|
A Comparative Study of Two Global Crises
LIU He
Front. Econ. China. 2015, 10 (3): 396-413.
https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-004-015-0017-0
This article identifies the differences and common features of two global crises: the Great Depression of 1929 and the international financial crisis of 2008. The circumstances of the two crises differ in terms of the demographic structure, the technological conditions, the economic and social systems in developed countries, the extent of globalization and other global economic situations. Among the common features, both crises were preceded by unprecedented economic booms, laisse-faire regulatory policies, easy monetary and credit policies, asset bubbles and yawning income gaps. Moreover, the crises had a strong redistribution effect, which would cause shifts of power among large countries and major changes in international economic order.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|
|
The Determinants of Location Choices of China's ODI: Institutions, Taxation and Resources
Yongqin Wang,Julan Du,Kai Wang
Front. Econ. China. 2015, 10 (3): 540-565.
https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-004-015-0024-6
China has become the third largest source of outward direct investment (ODI). This paper studies how institutions in the host countries affect the location choices of China’s ODI. Based on a deal-level sample from 2002–2011, this paper empirically tests how political institutions, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and contrd of corruption in the host countries affect the location choices of China’s ODI. On top of these institutional factors, we study the effects of tax evasion and natural resources in host countries, and their interactions with institutional factors. We find that political institutions in the host countries are not major concerns of the ODI, while government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and control of corruption have significant effects on the locations of ODI. In addition, China’s ODI tends to avoid countries with strict legal systems. Tax evasion and resources are also major motives of China’s ODI. General institutional quality and tax evasion are substitutes in China’s ODI location decisions.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|
9 articles
|