Materials (Basel), 2019, 12( 17): 2689–
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172689
42 1992-1-1 EN. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Edition: 2015-07-31. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2015
43 H Wang, C Hellmich, H Mang, B Pichler. May reversible water uptake/release by hydrates explain the thermal expansion of cement paste?—Arguments from an inverse multiscale analysis. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 113 : 13– 26
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.05.008
44 Meyers S. Thermal expansion characteristics of hardened cement paste and of concrete. Highway Research Board Proceedings, 1951, 30: 193–203
45 Mitchell L J. Thermal expansion tests on aggregates, neat cements, and concretes. Proceedings of the American Society for Testing and Materials, 1953, 53: 963–977
46 Dettling H. Thermal expansion of cement pastes, aggregates, and concretes. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Stuttgart: Technische Hochschule Stuttgart, 1962 (in German)
47 H Wang, R Höller, M Aminbaghai, C Hellmich, Y Yuan, H Mang, B Pichler. Concrete pavements subjected to hail showers: A semi-analytical thermoelastic multiscale analysis. Engineering Structures, 2019, 200 : 109677–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109677
48 R Höller, M Aminbaghai, L Eberhardsteiner, J Eberhardsteiner, R Blab, B Pichler, C Hellmich. Rigorous amendment of Vlasov’s theory for thin elastic plates on elastic Winkler foundations, based on the Principle of Virtual Power. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2019, 73 : 449– 482
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.07.013
49 M Königsberger, B Pichler, C Hellmich. Micromechanics of ITZ-aggregate interaction in concrete, part I: Stress concentration. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2014, 97( 2): 535– 542
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12591
50 M Königsberger, B Pichler, C Hellmich. Micromechanics of ITZ-aggregate interaction in concrete, part II: Strength upscaling. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2014, 97( 2): 543– 551
https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12606
51 H Wang, E Binder, H Mang, Y Yuan, B Pichler. Multiscale structural analysis inspired by exceptional load cases concerning the immersed tunnel of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. Underground Space, 2018, 3( 4): 252– 267
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.undsp.2018.02.001
52 X Liu, Y Bai, Y Yuan, H A Mang. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of continuously jointed segmental tunnel linings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2016, 12( 10): 1364– 1379
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1117115
53 X Liu, Z Jiang, Y Yuan, H A Mang. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of deformed segmental tunnel linings strengthened by epoxy-bonded steel plates. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2018, 14( 6): 685– 700
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1354892
54 X Liu, Z Jiang, L Zhang. Experimental investigation of the ultimate bearing capacity of deformed segmental tunnel linings strengthened by epoxy-bonded filament wound profiles. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2017, 13( 10): 1268– 1283
https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1260601
55 J L Zhang, X Liu, T Y Ren, Y Yuan, H A Mang. Structural behavior of reinforced concrete segments of tunnel linings strengthened by a steel-concrete composite. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2019, 178 : 107444–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107444
56 Liu X, Zhang J L, Jiang Z, Liu Z, Xu P, Li F. Experimental investigations of a segmental tunnel ring strengthened by using ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC). China Journal of Highway Transport, 2021, 34(8): 181–190 (in Chinese)
57 J L Zhang, T Schlappal, Y Yuan, H A Mang, B Pichler. The influence of interfacial joints on the structural behavior of segmental tunnel rings subjected to ground pressure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 84 : 538– 556
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.025
58 A Galván, F Peña, J Y Moreno-Martínez. Effect of TBM advance in the structural response of segmental tunnel lining. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17( 9): 04017056–
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000941
59 N A Do, D Dias, P Oreste, I Djeran-Maigre. Three-dimensional numerical simulation for mechanized tunnelling in soft ground: The influence of the joint pattern. Acta Geotechnica, 2014, 9( 4): 673– 694
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0279-7
60 Z Wang, L Wang, L Li, J Wang. Failure mechanism of tunnel lining joints and bolts with uneven longitudinal ground settlement. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 40 : 300– 308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.10.007
61 X Liu, Z Dong, Y Bai, Y Zhu. Investigation of the structural effect induced by stagger joints in segmental tunnel linings: First results from full-scale ring tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66 : 1– 18
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.03.008
62 X Liu, Z Dong, W Song, Y Bai. Investigation of the structural effect induced by stagger joints in segmental tunnel linings: Direct insight from mechanical behaviors of longitudinal and circumferential joints. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71 : 271– 291
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.030
63 X Liu, Y M Zhang, Y H Bao. Full-scale experimental investigation on stagger effect of segmental tunnel linings. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 102 : 103423–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103423
64 J L Zhang, H A Mang, X Liu, Y Yuan, B Pichler. On a nonlinear hybrid method for multiscale analysis of a bearing capacity test on a real-scale segmental tunnel ring. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43( 7): 1343– 1372
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2894
65 J L Zhang, C Vida, Y Yuan, C Hellmich, H A Mang, B Pichler. A hybrid analysis method for displacement-monitored segmented circular tunnel rings. Engineering Structures, 2017, 148 : 839– 856
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.049
66 Federation for Structural Concrete International. Fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn, 2010
67 Society of Civil Engineering (JSCE) Japan. Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures––2007 “Design”. Tokyo: JSCE, 2010
68 GB50010-2010. Chinese Code for Design of Concrete Structures. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of China, 2010
69 J L Zhang, E Binder, X Liu, Y Yuan, H A Mang, B L A Pichler. Assessment of the added value of multiscale modeling of concrete for structural analysis of segmental tunnel rings. Encyclopedia of Materials: Composites, 2021, 3 : 69– 78
70 M Königsberger, M Hlobil, B Delsaute, S Staquet, C Hellmich, B Pichler. Hydrate failure in ITZ governs concrete strength: A micro-to-macro validated engineering mechanics model. Cement and Concrete Research, 2018, 103 : 77– 94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.002
71 R Hill. Continuum micro-mechanics of elastoplastic polycrystals. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1965, 13( 2): 89– 101
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90023-2
72 J L Zhang, X Liu, Y Yuan, H A Mang, B L A Pichler. Transfer relations: useful basis for computer-aided engineering of circular arch structures. Engineering Computations, 2021, 38( 3): 1287– 1302
https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-06-2020-0313
73 J L Zhang, C Hellmich, H A Mang, Y Yuan, B Pichler. Application of transfer relations to structural analysis of arch bridges. Computer Assisted Methods in Engineering and Science, 2018, 24 : 199– 215
74 J L Zhang, X Liu, J B Zhao, Y Yuan, H A Mang. Application of a combined precast and in-situ-cast construction method for large-span underground vaults. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 111 : 103795–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103795
75 Z Jiang, X Liu, T Schlappal, J L Zhang, H Mang, B L A Pichler. Asymmetric serviceability limit states of symmetrically loaded segmental tunnel rings: Hybrid analysis of real-scale tests. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 113 : 103832–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2021.103832
[1] Li JIA, Zhi FANG, Maurizio GUADAGNINI, Kypros PILAKOUTAS, Zhengmeng HUANG. Shear behavior of ultra-high-performance concrete beams prestressed with external carbon fiber-reinforced polymer tendons[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1426-1440.
[2] Bo DA, Yan CHEN, Hongfa YU, Haiyan MA, Bo YU, Da CHEN, Xiao CHEN, Zhangyu WU, Jianbo GUO. Influence of steel corrosion on axial and eccentric compression behavior of coral aggregate concrete column[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1415-1425.
[3] Qinghai XIE, Jianzhuang XIAO, Kaijian ZHANG, Zhongling ZONG. Compressive behavior and microstructure of concrete mixed with natural seawater and sea sand[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1347-1357.
[4] Luthfi Muhammad MAULUDIN, Timon RABCZUK. Computational modeling of fracture in capsule-based self-healing concrete: A 3D study[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1337-1346.
[5] Meng ZHOU, Jiaji WANG, Jianguo NIE, Qingrui YUE. Theoretical study on the confine-stiffening effect and fractal cracking of square concrete filled steel tubes in tension loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1317-1336.
[6] Zaid MOMANI, Eyosias BENEBERU, Nur YAZDANI. Effect of earth reinforcement, soil properties and wall properties on bridge MSE walls[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1209-1221.
[7] Wenwen ZHU, Xiamin HU, Jing ZHANG, Tao LI, Zeyu CHEN, Wei SHAO. Experimental study on mechanical properties of a novel micro-steel fiber reinforced magnesium phosphate cement-based concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1047-1057.
[8] Khashayar JAFARI, Fatemeh HEIDARNEZHAD, Omid MOAMMER, Majid JARRAH. Experimental investigation on freeze−thaw durability of polymer concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1038-1046.
[9] Mehdi JAVADI, Reza HASSANLI, Md Mizanur RAHMAN, Md Rajibul KARIM. Self-centring segmental retaining walls—A new construction system for retaining walls[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 980-1000.
[10] Hui ZHANG, Zhixiang ZHANG, Peiwei GAO, Lei CUI, Youqiang PAN, Kuan LI. Performance of steel bridge deck pavement structure with ultra high performance concrete based on resin bonding[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 895-904.
[11] Yasmina KELLOUCHE, Mohamed GHRICI, Bakhta BOUKHATEM. Service life prediction of fly ash concrete using an artificial neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 793-805.
[12] Xin LIU, Liye ZHANG, Zhiwei SHAO, Yunqiang SHI, Lizhi SUN. Influence of construction-induced damage on the degradation of freeze–thawed lightweight cellular concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 781-792.
[13] Jagmeet SINGH, S P SINGH. Utilization of alkali-activated copper slag as binder in concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 773-780.
[14] Jingwei YING, Yijie HUANG, Xu GAO, Xibo QI, Yuedong SUN. Effects of coarse and fine aggregates on long-term mechanical properties of sea sand recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 754-772.
[15] Shuwen DENG, Xudong SHAO, Xudong ZHAO, Yang WANG, Yan WANG. Precast steel–UHPC lightweight composite bridge for accelerated bridge construction[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 364-377.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed