Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (4) : 630-641    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-0989-y
Bond behavior of the interface between concrete and basalt fiber reinforced polymer bar after freeze–thaw cycles
Li HONG1,2,3,4, Mingming LI1, Congming DU1, Shenjiang HUANG1(), Binggen ZHAN1,4, Qijun YU1,4()
1. Department of Structural Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
2. Key Laboratory of Performance Evolution and Control for Engineering Structures, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
3. Engineering Research Center of Low-carbon Technology and Equipment for Cement-based Materials (Ministry of Education), Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
4. Hefei Cement Research & Design Institute Corporation Ltd., Hefei 230051, China
 Download: PDF(6195 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The shear bond of interface between concrete and basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars during freeze–thaw (F–T) cycles is crucial for the application of BFRP bar-reinforced concrete structures in cold regions. In this study, 48 groups of pull-out specimens were designed to test the shear bond of the BFRP-concrete interface subjected to F–T cycles. The effects of concrete strength, diameter, and embedment length of BFRP rebar were investigated under numerous F–T cycles. Test results showed that a larger diameter or longer embedment length of BFRP rebar resulted in lower interfacial shear bond behavior, such as interfacial bond strength, initial stiffness, and energy absorption, after the interface goes through F–T cycles. However, higher concrete strength and fewer F–T cycles were beneficial for enhancing the interfacial bond behavior. Subsequently, a three-dimensional (3D) interfacial model based on the finite element method was developed, and the interfacial bond behavior of the specimens was analyzed in-depth. Finally, a degradation bond strength subjected to F–T cycles was predicted by a proposed mechanical model. The predictions were fully consistent with the tested results. The model demonstrated accuracy in describing the shear bond behavior of the interface under numerous F–T cycles.

Keywords F–T cycle      interface      shear bond strength      bond stress−slip curves      bond degradation     
Corresponding Author(s): Shenjiang HUANG,Qijun YU   
Online First Date: 29 May 2024    Issue Date: 13 June 2024
 Cite this article:   
Li HONG,Mingming LI,Congming DU, et al. Bond behavior of the interface between concrete and basalt fiber reinforced polymer bar after freeze–thaw cycles[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(4): 630-641.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-024-0989-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2024/V18/I4/630
Concrete grade Cement (P.O. 52.5) Water River middle sand Coarse aggregate SP (%)
C40 446 205 602 1146 none
C50 468 155 655 1166 2
C60 533 160 593 1147 2
Tab.1  Mix proportions of concrete matrix (kg/m3)
Specimens Concrete grade Size (mm) Freeze–thaw times Numbers
concrete splitting tensile specimens C40/C50/C60 100 ×100 ×100 0/100/200/300 36
concrete compressive specimens C40/C50/C60 100 ×100 ×100 0/100/200/300 36
BFRP bars 10 (diameter) 0/100/200/300 12
Tab.2  Information of specimens for concrete matrix and BFRP bars
Fig.1  Illustration of interfacial pull-out specimens.
Fig.2  Test set-up for interfacial bond specimens.
Fig.3  Weight of concrete matrix subjected to numerous F–T cycles.
Fig.4  Failure modes of the concrete matrix: (a) subjected to F–T cycles; (b) under compression; (c) under splitting tension.
Fig.5  Strength of concrete: (a) compressive strength; (b) splitting tensile strength.
F–T cycles Tensile strength (MPa) Elastic modulus (GPa) Maximum tensile strain (× 10–3)
0 720 24.5 30.0
100 535 25.1 22.5
200 416 25.6 17.6
300 337 26.0 17.1
Tab.3  Performance of BFRP bars with a diameter of 10 mm after F–T cycles
Fig.6  Failure of interfacial specimens: (a) pull-out failure; (b) crush of concrete matrix.
Fig.7  Interfacial shear bond stress−slip curve affected by: strength of concrete matrix: (a) D0, (b) D200; diameter of BFRP bars: (c) D0, (d) D200; embedment length of BFRP bars: (e) D0, (f) D200; (g) times of F–T cycle.
Fig.8  Interfacial shear bond strength affected by: (a) the strength of concrete matrix; (b) the BFRP embedment length; (c) the BFRP bar diameter; (d) decrease in interfacial shear bond strength of specimens with C50 after 100, 200, and 300 F–T cycles using a 10-mm BFRP bar diameter.
Specimen k0 Ti, max δ0 δc
D0-C50-d10-40 2.9 15.7 5.5 9.3
D0-C50-d10-50 2.1 11.1 5.3 9.7
D0-C50-d10-60 1.7 9.6 5.5 12.8
D0-C40-d10-50 2.3 7.0 3.1 7.1
D0-C60-d10-50 2.3 17.4 7.6 15.1
D0-C50-d8-50 2.9 14.3 4.9 11.2
D0-C50-d12-50 1.8 9.9 5.5 9.2
D100-C50-d10-50 2.0 8.4 4.2 9.4
D200-C50-d10-50 1.9 6.2 3.3 6.0
D300-C50-d10-50 1.9 5.3 2.8 5.1
D200-C40-d10-50 1.8 4.1 2.3 4.2
D200-C60-d10-50 2.5 12.0 4.8 10.8
D200-C50-d10-40 2.7 9.7 3.7 8.9
D200-C50-d10-60 1.7 5.2 3.1 5.8
D200-C50-d8-50 3.2 10.7 3.4 7.7
D200-C50-d12-50 2.2 5.1 2.3 5.3
Tab.4  Model parameters for the interfacial cohesive element
Specimen Interfacial bond strength Differences (%)
Experimental results Numerical results
D0-C50-d10-40 15.65 15.19 2.9
D0-C50-d10-50 11.07 10.61 4.2
D0-C50-d10-60 9.61 9.43 1.9
D0-C40-d10-50 7.02 6.86 2.3
D0-C60-d10-50 17.44 16.2 7.1
D0-C50-d8-50 14.33 13.67 4.6
D0-C50-d12-50 9.88 9.35 5.4
D100-C50-d10-50 8.41 8.57 -1.9
D200-C50-d10-50 6.24 6.04 3.2
D300-C50-d10-50 5.26 4.93 6.3
D50-C50-d10-50* 9.26
D150-C50-d10-50* 7.55
D250-C50-d10-50* 5.38
D400-C50-d10-50* 4.03
Tab.5  Interfacial bond strength of experimental and numerical results
Fig.9  Comparison of the interfacial shear bond stress−slip curves based on numerical and experimental results: (a) different strengths of concrete matrix; (b) different BFRP embedment lengths; (c) different BFRP bar diameters; (d) different numbers of F–T cycles.
Fig.10  Relationship between the F–T damage factor and the number of F–T cycles.
1 X G Liu, W P Zhang, X L Gu, Z W Ye. Assessment of fatigue life for corroded prestressed concrete beams subjected to high-cycle fatigue loading. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2023, 149(2): 04022242
https://doi.org/10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11663
2 V Fiore, T Scalici, G Di Bella, A Valenza. A review on basalt fiber and its composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2015, 74: 74–94
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.034
3 A H Abathar, W Alnahhal. Shear behavior of basalt FRC beams reinforced with basalt FRP bars and glass FRP stirrups: Experimental and analytical investigations. Engineering Structures, 2021, 242: 112612
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112612
4 K Attia, A E Refai, W Alnahhal. Flexural behavior of basalt fiber-reinforced concrete slab strips with BFRP bars: Experimental testing and numerical simulation. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2020, 24(2): 04020007
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001002
5 J Duic, S Kenno, S Das. Performance of concrete beams reinforced with basalt fibre composite rebar. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 176: 470–481
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.208
6 A Abushanab, W Alnahhal, M Farraj. Experimental and finite element studies on the structural behavior of BFRP continuous beams reinforced with BFRP bars. Composite Structures, 2022, 281: 114982
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114982
7 Z Xiong, L H Lin, S H Qiao, L J Li, Y J Li, Y L Li, S H He, Z W Li, F Liu, Y L Chen. Axial performance of seawater sea-sand concrete columns reinforced with basalt fibre-reinforced polymer bars under concentric compressive load. Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 47: 103828
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103828
8 P Li, L Jin, R B Zhang, X L Du. Static bond performance between BFRP bars and concrete with stirrup confinement: A refined modelling. Engineering Structures, 2022, 262: 114379
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114379
9 Y T Hua, S P Yin, Z H Wang. Analysis of influence factors on interfacial bond between BFRP bars and seawater sea-sand concrete. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2021, 40(1-2): 16–28
https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684420941608
10 A E Refai, M A Ammar, R Masmoudi. Bond performance of basalt fiber reinforced polymer bars to concrete. Journal of Composites for Construction, 2015, 19(3): 04014050
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000487
11 M Hassan, B Benmokrane, A E Safty, A Fam. Bond durability of basalt-fiber-reinforced-polymer (BFRP) bars embedded in concrete in aggressive environments. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 106: 262–272
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.039
12 M W Wei, J H Xie, H Zhang, J L Li. Bond-slip behaviors of BFRP-to-concrete interfaces exposed to wet/dry cycles in chloride environment. Composite Structures, 2019, 219: 185–193
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.049
13 D J Shen, C Y Wen, P F Zhu, M Li, B Ojha, C C Li. Bond behavior between basalt fiber-reinforced polymer bars and concrete under cyclic loading. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 258: 119518
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119518
14 F Ceroni, A Bonati, V Galimberti, A Occhiuzzi. Effects of environmental conditioning on the bond behavior of FRP and FRCM systems applied to concrete elements. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 144(1): 04017144
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943–7889.0001375
15 D de Domenico, S Urso, C Borsellino, N Spinella, A Recupero. Bond behavior and ultimate capacity of notched concrete beams with externally-bonded FRP and PBO-FRCM systems under different environmental conditions. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 265: 121208
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121208
16 J Z Sun, Z H Ding, X L Li, Z Y Wang. Bond behavior between BFRP bar and basalt fiber reinforced seawater sea-sand recycled aggregate concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 285: 122951
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122951
17 W J Wang, Y Wang, D D Li, Y Z Liu, Z Li. Bond-slip behavior between basalt fiber reinforced plastic bars and recycled aggregate concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 302: 124360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124360
18 X G Liu, Z W Yan, D J Wang, R Zhao, D T Niu, Y Wang. Corrosion cracking behavior of reinforced concrete under freeze–thaw cycles. Journal of Building Engineering, 2023, 64: 105610
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105610
19 30022 GB/T-2013. Standard for Test Method for Basic Mechanical Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bar. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2013 (in Chinese)
20 440 1R-15 ACI. Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI committee, 2015
21 GB/T50082-2009. Standard for Test Methods of Long-Term Performance and Durability of Ordinary Concrete. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2009 (in Chinese)
22 H S Shang, Y P Song, L K Qin. Experimental study on strength and deformation of plain concrete under triaxial compression after freeze–thaw cycles. Building and Environment, 2008, 43(7): 1197–1204
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.08.027
23 W J Wang, Y Wang, Q Chen, Y Z Liu, Y Zhang, G Ma, P Duan. Bond properties of basalt fiber reinforced polymer (BFRP) bars in recycled aggregate thermal insulation concrete under freeze–thaw cycles. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 329: 127197
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127197
24 R J Wang, Z Y Hu, Y Li, K Wang, H Zhang. Review on the deterioration and approaches to enhance the durability of concrete in the freeze–thaw environment. Construction & Building Materials, 2022, 321: 126371
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126371
25 J W Shi, H Zhu, G Wu, Z S Wu. Tensile behavior of FRP and hybrid FRP sheets in freeze–thaw cycling environments. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2014, 60: 239–247
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.11.026
26 D J Shen, C C Li, Z Feng, C Wen, B Ojha. Influence of strain rate on bond behavior of concrete members reinforced with basalt fiber-reinforced polymer rebars. Construction & Building Materials, 2019, 228: 116755
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116755
27 W Chen, F Meng, H Sun, Z Guo. Bond behaviors of BFRP bar-to-concrete interface under dynamic loading. Construction & Building Materials, 2021, 305: 124812
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124812
28 H Wang, X Sun, G Peng, Y Luo, Q Ying. Experimental study on bond behaviour between BFRP bar and engineered cementitious composite. Construction and building materials, 2015, 95: 448–456
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.135
29 P Deng, Y J Wang, Y Sun, Y Liu, W H Guo. Bond durability of basalt-fiber-reinforced-polymer bars embedded in lightweight aggregate concrete subjected to freeze–thaw cycles. Structural Concrete, 2021, 22(5): 2829–2848
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100007
30 M Baena, L Torres, A Turon, C Barris. Experimental study of bond behaviour between concrete and FRP bars using a pull-out test. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2009, 40(8): 784–797
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.07.003
31 G Long, H Liu, K Ma, Y Xie. Uniaxial compression damage constitutive model of concrete subjected to freezing and thawing. Journal of Central South University, 2018, 49: 1884–1892
https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7207.2018.08.007.-
32 Y J Dong, C Su, P Z Qiao, L Z Sun. Microstructural damage evolution and its effect on fracture behavior of concrete subjected to freeze–thaw cycles. International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 2018, 27(8): 1272–1288
https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789518787025
33 R Okelo, R L Yuan. Bond strength of fiber reinforced polymer rebars in normal strength concrete. Journal of composites for construction, 2005, 9(3): 203–213
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090–0268(2005)9:3(203
34 Y H Lee, M S Kim, H Kim, J Lee, D J Kim. Experimental study on bond strength of fiber reinforced polymer rebars in normal strength concrete. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2013, 27(5−6): 508–522
https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2012.687554
[1] Yazhen SUN, Yang YU, Jinchang WANG, Longyan WANG. Interface failure of segmental tunnel lining strengthened with steel plates based on fracture mechanics[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(1): 137-149.
[2] Yong Yuan, Xiaoyun Wang, Jiao-Long Zhang, Yaxin Tao, Kim Van Tittelboom, Luc Taerwe, Geert De Schutter. The shear strength of the interface between artificial rock and printed concrete at super-early ages[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2024, 18(1): 51-65.
[3] Shuvankar DAS, Debarghya CHAKRABORTY. Effect of interface adhesion factor on the bearing capacity of strip footing placed on cohesive soil overlying rock mass[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 1494-1503.
[4] Dongliang HU, Jianzhong PEI, Rui LI, Jiupeng ZHANG, Yanshun JIA, Zepeng FAN. Using thermodynamic parameters to study self-healing and interface properties of crumb rubber modified asphalt based on molecular dynamics simulation[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 109-122.
[5] Wan WANG, Jianzhuang XIAO, Shiying XU, Chunhui WANG. Experimental study on behavior of mortar-aggregate interface after elevated temperatures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 158-168.
[6] Jiu-jiang WU,Yan LI,Qian-gong CHENG,Hua WEN,Xin LIANG. A simplified method for the determination of vertically loaded pile-soil interface parameters in layered soil based on FLAC3D[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 103-111.
[7] Navneet DRONAMRAJU,Johannes SOLASS,Jörg HILDEBRAND. Studies of fiber-matrix debonding[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 448-456.
[8] Jun WU,Xuemei LIU. Performance of soft-hard-soft (SHS) cement based composite subjected to blast loading with consideration of interface properties[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 323-340.
[9] Xueyi YOU , Wei LIU , Houpeng XIAO , . Dynamics simulation of bottom high-sediment sea water movement under waves[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2009, 3(3): 312-315.
[10] R. R. SHAKIR, Jungao ZHU. Nonlinear elastic model for compacted clay concrete interface[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2009, 3(2): 187-194.
[11] R. R .SHAKIR, Jungao ZHU. Behavior of compacted clay-concrete interface[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2009, 3(1): 85-92.
[12] CHEN Yue, HU Kai. Optimal design of steel portal frames based on genetic algorithms[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2008, 2(4): 318-322.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed