Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 9 Issue (4) : 577-587    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2022467
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A WAY TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION THROUGH SCIENTIST−FARMER ENGAGEMENT
Yu GUO, Ran LI, Peng NING, Xiaoqiang JIAO()
National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, Department of Plant Nutrition, College of Resource and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
 Download: PDF(2892 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Farmer–scientist collaboration for improved farming was achieved.

● Wheat and maize yields of STB farmers improved by 13%.

● NUE increased 20% for wheat and maize production.

● GHG emissions and EEF decreased by 23% and 52%, respectively.

Feeding a large and growing population with scientifically sustainable food production is a major challenge globally, especially in smallholder-based agricultural production. Scientists have conducted a considerable theoretical research and technological innovation to synergistically achieve increased food production and reduced environmental impact. However, the potential and feasibility of synergistic smallholder-led agricultural production to achieve increased food production and environmental friendliness is not yet clear. Exploring the potential and feasibility of smallholders to synergistically achieve these two goals, this research collected survey data from 162 farmers implementing standard farming practices and 112 farmers engaged in Science and Technology Backyard (STB) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China. Grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), and emergy ecological footprint (EEF) of the wheat-maize cropping system dominated by smallholders were analyzed. The results showed smallholders in the STB group improved wheat and maize yields by about 13% and NUE by 20%, respectively. Also, a reduction of 23% in GHG emissions and 52% in EEF were simultaneously achieved in the wheat-maize cropping system. Compared with standard farming practices, 75 kg·ha−1 nitrogen-based fertilizer was saved in the STB farmers. In summary, this study shifts the main perspective of research from scientists to smallholder, and uses a combination of greenhouse gas emission calculations, EEF and material flow analyses to demonstrate from multiple perspectives that agricultural systems under the leadership of smallholders can synergistically achieve high crop yields and low resource use and environmental impacts. The results of this study also show that the smallholder-led scientist-farmer collaborative model established by STB can fully exploit the initiative and potential, and that this collaborative model can be a successful strategy for smallholders as operators to achieve food security at low environmental impacts. The results of this study can provide useful evidence for a sustainable shift toward more sustainable agricultural production systems.

Keywords food security      scientists and farmers innovate together      greenhouse gas emissions      emergy ecological footprint      environment footprint     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiaoqiang JIAO   
Just Accepted Date: 09 September 2022   Online First Date: 12 October 2022    Issue Date: 07 November 2022
 Cite this article:   
Yu GUO,Ran LI,Peng NING, et al. A WAY TO SUSTAINABLE CROP PRODUCTION THROUGH SCIENTIST−FARMER ENGAGEMENT[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(4): 577-587.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2022467
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2022/V9/I4/577
Fig.1  Logical framework of the model of the nutrient-derived environment in wheat-maize production.
Crop Treatment Yield (t·ha−1) Mineral N fertilizer (kg·ha−1 N) N use efficiency* (%)
Maize FP (n = 162) 9 ± 1.3b 248 ± 81a 69 ± 21b
STB (n = 112) 9 ± 1.1a 194 ± 61b 93 ± 27a
Wheat FP (n = 162) 8 ± 0.8a 264 ± 81a 68 ± 18b
STB (n = 112) 9 ± 0.4b 243 ± 33b 89 ± 18a
Tab.1  Comparison of grain yield, mineral N fertilizer, and N use efficiency of wheat-maize cropping system with standard farming practices (FP) and STB farming (STB) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China
Fig.2  Nitrogen flux (kg·ha−1 N) of wheat-maize production based on standard farming practices (FP) (a) and STB farmers (STB) (b) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China.
Fig.3  GHG emissions (kg·ha−1 CO2-eq) of wheat-maize production based on standard farming practices (FP) and STB farmers (STB) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China.
Fig.4  Emergy ecological footprint (ha) of wheat-maize production based on standard farming practices (FP) and STB farmers (STB) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China.
Fig.5  Indexes of emergy ecological footprint of wheat-maize production based on standard farming practices (FP) and STB farmers (STB) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China: (a) environment load index, (b) resource load index, and (c) sustainability index.
Fig.6  Proportion (%) of N application rate for wheat and maize production (a), wheat and maize yield (b) for practices by STB farmers compared to standard farming practices (FP) in Quzhou County, Hebei Province, China.
1 P C, Struik T W Kuyper. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2017, 37( 5): 39
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0445-7
2 X, Liu X, Zhang S J Herbert. Feeding China’s growing needs for grain. Nature, 2010, 465( 7297): 420
https://doi.org/10.1038/465420a pmid: 20505710
3 H, Wu S, Wang L, Gao L, Zhang Z, Yuan T, Fan K, Wei L Huang. Nutrient-derived environmental impacts in Chinese agriculture during 1978–2015. Journal of Environmental Management, 2018, 217 : 762–774
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.002 pmid: 29656257
4 J, Huang C C, Xu B G, Ridoutt X C, Wang P A Ren. Nitrogen and phosphorus losses and eutrophication potential associated with fertilizer application to cropland in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 159 : 171–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.008
5 M R, Bellon B H, Kotu C, Azzarri F Caracciolo. To diversify or not to diversify, that is the question. Pursuing agricultural development for smallholder farmers in marginal areas of Ghana. World Development, 2020, 125 : 104682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104682 pmid: 31902972
6 S K, Jones A C, Sánchez S D, Juventia N Estrada-Carmona. A global database of diversified farming effects on biodiversity and yield. Scientific Data, 2021, 8( 1): 212
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-01000-y pmid: 34376684
7 S, Sala A, Anton S J, McLaren B, Notarnicola E, Saouter U Sonesson. In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 140 : 387–398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.054
8 F P, Kamali J A, Borges M P M, Meuwissen Boer I J M, De A G O Lansink. Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: the validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis. Agricultural Systems, 2017, 157 : 118–128
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.07.013
9 X, Wang Z, Dou X, Shi C, Zou D, Liu Z, Wang X, Guan Y, Sun G, Wu B, Zhang J, Li B, Liang L, Tang L, Jiang Z, Sun J, Yang D, Si H, Zhao B, Liu W, Zhang F, Zhang F, Zhang X Chen. Innovative management programme reduces environmental impacts in Chinese vegetable production. Nature Food, 2021, 2( 1): 47–53
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00199-0
10 Z, Xu X, Chen J, Liu Y, Zhang S, Chau N, Bhattarai Y, Wang Y, Li T, Connor Y Li. Impacts of irrigated agriculture on food-energy-water-CO2 nexus across metacoupled systems. Nature Communications, 2020, 11( 1): 5837
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19520-3 pmid: 33203840
11 X, Ju P Christie. Calculation of theoretical nitrogen rate for simple nitrogen recommendations in intensive cropping systems: a case study on the North China Plain. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124( 3): 450–458
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.08.002
12 R, Mahmoud P, Casadebaig N, Hilgert L, Alletto G T, Freschet Mazancourt C, De N Gaudio. Species choice and N fertilization influence yield gains through complementarity and selection effects in cereal-legume intercrops. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2022, 42( 2): 12
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-022-00754-y
13 C, Pu J S, Chen H D, Wang A L, Virk X, Zhao H L Zhang. Greenhouse gas emissions from the wheat-maize cropping system under different tillage and crop residue management practices in the North China Plain. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 819 : 153089
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153089 pmid: 35038532
14 M, Springmann M, Clark D, Mason-D’Croz K, Wiebe B L, Bodirsky L, Lassaletta Vries W, de S J, Vermeulen M, Herrero K M, Carlson M, Jonell M, Troell F, DeClerck L J, Gordon R, Zurayk P, Scarborough M, Rayner B, Loken J, Fanzo H C J, Godfray D, Tilman J, Rockström W Willett. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 2018, 562( 7728): 519–525
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0 pmid: 30305731
15 Z, Cui H, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang W, Ma C, Huang W, Zhang G, Mi Y, Miao X, Li Q, Gao J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Ye S, Guo J, Lu J, Huang S, Lv Y, Sun Y, Liu X, Peng J, Ren S, Li X, Deng X, Shi Q, Zhang Z, Yang L, Tang C, Wei L, Jia J, Zhang M, He Y, Tong Q, Tang X, Zhong Z, Liu N, Cao C, Kou H, Ying Y, Yin X, Jiao Q, Zhang M, Fan R, Jiang F, Zhang Z Dou. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555( 7696): 363–366
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25785 pmid: 29513654
16 X, Chen Z, Cui M, Fan P, Vitousek M, Zhao W, Ma Z, Wang W, Zhang X, Yan J, Yang X, Deng Q, Gao Q, Zhang S, Guo J, Ren S, Li Y, Ye Z, Wang J, Huang Q, Tang Y, Sun X, Peng J, Zhang M, He Y, Zhu J, Xue G, Wang L, Wu N, An L, Wu L, Ma W, Zhang F Zhang. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514( 7523): 486–489
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13609 pmid: 25186728
17 V, Ricciardi Z, Mehrabi H, Wittman D, James N Ramankutty. Higher yields and more biodiversity on smaller farms supplementary information. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4( 7): 651–657
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00699-2
18 W, Zhang G, Cao X, Li H, Zhang C, Wang Q, Liu X, Chen Z, Cui J, Shen R, Jiang G, Mi Y, Miao F, Zhang Z Dou. Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537( 7622): 671–674
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19368 pmid: 27602513
19 Y, Wu X, Xi X, Tang D, Luo B, Gu S K, Lam P M, Vitousek D Chen. Policy distortions, farm size, and the overuse of agricultural chemicals in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 115( 27): 7010–7015
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806645115 pmid: 29915067
20 W J, Peng X M, Wang X K, Li C C He. Sustainability evaluation based on the emergy ecological footprint method: a case study of Qingdao, China, from 2004 to 2014. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85 : 1249–1261
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.020
21 S, Zhao K, Song F, Gui H, Cai W, Jin C Wu. The emergy ecological footprint for small fish farm in China. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 29 : 62–67
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.009
22 R, McDougall P, Kristiansen R Rader. Small-scale urban agriculture results in high yields but requires judicious management of inputs to achieve sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116( 1): 129–134
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809707115 pmid: 30584110
23 S, Riccetto A S, Davis K, Guan C M Pittelkow. Integrated assessment of crop production and resource use efficiency indicators for the US Corn Belt. Global Food Security, 2020, 24 : 100339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100339
24 S L, Dwivedi van Bueren E T, Lammerts S, Ceccarelli S, Grando H D, Upadhyaya R Ortiz. Diversifying food systems in the pursuit of sustainable food production and healthy diets. Trends in Plant Science, 2017, 22( 10): 842–856
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.06.011 pmid: 28716581
25 L, Deng H, Zhang C, Wang W, Ma A, Zhu F, Zhang X Jiao. Improving the sustainability of the wheat supply chain through multi-stakeholder engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 321 : 128837
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128837 pmid: 34720459
26 E, Blasi N, Passeri S, Franco A Galli. An ecological footprint approach to environmental-economic evaluation of farm results. Agricultural Systems, 2016, 145 : 76–82
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.013
27 M, Quemada L, Lassaletta L S, Jensen O, Godinot F, Brentrup C, Buckley S, Foray S K, Hvid J, Oenema K G, Richards O Oenema. Exploring nitrogen indicators of farm performance among farm types across several European case studies. Agricultural Systems, 2020, 177 : 102689
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102689
28 H Kitano. Nobel Turing Challenge: creating the engine for scientific discovery. NPJ Systems Biology and Applications, 2021, 7( 1): 29
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41540-021-00189-3 pmid: 34145287
29 B, Sterk Ittersum M K, van C Leeuwis. How, when, and for what reasons does land use modelling contribute to societal problem solving. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2011, 26( 3): 310–316
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.06.004
30 W, Jiang A, Zhu C, Wang F, Zhang X Jiao. Optimizing wheat production and reducing environmental impacts through scientist-farmer engagement: lessons from the North China Plain. Food and Energy Security, 2021, 10( 1): e255
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.255 pmid: 33791100
31 K, Golicz S H, Hallett R, Sakrabani G Pan. The potential for using smartphones as portable soil nutrient analyzers on suburban farms in central East China. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9( 1): 16424
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52702-8 pmid: 31712568
32 M, Lacoste S, Cook M, McNee D, Gale J, Ingram V, Bellon-Maurel T, MacMillan R, Sylvester-Bradley D, Kindred R, Bramley N, Tremblay L, Longchamps L, Thompson J, Ruiz F O, García B, Maxwell T, Griffin T, Oberthür C, Huyghe W, Zhang J, McNamara A Hall. On-Farm Experimentation to transform global agriculture. Nature Food, 2022, 3( 1): 11–18
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00424-4
33 J, Huang Z, Huang X, Jia R, Hu C Xiang. Long-term reduction of nitrogen fertilizer use through knowledge training in rice production in China. Agricultural Systems, 2015, 135 : 105–111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.01.004
34 X, Jiao Y, Lyu X, Wu H, Li L, Cheng C, Zhang L, Yuan R, Jiang B, Jiang Z, Rengel F, Zhang W J, Davies J Shen. Grain production versus resource and environmental costs: towards increasing sustainability of nutrient use in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67( 17): 4935–4949
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw282 pmid: 27489235
35 Noordwijk M, Van L A, Duguma S, Dewi B, Leimona D C, Catacutan B, Lusiana I, Öborn K, Hairiah P A Minang. SDG synergy between agriculture and forestry in the food, energy, water and income nexus: reinventing agroforestry. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2018, 34 : 33–42
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.003
[1] Jeroen C. J. GROOT, Xiaolin YANG. TRADE-OFFS IN THE DESIGN OF SUSTAINABLE CROPPING SYSTEMS AT A REGIONAL LEVEL: A CASE STUDY ON THE NORTH CHINA PLAIN[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(2): 295-308.
[2] Hans LAMBERS, Wen-Feng CONG. CHALLENGES PROVIDING MULTIPLE ECOSYSTEM BENEFITS FOR SUSTAINABLE MANAGED SYSTEMS[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(2): 170-176.
[3] Bing-Xin WANG, Anouschka R. HOF, Chun-Sen MA. IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON CROP PRODUCTION, PESTS AND PATHOGENS OF WHEAT AND RICE[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2022, 9(1): 4-18.
[4] Fujiang HOU, Qianmin JIA, Shanning LOU, Chuntao YANG, Jiao NING, Lan LI, Qingshan FAN. GRASSLAND AGRICULTURE IN CHINA—A REVIEW[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2021, 8(1): 35-44.
[5] Zhenling CUI, Zhengxia DOU, Hao YING, Fusuo ZHANG. Producing more with less: reducing environmental impacts through an integrated soil-crop system management approach[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(1): 14-20.
[6] William J. DAVIES, Susan E. WARD, Alan WILSON. Can crop science really help us to produce more better-quality food while reducing the world-wide environmental footprint of agriculture?[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(1): 28-44.
[7] Jianbo SHEN, Qichao ZHU, Xiaoqiang JIAO, Hao YING, Hongliang WANG, Xin WEN, Wen XU, Tingyu LI, Wenfeng CONG, Xuejun LIU, Yong HOU, Zhenling CUI, Oene OENEMA, William J. DAVIES, Fusuo ZHANG. Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2020, 7(1): 5-13.
[8] Huilong LIN, Ruichao LI, Yifan LIU, Jingrong ZHANG, Jizhou REN. Allocation of grassland, livestock and arable based on the spatial and temporal analysis for food demand in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2017, 4(1): 69-80.
[9] Lin MA, Wei QIN, Tara GARNETT, Fusuo ZHANG. Review on drivers, trends and emerging issues of the food wastage in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2015, 2(2): 159-167.
[10] Zheng RUAN, Shumei MI, Yan ZHOU, Zeyuan DENG, Xiangfeng KONG, Tiejun LI, Yulong YIN. Protein security and food security in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2015, 2(2): 144-151.
[11] Yuanmei ZUO, Zhenjiao ZHANG, Caihong LIU, Weina ZHANG. Achieving food security and high production of bioenergy crops through intercropping with efficient resource use in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2015, 2(2): 134-143.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed