Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-7505

ISSN 2095-977X(Online)

CN 10-1204/S

Postal Subscription Code 80-906

Front. Agr. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 11 Issue (1) : 5-19    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2024535
Agriculture green development in China: insights and advances
Jianbo SHEN1, Qichao ZHU1, Yong HOU1, Wen-Feng CONG1, Wen XU1, Jiuliang XU1, Zhichao AN1, Xiaoqiang JIAO1, Kai ZHANG1, Tianxiang YU1, Lin MA2, Oene OENEMA3, William J. DAVIES4, Fusuo ZHANG1()
1. State Key Laboratory of Nutrient Use and Management, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2. Key Laboratory of Agricultural Water Resources, Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetic and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050021, China
3. Wageningen Environmental Research, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, 6700 AA, the Netherlands
4. Lancaster Environment Centre, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK
 Download: PDF(7894 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Agriculture green development (AGD) has been undertaken in China for 5 years.

● New insights and advances on the four themes of AGD in China are elucidated.

● AGD involves interdisciplinary research innovation, multistakeholder participation, multi-objective realization and regional-specific technology implementation.

● Implementation of AGD in China will provide valuable experience paradigm for the world.

Reconciling the tasks of producing adequate amounts of nutritious food for the increasing global population while preserving the environment and natural ecosystems simultaneously is an enormous challenge. The concept of agriculture green development (AGD) and the necessary governmental policies were developed to address the aforementioned challenge in China and to help achieve the related global sustainable development goals. Agriculture green development emphasizes the synergy between green and development; current agriculture has to transform from the intensive farming with high inputs, high environmental impacts and low resource-use efficiency to a more sustainable agriculture, in order to ensure an adequate supply of nutritious food while delivering environmental integrity, improved economic profitability, and social equity. A research program on AGD was established by China Agricultural University with four research themes, namely: green crop production, green integrated crop-animal production, green food and industry, and green ecological environment and ecosystem services, to provide a scientific basis for future developments and to facilitate the implementation of AGD in practice. AGD requires a multistakeholder approach, fueled by innovative and interdisciplinary research. Joint actions have to be taken by governments, farmers, supply industries, consumers, educators, extension services and researchers to support AGD. This requires strong coordination and public awareness campaigns. This review presents the progress that has been made over the past 5 years and makes recommendations for more research and development, in order to better deliver agricultural green and sustainable development on national and international scales.

Keywords Agriculture      ecosystem services      environmental protection      food security      green development      multi-sectoral cooperation      sustainable development     
Corresponding Author(s): Fusuo ZHANG   
Just Accepted Date: 09 January 2024   Online First Date: 05 February 2024    Issue Date: 08 March 2024
 Cite this article:   
Jianbo SHEN,Qichao ZHU,Yong HOU, et al. Agriculture green development in China: insights and advances[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 5-19.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/10.15302/J-FASE-2024535
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fase/EN/Y2024/V11/I1/5
Fig.1  The four subsystems of agriculture green development; i.e., green crop production, green integrated crop-animal production, green food and industry, and green ecological environment and ecosystem services, with their interlinkages. Some of the innovations may have to take place at these interlinkages. SDGs, UN Sustainable Development Goals.
Fig.2  Theoretical framework of green ecological environment in agriculture. It includes three subthemes on: (1) material flow and environmental impact analysis at the water-soil-air interface, (2) the construction of regional water-soil-air environmental thresholds, and (3) exploring the impacts of green environmental scenarios in typical regions of China. The top-down approach involves setting environmental limits for nutrient and pollutant emissions in the agricultural food system while also considering the crucial aspect of food security. This approach focuses on establishing clear guidelines and regulations to ensure sustainable farming practices from the top levels of the production chain. The bottom-up approach refers to achieving top-level environmental thresholds through technological innovations in the whole food production-processing-consumption system, through for example structural adjustments in agriculture, adjusting dietary structures, and disseminating green production technologies.
Fig.3  The multi-system coupling of the agriculture green development (AGD). Achieving the AGD targets requires systematic interlinking and integration of green crop production, green integrated crop-animal production, green food and industry, and green ecological environment and ecosystem services.
Fig.4  Optimization of activities in the whole food production, processing and consumption chain. AWIC, agricultural whole industry chain.
Fig.5  Conceptual framework of the integrated joint service and technology platform based on the cooperation of government, enterprise, university, researcher, farmer and NGOs through combination of top-down and bottom-up strategies. The green arrow indicates the top-down path and the orange arrow represents the bottom-up path. The circles of various colors in the middle represent different stakeholders. STB, Science and Technology Backyard; NGOs, non-governmental organizations. Enterprise include entities covering the whole chain of agricultural production, including crop and animal production enterprises as well as fertilizer companies.
Fig.6  Implementation approach of agriculture green development through top-down and bottom-up pathways.
1 X, Jiao Y, Lyu X, Wu H, Li L, Cheng C, Zhang L, Yuan R, Jiang B, Jiang Z, Rengel F, Zhang W J, Davies J Shen . Grain production versus resource and environmental costs: towards increasing sustainability of nutrient use in China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016, 67(17): 4935–4949
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw282
2 J, Huang G Yang . Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China. Global Food Security, 2017, 12: 119–126
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.10.002
3 Z, Cui H, Zhang X, Chen C, Zhang W, Ma C, Huang W, Zhang G, Mi Y, Miao X, Li Q, Gao J, Yang Z, Wang Y, Ye S, Guo J, Lu J, Huang S, Lv Y, Sun Y, Liu X, Peng J, Ren S, Li X, Deng X, Shi Q, Zhang Z, Yang L, Tang C, Wei L, Jia J, Zhang M, He Y, Tong Q, Tang X, Zhong Z, Liu N, Cao C, Kou H, Ying Y, Yin X, Jiao Q, Zhang M, Fan R, Jiang F, Zhang Z Dou . Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature, 2018, 555(7696): 363–366
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25785
4 J, Liu A R, Fernie J Yan . The past, present, and future of maize improvement: domestication, genomics, and functional genomic routes toward crop enhancement. Plant Communications, 2020, 1(1): 100010
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100010
5 U C, Jha H, Nayyar S K, Parida R, Deshmukh Wettberg E J B, von K H M Siddique . Ensuring global food security by improving protein content in major grain legumes using breeding and ‘Omics’ tools. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(14): 7710
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23147710
6 Bureau of statistics of China (NBSC) National . “Grain production”, 2023. Available at NBSC website on September 20, 2023 (in Chinese)
7 W Yu . Agricultural and agri-environment policy and sustainable agricultural development in China. Frederiksberg: Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen, 2017
8 J, Shen C, Li G, Mi L, Li L, Yuan R, Jiang F Zhang . Maximizing root/rhizosphere efficiency to improve crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency in intensive agriculture of China. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2013, 64(5): 1181–1192
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers342
9 J, Shen F, Zhang K H M Siddique . Sustainable resource use in enhancing agricultural development in China. Engineering, 2018, 4(5): 588–589
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2018.08.007
10 and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Food . The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World. Rome: FAO, 2022. Available at FAO website on September 20, 2023
11 J, Shen Q, Zhu X, Jiao H, Ying H, Wang X, Wen W, Xu T, Li W, Cong X, Liu Y, Hou Z, Cui O, Oenema W J, Davie F Zhang . Agriculture Green Development: a model for China and the world. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 5–13
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019300
12 W J, Davies J Shen . Reducing the environmental footprint of food and farming with Agriculture Green Development. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 1–4
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019311
13 W, Zhang G, Cao X, Li H, Zhang C, Wang Q, Liu X, Chen Z, Cui J, Shen R, Jiang G, Mi Y, Miao F, Zhang Z Dou . Closing yield gaps in China by empowering smallholder farmers. Nature, 2016, 537(7622): 671–674
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19368
14 L, Ma Z, Bai W, Ma M, Guo R, Jiang J, Liu O, Oenema G L, Velthof A P, Whitmore J, Crawford A, Dobermann M, Schwoob F Zhang . Exploring Future Food Provision Scenarios for China. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(3): 1385–1393
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b04375
15 L, You G H, Ros Y, Chen Q, Shao M D, Young F, Zhang Vries W de . Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 5747
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41504-2
16 C, Li E, Hoffland T W, Kuyper Y, Yu C, Zhang H, Li F, Zhang der Werf W van . Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(6): 653–660
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-020-0680-9
17 C, Li T J, Stomph D, Makowski H, Li C, Zhang F, Zhang der Werf W van . The productive performance of intercropping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(2): e2201886120
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201886120
18 Z, Liang Z, Xu J, Cheng B, Ma W F, Cong C, Zhang F, Zhang der Werf W, van J C Groot . Designing diversified crop rotations to advance sustainability: a method and an application. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2023, 40: 532–544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.018
19 J, Lehmann D A, Bossio I, Kögel-Knabner M C Rillig . The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2020, 1(10): 544–553
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8
20 X, Qiao X, Wang P, Smith J, Fan Y, Lu B, Emmit R, Li S, Dorling H, Chen S, Liu T G, Benton Y, Wang Y, Ma R, Jiang F, Zhang S, Piao C, Mϋller H, Yang Y, Hao W, Li M Fan . Soil quality both increases crop production and improves resilience to climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12(6): 574–580
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01376-8
21 J, Zhang Y, Li Y, Li J, Zhang F Zhang . Advances in the indicator system and evaluation approaches of soil health. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(3): 603−616 (in Chinese)
22 X, Wang W R, Whalley A J, Miller P J, White F, Zhang J Shen . Sustainable cropping requires adaptation to a heterogeneous rhizosphere. Trends in Plant Science, 2020, 25(12): 1194–1202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.07.006
23 L, Wang Z, Rengel K, Zhang K, Jin Y, Lyu L, Zhang L, Cheng F, Zhang J Shen . Ensuring future food security and resource sustainability: insights into the rhizosphere. iScience, 2022, 25(4): 104168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104168
24 K, Zhang Z, Rengel F, Zhang P J, White J Shen . Rhizosphere engineering for sustainable crop production: entropy-based insights. Trends in Plant Science, 2023, 28(4): 390–398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2022.11.008
25 J, Jing W, Gao L, Cheng X, Wang F, Duan L, Yuan Z, Rengel F, Zhang H, Li J F Jr, Cahill J Shen . Harnessing root-foraging capacity to improve nutrient-use efficiency for sustainable maize production. Field Crops Research, 2022, 279: 108462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108462
26 Z, Wen P J, White J, Shen H Lambers . Linking root exudation to belowground economic traits for resource acquisition. New Phytologist, 2022, 233(4): 1620–1635
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17854
27 F, Zhang J, Shen C, Wei W, Ma W, Zhang C, Huang Y, Lyu L, Zhang Z, Lu H, Ying L, Cheng R, Jiang L, Qu C, Hou X, Wang X, Xiu H Ma . Green intelligent fertilizer: from interdisciplinary innovation to industrialization realization. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(4): 873−887 (in Chinese)
28 Y, Yin R, Zhao Y, Yang Q, Meng H, Ying K G, Cassman W, Cong X, Tian K, He Y, Wang Z, Cui X, Chen F Zhang . A steady-state N balance approach for sustainable smallholder farming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021, 118(39): e2106576118
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106576118
29 X, Wang Z, Dou X, Shi C, Zou D, Liu Z, Wang X, Guan Y, Sun G, Wu B, Zhang J, Li B, Liang L, Tang L, Jiang Z, Sun J, Yang D, Si H, Zhao B, Liu W, Zhang F, Zhang F, Zhang X Chen . Innovative management programme reduces environmental impacts in Chinese vegetable production. Nature Food, 2021, 2(1): 47–53
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-020-00199-0
30 J, Kang J, Wang M R, Heal K, Goulding Vries W, de Y, Zhao S, Feng X, Zhang B, Gu X, Niu H, Zhang X, Liu Z, Cui F, Zhang W Xu . Ammonia mitigation campaign with smallholder farmers improves air quality while ensuring high cereal production. Nature Food, 2023, 4(9): 751–761
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00833-7
31 A W Black . Extension theory and practice: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2000, 40(4): 493–502
https://doi.org/10.1071/EA99083
32 Z, Bai W, Ma L, Ma G L, Velthof Z, Wei P, Havlík O, Oenema M R F, Lee F Zhang . China’s livestock transition: Driving forces, impacts, and consequences. Science Advances, 2018, 4(7): eaar8534
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8534
33 Y, Ma L, Zhang Z, Bai R, Jiang Y, Hou L Ma . Nutrient use efficiency and losses of industrial farms and mixed smallholdings: lessons from the North China Plain. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(1): 58–71
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020371
34 Z, Bai X, Fan X, Jin Z, Zhao Y, Wu O, Oenema G, Velthof C, Hu L Ma . Relocate 10 billion livestock to reduce harmful nitrogen pollution exposure for 90% of China’s population. Nature Food, 2022, 3(2): 152–160
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00453-z
35 H, Wang W, Long D, Chadwick G, Velthof O, Oenema W, Ma J, Wang W, Qin Y, Hou F Zhang . Can dietary manipulations improve the productivity of pigs with lower environmental and economic cost? A global meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 289: 106748
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106748
36 Q, Fang X, Zhang G, Dai B, Tong H, Wang O, Oenema Zanten H H E, van P, Gerber Y Hou . Low-opportunity-cost feed can reduce land-use-related environmental impacts by about one-third in China. Nature Food, 2023, 4(8): 677–685
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00813-x
37 B, Tong L, Zhang Y, Hou O, Oenema W, Long G, Velthof W, Ma F Zhang . Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China. Nature Food, 2023, 4(1): 74–83
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00640-6
38 Y, Ma Y, Hou P, Dong G L, Velthof , Lon, WL, Ma W, Ma R, Jiang O Oenema . Cooperation between specialized livestock and crop farms can reduce environmental footprints and increase net profits in livestock production. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 302(Part A): 113960
39 G, Dai Y, Hou Q, Fang X, Zhang H, Wang S, Wang X, Zhu F, Zhang O Oenema . Boosting domestic feed production with less environmental cost through optimized crop distribution. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2023, 194: 106996
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.106996
40 J, Shen Z, Cui Y, Miao G, Mi H, Zhang M, Fan C, Zhang R, Jiang W, Zhang H, Li X, Chen X, Li F Zhang . Transforming agriculture in China: from solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency. Global Food Security, 2013, 2(1): 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2012.12.004
41 S Q Wang . The way to regulate environmental and economic benefits of supply chain of Quzhou laying hens. Thesis for the Master’s Degree. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2023 (in Chinese)
42 Z, Chang H, Cai E F, Talsma S, Fan Y, Ni X, Wen Veer P, Van’t S Biesbroek . Assessing the diet quality, environmental impact, and monetary costs of the dietary transition in China (1997–2011): Impact of urbanization. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2023, 7: 1111361
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1111361
43 H, Cai S, Biesbroek X, Wen S, Fan ’t Veer P, van E F Talsma . Environmental footprints of Chinese foods and beverages: literature-based construction of a LCA database. Data in Brief, 2022, 42: 108244
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108244
44 J, Xu Z, Zhang X, Zhang M, Ishfaq J, Zhong W, Li F, Zhang X Li . Green food development in China: experiences and challenges. Agriculture, 2020, 10(12): 614
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10120614
45 S J, Cusworth W J, Davies M R, McAinsh C J Stevens . Sustainable production of healthy, affordable food in the UK: The pros and cons of plasticulture. Food and Energy Security, 2022, 11(4): e404
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.404
46 X, Liu W, Xu Z, Sha Y, Zhang Z, Wen J, Wang F, Zhang K Goulding . A green eco-environment for sustainable development: framework and action. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2020, 7(1): 67–74
https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2019297
47 F, Meng M, Wang M, Strokal C, Kroeze L, Ma Y, Li Q, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Hou X, Liu W, Xu F Zhang . Nitrogen losses from food production in the North China Plain: a case study for Quzhou. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 816: 151557
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151557
48 T, Zou F, Meng J, Zhou H, Ying X, Liu Y, Hou Z, Zhao F, Zhang W Xu . Quantifying nitrogen and phosphorus losses from crop and livestock production and mitigation potentials in Erhai Lake Basin, China. Agricultural Systems, 2023, 211: 103745
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103745
49 Q, Zhang C, Kroeze S, Cui Y, Li L, Ma V, Strokal P, Vriend M, Wang Wijnen J, van W, Xu F, Zhang M Strokal . COVID-19 estimated to have increased plastics, diclofenac, and triclosan pollution in more than half of urban rivers worldwide. Cell Reports Sustainability, 2023, 100001
50 T Benton . Climate change and agriculture: adaptation and mitigation. Food Systems Academy, 2019. Available at Food Systems Academy website on September 20, 2023
51 C B, Barrett T G, Benton K A, Cooper J, Fanzo R, Gandhi M, Herrero S, James M, Kahn D, Mason-D’Croz A, Mathys R J, Nelson J, Shen P, Thornton E, Bageant S, Fan A G, Mude L M, Sibanda S Wood . Bundling innovations to transform agri-food systems. Nature Sustainability, 2020, 3(12): 974–976
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00661-8
52 The State Council, the People’s Republic of China. Opinions on Innovating Systems and Mechanisms to Promote Agriculture Green Development. The State Council, the People’s Republic of China, 2017 (in Chinese)
53 H, Zhang Y, Feng Y, Jia P, Liu Y, Hou J, Shen Q, Zhu F Zhang . China’s agriculture green development: from concept to actions. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2023 [Published Online] doi:
54 Z, Bai X, Wu L, Lassaletta A, Haverkamp W, Li Z, Yuan E, Aguilera A, Uwizeye A, Sanz-Cobena N, Zhang X, Fan F, Zhu M, Dicke X, Wang L Ma . Investing in mini-livestock production for food security and carbon neutrality in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(43): e2304826120
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304826120
55 C, Pohl J T, Klein S, Hoffmann C, Mitchell D Fam . Conceptualising transdisciplinary integration as a multidimensional interactive process. Environmental Science & Policy, 2021, 118: 18–26
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.005
56 C, Pachoud V, Labeyrie E Polge . Collective action in Localized Agrifood Systems: an analysis by the social networks and the proximities. Study of a Serrano cheese producers’ association in the Campos de Cima da Serra/Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 2019, 72: 58–74
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.003
57 X Q, Jiao H Y, Zhang W Q, Ma C, Wang X L, Li F S Zhang . Science and Technology Backyard: a novel approach to empower smallholder farmers for sustainable intensification of agriculture in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(8): 1657–1666
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(19)62592-X
58 W, Zhang Y, Qiao P, Lakshmanan L, Yuan J, Liu C, Zhong X Chen . Combing public-private partnership and large-scale farming increased net ecosystem carbon budget and reduced carbon footprint of maize production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 184: 106411
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106411
59 H, Zhao J F, Chang P, Havlík Dijk M, Van H, Valin C, Janssens L, Ma Z H, Bai M, Herrero P, Smith M Obersteiner . China’s future food demand and its implications for trade and environment. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(12): 1042–1051
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00784-6
60 J, Zhou X, Jiao L, Ma Vries W, de F, Zhang J Shen . Model-based analysis of phosphorus flows in the food chain at county level in China and options for reducing the losses towards green development. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 288: 117768
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117768
[1] Lihua MA, Shiyang LI, Linfa FANG, Xuanjing CHEN, Ran XIAO, Xiaoxuan SU, Zhaolei LI, Zhaohai BAI, Lin MA, Prakash LAKSHMANAN, Xinping CHEN. Multiple pollutants from crop and livestock production in the Yangtze River: status and challenges[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 134-139.
[2] Xiangwen FAN, Xiaomeng ZHANG, Xiaofei WU, Wenqi MA, Zhaohai BAI, Lin MA. Toward sustainable food systems: global initiatives and innovations[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 197-209.
[3] Maoying WANG, Lingyun CHENG, Chengdong HUANG, Yang LYU, Lin ZHANG, Zhenya LU, Changzhou WEI, Wenqi MA, Zed RENGEL, Jianbo SHEN, Fusuo ZHANG. Green intelligent fertilizers—A novel approach for aligning sustainable agriculture with green development[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 186-196.
[4] Samuel J. CUSWORTH, William J. DAVIES, Martin R. MCAINSH, Carly J. STEVENS, Weilu WANG. Sustainable plasticulture in Chinese agriculture: a review of challenges and routes to achieving long-term food and ecosecurity[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 155-168.
[5] Xiaomeng ZHANG, Xiangwen FAN, Wenqi MA, Zhaohai BAI, Jiafa LUO, Jing YANG, Ling LIU, Jianjie ZHANG, Lin MA. Toward to agricultural green development by multi-objective zoning and nitrogen nutrient management: a case study in the Baiyangdian Basin, China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 140-154.
[6] Gang HE, Zhaohui WANG, Qichao ZHU, Jianbo SHEN, Fusuo ZHANG. Implications of agricultural success in the Yellow River Basin and its strategy for green development[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 122-133.
[7] Fanlei MENG, Menru WANG, Yong HOU, Lin MA, Wenqi MA, Xuejun LIU, Fusuo ZHANG, Wen XU. Optimizing nitrogen management in the food system for sustainable development: a case study of Quzhou County[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 113-121.
[8] Kemo JIN, Nico HEERINK, William J. DAVIES, Jianbo SHEN, Yifeitong ZHANG, Yong HOU, Yaqiao ZHAO, Zhengxiong ZHAO, Fusuo ZHANG. Coordinating environmental protection and agricultural development: a village-based case study for promoting green transformation[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 100-112.
[9] Tianxiang YU, Jichen ZHOU, Lin MA, Fusuo ZHANG, Zed RENGEL, William J. DAVIES, Jianbo SHEN. Spatiotemporal variation and evaluation of agriculture green development: a case study of Hainan Province, China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 83-99.
[10] Jianjie ZHANG, Xiangwen FAN, Ling LIU, Lin MA, Zhaohai BAI, Wenqi MA. Comparison of indicators for agricultural green development and the Sustainable Development Goals, and mapping the way forward[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 69-82.
[11] Xiao XU, Yanxiang JIA, Yuan FENG, Haixing ZHANG, Wen XU, Qichao ZHU. An index system for evaluation of agriculture green development at county level in China[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 55-68.
[12] William J. DAVIES. Developing a new agenda for increased food and climate security[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 35-54.
[13] Haixing ZHANG, Yuan FENG, Yanxiang JIA, Pengqi LIU, Yong HOU, Jianbo SHEN, Qichao ZHU, Fusuo ZHANG. China’s agriculture green development: from concept to actions[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2024, 11(1): 20-34.
[14] Mengru WANG, Qi ZHANG, Yanan LI, Mirjam P. BAK, Sijie FENG, Carolien KROEZE, Fanlei MENG, Ilaria MICELLA, Vita STROKAL, Aslıhan URAL-JANSSEN, Maryna STROKAL. WATER POLLUTION AND AGRICULTURE: MULTI-POLLUTANT PERSPECTIVES[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2023, 10(4): 639-647.
[15] Aslıhan URAL-JANSSEN, Carolien KROEZE, Jan Peter LESSCHEN, Erik MEERS, Peter J.T.M. VAN PUIJENBROEK, Maryna STROKAL. HOTSPOTS OF NUTRIENT LOSSES TO AIR AND WATER: AN INTEGRATED MODELING APPROACH FOR EUROPEAN RIVER BASINS[J]. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. , 2023, 10(4): 579-592.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed