Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (6) : 70    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1830-5
Your personal choices in transportation and food are important for lowering carbon emissions
Bruce Logan1(), Fang Zhang2, Wulin Yang3, Le Shi4
1. Institute of Energy and the Environment, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
2. School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3. College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
4. College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
 Download: PDF(1663 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Express energy use and carbon emissions in understandable numbers.

● Normalize energy use to daily food energy using “D”.

● Ratio carbon emissions to those from daily food using “C”.

● Based on the entire country China emitted 22.5 C and the US emitted 43.9 C (2022).

● Personal choices such as the car you drive, food you eat, and home heating lower C.

There is a global need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to limit the extent of climate change. A better understanding of how our own activities and lifestyle influence our energy use and carbon emissions can help us enable changes in activities that can lead to reductions in carbon emissions. Here we discuss an approach based on examining carbon emissions from the perspective of the unit C, where 1 C is the CO2 from food a person would on average eat every day. This approach shows that total CO2 emissions in China, normalized by the population, is 22.5 C while carbon emissions for a person in the US is 43.9 C. A better appreciation of our own energy use can be obtained by calculating carbon emissions from our own activities in units of C, for example for driving a car gasoline or electric vehicle a certain number of kilometers, using electricity for our homes, and eating different foods. With this information, we can see how our carbon emissions compare to national averages in different countries and make decisions that could lower our personal CO2 emissions.

Keywords Carbon dioxide      Climate change      Daily energy      Greenhouse gas     
Corresponding Author(s): Bruce Logan   
Issue Date: 08 April 2024
 Cite this article:   
Bruce Logan,Fang Zhang,Wulin Yang, et al. Your personal choices in transportation and food are important for lowering carbon emissions[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(6): 70.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1830-5
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I6/70
Fig.1  Comparison of carbon emissions based on the daily C unit for portions of different foods.
  
1 Institute Energy (2023). Statistical Review of World Enregy 2023, ISSN 2976–7857, Available on line at the website of flowcharts.llnl.gov
2 S GodinL Landberg (2022). The carbon almanac. Penguin Bussiness, ISBN: 9780241594827, London, UK
3 D Helm (2020). Net Zero: How we stop causing climate change. HarperCollins Publishers Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (2023). Estimated U.S. Energy Consumption in 2020, Available on line at the website of flowcharts.llnl.gov
4 B E Logan. (2019). Energy literacy begins with units that make sense: the daily energy unit D. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 6(12): 686–687
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00623
5 B E Logan (2022). Daily Energy Use and Carbon Emissions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
6 H RitchieM Roser (2020). CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions (webpage), Available on line at the website of ourworldindata.org
7 Statistica (2023). Vehicles & Road Traffic, Available on line at the website of www.google.com
8 Bank World (2023). Population, total, Available on line at the website of data.worldbank.org
9 Bank Group World (2019). Urban and rural municipal solid waste in China and the circular economy, Available on line at the website of documents1.worldbank.org
[1] Xinke Song, Shihui Zhang, Hai Huang, Qun Ding, Fang Guo, Yaxin Zhang, Jin Li, Mingyu Li, Wenjia Cai, Can Wang. A systematic review of the inequality of health burdens related to climate change[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 63-.
[2] Chengjun Li, Riqing Yu, Wenjing Ning, Huan Zhong, Christian Sonne. Embracing digital mindsets to ensure a sustainable future[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 39-.
[3] Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Panagiotis Tsigaris. The relevance of James Lovelock’s research and philosophy to environmental science and academia[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 39-.
[4] Yisheng Shao, Yijian Xu. Challenges and countermeasures of urban water systems against climate change: a perspective from China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(12): 156-.
[5] Chaoxue Song, Hong S. He, Kai Liu, Haibo Du, Justin Krohn. Impact of historical pattern of human activities and natural environment on wetland in Heilongjiang River Basin[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(12): 151-.
[6] Jing Xu, Jiong Cheng, Runtian He, Jiaqi Lu, Chunling Wang, Heng Zhong, Fangming Jin. Revealing the GHG reduction potential of emerging biomass-based CO2 utilization with an iron cycle system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 127-.
[7] Qinjun Liang, Yu Gao, Zhigang Li, Jiayi Cai, Na Chu, Wen Hao, Yong Jiang, Raymond Jianxiong Zeng. Electricity-driven ammonia oxidation and acetate production in microbial electrosynthesis systems[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 42-.
[8] Xiaoqiang Gong, Jinbiao Li, Scott X. Chang, Qian Wu, Zhengfeng An, Chengpeng Huang, Xiangyang Sun, Suyan Li, Hui Wang. Cattle manure biochar and earthworm interactively affected CO2 and N2O emissions in agricultural and forest soils: Observation of a distinct difference[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 39-.
[9] Yangyan Cheng, Ye Shan, Yuhuan Xue, Yujiao Zhu, Xinfeng Wang, Likun Xue, Yanguang Liu, Fangli Qiao, Min Zhang. Variation characteristics of atmospheric methane and carbon dioxide in summertime at a coastal site in the South China Sea[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(11): 139-.
[10] Sung-Geun Woo, Holly L. Sewell, Craig S. Criddle. Phylogenetic diversity of NO reductases, new tools for nor monitoring, and insights into N2O production in natural and engineered environments[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(10): 127-.
[11] Hanli Wan, Jianmin Bian, Han Zhang, Yihan Li. Assessment of future climate change impacts on water-heat-salt migration in unsaturated frozen soil using CoupModel[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 10-.
[12] Xu Zhang, Huanhuan Yang, Xinlei Wang, Wen Song, Zhaojie Cui. An extraction- assay system: Evaluation on flavonols in plant resistance to Pb and Cd by supercritical extraction- gas chromatography[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 6-.
[13] Xiying Hao, Francis J. Larney. Greenhouse gas emissions during co-composting of cattle feedlot manure with construction and demolition (C&D) waste[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 15-.
[14] Takashi Osada, Makoto Shiraishi, Teruaki Hasegawa, Hirofumi Kawahara. Methane, Nitrous Oxide and Ammonia generation in full-scale swine wastewater purification facilities[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 10-.
[15] Devin L. Maurer, Jacek A. Koziel, Kelsey Bruning. Field scale measurement of greenhouse gas emissions from land applied swine manure[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 1-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed