Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (12) : 155    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-024-1915-1
Enhanced nitrogen removal from low strength anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) permeate using complete nitrification and partial denitrification-anammox processes
Jingwei Fu1, Zhaoyang Hou1, Hexiang Zhao2, Qian Li1,3,4(), Rong Chen1,3, Yu-You Li4
1. Key Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Shaanxi Province, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
2. Hualu Engineering & Technology Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710000, China
3. International Science & Technology Cooperation Center for Urban Alternative Water Resources Development, Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resource, Environment and Ecology, MOE, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
4. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai Miyagi 980-8579, Japan
 Download: PDF(11768 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● Efficient removal of COD and nitrogen was achieved in the AnMBR–NF–PDA system.

● Precise COD/NO3–N control was achieved by adjusting the raw water proportion.

● The presence of filamentous bacteria was conducive to sludge granulation in PDA.

● AnAOB and filamentous bacteria achieved a good cross-feeding relationship.

In this study, an anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled with a complete nitrification and partial denitrification–anammox process (AnMBR–NF–PDA) was developed to efficiently remove both chemical oxygen demand (COD) and nitrogen. Precise control of raw water ratios was utilized to adjust the ratio of COD/NO3–N, resulting in maximum nitrogen removal efficiency of 90.14% at a ratio of 3.44. Initially, specific anammox activity (SAA) increased with the proportion of raw water, peaking at 17.83 mg-N/(g-VSS∙d) in stage II before decreasing. This variation was attributed to the significant presence of filamentous bacteria, especially “Acinetobacter” (13.58%–31.59%), which facilitated nitrite generation, supporting the nitrous oxide hypothesis in partial denitrification processes and enabling cross-feeding with AnAOB. Additionally, the average particle size of granular sludge increased from 300 to 528 µm under the influence of filamentous bacteria. Metagenomic analysis revealed an upsurge in genes associated with partial denitrification (NarG and NapA) as the COD/NO3–N ratio rose. The abundance of genes closely correlated with anammox (Hzs and Hdh) peaked during stage II, indicating the beneficial role of filamentous bacteria in the stable conversion of nitrite in PDA system. This study offers valuable insights into optimizing the synergistic metabolism and granulation processes involving filamentous bacteria and AnAOB, thereby laying the groundwork for the practical application of AnMBR coupled with anammox processes in wastewater treatment.

Keywords Anammox      Anaerobic membrane bioreactor      COD/NO3–N      Filamentous bacteria     
Corresponding Author(s): Qian Li   
Issue Date: 18 October 2024
 Cite this article:   
Yu-You Li,Rong Chen,Qian Li, et al. Enhanced nitrogen removal from low strength anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) permeate using complete nitrification and partial denitrification-anammox processes[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(12): 155.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-024-1915-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2024/V18/I12/155
Fig.1  (a) Schematic representation of the combined AnMBR–NF–PDA process for the treatment of municipal wastewater (AnMBR: an anaerobic membrane reactor for carbon capture; NF: a complete mixed reactor for complete nitrification; PDA: a continuous stirred tank reactor for partial denitrification coupled anammox process); (b) Flow of organic carbon, nitrogen, and operating conditions in the AnMBR–NF–PDA process.
Fig.2  (a) The effluent COD of each system in the AnMBR–NF–PDA and the COD removal efficiency of the process. (b) The effluent TN of each system of the process and the NRE of the process. (c) The change in nitrogen concentration in influent and effluent and the ratio of COD/NO3–N in the influent of the PDA system. (d) Contribution of anammox and denitrification processes to nitrogen removal and changes of VAMX/VNO3 and VNO2/VNO3 in the PDA system.
Items Unit Stage I(Q2=10%; COD/NO3–N=2.70) Stage II(Q2=14%; COD/NO3–N=3.44) Stage III(Q2=18%; COD/NO3–N=4.09)
AnMBR NF PDAa) AnMBR NF PDAa) AnMBR NF PDAa)
CODInf. mg/L 497.8±5.27 16.6±1.34 62.6±3.40 498.3±6.95 16.5±1.38 85.7±4.48 498.9±6.07 16.1±1.22 102.2±5.04
CODEff. mg/L 16.6±1.34 11.9±1.38 14.3±1.52 16.5±1.38 11.6±1.86 15.3±2.77 16.1±1.22 11.6±1.51 16.3±3.33
COD removal efficiency % 96.6±0.26 28.9±8.81 77.0±2.61 96.7±0.27 29.3±12.1 81.8±3.71 96.7±0.23 28.7±10.2 84.1±1.98
Contribution to COD removal b) % 87.6±0.37 0.85±0.33 8.88±0.32 83.1±0.61 0.84±0.37 12.7±0.34 79.0±0.76 0.73±0.32 16.6±0.43
TNInf. c) mg/L 51.2±1.37 50.8±2.07 48.5±2.07 52.1±1.10 52.2±0.91 50.9±1.52 51.6±1.24 50.0±1.82 50.8±1.05
TKNEff. mg/L 50.8±2.07 13.3±1.25 52.2±0.91 3.45±1.27 50.0±1.82 12.4±2.21
NO3–NEff. mg/L 50.3±2.46 14.4±1.92 51.5±1.60 3.68±1.23 50.6±1.91 1.74±1.45
NO2–NEff. mg/L 0.05±0.03 0.02±0.00 0.01±0.00
TKN removal efficiency d) % 47.7±3.77 86.2±3.78 47.9±6.15
NO3–N removal efficiency d) % 40.5±4.62 85.0±3.64 95.3±3.75
TN removal efficiency e) % 46.4±5.11 86.1±4.81 72.5±4.96
Tab.1  Performance of AnMBR-NF-PDA system at different stages
Fig.3  (a) Changes in the activity of AnAOB and denitrifying bacteria at each stage. (b) The activity of SDANO3 and SDANO2 at the addition of NH4+–N (25 mg/L) in stage II.
Fig.4  (a) Microscope observation of sludge at the end of each stage in the PDA, (b) the settlement performance of PDA at each stage, (c) change in the particle size of sludge in the PDA at the end of each stage.
Fig.5  (a) Relative abundance of functional microorganisms in PDA at the genus level during different stages, (b) correlation between performance and the relative abundance of dominant bacteria at the genus level, (c) variation in the relative abundance of functional bacteria in each phase.
Fig.6  Variations of the nitrogen conversion and carbon pathways under the effect of COD/NO3–N and relative abundance of genes encoding enzymes related to nitrogen and carbon metabolism at each stage.
Fig.7  Possible mechanism of PDA under different COD/NO3–N.
Process Wastewater Influent concentrations Removal efficiency (%) Oxygen consumptiona)(mg/L) COD consumptionb)(mg/L) Advantage Disadvantage Reference
COD TN COD TN
Nitrification–Denitrification The manual wastewater 363.2 mg/L 100 85.4 98.9 4.57 3.71 The removal efficiency of COD and TN is better Higher energy consumption Song et al. (2023)
AnMBR Municipal waste 6 kg COD /(m3?d) 95 High COD removal efficiency; Conserve and generate energy Inability to remove nitrogen Wu et al. (2023)
PNA Synthetic wastewater 40 90 1.89 0.37 Lower energy consumption The process is unstable and produces 11% nitrate Li et al. 2019)
PNA The effluent of AnMBR 62 mg/L 50 55 67.9 Guo et al. (2022c)
PDA Synthetic wastewater 220 84.0 0.78 The NRE is higher COD consumption required Wan et al. (2024)
NF–PDA Synthetic wastewater 50 92.8 2.52 0.78 The process is relatively stable COD consumption required Chen et al. (2023)
AnMBR–PNA Synthetic wastewater 500 mg/L 50 93.0 80.4 1.89 0.37 Lower energy consumptionAchieve simultaneous removal of COD and nitrogen The stability of the PNA is significantly impacted by organic matter Li et al. (2023)
AnMBR–PNA Municipal wastewater 351 mg/L 23 90.8 76.3 Wu et al. (2021)
AnMBR–NF–PDA Synthetic wastewater 498 mg/L 97.3 86.1 2.52 The process is stable, no external carbon source is required, and COD and nitrogen are removed simultaneously 25% higher oxygen consumption than AnMBR-PNA process This study
Tab.2  Application of the integrated anammox process for biological nitrogen removal from wastewater
1 APHA/AWWA/WEF (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Denver
2 S B Cao, R Du, Y Z Peng, B K Li, S Y Wang. (2019). Novel two stage partial denitrification (PD)-Anammox process for tertiary nitrogen removal from low carbon/nitrogen (C/N) municipal sewage. Chemical Engineering Journal, 362: 107–115
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124810
3 J Chen, X Zhang, L Zhou, Z Zhu, Z Wu, K Zhang, Y Wang, T Ju, X Ji, D Jin. et al.. (2023). Metagenomics insights into high-rate nitrogen removal from municipal wastewater by integrated nitrification, partial denitrification and anammox at an extremely short hydraulic retention time. Bioresource Technology, 387: 129606
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129606
4 R Chen, Y Nie, Y Hu, R Miao, T Utashiro, Q Li, M Xu, Y Y Li. (2017). Fouling behaviour of soluble microbial products and extracellular polymeric substances in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating low-strength wastewater at room temperature. Journal of Membrane Science, 531: 1–9
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.02.046
5 K I Cogert, R M Ziels, M K H Winkler. (2019). Reducing cost and environmental impact of wastewater treatment with denitrifying methanotrophs, anammox, and mainstream anaerobic treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(21): 12935–12944
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b04764
6 L Deng, Y Peng, C Wu, R Gao, W Li, C Kao, J Li. (2022). Mutual boost of granulation and enrichment of anammox bacteria in an anaerobic/oxic/anoxic system as the temperature decreases when treating municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 357: 127336
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127336
7 R Du, S Cao, Y Peng, H Zhang, S Wang. (2019). Combined partial denitrification (PD)-anammox: a method for high nitrate wastewater treatment. Environment International, 126: 707–716
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.007
8 R Du, S Cao, H Zhang, X Li, Y Peng. (2020). Flexible nitrite supply alternative for mainstream anammox: advances in enhancing process stability. Environmental Science & Technology, 54(10): 6353–6364
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06265
9 R Du, Y Peng, S Cao, S Wang, C Wu. (2015). Advanced nitrogen removal from wastewater by combining anammox with partial denitrification. Bioresource Technology, 179: 497–504
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.043
10 J Fu, Q Li, M Dzakpasu, Y He, P Zhou, R Chen, Y Y Li. (2024). Biochar’s role to achieve multi-pathway nitrogen removal in anammox systems: insights from electron donation and selective microbial enrichment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 482: 148824
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.148824
11 S Ganesan, V M Vadivelu. (2020). Effect of storage conditions on maintaining anammox cell viability during starvation and recovery. Bioresource Technology, 296: 122341
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122341
12 G Guo, Y Li, S Zhou, Y Chen, K Urasaki, Y Qin, K Kubota, Y Y Li. (2022a). Long term operation performance and membrane fouling mechanisms of anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating waste activated sludge at high solid concentration and high flux. Science of the Total Environment, 846: 157435
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157435
13 Y Guo, Z B Luo, J H Shen, Y Y Li. (2022b). The main anammox-based processes, the involved microbes and the novel process concept from the application perspective. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 16(7): 84
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1487-1
14 Y Guo, E H Sanjaya, C Rong, T Wang, Z Luo, H Chen, H Wang, T Hanaoka, S Sakemi, M Ito. et al.. (2022c). Treating the filtrate of mainstream anaerobic membrane bioreactor with the pilot-scale sludge-type one-stage partial nitritation/anammox process operated from 25 to 15 °C. Bioresource Technology, 351: 127062
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127062
15 Y Guo, Y Zhao, T Zhu, J Li, Y Feng, H Zhao, S Liu. (2018). A metabolomic view of how low nitrogen strength favors anammox biomass yield and nitrogen removal capability. Water Research, 143: 387–398
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.052
16 X S He, B D Xi, X Li, H W Pan, D An, S G Bai, D Li, D Y Cui. (2013). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectra coupled with parallel factor and regional integration analysis to characterize organic matter humification. Chemosphere, 93(9): 2208–2215
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.039
17 P Izadi, P Sinha, M Andalib, C Samberger, G Lehman, K Messologitis, J Jacangelo. (2023). Coupling fundamental mechanisms and operational controls in mainstream partial denitrification for partial denitrification anammox applications: a review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 400: 136741
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136741
18 S Kalyuzhnyi, M Gladchenko. (2009). DEAMOX–new microbiological process of nitrogen removal from strong nitrogenous wastewater. Desalination, 248(1): 783–793
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.054
19 M Kumar, Y L Ou, J G Lin. (2010). Co-composting of green waste and food waste at low C/N ratio. Waste Management, 30(4): 602–609
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.023
20 B Li, W Yan, Y Wang, H Wang, Z Zhou, Y Li, W Zhang. (2019). Effects of key enzyme activities and microbial communities in a flocculent-granular hybrid complete autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite reactor under mainstream conditions. Bioresource Technology, 280: 136–142
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.146
21 Q Li, Z Hou, X Huang, S Yang, J Zhang, J Fu, Y Y Li, R Chen. (2023). Methanation and chemolitrophic nitrogen removal by an anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled partial nitrification and anammox. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(6): 68
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1668-2
22 T Lotti, R Kleerebezem, C Lubello, M C M van Loosdrecht. (2014). Physiological and kinetic characterization of a suspended cell anammox culture. Water Research, 60: 1–14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.04.017
23 B Ma, X Xu, Y Wei, C Ge, Y Peng. (2020). Recent advances in controlling denitritation for achieving denitratation/anammox in mainstream wastewater treatment plants. Bioresource Technology, 299: 122697
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122697
24 P L McCarty, J Bae, J Kim (2011). Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer-Can this be achieved? Environmental Science & Technology, 45(17): 7100–7106
25 Y Meng, Z Wang, Z Yu, Q Yan, Z He, F Meng. (2023). Genome-resolved metagenomic analysis reveals different functional potentials of multiple Candidatus Brocadia species in a full-scale swine wastewater treatment system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(1): 2
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1602-7
26 M Oshiki, H Satoh, S Okabe. (2016). Ecology and physiology of anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacteria. Environmental Microbiology, 18(9): 2786–2796
https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13134
27 Á Robles, F Durán, J B Giménez, E Jiménez, J Ribes, J Serralta, A Seco, J Ferrer, F Rogalla. (2020). Anaerobic membrane bioreactors (AnMBR) treating urban wastewater in mild climates. Bioresource Technology, 314: 123763
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123763
28 C Rong, T Wang, Z Luo, Y Guo, Z Kong, J Wu, Y Qin, T Hanaoka, S Sakemi, M Ito. et al.. (2022). Seasonal temperatures impact on the mass flows in the innovative integrated process of anaerobic membrane bioreactor and one-stage partial nitritation-anammox for the treatment of municipal wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 349: 126864
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.126864
29 L Shi, X Li, Q Zhang, Y Peng. (2021). Effectively stimulating partial denitrification to utilize dissolved slowly-biodegradable organic matter by introducing in-situ biosorption and hydrolytic acidification. Bioresource Technology, 333: 125175
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125175
30 K Song, Y Gao, Y Yang, B Q Guo, Y Z Wang. (2023). Performance of simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal of high-salinity wastewater in heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification mode. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(3): 109682
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109682
31 T Song, X Zhang, J Li. (2022). The formation and distinct characteristics of aerobic granular sludge with filamentous bacteria in low strength wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 360: 127409
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127409
32 J Wan, Z Zhang, P Li, Y Ma, H Li, Q Guo, Y Wang, C Dagot. (2024). Simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal through an integrated partial-denitrification/anammox process in a single UAFB system. Chemosphere, 350: 141040
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.141040
33 Y Wang, X Zheng, G Wu, Y Guan. (2023). Removal of ammonium and nitrate through anammox and FeS-driven autotrophic denitrification. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 17(6): 74
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1674-4
34 Z Wei, D Li, S Li, T Hao, H Zeng, J Zhang. (2023). Improving anammox performance by limited filamentous bulking for wastewater treatment with organic stress. Bioresource Technology, 369: 128506
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128506
35 J Wu, Z Kong, Z B Luo, Y Qin, C Rong, T J Wang, T Hanaoka, S Sakemi, M Ito, S Kobayashi. et al.. (2021). A successful start-up of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) coupled mainstream partial nitritation-anammox (PN/A) system: a pilot-scale study on in-situ NOB elimination, AnAOB growth kinetics, and mainstream treatment performance. Water Research, 207: 117783
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117783
36 P Wu, J Chen, V K Garlapati, X Zhang, F Wani Victor Jenario, X Li, W Liu, C Chen, T M Aminabhavi, X Zhang. (2022). Novel insights into anammox-based processes: a critical review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 444: 136534
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136534
37 Z Wu, W Qiao, R Dong. (2023). Elucidating methanogenesis and membrane filtration performance of a ceramic AnMBR treating municipal waste leachate. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 53: 103905
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103905
38 C Zhang, M Zhang, H Yang, W Cai, J Wu. (2024). Single-stage partial nitrification/anammox process performance restoration by bio-augmenting nitrifiers with or without nitrite oxidizing bacteria suppression. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 57: 104608
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104608
39 Q Zhao, K Chen, J Li, S Sun, T Jia, Y Huang, Y Peng, L Zhang. (2021). Pilot-scale evaluation of partial denitrification/anammox on nitrogen removal from low COD/N real sewage based on a modified process. Bioresource Technology, 338(10): 125580
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125580
[1] FSE-24101-OF-FJW_suppl_1 Download
[1] Wanlu Zhu, Rui Xiao, Min Xu, Wenbo Chai, Wenlong Liu, Zhengyu Jin, David Ikumi, Huijie Lu. Unraveling the role of formate in improving nitrogen removal via coupled partial denitrification-anammox[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(9): 112-.
[2] Caiyan Qu, Lushan Li, Fan Feng, Kainian Jiang, Xing Wu, Muchuan Qin, Jia Tang, Xi Tang, Ruiyang Xiao, Di Wu, Chongjian Tang. Enhancement of extracellular Cr(VI) reduction for anammox recovery using hydrazine: performance, pathways, and mechanism[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(9): 115-.
[3] Guangjiao Chen, Lan Lin, Ying Wang, Zikun Zhang, Wenzhi Cao, Yanlong Zhang. Unveiling the interaction mechanisms of key functional microorganisms in the partial denitrification-anammox process induced by COD[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(8): 103-.
[4] Yanfei Wang, Xiaona Zheng, Guangxue Wu, Yuntao Guan. Removal of ammonium and nitrate through Anammox and FeS-driven autotrophic denitrification[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 74-.
[5] Qian Li, Zhaoyang Hou, Xingyuan Huang, Shuming Yang, Jinfan Zhang, Jingwei Fu, Yu-You Li, Rong Chen. Methanation and chemolitrophic nitrogen removal by an anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled partial nitrification and Anammox[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 68-.
[6] Yabing Meng, Depeng Wang, Zhong Yu, Qingyun Yan, Zhili He, Fangang Meng. Genome-resolved metagenomic analysis reveals different functional potentials of multiple Candidatus Brocadia species in a full-scale swine wastewater treatment system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 2-.
[7] Yan Guo, Zibin Luo, Junhao Shen, Yu-You Li. The main anammox-based processes, the involved microbes and the novel process concept from the application perspective[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 84-.
[8] Yingbin Hu, Ning Li, Jin Jiang, Yanbin Xu, Xiaonan Luo, Jie Cao. Simultaneous Feammox and anammox process facilitated by activated carbon as an electron shuttle for autotrophic biological nitrogen removal[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 90-.
[9] Feng Hou, Ting Zhang, Yongzhen Peng, Xiaoxin Cao, Hongtao Pang, Yanqing Shao, Xianchun Lu, Ju Yuan, Xi Chen, Jin Zhang. Partial anammox achieved in full scale biofilm process for typical domestic wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 33-.
[10] Shuhan Li, Xin Zhou, Xiwei Cao, Jiabo Chen. Insights into simultaneous anammox and denitrification system with short-term pyridine exposure: Process capability, inhibition kinetics and metabolic pathways[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 139-.
[11] Fei Xie, Bowei Zhao, Ying Cui, Xiao Ma, Xiao Zhang, Xiuping Yue. Reutilize tire in microbial fuel cell for enhancing the nitrogen removal of the anammox process coupled with iron-carbon micro-electrolysis[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 121-.
[12] Guoliang Zhang, Liang Zhang, Xiaoyu Han, Shujun Zhang, Yongzhen Peng. Start-up of PN-anammox system under low inoculation quantity and its restoration after low-loading rate shock[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 32-.
[13] Shengjie Qiu, Jinjin Liu, Liang Zhang, Qiong Zhang, Yongzhen Peng. Sludge fermentation liquid addition attained advanced nitrogen removal in low C/N ratio municipal wastewater through short-cut nitrification-denitrification and partial anammox[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 26-.
[14] Jinjin Fu, Quan Zhang, Baocheng Huang, Niansi Fan, Rencun Jin. A review on anammox process for the treatment of antibiotic-containing wastewater: Linking effects with corresponding mechanisms[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 17-.
[15] Jing Ding, Wanyi Seow, Jizhong Zhou, Raymond Jianxiong Zeng, Jun Gu, Yan Zhou. Effects of Fe(II) on anammox community activity and physiologic response[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 7-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed