Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (2) : 284-305    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0901-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Optimization of machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete
Hai-Van Thi MAI1, May Huu NGUYEN1,2, Son Hoang TRINH1, Hai-Bang LY1()
1. Civil Engineering Department, University of Transport Technology, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
2. Civil and Environmental Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan
 Download: PDF(11844 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete (FRSCC) is a typical construction material, and its compressive strength (CS) is a critical mechanical property that must be adequately determined. In the machine learning (ML) approach to estimating the CS of FRSCC, the current research gaps include the limitations of samples in databases, the applicability constraints of models owing to limited mixture components, and the possibility of applying recently proposed models. This study developed different ML models for predicting the CS of FRSCC to address these limitations. Artificial neural network, random forest, and categorical gradient boosting (CatBoost) models were optimized to derive the best predictive model with the aid of a 10-fold cross-validation technique. A database of 381 samples was created, representing the most significant FRSCC dataset compared with previous studies, and it was used for model development. The findings indicated that CatBoost outperformed the other two models with excellent predictive abilities (root mean square error of 2.639 MPa, mean absolute error of 1.669 MPa, and coefficient of determination of 0.986 for the test dataset). Finally, a sensitivity analysis using a partial dependence plot was conducted to obtain a thorough understanding of the effect of each input variable on the predicted CS of FRSCC. The results showed that the cement content, testing age, and superplasticizer content are the most critical factors affecting the CS.

Keywords compressive strength      self-compacting concrete      artificial neural network      decision tree      CatBoost     
Corresponding Author(s): Hai-Bang LY   
Just Accepted Date: 07 December 2022   Online First Date: 20 February 2023    Issue Date: 03 April 2023
 Cite this article:   
Hai-Van Thi MAI,May Huu NGUYEN,Son Hoang TRINH, et al. Optimization of machine learning models for predicting the compressive strength of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 284-305.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-022-0901-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2023/V17/I2/284
referencealgorithminputs and outputsdatabest accuracyadvantages and disadvantages
Saha et al. [60]ANNMRA7 inputs1 output99testing ANN:R2 = 0.983MSE = 1.566MAPE = 2.480- 99 samples- missing model assessment (i.e., cross-validation)
Mashhadban et al. [61]PSO-ANN3 inputs4 outputs9 mixPSO-ANN:R2 = 0.999R2 = 0.945- 9 mixtures- specific study- constrained in model application- no sensitivity analysis
Nik and Omran [15]exponential functionregression between ultrasonic pulse velocity and CS40 mixsteel fiber SCC:R2 = 0.9296PP fiber SCC:R2 = 0.8461glass fiber SCC:R2 = 0.8926- 40 mixtures- specific study- constrained in model application
Uysal and Tanyildizi [58]ANN11 inputs1 output85BFGS quasi-Newton BP algorithmR2 = 0.9757- 85 data- different studied temperatures
Nguyen et al. [59]ANNANFIS8 inputs1 output131ANN all data:R2 = 0.9742RMSE = 7.47- 131 data points
Naseri et al. [62]SVM8 inputs1 output13WWLS–SVM:+ testingR2 = 0.9910RMSE = 0.1026MAPE = 8.9702- specific study
Gencel et al. [63]FL8 inputs1 output40R2 = 0.965- specific study
Meesaraganda et al. [22]ANN5 inputs1 output99ANN testing:R2 = 0.938MSE = 0.002MAPE = 6.404- specific study- no sensitivity analysis
Tavakoli et al. [64]ANN2 inputs3 outputs70NP- specific study
Tab.1  Summary of recent studies on predicting the CS of FRSCC in the literature
No.referenceNo. of datapercent (%)
1Saha et al. [60]9925.98
2Majain et al. [9]82.10
3Mashhadban et al. [61]92.36
4Begum et al. [65]92.36
5Beigi et al. [66]12031.50
6Pons et al. [26]112.89
7Song et al. [27]246.30
8Gencel et al. [67]51.31
9Uysal and Tanyildizi [58]102.62
10Naseri et al. [62]266.82
11Gencel et al. [63]6015.75
total381100
Tab.2  Collected dataset and corresponding references used to construct the FRSCC CS database.
inputnameunitmeanStDmin50%max
V1cementkg/m3416.26100.56220405754
V2coarse aggregatekg/m3725.23204.8707721311.9
V3fine aggregatekg/m3910.56130.140.839331220
V4waterkg/m3172.2522.54137.2162239
V5fly ashkg/m341.0586.9900306
V6glass fiberkg/m30.641.75007.95
V7PP fiberkg/m31.402.810012
V8steel fiberkg/m313.8138.5500156
V9limestonekg/m3103.00136.7800288.9
V10nano-silicakg/m310.6419.390090
V11nano-CuOkg/m30.582.430013.8
V12metakaolinkg/m32.8313.400090
V13superplasticizerkg/m38.776.970733
V14VMAL/m30.170.28000.9
V15testing aged36.2628.9512890
CScompressive strengthMPa65.7820.3828.2465.38159.91
Tab.3  Input and output parameters used in the development of ML models.
Fig.1  Histograms of the parameters used in the dataset. (a) Cement; (b) coarse aggregate; (c) fine aggregate; (d) water; (e) fly ash; (f) glass fiber; (g) PP fiber; (h) steel fiber; (i) limestone; (j) nano-silica; (k) nano-CuO; (l) metakaolin; (m) superplasticizer; (n) VMA; (o) testing age.
Fig.2  Correlation matrix using the Pearson correlation coefficient between input and output variables in the database.
Fig.3  Typical neural network architecture for the problem in this study.
Fig.4  Proposed workflow of this study.
Fig.5  Investigation of the results over 10-fold CV scores using different ANN structures on the training dataset: (a) number of neurons; (b) activation function; (c) solver for weight optimization; (d) number of epochs.
Fig.6  Investigation of the results of 10-fold CV using different RF parameters: (a) number of estimators; (b) maximum tree depth; (c) minimum sample split; (d) minimum sample leaf; (e) maximum leaf nodes.
Fig.7  Investigation of the results over 10-fold CV using different CatBoost growing policy: (a) number of iterations; (b) CatBoost’s trees’ depth; (c) CatBoost’s lossguide maximum leaves; (d) CatBoost’s grow policy.
Fig.8  Regression analysis for the prediction results of the optimized CatBoost algorithm: (a) training part; (b) testing part.
Fig.9  Relative errors between actual and CatBoost simulation results: (a) training part; (b) testing part.
Fig.10  Error histograms between predicted and experimental CS for the best CatBoost model: (a) training part; (b) testing part.
Fig.11  Comparison with other ML models using regression analysis: (a) XGB training; (b) XGB testing; (c) LGB training; (d) LGB testing; (e) DT training; (f) DT testing.
Fig.12  PDP analysis of 15 input variables considered in this study: (a) cement; (b) coarse aggregate; (c) fine aggregate; (d) water; (e) fly ash; (f) glass fiber; (g) PP fiber; (h) steel fiber; (i) limestone; (j) nano-silica; (k) nano-CuO; (l) metakaolin; (m) superplasticizer; (n) VMA; (o) testing age.
No.inputsinput variationPDP CS variationeffectrank
minmaxminmax|Δ|
1cement (kg/m3)22075455.675.019.4positive1
2coarse aggregate (kg/m3)01311.959.868.89.00negative7
3fine aggregate (kg/m3)0.83122061.367.56.2negative9
4water (kg/m3)137.223956.571.515.0negative4
5fly ash (kg/m3)030665.073.08.0positive8
6glass fiber (kg/m3)07.9564.668.84.2mix11
7PP fiber (kg/m3)01262.666.64.0mix12
8steel fiber (kg/m3)015664.575.010.5positive5
9limestone (kg/m3)0288.964.765.60.9mix14
10nano-silica (kg/m3)09064.574.510.0positive6
11nano-CuO (kg/m3)013.863.566.02.5mix13
12metakaolin (kg/m3)09065.571.05.5positive10
13superplasticizer (kg/m3)03361.077.516.5positive3
14VMA (L/m3)00.965.065.80.8mix15
15testing age (d)19056.375.018.7positive2
Tab.4  Summary of effect of input variables on the CS of FRSCC based on PDP analysis
1 H Okamura, K Ozawa. Self-compacting high performance concrete. Structural engineering international, 1996, 6(4): 269–270
2 A M ZeyadA M Saba, Influence of fly ash on the properties of self-compacting fiber reinforced concrete. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University (Basic and Applied Sciences). 2018, 19(2): 55–67
3 M Sahmaran, A Yurtseven, I O Yaman. Workability of hybrid fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. Building and Environment, 2005, 40(12): 1672–1677
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.12.014
4 A M Zeyad. Effect of fibers types on fresh properties and flexural toughness of self-compacting concrete. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2020, 9(3): 4147–4158
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.02.042
5 R Madandoust, M M Ranjbar, R Ghavidel, S F Shahabi. Assessment of factors influencing mechanical properties of steel fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. Materials & Design, 2015, 83: 284–294
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.024
6 C Lin, O Kayali, E V Morozov, D J Sharp. Influence of fibre type on flexural behaviour of self-compacting fibre reinforced cementitious composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2014, 51: 27–37
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.007
7 K H Khayat, F Kassimi, P Ghoddousi. Mixture design and testing of fiber-reinforced self-consolidating concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 2014, 111(2): 143–152
https://doi.org/10.14359/51686722
8 Z Salari, B Vakhshouri, S Nejadi. Analytical review of the mix design of fiber reinforced high strength self-compacting concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 2018, 20: 264–276
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.07.025
9 N Majain, A B A Rahman, R N Mohamed, A Adnan. Effect of steel fibers on self-compacting concrete slump flow and compressive strength. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 513(1): 012007
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/513/1/012007
10 H FathiT LameieM MalekiR Yazdani. Simultaneous effects of fiber and glass on the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2017,133: 443–449
11 R Prakash, S N Raman, N Divyah, C Subramanian, C Vijayaprabha, S Praveenkumar. Fresh and mechanical characteristics of roselle fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete incorporating fly ash and metakaolin. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 290: 123209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123209
12 A Boz, A Sezer, T Özdemir, G E Hızal, Dolmacı Ö Azdeniz. Mechanical properties of lime-treated clay reinforced with different types of randomly distributed fibers. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(6): 1–14
13 S Fallah, M Nematzadeh. Mechanical properties and durability of high-strength concrete containing macro-polymeric and polypropylene fibers with nano-silica and silica fume. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 132: 170–187
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.100
14 A C Bhogayata, N K Arora. Fresh and strength properties of concrete reinforced with metalized plastic waste fibers. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 146: 455–463
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.095
15 A S Nik, O L Omran. Estimation of compressive strength of self-compacted concrete with fibers consisting nano-SiO2 using ultrasonic pulse velocity. Construction & Building Materials, 2013, 44: 654–662
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.082
16 V Revilla-Cuesta, M Skaf, R Serrano-López, V Ortega-López. Models for compressive strength estimation through non-destructive testing of highly self-compacting concrete containing recycled concrete aggregate and slag-based binder. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 280: 122454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122454
17 A M Saba, A H Khan, M N Akhtar, N A Khan, Koloor S S Rahimian, M Petrů, N Radwan. Strength and flexural behavior of steel fiber and silica fume incorporated self-compacting concrete. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2021, 12: 1380–1390
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.066
18 W ZatarT Nguyen, Mixture design study of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete for prefabricated street light post structures. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020: e8852320
19 M Harihanandh, V Rajeshkumar, K S Elango. Study on mechanical properties of fiber reinforced self compacting concrete. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, 45: 3124–3131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.214
20 A Karimipour, M Ghalehnovi, J de Brito, M Attari. The effect of polypropylene fibres on the compressive strength, impact and heat resistance of self-compacting concrete. Structures, 2020, 25: 72–87
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.02.022
21 K B Ramkumar, P R Kannan Rajkumar, S Noor Ahmmad, M Jegan. A review on performance of self-compacting concrete—Use of mineral admixtures and steel fibres with artificial neural network application. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 261: 120215
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120215
22 L V P Meesaraganda, P Saha, N Tarafder. Artificial neural network for strength prediction of fibers’ self-compacting concrete. In: Soft Computing for Problem Solving. Singapore: Springer, 2019, 15–24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1592-3_2
23 S Yehia, A Douba, O Abdullahi, S Farrag. Mechanical and durability evaluation of fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 121: 120–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.127
24 Y Ding, C Azevedo, J B Aguiar, S Jalali. Study on residual behaviour and flexural toughness of fibre cocktail reinforced self compacting high performance concrete after exposure to high temperature. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 26: 21–31
25 J S HuangJ X LiewK M Liew. Data-driven machine learning approach for exploring and assessing mechanical properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced cement composites. Composite Structures, 2021, 267: 113917
26 G Pons, M Mouret, M Alcantara, J L Granju. Mechanical behaviour of self-compacting concrete with hybrid fibre reinforcement. Materials and Structures, 2007, 40(2): 201–210
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-006-9131-y
27 Q Song, R Yu, X Wang, S Rao, Z Shui. A novel self-compacting ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (SCUHPFRC) derived from compounded high-active powders. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 158: 883–893
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.059
28 B Karami, A Shishegaran, H Taghavizade, T Rabczuk. Presenting innovative ensemble model for prediction of the load carrying capacity of composite castellated steel beam under fire. Structures., 2021, 33: 4031–4052
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.07.005
29 A Shishegaran, M Saeedi, A Kumar, H Ghiasinejad. Prediction of air quality in Tehran by developing the nonlinear ensemble model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 259: 120825
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120825
30 A Shishegaran, M Shokrollahi, A Mirnorollahi, A Shishegaran, M Mohammad Khani. A novel ensemble model for predicting the performance of a novel vertical slot fishway. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(6): 1418–1444
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0664-x
31 A Shishegaran, M R Khalili, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 139: 103527
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2020.103527
32 M A Naghsh, A Shishegaran, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran, H Taghavizadeh, M Moradi. An innovative model for predicting the displacement and rotation of column-tree moment connection under fire. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(1): 194–212
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0688-2
33 A Shishegaran, B Karami, T Rabczuk, A Shishegaran, M A Naghsh, M Mohammad Khani. Performance of fixed beam without interacting bars. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1180–1195
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0661-0
34 A Shishegaran, B Karami, E Safari Danalou, H Varaee, T Rabczuk. Computational predictions for predicting the performance of steel 1 panel shear wall under explosive loads. Engineering Computations, 2021, 38(9): 3564–3589
https://doi.org/10.1108/EC-09-2020-0492
35 A Bigdeli, A Shishegaran, M A Naghsh, B Karami, A Shishegaran, G Alizadeh. Surrogate models for the prediction of damage in reinforced concrete tunnels under internal water pressure. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2021, 22(8): 632–656
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000290
36 A Shishegaran, M Moradi, M A Naghsh, B Karami, A Shishegaran. Prediction of the load-carrying capacity of reinforced concrete connections under post-earthquake fire. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2021, 22(6): 441–466
https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000268
37 A Shishegaran, M R Ghasemi, H Varaee. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1301–1315
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0552-4
38 H GuoX ZhuangT Rabczuk. A deep collocation method for the bending analysis of Kirchhoff plate. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019(5): 433–456
39 C AnitescuE AtroshchenkoN AlajlanT Rabczuk. Artificial neural network methods for the solution of second order boundary value problems. Computers, Materials & Continua, 2019, 59(1): 345–359
40 E Samaniego, C Anitescu, S Goswami, V M Nguyen-Thanh, H Guo, K Hamdia, X Zhuang, T Rabczuk. An energy approach to the solution of partial differential equations in computational mechanics via machine learning: Concepts, implementation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 362: 112790
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112790
41 X Zhuang, H Guo, N Alajlan, H Zhu, T Rabczuk. Deep autoencoder based energy method for the bending, vibration, and buckling analysis of Kirchhoff plates with transfer learning. European Journal of Mechanics. A, Solids, 2021, 87: 104225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104225
42 H GuoX ZhuangP ChenN AlajlanT Rabczuk. Stochastic deep collocation method based on neural architecture search and transfer learning for heterogeneous porous media. Engineering with Computers, 2022
43 H GuoX ZhuangP ChenN AlajlanT Rabczuk. Analysis of three-dimensional potential problems in non-homogeneous media with physics-informed deep collocation method using material transfer learning and sensitivity analysis. Engineering with Computers, 2022
44 A Shishegaran, H Varaee, T Rabczuk, G Shishegaran. High correlated variables creator machine: Prediction of the compressive strength of concrete. Computers & Structures, 2021, 247: 106479
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106479
45 A Shishegaran, F Daneshpajoh, H Taghavizade, S Mirvalad. Developing conductive concrete containing wire rope and steel powder wastes for route deicing. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 232: 117184
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117184
46 H Varaee, A Shishegaran, M R Ghasemi. The life-cycle cost analysis based on probabilistic optimization using a novel algorithm. Journal of Building Engineering, 2021, 43: 103032
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103032
47 M S Es-Haghi, A Shishegaran, T Rabczuk. Evaluation of a novel Asymmetric Genetic Algorithm to optimize the structural design of 3D regular and irregular steel frames. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(5): 1110–1130
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0643-2
48 A Shishegaran, A N Boushehri, A F Ismail. Gene expression programming for process parameter optimization during ultrafiltration of surfactant wastewater using hydrophilic polyethersulfone membrane. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 264: 110444
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110444
49 H Tran-Ngoc, S Khatir, T Le-Xuan, G De Roeck, T Bui-Tien, M Abdel Wahab. A novel machine-learning based on the global search techniques using vectorized data for damage detection in structures. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2020, 157: 103376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103376
50 S Khatir, S Tiachacht, C Le Thanh, E Ghandourah, S Mirjalili, M Abdel Wahab. An improved Artificial Neural Network using arithmetic optimization algorithm for damage assessment in FGM composite plates. Composite Structures, 2021, 273: 114287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114287
51 S Wang, H Wang, Y Zhou, J Liu, P Dai, X Du, M Abdel Wahab. Automatic laser profile recognition and fast tracking for structured light measurement using deep learning and template matching. Measurement, 2021, 169: 108362
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108362
52 L V Ho, T T Trinh, G De Roeck, T Bui-Tien, L Nguyen-Ngoc, M Abdel Wahab. An efficient stochastic-based coupled model for damage identification in plate structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 131: 105866
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105866
53 H Tran-Ngoc, S Khatir, G De Roeck, T Bui-Tien, M Abdel Wahab. An efficient artificial neural network for damage detection in bridges and beam-like structures by improving training parameters using cuckoo search algorithm. Engineering Structures, 2019, 199: 109637
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109637
54 S Khatir, D Boutchicha, C Le Thanh, H Tran-Ngoc, T N Nguyen, M Abdel-Wahab. Improved ANN technique combined with Jaya algorithm for crack identification in plates using XIGA and experimental analysis. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 107: 102554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102554
55 D H Nguyen-Le, Q B Tao, V H Nguyen, M Abdel-Wahab, H Nguyen-Xuan. A data-driven approach based on long short-term memory and hidden Markov model for crack propagation prediction. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2020, 235: 107085
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107085
56 P G Asteris, A Ashrafian, M Rezaie-Balf. Prediction of the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete using surrogate models. Computers and Concrete, 2019, 24: 137–150
57 F Farooq, S Czarnecki, P Niewiadomski, F Aslam, H Alabduljabbar, K A Ostrowski, K Śliwa-Wieczorek, T Nowobilski, S Malazdrewicz. A comparative study for the prediction of the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete modified with fly ash. Materials (Basel), 2021, 14(17): 1–27
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174934
58 M Uysal, H Tanyildizi. Estimation of compressive strength of self compacting concrete containing polypropylene fiber and mineral additives exposed to high temperature using artificial neural network. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 27(1): 404–414
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.028
59 T NguyenH Pham DuyT Pham ThanhH H Vu, Compressive strength evaluation of fiber-reinforced high-strength self-compacting concrete with artificial intelligence. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020: e3012139
60 P Saha, M L V Prasad, P RathishKumar. Predicting strength of SCC using artificial neural network and multivariable regression analysis. Computers and Concrete, 2017, 20(1): 31–38
61 H Mashhadban, S S Kutanaei, M Sayarinejad. Prediction and modeling of mechanical properties in fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete using particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network. Construction & Building Materials, 2016, 119: 277–287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.034
62 F Naseri, F Jafari, E Mohseni, W Tang, A Feizbakhsh, M Khatibinia. Experimental observations and SVM-based prediction of properties of polypropylene fibres reinforced self-compacting composites incorporating nano-CuO. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 143: 589–598
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.124
63 O GencelC ÖzelF KoksalG Martínez-BarreraW BrostowH Polat. Fuzzy logic model for prediction of properties of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. Medziagotyra, 2013, 19(2)
64 H R Tavakoli, O L Omran, M F Shiade, S S Kutanaei. Prediction of combined effects of fibers and nano-silica on the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete using artificial neural network. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2014, 11: 1906–1923
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-78252014001100002
65 S J BegumP J D AnjaneyuluM Ratnam. A study on effect of steel fiber in fly ash based self compacting concrete. International Journal for Innovative Research in Science & Technology, 2018(1), 5: 95–99
66 M H Beigi, J Berenjian, O Lotfi Omran, A Sadeghi Nik, I M Nikbin. An experimental survey on combined effects of fibers and nanosilica on the mechanical, rheological, and durability properties of self-compacting concrete. Materials & Design, 2013, 50: 1019–1029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.046
67 O Gencel, W Brostow, T Datashvili, M Thedford. Workability and mechanical performance of steel fiber-reinforced self-compacting concrete with fly ash. Composite Interfaces, 2011, 18(2): 169–184
68 H B Ly, M H Nguyen, B T Pham. Metaheuristic optimization of Levenberg–Marquardt-based artificial neural network using particle swarm optimization for prediction of foamed concrete compressive strength. Neural Computing & Applications, 2021, 33(24): 17331–17351
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06321-y
69 D E Rumelhart, B Widrow, M A Lehr. The basic ideas in neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 1994, 37(3): 87–92
https://doi.org/10.1145/175247.175256
70 B B Adhikary, H Mutsuyoshi. Prediction of shear strength of steel fiber RC beams using neural networks. Construction & Building Materials, 2006, 20(9): 801–811
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.047
71 T K Ho. Random decision forests. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition. Montreal: IEEE, 1995
72 L Breiman. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324
73 W Ben Chaabene, M Flah, M L Nehdi. Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 260: 119889
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889
74 A V DorogushV ErshovA Gulin. CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support. 2018, arXiv:1810.11363
75 T T Le, B T Pham, H B Ly, A Shirzadi, L M Le. Development of 48-hour Precipitation Forecasting Model using Nonlinear Autoregressive Neural Network. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures. Hanoi: Singapore, 2020, 1191–1196
76 B T Pham, M D Nguyen, H B Ly, T A Pham, V Hoang, H Van Le, T T Le, H Q Nguyen, G L Bui. Development of artificial neural networks for prediction of compression coefficient of soft soil. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures. Hanoi: Singapore, 2020, 1167–1172
77 T T M Thanh, H B Ly, B T Pham. A possibility of AI application on mode-choice prediction of transport users. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotechnics, Civil Engineering Works and Structures. Hanoi: Singapore, 2020, 1179–1184
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_189
78 G Cybenko. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Mathematics of Control, Signals, and Systems, 1989, 2(4): 303–314
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551274
79 D G Bounds, P J Lloyd, B G Mathew, G Waddell. A multilayer perceptron network for the diagnosis of low back pain. In: IEEE 1988 International Conference on Neural Networks. San Diego, CA: IEEE, 1988, 481–489
80 B D Ripley. Statistical aspects of neural networks. Networks and Chaos—Statistical and Probabilistic Aspects, 1993, 50: 40–123
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3099-6_2
81 K G Sheela, S N Deepa. Review on methods to fix number of hidden neurons in neural networks. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 2013: e425740
https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/425740
82 Z Zhang, X Ma, Y Yang. Bounds on the number of hidden neurons in three-layer binary neural networks. Neural Networks, 2003, 16(7): 995–1002
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-6080(03)00006-6
83 T Chen, C Guestrin. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. San Francisco, CA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016, 785–794
84 G Ke, Q Meng, T Finley, T Wang, W Chen, W Ma, Q Ye, T Y Liu. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017, 30: 1–9
85 B S Mohammed, N J Azmi. Strength reduction factors for structural rubbercrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2014, 8(3): 270–281
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-014-0265-7
86 A Oner, S Akyuz. An experimental study on optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive strength of concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2007, 29(6): 505–514
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.01.001
87 J Shen, Q Xu. Effect of moisture content and porosity on compressive strength of concrete during drying at 105 °C. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 195: 19–27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.046
88 J Zhou, X Chen, L Wu, X Kan. Influence of free water content on the compressive mechanical behaviour of cement mortar under high strain rate. Sadhana, 2011, 36(3): 357–369
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-011-0024-6
89 A Oner, S Akyuz, R Yildiz. An experimental study on strength development of concrete containing fly ash and optimum usage of fly ash in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(6): 1165–1171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.031
90 S Ghorbani, S Sharifi, H Rokhsarpour, S Shoja, M Gholizadeh, M A D Rahmatabad, J de Brito. Effect of magnetized mixing water on the fresh and hardened state properties of steel fibre reinforced self-compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 248: 118660
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118660
[1] Mohamed NOURELDIN, Tabish ALI, Jinkoo KIM. Machine learning-based seismic assessment of framed structures with soil-structure interaction[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 205-223.
[2] Xinyu WANG, Jian WU, Xin YIN, Quansheng LIU, Xing HUANG, Yucong PAN, Jihua YANG, Lei HUANG, Shuangping MIAO. QPSO-ILF-ANN-based optimization of TBM control parameters considering tunneling energy efficiency[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 25-36.
[3] Dung Quang VU, Fazal E. JALAL, Mudassir IQBAL, Dam Duc NGUYEN, Duong Kien TRONG, Indra PRAKASH, Binh Thai PHAM. Novel hybrid models of ANFIS and metaheuristic optimizations (SCE and ABC) for prediction of compressive strength of concrete using rebound hammer field test[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 1003-1016.
[4] Hai-Bang LY, Thuy-Anh NGUYEN, Binh Thai PHAM, May Huu NGUYEN. A hybrid machine learning model to estimate self-compacting concrete compressive strength[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 990-1002.
[5] Van Quan TRAN, Hai-Van Thi MAI, Thuy-Anh NGUYEN, Hai-Bang LY. Assessment of different machine learning techniques in predicting the compressive strength of self-compacting concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 928-945.
[6] Nang Duc BUI, Hieu Chi PHAN, Tiep Duc PHAM, Ashutosh Sutra DHAR. A hierarchical system to predict behavior of soil and cantilever sheet wall by data-driven models[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 667-684.
[7] Izhar AHMAD, Kashif Ali KHAN, Tahir AHMAD, Muhammad ALAM, Muhammad Tariq BASHIR. Influence of accelerated curing on the compressive strength of polymer-modified concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 589-599.
[8] Hamid MIRZAHOSSEIN, Milad SASHURPOUR, Seyed Mohsen HOSSEINIAN, Vahid Najafi Moghaddam GILANI. Presentation of machine learning methods to determine the most important factors affecting road traffic accidents on rural roads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 657-666.
[9] Duc-Hien LE, Yeong-Nain SHEEN, Khanh-Hung NGUYEN. Enhancing compressive strength and durability of self-compacting concrete modified with controlled-burnt sugarcane bagasse ash-blended cements[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 161-174.
[10] Paramveer SINGH, Kanish KAPOOR. Development of mix design method based on statistical analysis of different factors for geopolymer concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(10): 1315-1335.
[11] Gebrail BEKDAŞ, Melda YÜCEL, Sinan Melih NIGDELI. Estimation of optimum design of structural systems via machine learning[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1441-1452.
[12] Qinghai XIE, Jianzhuang XIAO, Kaijian ZHANG, Zhongling ZONG. Compressive behavior and microstructure of concrete mixed with natural seawater and sea sand[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1347-1357.
[13] Guangping HUANG, Deepak PUDASAINEE, Rajender GUPTA, Wei Victor LIU. Extending blending proportions of ordinary Portland cement and calcium sulfoaluminate cement blends: Its effects on setting, workability, and strength development[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1249-1260.
[14] Plaban DEB, Sujit Kumar PAL. Interaction behavior and load sharing pattern of piled raft using nonlinear regression and LM algorithm-based artificial neural network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1181-1198.
[15] Khashayar JAFARI, Fatemeh HEIDARNEZHAD, Omid MOAMMER, Majid JARRAH. Experimental investigation on freeze−thaw durability of polymer concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1038-1046.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed