Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (3) : 32    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1632-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Influence of H2S and NH3 on biogas dry reforming using Ni catalyst: a study on single and synergetic effect
Yuchen Gao1(), Jianguo Jiang2, Yuan Meng2, Tongyao Ju2, Siyu Han2
1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tiangong University, Tianjin 300387, China
2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(17084 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● NH3 in biogas had a slight inhibitory effect on dry reforming.

● Coexistence of H2S and NH3 led to faster decline of biogas conversion.

● Regeneration was effective for catalysts deactivated under synergetic effect.

Biogas is a renewable biomass energy source mainly composed of CH4 and CO2. Dry reforming is a promising technology for the high-value utilization of biogas. Some impurity gases in biogas can not be completely removed after pretreatment, which may affect the performance of dry reforming. In this study, the influence of typical impurities H2S and NH3 on dry reforming was studied using Ni/MgO catalyst. The results showed that low concentration of H2S in biogas could cause serious deactivation of catalyst. Characterization results including EDS, XPS and TOF-SIMS confirmed the adsorption of sulfur on the catalyst surface, which was the cause of catalyst poisoning. We used air calcination method to regenerate the sulfur-poisoned catalysts and found that the regeneration temperature higher than 500 °C could help catalyst recover the original activity. NH3 in the concentration range of 50–10000 ppm showed a slight inhibitory effect on biogas dry reforming. The decline rate of biogas conversion efficiency increased with the increase of NH3 concentration. This was related to the reduction of oxygen activity on catalyst surface caused by NH3. The synergetic effect of H2S and NH3 in biogas was investigated. The results showed that biogas conversion decreased faster under the coexistence of H2S and NH3 than under the effect of H2S alone, so as the surface oxygen activity of catalyst. Air calcination regeneration could also recover the activity of the deactivated catalyst under the synergetic effect of H2S and NH3.

Keywords Biogas      Dry reforming      Sulfur poisoning      Ammonia      Synergetic effect      Hydrogen     
Corresponding Author(s): Yuchen Gao   
Issue Date: 27 October 2022
 Cite this article:   
Yuchen Gao,Jianguo Jiang,Yuan Meng, et al. Influence of H2S and NH3 on biogas dry reforming using Ni catalyst: a study on single and synergetic effect[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 32.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-023-1632-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2023/V17/I3/32
Fig.1  CH4 and CO2 conversion efficiencies with the presence of H2S. (a) 700 °C CH4, (b) 700 °C CO2, (c) 750 °C CH4, (d) 750 °C CO2, (e) 800 °C CH4, (f) 800 °C CO2, GHSV=15000 mL/(gcat·h).
Temperature (°C)H2S (ppm)H2S/H2θs
70019.13×10?60.88
54.72×10?41.05
101.51×10?31.09
200.011.17
500.491.32
75015.03×10?60.83
55.08×10?31.13
107.02×10?31.14
200.011.16
500.041.21
80014.60×10?50.90
51.02×10?31.04
102.57×10?31.08
205.64×10?31.12
500.011.15
Tab.1  H2S/H2 and sulfur coverage values after 12-h reaction under different temperatures and H2S concentrations
Fig.2  TOF-SIMS sulfur distribution (a) horizontal, (b) vertical, and (c) XPS (S 2p) results for spent catalyst. (12 h, under 750 °C, 20 ppm H2S).
Concentration of H2S (ppm)Area of peak 1Area of peak 2Total areaRatio of area 1 and 2r2
5654.9487.21142.11.30.5719
10482.2863.71345.90.60.5427
201029.91762.12792.00.60.8099
502696.42334.95031.31.20.9378
Tab.2  XPS peak calculation data of sulfur after reaction for 12 h under different concentrations of H2S at 750 °C
Fig.3  Conversion efficiencies after catalyst regeneration. (a) 700 °C, (b) 750 °C, (c) 800 °C, 20 ppm H2S, GHSV=15000 mL/(gcat·h).
Fig.4  CH4 (a) and CO2 (b) conversions at 750 °C with catalysts regenerated under different temperatures.
Fig.5  XPS spectrums (S 2p) of regenerated and spent catalysts.
Fig.6  CH4 and CO2 conversion efficiencies with the presence of NH3. (a) 700 °C CH4, (b) 700 °C CO2, (c) 750 °C CH4, (d) 750 °C CO2, (e) 800 °C CH4, (f) 800 °C CO2, GHSV=15000 mL/(gcat·h).
NH3 concentration (ppm)Area of peak 1Area of peak 2Total areaOα/Oβ
072191.655707.7127899.30.77
5085012.748757.6133770.30.57
10073643.235397.3109040.50.48
50083379.541861.4125240.90.50
200095023.258586.2153609.40.62
1000075485.439911.5115396.90.53
Tab.3  XPS (O 1s) analysis parameters of spent catalysts with different concentrations of NH3
Fig.7  XPS spectrums (O 1s) of spent catalysts with the presence of NH3 (after 12 h, 750 °C).
Fig.8  CH4 and CO2 conversion efficiencies with the presence of H2S and NH3. (a) 700 °C CH4, (b) 700 °C CO2, (c) 750 °C CH4, (d) 750 °C CO2, (e) 800 °C CH4, (f) 800 °C CO2, GHSV=15000 mL/(gcat·h).
Fig.9  (a) Biogas conversion at 750 °C of the catalyst after regeneration, (b) XPS spectrums (O 1s) of spent catalyst (deactivated under 1 ppm H2S + 5000 ppm NH3) and regenerated catalyst.
1 B Abdullah , N A Abd Ghani , D V N Vo . (2017). Recent advances in dry reforming of methane over Ni-based catalysts. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162: 170–185
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.176
2 I Alstrup , J R Rostrup-Nielsen , S Røen . (1981). High temperature hydrogen sulfide chemisorption on nickel catalysts. Applied Catalysis, 1(5): 303–314
https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-9834(81)80036-X
3 Z Bian , I Y Suryawinata , S Kawi . (2016). Highly carbon resistant multi core-shell catalyst derived from Ni-Mg phyllosilicate nanotubes@silica for dry reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 195: 1–8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.05.001
4 S A Chattanathan , S Adhikari , M McVey , O Fasina . (2014). Hydrogen production from biogas reforming and the effect of H2S on CH4 conversion. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 39(35): 19905–19911
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.09.162
5 R Y Chein , Y C Chen , W H Chen . (2021). Experimental study on sulfur deactivation and regeneration of Ni-based catalyst in dry reforming of biogas. Catalysts, 11: 777
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11070777
6 X Chen , J Jiang , F Yan , K Li , S Tian , Y Gao , H Zhou . (2017). Dry reforming of model biogas on a Ni/SiO2 catalyst: overall performance and mechanisms of sulfur poisoning and regeneration. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5(11): 10248–10257
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02251
7 N H Elsayed , A Elwell , B Joseph , J N Kuhn . (2017). Effect of silicon poisoning on catalytic dry reforming of simulated biogas. Applied Catalysis A: General, 538: 157–164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2017.03.024
8 E Finocchio , T Montanari , G Garuti , C Pistarino , F Federici , M Cugino , G Busca . (2009). Purification of biogases from siloxanes by adsorption: on the regenerability of activated carbon sorbents. Energy & Fuels, 23(8): 4156–4159
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef900356n
9 Y Gao , A Aihemaiti , J Jiang , Y Meng , T Ju , S Han , X Chen , J Liu . (2020). Inspection over carbon deposition features of various nickel catalysts during simulated biogas dry reforming. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260: 120944
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120944
10 Y Gao , J Jiang , Y Meng , F Yan , A Aihemaiti . (2018). A review of recent developments in hydrogen production via biogas dry reforming. Energy Conversion and Management, 171: 133–155
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.05.083
11 A D Hernandez , N Kaisalo , P Simell , M Scarsella . (2019). Effect of H2S and thiophene on the steam reforming activity of nickel andrhodium catalysts in a simulated coke oven gas stream. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 258: 117977
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117977
12 Z Hou , P Chen , H Fang , X Zheng , T Yashima . (2006). Production of synthesis gas via methane reforming with CO2 on noble metals and small amount of noble-(Rh-) promoted Ni catalysts. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 31(5): 555–561
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.06.010
13 E Kurkela, J Laatikainen-Luntama, P Ståhlberg, Moilanen A (1996). Pressurised fluidised-bed gasification experiments with biomass, peat and coal at VTT in 1991–1994: Part 3. Gasification of Danish wheat straw and coal. Espoo: VTT Publications
14 T S Li , M Xu , C Gao , B Wang , X Liu , B Li , W G Wang . (2014). Investigation into the effects of sulfur on syngas reforming inside a solid oxide fuel cell. Journal of Power Sources, 258: 1–4
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.02.041
15 X P Liu , J K Yan , J Mao , D D He , S Yang , Y Mei , Y M Luo . (2021). Inhibitor, co-catalyst, or intermetallic promoter? Probing the sulfur-tolerance of MoOx surface decoration on Ni/SiO2 during methane dry reforming. Applied Surface Science, 548: 149231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.149231
16 G Mancino , S Cimino , L Lisi . (2016). Sulphur poisoning of alumina supported Rh catalyst during dry reforming of methane. Catalysis Today, 277: 126–132
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.035
17 C Marschelke , A Fery , A Synytska . (2020). Janus particles: from concepts to environmentally friendly materials and sustainable applications. Colloid & Polymer Science, 298(7): 841–865
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00396-020-04601-y
18 D Pakhare , J Spivey . (2014). A review of dry (CO2) reforming of methane over noble metal catalysts. Chemical Society Reviews, 43(22): 7813–7837
https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CS60395D pmid: 24504089
19 V Pawar , S Appari , D S Monder , V M Janardhanan . (2017). Study of the combined deactivation due to sulfur poisoning and carbon deposition during biogas dry reforming on supported Ni catalyst. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 56(30): 8448–8455
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b01662
20 S Rasi , J Lantela , J Rintala . (2011). Trace compounds affecting biogas energy utilization: a review. Energy Conversion and Management, 52(12): 3369–3375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.07.005
21 R P W J Struis, T J Schildhauer, I Czekaj, M Janousch, S M A Biollaz, C Ludwig (2009). Sulphur poisoning of Ni catalysts in the SNG production from biomass: a TPO/XPS/XAS study. Applied Catalysis A:General, 362(1–2): 121–128
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.04.030
22 S A Theofanidis , J A Z Pieterse , H Poelman , A Longo , M K Sabbe , M Virginie , C Detavernier , G B Marin , V V Galvita . (2020). Effect of Rh in Ni-based catalysts on sulfur impurities during methane reforming. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 267: 118691
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118691
23 Y Xu , H Gong , X Dai . (2021). High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: achievements and perspectives. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(4): 71
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1364-4
24 X Yan , T Hu , P Liu , S Li , B Zhao , Q Zhang , W Jiao , S Chen , P Wang , J Lu , L Fan , X Deng , Y X Pan . (2019). Highly efficient and stable Ni/CeO2-SiO2 catalyst for dry reforming of methane: effect of interfacial structure of Ni/CeO2 on SiO2. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 246: 221–231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.070
25 I V Yentekakis , P Panagiotopoulou , G Artemakis . (2021). A review of recent efforts to promote dry reforming of methane (DRM) to syngas production via bimetallic catalyst formulations. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 296: 120210
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120210
26 T Y Yeo , J Ashok , S Kawi . (2019). Recent developments in sulphur-resilient catalytic systems for syngas production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 100: 52–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.016
27 J Zhang, F Li (2015). Coke-resistant Ni@SiO2 catalyst for dry reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 176–177: 513–521
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.04.039
[1] FSE-22076-OF-GYC_suppl_1 Download
[1] Tingting Zhu, Zhongxian Su, Wenxia Lai, Jiazeng Ding, Yufen Wang, Yingxin Zhao, Yiwen Liu. Evaluating the impact of sulfamethoxazole on hydrogen production during dark anaerobic sludge fermentation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 7-.
[2] Shaoping Luo, Yi Peng, Ying Liu, Yongzhen Peng. Research progress and prospects of complete ammonia oxidizing bacteria in wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(9): 123-.
[3] Yang Yang, Qi Zhang, Baiyang Chen, Liangchen Long, Guan Zhang. Toward better understanding vacuum ultraviolet–iodide induced photolysis via hydrogen peroxide formation, iodine species change, and difluoroacetic acid degradation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 55-.
[4] Shaoyi Xu, Xiaolong Wu, Huijie Lu. Overlooked nitrogen-cycling microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 133-.
[5] Yukun Zhang, Shuying Wang, Shengbo Gu, Liang Zhang, Yijun Dong, Lei Jiang, Wei Fan, Yongzhen Peng. The combined effects of biomass and temperature on maximum specific ammonia oxidation rate in domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 123-.
[6] Noshan Bhattarai, Shuxiao Wang, Yuepeng Pan, Qingcheng Xu, Yanlin Zhang, Yunhua Chang, Yunting Fang. δ15N-stable isotope analysis of NHx: An overview on analytical measurements, source sampling and its source apportionment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 126-.
[7] Zeshen Tian, Bo Wang, Yuyang Li, Bo Shen, Fengjuan Li, Xianghua Wen. Enhancement on the ammonia oxidation capacity of ammonia-oxidizing archaeon originated from wastewater: Utilizing low-density static magnetic field[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 81-.
[8] Ling Wang, Chunxue Yang, Sangeetha Thangavel, Zechong Guo, Chuan Chen, Aijie Wang, Wenzong Liu. Enhanced hydrogen production in microbial electrolysis through strategies of carbon recovery from alkaline/thermal treated sludge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 56-.
[9] Yang Li, Yixin Zhang, Guangshen Xia, Juhong Zhan, Gang Yu, Yujue Wang. Evaluation of the technoeconomic feasibility of electrochemical hydrogen peroxide production for decentralized water treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 1-.
[10] Kuo Fang, Fei Peng, Hui Gong, Huanzhen Zhang, Kaijun Wang. Ammonia removal from low-strength municipal wastewater by powdered resin combined with simultaneous recovery as struvite[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 8-.
[11] Alisa Salimova, Jian’e Zuo, Fenglin Liu, Yajiao Wang, Sike Wang, Konstantin Verichev. Ammonia and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff using cash crop waste-derived biochars[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 48-.
[12] Madhavaraj Lavanya, Ho-Dong Lim, Kong-Min Kim, Dae-Hyuk Kim, Balasubramani Ravindran, Gui Hwan Han. A novel strategy for gas mitigation during swine manure odour treatment using seaweed and a microbial consortium[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 53-.
[13] Shihao Sun, Tipei Jia, Kaiqi Chen, Yongzhen Peng, Liang Zhang. Simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulfide and volatile organic sulfur compounds in off-gas mixture from a wastewater treatment plant using a two-stage bio-trickling filter system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 60-.
[14] Chunhong Chen, Hong Liang, Dawen Gao. Community diversity and distribution of ammonia-oxidizing archaea in marsh wetlands in the black soil zone in North-east China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 58-.
[15] Yao Zhang, Yayi Wang, Yuan Yan, Haicheng Han, Min Wu. Characterization of CANON reactor performance and microbial community shifts with elevated COD/N ratios under a continuous aeration mode[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 7-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed