Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (9) : 114    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1535-6
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in typical urban of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau: Characterization, sources and risk assessment
Yaoqian Zhong1, Bingxin Xia1, Jianwu Shi1(), Ping Ning1(), Chaoneng Zhang1, Xinyu Han1, Jiming Hao1,2
1. Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China
2. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(1973 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• The sampling was conducted in city on the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau for one year.

• The groups of PAHs revealed their different environmental fates and migration paths.

• Seasonal biomass burning could affect the concentration by long-distance transport.

• Industrial sources and traffic emissions were the main contributor of PAHs.

• Living in industrial areas or winter had higher health risk by exposure PAHs in PM2.5.

Monthly particle-phase ambient samples collected at six sampling locations in Yuxi, a high-altitude city on the edge of Southeast Asia, were measured for particle-associated PAHs. As trace substances, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are susceptible to the influences of meteorological conditions, emissions, and gas-particulate partitioning and it is challenging job to precise quantify the source and define the transmission path. The daily concentrations of total PM2.5-bound PAHs ranged from 0.65 to 80.76 ng/m3, with an annual mean of 11.94 ng/m3. Here, we found that the concentration of PM2.5-bound PAHs in winter was significantly higher than that in summer, which was mainly due to source and meteorology influence. The increase of fossil combustion and biomass burning in cold season became the main contributors of PAHs, while precipitation and low temperature exacerbated this difference. According to the concentration variation trend of PM2.5-bound PAHs and their relationship with meteorological conditions, a new grouping of PAHs is applied, which suggested that PAHs have different environmental fates and migration paths. A combination of source analysis and trajectory model supported local sources from combustion of fossil fuel and vehicle exhaust contributed to the major portion on PAHs in particle, but on the Indochina Peninsula the large number of pollutants emitted by biomass burning during the fire season would affect the composition of PAHs through long-range transporting. Risk assessment in spatial and temporal variability suggested that citizens living in industrial areas were higher health risk caused by exposure the PM2.5-bound PAHs than that in other regions, and the risk in winter was three times than in summer.

Keywords Particle-associated PAHs      Fine particle      Source appointment      Group analysis      Risk assessment      Biomass burning     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianwu Shi,Ping Ning   
About author:

Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.

Issue Date: 24 January 2022
 Cite this article:   
Yaoqian Zhong,Bingxin Xia,Jianwu Shi, et al. Particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in typical urban of Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau: Characterization, sources and risk assessment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 114.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-022-1535-6
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2022/V16/I9/114
Name Abbr. Lon. & Lat. Height (m) Type Nearby sources
City Environmental Monitoring Station MS 102.54E, 24.36N 1631.7 Urban Traffic & resident
Yuxi No.1 Middle School YX 102.54E, 24.37N 1629.2 Urban Traffic & resident
Dayingjie Town DY 102.50E, 24.34N 1618.6 Suburban Traffic, resident & industry
Yanhe Industrial Park YH 102.50E, 24.25N 1637.2 Suburban Traffic & industry
Hongta Cultural and Sports Center HT 102.54E, 24.34N 1660.5 Urban resident
Dongfeng Reservoir DF 102.57E, 24.37N 1700.2 Control Traffic
Tab.1  Sample sites
Compounds Abbr. TEFs* MW(g/mol )
Naphthalene NA 0.001 128
Acenaphthylene ACL 0.001 152
Acenaphthene AC 0.001 154
Fluorene FL 0.001 166
Phenanthrene PHE 0.001 178
Anthracene AN 0.01 178
Fluoranthene FA 0.001 202
Pyrene PY 0.001 202
Benzo(a)anthracene BaA 0.1 228
Chrysene CHR 0.01 228
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BbFA 0.1 252
Benzo(k)gluoranthene BkFA 0.1 252
Benzo(a)pyrene BaP 1 252
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BghiP 0.01 276
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene DBahA 5 278
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene IP 0.1 288
Tab.2  PAHs (their abbreviations and molecular weight) and toxic equivalent factors (TEFs)
Fig.1  PM2.5-bound PAHs profiles at each station and city average PAHs and other studies: Tianjin (Shi et al 2010), Taiyuan (Li et al 2014), Kunming (Bi et al 2015), Madrid (Barrado et al 2012), Italy (Martellini et al 2012), Malaysia (Khan et al 2015). Diamond shape represents the total PM2.5-bound PAHs concentrations.
Fig.2  Heat map of PAH compounds in PM2.5 with meteorology, pollutants, correlation coefficient calculated from daily PAH concentrations. Each correlation coefficient was calculated using 120 sample pairs. Temp: average daily ambient temperature, Pressure: average daily ambient pressure, MMD: maximum mixed layer height of the day, PM2.5: average daily concentration of PM2.5, PM10: average daily concentration of PM10.
Fig.3  Relationships between Groups of PAHs in PM2.5 and ambient temperature at each group, fitting data with standard deviation. Group A: AC, AN, FA, BaA, CHR, BbFA, BkFA, BaP, DBahA, BghiP, IP. Group B: PHE, PY. Group C: NA, FL, ACL.
Fig.4  Daily concentration of PM2.5-bound PAHs with standard deviation and monthly mass ratio of groups. Daily ambient pressure and temperature during sample period.
PAHs Spring Summer Autumn Winter
FC 1 FC 2 FC 3 FC 1 FC 2 FC 3 FC 1 FC 2 FC 3 FC 1 FC 2 FC 3
NA 0.126 0.447 –0.237 0.015 0.875 0.075 –0.142 0.843 –0.186 0.285 0.56 –0.212
AC 0.031 –0.104 0.69 0.542 0.182 0.322 0.14 0.053 0.704 0.238 –0.028 0.829
FL –0.016 –0.016 0.842 –0.14 0.06 0.885 –0.049 0.007 0.852 –0.02 0.783 0.053
ACL –0.042 0.741 0.353 0.061 0.754 0.322 –0.06 0.648 0.261 –0.177 0.628 0.444
PHE 0.112 0.948 –0.079 0.17 0.890 –0.161 0.677 0.332 0.161 0.394 0.444 –0.104
FA 0.354 0.866 –0.028 0.671 0.561 –0.26 0.837 0.17 0.033 0.832 0.18 –0.255
PY 0.089 0.925 –0.116 0.642 0.519 –0.341 0.882 0.134 0.089 0.816 0.063 –0.111
BaA 0.889 0.237 0.021 0.815 0.354 –0.217 0.942 –0.132 0.043 0.938 0.052 –0.015
CHR 0.786 0.432 0.046 0.882 0.221 –0.178 0.938 –0.19 0.111 0.937 0.109 0.153
BbFA 0.975 0.143 0.043 0.959 0.12 –0.066 0.944 –0.204 0.076 0.965 0.094 0.08
BkFA 0.979 0.108 0.035 0.966 0.08 –0.09 0.964 –0.182 0.043 0.971 0.115 0.083
BaP 0.974 0.102 0.124 0.949 0.14 –0.036 0.954 –0.194 0.004 0.972 0.082 0.097
BghiP 0.945 0.012 0.106 0.937 –0.029 –0.03 0.874 –0.114 –0.065 0.927 0.061 0.155
IP 0.913 0.05 0.044 0.920 –0.043 0.012 0.953 –0.147 0.005 0.904 0.06 0.241
Variance (%) 44.62 25.37 10.15 50.92 21.18 9.29 58.2 10.65 9.9 56.7 11.48 8.21
Cumulative (%) 44.62 69.99 80.14 50.92 72.1 81.39 58.2 68.85 78.75 56.7 68.19 76.39
Tab.3  PCA seasonal analysis of PM2.5-bound BaPeq
Fig.5  120-h backward trajectory cluster analysis from January to April. Overlay of the PM2.5 grid emission inventory on the Indochina Peninsula by spatial resolution (0.05º × 0.05º).
Fig.6  Temporal variation in the concentration and composition of PM2.5-bound BaPeq.
Fig.7  Toxic equivalent concentrations of PM2.5-bound BaPeq, calculated from the daily concentrations of compounds for stations and seasons.
1 Dayana Milena Agudelo-Castañeda, Elba Calesso Teixeira (2014). Seasonal changes, identification and source apportionment of PAH in PM1.0. Atmospheric Environment, 96: 186–200
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.030
2 ATSDR (2009). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Case Studies in Environmental Medicine. Toxicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
3 K R Baker, S N Koplitz, K M Foley, L Avey, A Hawkins (2019). Characterizing grassland fire activity in the Flint Hills region and air quality using satellite and routine surface monitor data. Science of the Total Environment, 659: 1555–1566
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.427 pmid: 31096365
4 B A M Bandowe, H Meusel, R J Huang, K Ho, J Cao, T Hoffmann, W Wilcke (2014). PM2.5-bound oxygenated PAHs, nitro-PAHs and parent-PAHs from the atmosphere of a Chinese megacity: Seasonal variation, sources and cancer risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 473– 474: 77–87
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.108 pmid: 24361780
5 A I Barrado, S Garcia, E Barrado, R M Perez (2012). PM2.5-bound PAHs and hydroxy-PAHs in atmospheric aerosol samples: Correlations with season and with physical and chemical factors. Atmospheric Environment, 49(3): 224–232
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.11.056
6 BCS (2019). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: Statistics Bureau of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese)
7 L Bi, J Hao, P Ning, J Shi, Z Shi, X Xu (2015). Characteristics and sources apportionment of PM2.5-bound PAHs in Kunming. China. Environmental Sciences (Ruse), 35(3): 659–667
8 C Bourotte, M C Forti, S Taniguchi, M C Bícego, P A Lotufo (2005). A wintertime study of PAHs in fine and coarse aerosols in Sáo Paulo City, Brazil. Atmospheric Environment, 39(21): 3799–3811
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.02.054
9 N Domínguez-Morueco, M Schuhmacher, J Sierra, M Nadal, J L Domingo (2016). Assessment of PAH loss in passive air samplers by the effect of temperature. Atmospheric Pollution Research, 7(1): 142–146
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2015.08.005
10 R Draxler, B Stunder, G Rolph, A Stein, A Taylor (2014). HYSPLIT4 User’s Guide. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Environmental Research Laboratories, Air Resources Laboratory.
11 I Durre, R S Vose, D B Wuertz (2008). Robust automated quality assurance of radiosonde temperatures. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 47(8): 2081–2095
https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1809.1
12 A Dvorská, G Lammel, J Klánová (2011). Use of diagnostic ratios for studying source apportionment and reactivity of ambient polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons over central Europe. Atmospheric Environment, 45(2): 420–427
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.063
13 G C Fang, Y S Wu, J C Chen, C N Chang, T T Ho (2006). Characteristic of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations and source identification for fine and coarse particulates at Taichung Harbor near Taiwan Strait during 2004–2005. Science of the Total Environment, 366(2–3): 729–738
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.075 pmid: 16343600
14 GB3095-2012 (2012). Ambient air quality standard. Standard.Beijing: Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese)
15 C Geng, J Chen, X Yang, L Ren, B Yin, X Liu, Z Bai (2014). Emission factors of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from domestic coal combustion in China. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(1): 160–166
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(13)60393-9 pmid: 24649702
16 C W Götz, M Scheringer, M MacLeod, F Wegmann, K Hungerbühler. (2008). Regional differences in gas–particle partitioning and deposition of semivolatile organic compounds on a global scale. Atmospheric Environment, 42(3): 554–567
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.08.033
17 H Guo, S C Lee, K F Ho, X M Wang, S C Zou (2003). Particle-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air of Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 37(38): 5307–5317
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.09.011
18 R M Harrison, D J T Smith, L Luhana (1996). Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK. Environmental Science & Technology, 30(3): 825–832
https://doi.org/10.1021/es950252d
19 G C Holzworth (1964). Estimates of mean maximum mixing depths in the contiguous united states. Monthly Weather Review, 92(5): 235–242
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1964)092<0235:EOMMMD>2.3.CO;2
20 IARC (2008). Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Human: Air Pollution, Part 1. In: Some Non-Heterocyclic PAHs and Related Industrial Exposures, Vol.92. Washington, DC: World Health Organization International Agency for Research on Cancer
21 G Karavalakis, G Fontaras, D Ampatzoglou, M Kousoulidou, S Stournas, Z Samaras, E Bakeas (2010). Effects of low concentration biodiesel blends application on modern passenger cars. Part 3: Impact on PAH, nitro-PAH, and oxy-PAH emissions. Environmental Pollution, 158(5): 1584–1594
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.017 pmid: 20083330
22 K Kashiwa, M Arai, Y Kobayashi (2020). Oxygen effect on PAH and PM formation in low temperature benzene pyrolysis. Fuel, 262:116–429
23 I G Kavouras, P Koutrakis, M Tsapakis, E Lagoudaki, E G Stephanou, D Von Baer, P Oyola (2001). Source apportionment of urban particulate aliphatic and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) using multivariate methods. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(11): 2288–2294
https://doi.org/10.1021/es001540z pmid: 11414034
24 N Khalili, P Scheff, T Holsen (1995). PAH source fingerprints for coke ovens, diesel and gasoline engines, highway tunnels, and wood combustion emissions. Atmospheric Environment, 29(4): 533–542
https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)00275-P
25 M F Khan, M T Latif, C H Lim, N Amil, S A Jaafar, D Dominick, M S Mohd Nadzir, M Sahani, N M Tahir (2015). Seasonal effect and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5. Atmospheric Environment, 106(178): 178–190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.077
26 D J Kielhorn, U Wahnschaffe, I Mangelsdorf (2003). Selected nitro- and nitro- oxy- polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environmental Health Criteria: 229
27 R K Larsen 3rd, J E Baker (2003). Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: A comparison of three methods. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(9): 1873–1881
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0206184 pmid: 12775060
28 A R Lea-Langton, A B Ross, K D Bartle, G E Andrews, J M Jones, H Li, M Pourkashanian, A Williams. (2013). Low temperature PAH formation in diesel combustion. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 103: 119–125
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.10.009
29 J Li, G Zhang, S Qi (2004). Characteristics and seasonal variations and influence factors on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in Guangzhou City. Environmental Sciences, 25(3): 7–13
30 R J Li, X J Kou, H Geng, C Dong, Z W Cai (2014). Pollution characteristics of ambient PM2.5-bound PAHs and NPAHs in a typical winter time period in Taiyuan. Chinese Chemical Letters, 25(5): 663–666
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2014.03.032
31 W Li, Y Peng, J Shi, W Qiu, J Wang, Z Bai (2011). Particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban northeast region of China: Profiles, distributions and sources. Atmospheric Environment, 45(40): 7664–7671
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.004
32 Z Li, E N Porter, A Sjodin, L L Needham, S Lee, A G Russell, J A Mulholland (2009). Characterization of PM2.5−bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atlantad-seasonal variations at urban, suburban, and rural ambient air monitoring sites. Atmospheric Environment, 43(27): 4187–4193
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.031
33 L Ma, B Li, Y Liu, X Sun, D Fu, S Sun, S Thapa, J Geng, H Qi, A Zhang, C Tian (2020a). Characterization, sources and risk assessment of PM2.5-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nitrated PAHs (NPAHs) in Harbin, a cold city in northern China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264: 118296
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121673
34 W Ma, L Liu, H Jia, M Yang, Y Li (2018). PAHs in Chinese atmosphere part i: Concentration, source and temperature dependence. Atmospheric Environment, 173: 330–337
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.029
35 W L Ma, F J Zhu, P T Hu, L N Qiao, Y F Li (2020b). Gas/particle partitioning of PAHs based on equilibrium-state model and steady-state model. Science of the Total Environment, 706: 136029
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136029 pmid: 31855629
36 T Martellini, M Giannoni, L Lepri, A Katsoyiannis, A Cincinelli (2012). One year intensive PM2.5 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons monitoring in the area of Tuscany, Italy. Concentrations, source understanding and implications. Environmental Pollution, 164(1): 252–258
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.040 pmid: 22377904
37 P Masclet, G Mouvier, K Nikolaou (1986). Relative decay index and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Atmospheric Environment, 20(3): 439–446
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90083-1
38 A Mastral, M Callen, J Lopez, R Murillo, T Garcıa, M Navarro (2003). Critical review on atmospheric PAH: Assessment of reported data in the Mediterranean Basin. Fuel Processing Technology, 80(2): 183–193
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00249-7
39 A M Mastral, M Call’en, R Murillo (1996). Assessment of PAH emissions as a function of coal combustion variables. Fuel, 75(13): 1533–1536
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(96)00120-2
40 J L Mumford, X Li, F Hu, X B Lu, J C Chuang (1995). Human exposure and dosimetry of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine from Xuan Wei, China with high lung cancer mortality associated with exposure to unvented coal smoke. Carcinogenesis, 16(12): 3031–3036
https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/16.12.3031 pmid: 8603481
41 I C T Nisbet, P K LaGoy (1992). Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP, 16(3): 290–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-X pmid: 1293646
42 N T Kim Oanh, D A Permadi, P K Hopke, K R Smith, N P Dong, A N Dang. (2018). Annual emissions of air toxics emitted from crop residue open burning in southeast Asia over the period of 2010–2015. Atmospheric Environment, 187: 163–173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.061
43 B Panther, M Hooper, N Tapper (1999). A comparison of air particulate matter and associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in some tropical and temperate urban environments. Atmospheric Environment, 33(24-25): 4087–4099
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00150-8
44 S Ramachandran, T A Rajesh, S Kedia (2019). Influence of relative humidity, mixed layer height, and mesoscale vertical-velocity variations on column and surface aerosol characteristics over an urban region. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 170(1): 161–181
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-018-0384-0
45 K Ravindra, L Bencs, E Wauters, J de Hoog, F Deutsch, E Roekens, N Bleux, P Berghmans, R Van Grieken. (2006). Seasonal and site-specific variation in vapour and aerosol phase PAHs over Flanders (Belgium) and their relation with anthropogenic activities. Atmospheric Environment, 40(4): 771–785
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.10.011
46 J Ringuet, A Albinet, E Leoz-Garziandia, H Budzinski, E Villenave (2012). Reactivity of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAHs, NPAHs and OPAHs) adsorbed on natural aerosol particles exposed to atmospheric oxidants. Atmospheric Environment, 61: 15–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.025
47 W F Rogge, L M Hildemann, M A Mazurek, G R Cass, B R T Simoneit (1993). Sources of fine organic aerosol. 2. Non-catalyst and catalyst-equipped automobiles and heavy duty diesel trucks. Environmental Science & Technology, 27(4): 636–651
https://doi.org/10.1021/es00041a007
48 N E Sánchez, Á Millera, R Bilbao, M U Alzueta (2013). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), soot and light gases formed in the pyrolysis of acetylene at different temperatures: Effect of fuel concentration. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 103: 126–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.10.027
49 O Sevimoğlu , W F Rogge (2019). Seasonal variations of PM10–trace elements, PAHs and levoglucosan: Rural sugarcane growing area versus coastal urban area in southeastern Florida, USA. Part Ⅱ: Elemental concentrations. Particuology, 46: 99–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2019.05.001
50 J Shi, Y Peng, W Li, W Qiu, Z Bai, S Kong, T Jin (2010). Characterization and source identification of PM10-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air of Tianjin, China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 10(5): 507–518
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2010.06.0050
51 M D R Sienra, N G Rosazza, M Préndez (2005). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their molecular diagnostic ratios in urban atmospheric respirable particulate matter. Atmospheric Research, 75(4): 267–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.01.003
52 M F Simcik, S J Eisenreich, P J Lioy (1999). Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and lake Michigan. Atmospheric Environment, 33(30): 5071–5079
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00233-2
53 H Tao, HY Wang, W Ren, K CLin (2019). Kinetic mechanism for modeling the temperature effect on PAH formation in pyrolysis of acetylene. Fuel, 255: 115, 796
54 E C Teixeira, D M Agudelo-Castañeda, J M G Fachel, K A Leal, K O Garcia, F Wiegand. (2012). Source identification and seasonal variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons associated with atmospheric fine and coarse particles in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Atmospheric Research, 118: 390–403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.07.004
55 S Tomaz, P Shahpoury, J L Jaffrezo, G Lammel, E Perraudin, E Villenave, A Albinet (2016). One-year study of polycyclic aromatic compounds at an urban site in Grenoble (France): Seasonal variations, gas/particle partitioning and cancer risk estimation. Science of the Total Environment, 565: 1071–1083
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.137 pmid: 27261422
56 USEPA (1999). Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air: determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in ambient air using gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS). method to –13a. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Government Printing Office
57 A Valavanidis, K Fiotakis, T Vlahogianni, E B Bakeas, S Triantafillaki, V Paraskevopoulou, M Dassenakis (2006). Characterization of atmospheric particulates, particle-bound transition metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of urban air in the centre of Athens (Greece). Chemosphere, 65(5): 760–768
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.052 pmid: 16674985
58 QT Vuong, PQ Thang, TNT Nguyen, T Ohura, SD Choi (2020). Seasonal variation and gas/particle partitioning of atmospheric halogenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the effects of meteorological conditions in Ulsan, South Korea. Environmental Pollution, 263:114–592
59 J Wang, N B Geng, Y F Xu, W D Zhang, X Y Tang, R Q Zhang (2014). PAHs in PM2.5 in Zhengzhou: Concentration, carcinogenic risk analysis, and source apportionment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(11): 7461–7473
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3940-1 pmid: 25060861
60 Y Wang, M Bao, Y Zhang, F Tan, H Zhao, Q Zhang, Q Li (2020). Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the atmosphere and soils of Dalian, China: Source, urban-rural gradient, and air-soil exchange. Chemosphere, 244: 125–518
61 C Wiedinmyer, S K Akagi, R J Yokelson, L K Emmons, J A Al-Saadi, J J Orlando, A J Soja. (2011). The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN): A high resolution global model to estimate the emissions from open burning. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3): 625–641
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-625-2011
62 K Yang, Y Huang, G Zhao, Y Lei, K Wang (2010). The expression of PAH-DNA adducts in lung tissues of Xuanwei female lung cancer patients. The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology. 9: 497–501
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-010-0669-3 pmid: 20677652
[1] FSE-21132-OF-ZYQ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Wenwen Gong, Yu Xing, Lihua Han, Anxiang Lu, Han Qu, Li Xu. Occurrence and distribution of micro- and mesoplastics in the high-latitude nature reserve, northern China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 113-.
[2] Liang Cui, Ji Li, Xiangyun Gao, Biao Tian, Jiawen Zhang, Xiaonan Wang, Zhengtao Liu. Human health ambient water quality criteria for 13 heavy metals and health risk assessment in Taihu Lake[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 41-.
[3] Hua Long, Yang Liao, Changhao Cui, Meijia Liu, Zeiwei Liu, Li Li, Wenzheng Hu, Dahai Yan. Assessment of popular techniques for co-processing municipal solid waste in Chinese cement kilns[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 51-.
[4] Yuan Cheng, Qinqin Yu, Jiumeng Liu, Youwen Sun, Linlin Liang, Zhenyu Du, Guannan Geng, Wanli Ma, Hong Qi, Qiang Zhang, Kebin He. Formation of secondary inorganic aerosol in a frigid urban atmosphere[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(2): 18-.
[5] Yanfeng Yang, Ruina Zhang, Ziyang Lou. Bioaerosol emissions variations in large-scale landfill region and their health risk impacts[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 158-.
[6] Yuan Meng, Weiyi Liu, Heidelore Fiedler, Jinlan Zhang, Xinrui Wei, Xiaohui Liu, Meng Peng, Tingting Zhang. Fate and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in reclaimed water production processes[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 104-.
[7] Yunping Han, Lin Li, Ying Wang, Jiawei Ma, Pengyu Li, Chao Han, Junxin Liu. Composition, dispersion, and health risks of bioaerosols in wastewater treatment plants: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 38-.
[8] Kehui Liu, Xiaolu Liang, Chunming Li, Fangming Yu, Yi Li. Nutrient status and pollution levels in five areas around a manganese mine in southern China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 100-.
[9] Lei Zheng, Xingbao Gao, Wei Wang, Zifu Li, Lingling Zhang, Shikun Cheng. Utilization of MSWI fly ash as partial cement or sand substitute with focus on cementing efficiency and health risk assessment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 5-.
[10] Bao Yu, Guodi Zheng, Xuedong Wang, Min Wang, Tongbin Chen. Biodegradation of triclosan and triclocarban in sewage sludge during composting under three ventilation strategies[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 41-.
[11] Xinshu Jiang, Yingxi Qu, Liquan Liu, Yuan He, Wenchao Li, Jun Huang, Hongwei Yang, Gang Yu. PPCPs in a drinking water treatment plant in the Yangtze River Delta of China: Occurrence, removal and risk assessment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 27-.
[12] Huang Huang, Jie Wu, Jian Ye, Tingjin Ye, Jia Deng, Yongmei Liang, Wei Liu. Occurrence, removal, and environmental risks of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants in south China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 7-.
[13] Sheng Huang, Xin Zhao, Yanqiu Sun, Jianli Ma, Xiaofeng Gao, Tian Xie, Dongsheng Xu, Yi Yu, Youcai Zhao. Pollution of hazardous substances in industrial construction and demolition wastes and their multi-path risk within an abandoned pesticide manufacturing plant[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 12-.
[14] Wenyan LIANG,Lili SUI,Yuan ZHAO,Feizhen LI,Lijun LIU,Di XIE. Ecotoxicity assessment of soil irrigated with domestic wastewater using different extractions[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(4): 685-693.
[15] XIA Tianxiang,JIANG Lin,JIA Xiaoyang,ZHONG Maosheng,LIANG Jing. Application of probabilistic risk assessment at a coking plant site contaminated by Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons[J]. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2014, 8(3): 441-450.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed