|
Promote Competitive Neutrality to Facilitate China’s Economic Development: Outlook, Policy Simulations, and Reform Implementation—A Summary of the Annual SUFE Macroeconomic Report (2019–2020)
Kevin X.D. Huang, Zixi Liu, Guoqiang Tian
Front. Econ. China. 2020, 15 (1): 1-24.
https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-011-020-0001-9
Twenty nineteen (2019) marked another year of lethargic growth in the Chinese economy amidst escalated internal and external complexities. Internally, the country’s macroeconomic landscape was overcast continuously by fallen consumption growth, plunged growth in manufacturing investment, rapid accumulation of household debt, risen income inequality, and the overhang of local government debt. The nation’s external conditions did not fare any better, with drastically declined growth in imports and exports, continued trade tensions with the US, and weakened external demand. Based on the IAR-CMM model, which takes account of both cyclical and secular factors, the baseline real GDP growth rate is projected to be 6.0% in 2020 (5.9% using more reliable rather than the official data), with a downside risk. Alternative scenario analyses and policy simulations are conducted, in addition to the benchmark forecast, to reflect the influences of various internal and external uncertainties. The findings emanated from these analyses lead us to stress the importance and urgency of deepening reform to achieve competitive neutrality for China’s transformation into a phase with sustainable and high-quality development.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|
|
Interest Rate Volatility Regimes in Selected Asian Countries: A Univariate Markov Switching Analysis
Dicle Ozdemir
Front. Econ. China. 2020, 15 (1): 56-69.
https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-011-020-0003-3
Business cycle dynamics are determined by relatively large volatilities in output, consumption, and investment, which leads to cyclical fluctuations in interest rates. Using the Markov switching model, we model the nominal interest rate movements to explain the volatility regime shifts in a set of selected emerging Asian economies. The estimated results provide significant evidence of regime-dependent means, variances, and probabilities in both stable and volatile regimes in selected countries, confirming the existence of two distinct regimes in nominal interest rate movements. In addition, the smoothed probability results of switching autoregressive model show that the model is capable of capturing the two regimes for the corresponding nominal interest rate behaviors. Besides, the results reveal that the stables regimes have higher durations than the volatile regimes. This study also shows the advantage of Markov switching models over conventional regression models, allowing the identification of different regimes for the cyclical behavior of interest rates.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|
|
A Global-Optimal Portfolio Theory beyond the R-σ Model
Yifan Liu, Shi-Dong Liang
Front. Econ. China. 2020, 15 (1): 124-139.
https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-011-020-0006-4
Deviations from the efficient market hypothesis allow us to benefit from risk premium in financial markets. We propose a three-pronged (R, σ, H) theory to generalize the (R, σ) model and present the formulation of a three-pronged (R, σ, H) model and its Pareto-optimal solution. We define the local-optimal weights (wR, wσ,wH) that construct the triangle of the quasi-optimal investing subspace and further define the centroid or incenter of the triangle as the optimal investing weights that optimize the mean return, risk premium, and volatility risk. By numerically investigating the Chinese stock market, we demonstrate the validity of this formulation method. The proposed theory provides investors of different styles (conservative or aggressive) an efficient way to design portfolios in financial markets to maximize the mean return while minimizing the volatility risk.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|
6 articles
|