Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front Earth Sci    2013, Vol. 7 Issue (3) : 310-319    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0374-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysis for remedial alternatives of unregulated municipal solid waste landfills leachate-contaminated groundwater
Da AN1,2, Yonghai JIANG2, Beidou XI2(), Zhifei MA2, Yu YANG2, Queping YANG2, Mingxiao LI2, Jinbao ZHANG2, Shunguo BAI2, Lei JIANG2
1. School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China
 Download: PDF(700 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

A groundwater flow and solute transport model was developed using Visual Modflow for forecasting contaminant transport and assessing effects of remedial alternatives based on a case study of an unregulated landfill leachate-contaminated groundwater in eastern China. The results showed that arsenic plume was to reach the pumping well in the downstream farmland after eight years, and the longest lateral and longitudinal distance of arsenic plume was to reach 200 m and 260 m, respectively. But the area of high concentration region of arsenic plume was not to obviously increase from eight years to ten years and the plume was to spread to the downstream river and the farmland region after 20 years; while the landfill’s ground was hardened, the plume was not to reach the downstream farmland region after eight years; when the pumping well was installed in the plume downstream and discharge rate was 200 m3/d, the plume was to be effectively restrained; for leakage-proof barriers, it might effectively protect the groundwater of sensitive objects within an extent time range. But for the continuous point source, the plume was still to circle the leakage-proof barrier; when discharge rate of drainage ditches was 170.26 m3/d, the plume was effectively controlled; the comprehensive method combining ground-harden with drainage ditches could get the best effect in controlling contaminant diffusion, and the discharge rate was to be reduced to 111.43 m3/d. Therefore, the comprehensive remedial alternative combining ground-harden with drainage ditch will be recommended for preventing groundwater contamination when leachate leakage has happened in unregulated landfills.

Keywords unregulated landfill      groundwater      numerical simulation      contaminant transport      arsenic      remedial alternative     
Corresponding Author(s): XI Beidou,Email:anda7977@hotmail.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2013
 Cite this article:   
Beidou XI,Zhifei MA,Yu YANG, et al. Analysis for remedial alternatives of unregulated municipal solid waste landfills leachate-contaminated groundwater[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2013, 7(3): 310-319.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-013-0374-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2013/V7/I3/310
Fig.1  Layout sketch of the study site.
Soil seriesStrata nameDepthThickness
1silt0.50-1.900.50-1.90
2mucky silty clay and silt cross layer1.40-6.300.50-5.40
3-1silt3.10-5.701.20-3.40
3-2silt5.20-7.001.40-4.10
3-3silt15.90-16.7010.90-12.10
3-4silt and mucky silty clay cross layer14.80-16.207.80-13.10
3-5silt18.60-14.802.50-5.40
4mucky silty clay40.80-40.802.50-5.40
5-1Silt mixed silty sand43.00-43.002.20-2.20
5-2silty sand51.80-51.808.80-8.80
6silty clay--
Tab.1  Primary geological layers distribution of the study site
Aquifer styleWater supply degreeWater storage rateKx,Ky/(m·d-1)Kz/(m·d-1)Rainfall recharge coefficient
Water-table aquifer0.21 × 10-53.03 × 10-53.03 × 10-50.25
The upper aquitard0.21 × 10-51 × 10-81 × 10-8-
Confined aquifer0.21 × 10-51 × 10-61 × 10-6-
Tab.2  Parameters of the groundwater flow model
Fig.2  Match of the observed and calculated (a) groundwater level and (b) arsenic concentration.
Fig.3  Tendency of arsenic transport in the water-table aquifer for (a) five years, (b) eight years, (c) ten years and (d) 20 years.
Fig.4  Tendency of arsenic transport by hardening ground after eight years.
Fig.5  The remedial effect of the arsenic plume under the pumping well’s discharge rate of 100 md and pumping time of (a) ten years and (b) 20 years, 200 md and pumping time of (c) ten years and (d) 20 years and 300 mdand pumping time of (e) ten years and (f) 20 years.
Fig.6  Tendency of the arsenic transport by installing leakage-proof barrier for (a) ten years and (b) 20 years.
Fig.7  Tendency of the arsenic plume transport by installing the 80m length drainage ditch after 20 years.
Fig.8  Remedial effect of optimized method by combining ground harden with drainage ditches after 20 years.
1 Cheng D H, He J T, Liu Q F, Zhong Z S (2006). A discussion about anthropogenic influence on groundwater in urban areas. Environmental Protection of Xinjiang , 28(4): 22-25 (in Chinese)
2 Dai W H, Yu J Y (2003). Application of curtain grouting anti-seepage technology to Taiziling domestic waste sanitary landfill field. Nonferrous Metals , 55(S1): 113-117 (in Chinese)
3 Ezekwe I C, Odubo E, Chima G N, Onwuchekwa I S (2012). Groundwater occurrence and flow patterns in the Ishiagu mining area of southeastern Nigeria. Frontiers of Earth Science , 6(1): 18-28
doi: 10.1007/s11707-011-0203-0
4 Foose G J, Benson C H, Edil T B (2001). Prediction leakage through composite landfill liners. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng , 127(6): 510-520
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:6(510)
5 Guo M L, Wang J S, Liu L (2009). Comparison of different techniques for control of groundwater pollution in an informal landfill. Water Resources Protection , 25(4): 28-36 (in Chinese)
6 Gurunadha Rao V V S, Dhar R L, Subrahmanyam K (2001). Assessment of contaminant migration in groundwater from an industrial development area, Medak district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Water Air Soil Pollut , 128(3/4): 369-389
doi: 10.1023/A:1010307026457
7 Han H, Li X Y, Yu Y (2011). Preliminary survey and assessment of unregulated landfill sites. Journal of Engineering Geology , 19(5): 771-777 (in Chinese)
8 Hussein M, Schwartz F W (2003). Modeling of flow and contaminant transport in coupled stream-aquifer systems. J Contam Hydrol , 65(1-2): 41-64
doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00229-2 pmid:12855200
9 Kjeldsen P (1993). Groundwater pollution source characterization of an old landfill. J Hydrol (Amst) , 142(1-4): 349-371
doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(93)90018-5
10 Li J P, Li X Q, Wang C Z, Jiang H Z, Shen Z L (2004). Simulative study on landfill site pollution to groundwater. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control , 5(11): 60-64 (in Chinese)
11 Liu M Z, Chen H H (2006). Modeling of transformation and transportation of PCE and TCE by biodegradation in shallow groundwater. Earth Sci Front , 1(13): 155-159 (in Chinese)
12 Lu W X (2003). Approach on boundary condition in numerical simulation of groundwater flows. Journal of Hydraulic , 3: 33-36 (in Chinese)
13 Ma Z F, An D, Jiang Y H, Xi B D, Li D L, Zhang J B, Yang Y (2012). Simulation on contamination forecast and control of groundwater in a certain hazardous waste landfill. Environmental Science , 33(1): 64-70 (in Chinese)
pmid:22452190
14 Rajamanickam R, Nagan S (2010). Groundwater quality modeling of Amaravathi River Basin of Karur district, Tamil Nadu, using Visual Modflow. International Journal of Environmental Sciences , 1(1): 91-108
15 Reinhart D R, McCreanor P T, Townsend T (2002). The bioreactor landfill: its status and future. Waste Manag Res , 20(2): 172-186
doi: 10.1177/0734242X0202000209 pmid:12058823
16 Shen Y Y, Jiang Y Z (2008). Research on disposal method of artificial boundary condition in numerical simulation of groundwater flow. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology , 6(134): 12-15 (in Chinese)
17 Shi W F, Zeng W H, Chen B (2010). Application of Visual MODFLOW to assess the Sewage Plant accident pool leakage impact on groundwater in the Guanting Reservoir area of Beijing. Front Earth Sci China , 4(3): 320-325
doi: 10.1007/s11707-010-0118-1
18 Tsanis I K (2006). Modeling leachate contamination and remediation of groundwater at a landfill site. Water Resour Manage , 20(1): 109-132
doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-4634-4
19 Wang J J (2004). A discussion on compensation for breaking down facilities of water and soil conservation and the methods of preventing erosion. Shandong Hydraulic , 1: 12-13 (in Chinese)
20 Wang T A, McTernan W F (2002). The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty. J Environ Manage , 64(3): 221-235
doi: 10.1006/jema.2001.0470 pmid:12040956
21 Wang Y H, Zhao Y S (2002). Pollution of municipal landfill to groundwater in Beitiantang of Beijing. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology , 29(6): 45-47 (in Chinese)
22 Xie X N (2009). Influence on seepage field in foundation excavation dewatering of underground water blocking structure. Construction Technology , 6(38): 208-210 (in Chinese)
23 Zhang C Y, Ma L N, Zhang S, Li Z H, Yin M Y, Zang Y Z (2007). The application of Visual Modflow to the simulation of groundwater nitrate contamination in Shijiazhuang. Acta Geoscientica Sinica , 28(6): 561-566 (in Chinese)
24 Zhang W J, Lin X Y, Su X S (2010a). Transport and fate modeling of nitrobenzene in groundwater after the Songhua River pollution accident. J Environ Manage , 91(11): 2378-2384
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.025 pmid:20655653
25 Zhang X X, Fang J M (2006). Engineering application of leachate recirculation technology in closure of dumping-type waste landfill site in China. Environmental Sanitation Engineering , 14(6): 17-19 (in Chinese)
26 Zhang Y, He J T, Li P, Wang J J (2010b). Contaminant transport simulation and control of a landfill in Kaifeng City. Ground Water , 32(3): 15-27 (in Chinese)
27 Zheng C, Bennett G D, Andrews C B (1991). Analysis of ground water remedial alternatives at a superfund site. Ground Water , 29(6): 838-848
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.1991.tb00570.x
28 Zheng C M, Bennett G D (2009). Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling, 2nd ed. Beijing: Wiley-Interscience Press (in Chinese)
29 Zheng C M, Bianchi M, Gorelick S M (2011). Lessons learned from 25 years of research at the MADE site. Ground Water , 49(5): 649-662
doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00753.x pmid:20860688
[1] Sergei RASSKAZOV, Aigul ILYASOVA, Sergei BORNYAKOV, Irina CHUVASHOVA, Eugene CHEBYKIN. Responses of a 234U/238U activity ratio in groundwater to earthquakes in the South Baikal Basin, Siberia[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 711-737.
[2] Pingzhi FANG, Deqian ZHENG, Liang LI, Wenyong MA, Shengming TANG. Numerical and experimental study of the aerodynamic characteristics around two-dimensional terrain with different slope angles[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(4): 705-720.
[3] Haizhu HU, Xiaomin MAO, Qing YANG. Development of a groundwater flow and reactive solute transport model in the Yongding River alluvial fan, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(2): 371-384.
[4] Jincui WANG, Yongsheng ZHAO, Jichao SUN, Ying ZHANG, Chunyan LIU. The distribution and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in shallow groundwater from an alluvial-diluvial fan of the Hutuo River in North China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(1): 33-42.
[5] Yintao LU, Xinghua ZANG, Hong YAO, Shichao ZHANG, Shaobin SUN, Fang LIU. Assessment of trace metal contamination in groundwater in a highly urbanizing area of Shenfu New District, Northeast China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(3): 569-582.
[6] Yilei YU, Xianfang SONG, Yinghua ZHANG, Fandong ZHENG, Licai LIU. Impact of reclaimed water in the watercourse of Huai River on groundwater from Chaobai River basin, Northern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 643-659.
[7] Rui XING,Zhiying DING,Sangjie YOU,Haiming XU. Relationship of tropical-cyclone-induced remote precipitation with tropical cyclones and the subtropical high[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 595-606.
[8] Jianmei JIANG,Lin ZHAO,Zhe ZHAI. Estimating the effect of shallow groundwater on diurnal heat transport in a vadose zone[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(3): 513-526.
[9] Suvendu ROY,Abhay Sankar SAHU. Effectiveness of basin morphometry, remote sensing, and applied geosciences on groundwater recharge potential mapping: a comparative study within a small watershed[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(2): 274-291.
[10] Yintao LU,Changyuan TANG,Jianyao CHEN,Hong YAO. Assessment of major ions and heavy metals in groundwater: a case study from Guangzhou and Zhuhai of the Pearl River Delta, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(2): 340-351.
[11] Jianmei JIANG,Lin ZHAO,Yijian ZENG,Zhe ZHAI. Experimental study of the effect of shallow groundwater table on soil thermal properties[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2016, 10(1): 29-37.
[12] Shou MA,Jianchun GUO,Lianchong LI,Leslie George THAM,Yingjie XIA,Chun’an TANG. Influence of pore pressure on tensile fracture growth in rocks: a new explanation based on numerical testing[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(3): 412-426.
[13] Xinwen LI,Yongming SHEN. Numerical simulation of the impacts of water level variation on water age in Dahuofang Reservoir[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2015, 9(2): 209-224.
[14] Lianchong LI,Shaohua LI,Chun’an TANG. Fracture spacing behavior in layered rocks subjected to different driving forces: a numerical study based on fracture infilling process[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(4): 472-489.
[15] Jue YUAN, Li ZENG, Yijun ZHAO, Yihong WU, Ping JI, Bin CHEN. Transport of a volatile contaminant in a free-surface wetland flow[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2014, 8(1): 115-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed