Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering

ISSN 2095-0233

ISSN 2095-0241(Online)

CN 11-5984/TH

Postal Subscription Code 80-975

2018 Impact Factor: 0.989

Front. Mech. Eng.    2022, Vol. 17 Issue (3) : 36    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-022-0692-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps with multi-sensor data and convolutional neural network
Qun CHAO1,2,3, Haohan GAO1, Jianfeng TAO1,3(), Chengliang LIU1,3, Yuanhang WANG4, Jian ZHOU4
1. State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
3. MoE Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
4. China Electronic Product Reliability and Environmental Testing Research Institute, Guangzhou 510610, China
 Download: PDF(9623 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Axial piston pumps have wide applications in hydraulic systems for power transmission. Their condition monitoring and fault diagnosis are essential in ensuring the safety and reliability of the entire hydraulic system. Vibration and discharge pressure signals are two common signals used for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps because of their sensitivity to pump health conditions. However, most of the previous fault diagnosis methods only used vibration or pressure signal, and literatures related to multi-sensor data fusion for the pump fault diagnosis are limited. This paper presents an end-to-end multi-sensor data fusion method for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps. The vibration and pressure signals under different pump health conditions are fused into RGB images and then recognized by a convolutional neural network. Experiments were performed on an axial piston pump to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed method. Results show that the proposed multi-sensor data fusion method greatly improves the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps in terms of accuracy and robustness and has better diagnostic performance than other existing diagnosis methods.

Keywords axial piston pump      fault diagnosis      convolutional neural network      multi-sensor data fusion     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianfeng TAO   
About author: Tongcan Cui and Yizhe Hou contributed equally to this work.
Just Accepted Date: 22 April 2022   Issue Date: 09 October 2022
 Cite this article:   
Qun CHAO,Haohan GAO,Jianfeng TAO, et al. Fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps with multi-sensor data and convolutional neural network[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(3): 36.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/10.1007/s11465-022-0692-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fme/EN/Y2022/V17/I3/36
Fig.1  Illustration of an axial piston pump and worn slippers.
Fig.2  (a) Hydraulic circuit diagram of the test rig [2] and (b) the test pump [33]. Reproduced with permission from Springer Nature, copyright 2021.
Degradation state Increased clearance/mm Leakage flow rate/(L·min−1)
Normal 0.00 0.40
Slight leakage 0.05 0.57
Medium leakage 0.15 0.65
Severe leakage 0.20 1.10
Tab.1  Different degradation states of the axial piston pump
Fig.3  Raw vibration signals for four different pump degradation states: (a) normal; (b) slight leakage; (c) medium leakage; and (d) severe leakage.
Fig.4  Raw discharge pressure signals for four different pump degradation states.
Fig.5  Illustration of the proposed multi-sensor data fusion for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps.
Fig.6  RGB images under different pump degradation states: (a) three vibration signals; (b) vibration signals 2 and 3, and pressure signal; (c) vibration signals 1 and 3, and pressure signal; and (d) vibration signals 1 and 2, and pressure signal.
Fig.7  Grayscale images under different pump degradation states: (a) vibration signal 1; (b) vibration signal 2; (c) vibration signal 3; and (d) pressure signal.
Fig.8  Comparison of classification accuracy between single-sensor data and multi-sensor data.
Fig.9  Comparison of contaminated spectrograms among different pump degradation states at an SNR of 6 dB: (a) three vibration signals; (b) vibration signals 2 and 3, and pressure signal; (c) vibration signals 1 and 3, and pressure signal; and (d) vibration signals 1 and 2, and pressure signal.
Fig.10  Comparison of anti-noise performance between single-sensor data and multi-sensor data.
Fig.11  Comparison of confusion matrix before and after multi-sensor data fusion at an SNR of 6 dB: (a) vibration signal 1; (b) vibration signal 2; (c) vibration signal 3; (d) pressure signal; (e) three vibration signals; (f) vibration signals 2 and 3, and pressure signal; (g) vibration signals 1 and 3, and pressure signal; and (h) vibration signals 1 and 2 and pressure signal.
Method Input signal Classification accuracy/%
CNN-BO [15] One acoustic signal 97.8
2D CNN [40] One vibration signal 96.1
1D CNN [41] One vibration signal 98.7
Extreme learning machine [5] Nine vibration signals + one discharge flow signal 84.1
EWT and variance contribution rate [19] Three vibration signals 66.5
Proposed method Two vibration signals + one discharge pressure signal 100.0
Tab.2  Classification accuracy of slipper faults in axial piston pumps for different methods and input signals
Abbreviations
1D One-dimensional
2D Two-dimensional
CNN Convolutional neural network
SNR Signal-to-noise ratio
STFT Short-time Fourier transform
Variables
ahw Feature map element at pixel (h, w) in the pooling window
Akl The kth feature map at layer l
Bkl Bias of the kth group filter at layer l
c Index of channels for input feature maps or the group filters
C Total number of filter channels
f(·) Activation function
H Pooling window height
i Height index of element pixels
j Imaginary unit
j Width index of element pixels
J Loss function
k Index of group filters or output feature maps
l Index of network layers
L Total layer number
m, n Indices of discrete sampling points
N Size of Hanning window
pkl+1 Maximum element in the pooling window
q The qth class
Q Total classification number
s Index of samples
S Total number of samples
t Time
x(τ) Vibration signal
x(s) The sth sample
Xcl1 The cth-channel component of the input feature map at layer (l – 1)
Xkl The kth output feature map at layer l
y(s) Predicted label
w(τ), w*(τ) Window function and its conjugated form
W Pooling window width
Wc,kl The cth-channel component of the kth group filter weight at layer l
η Learning rate
θL Trainable parameters at the last layer L
θnew, θold Trainable parameters after and before update, respectively
τ Time variable of integration
ω Angular frequency
  
1 Q Chao, J H Zhang, B Xu, Q N Wang, F Lyu, K Li. Integrated slipper retainer mechanism to eliminate slipper wear in high-speed axial piston pumps. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 17( 1): 1– 13
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-021-0657-z
2 Q Chao, Z Xu, J F Tao, C L Liu, J Zhai. Cavitation in a high-speed aviation axial piston pump over a wide range of fluid temperatures. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 2022, 236( 4): 727– 737
https://doi.org/10.1177/09576509211046998
3 Lázaro J G Maradey, Pinilla C Borrás. Detection and classification of wear fault in axial piston pumps: using ANNs and pressure signals. In: Burgos D A T, Vejar M A, Pozo F, eds. Pattern Recognition Applications in Engineering. Hershey: IGI Global, 2020, 286– 316
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1839-7.ch012
4 S Q Xia, J H Zhang, S G Ye, B Xu, W D Huang, J W Xiang. A spare support vector machine based fault detection strategy on key lubricating interfaces of axial piston pumps. IEEE Access, 2019, 7 : 178177– 178186
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958141
5 Y Lan, J W Hu, J H Huang, L K Niu, X H Zeng, X Y Xiong, B Wu. Fault diagnosis on slipper abrasion of axial piston pump based on extreme learning machine. Measurement, 2018, 124 : 378– 385
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.03.050
6 R Guo, Z Q Zhao, T Wang, G H Liu, J Y Zhao, D R Gao. Degradation state recognition of piston pump based on ICEEMDAN and XGBoost. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10( 18): 6593
https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186593
7 N Keller, A Sciancalepore, A Vacca. Demonstrating a condition monitoring process for axial piston pumps with damaged valve plates. International Journal of Fluid Power, 2022, 23( 2): 205– 236
https://doi.org/10.13052/ijfp1439-9776.2324
8 S H Wang, J W Xiang, Y T Zhong, H S Tang. A data indicator-based deep belief networks to detect multiple faults in axial piston pumps. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 112 : 154– 170
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.04.038
9 Q Chao, J F Tao, X L Wei, Y H Wang, L H Meng, C L Liu. Cavitation intensity recognition for high-speed axial piston pumps using 1-D convolutional neural networks with multi-channel inputs of vibration signals. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2020, 59( 6): 4463– 4473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2020.07.052
10 Q Chao, J F Tao, X L Wei, C L Liu. Identification of cavitation intensity for high-speed aviation hydraulic pumps using 2D convolutional neural networks with an input of RGB-based vibration data. Measurement Science and Technology, 2020, 31( 10): 105102
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab8d5a
11 S H Wang, J W Xiang. A minimum entropy deconvolution-enhanced convolutional neural networks for fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps. Soft Computing, 2020, 24( 4): 2983– 2997
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04076-2
12 S N Tang, S Q Yuan, Y Zhu, G P Li. An integrated deep learning method towards fault diagnosis of hydraulic axial piston pump. Sensors, 2020, 20( 22): 6576
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226576
13 Q Chao, H H Gao, J F Tao, Y H Wang, J Zhou, C L Liu. Adaptive decision-level fusion strategy for the fault diagnosis of axial piston pumps using multiple channels of vibration signals. Science China Technological Sciences, 2022, 65( 2): 470– 480
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-021-1904-7
14 S N Tang, Y Zhu, S Q Yuan. Intelligent fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump based on deep learning and Bayesian optimization. ISA Transactions, 2022 (in press)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2022.01.013
15 S N Tang, Y Zhu, S Q Yuan. A novel adaptive convolutional neural network for fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pump with acoustic images. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2022, 52 : 101554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101554
16 C Q Lu, S P Wang, V Makis. Fault severity recognition of aviation piston pump based on feature extraction of EEMD paving and optimized support vector regression model. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2017, 67 : 105– 117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2017.03.039
17 Y D Wang, Y Zhu, Q L Wang, S Q Yuan, S N Tang, Z J Zheng. Effective component extraction for hydraulic pump pressure signal based on fast empirical mode decomposition and relative entropy. AIP Advances, 2020, 10( 7): 075103
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009771
18 C Q Lu, S P Wang, C Zhang. Fault diagnosis of hydraulic piston pumps based on a two-step EMD method and fuzzy C-means clustering. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2016, 230( 16): 2913– 2928
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954406215602285
19 H Yu, H R Li, Y L Li. Vibration signal fusion using improved empirical wavelet transform and variance contribution rate for weak fault detection of hydraulic pumps. ISA Transactions, 2020, 107 : 385– 401
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.07.025
20 H Yu, H R Li, Y L Li, Y F Li. A novel improved full vector spectrum algorithm and its application in multi-sensor data fusion for hydraulic pumps. Measurement, 2019, 133 : 145– 161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.011
21 M S Safizadeh, S K Latifi. Using multi-sensor data fusion for vibration fault diagnosis of rolling element bearings by accelerometer and load cell. Information Fusion, 2014, 18 : 1– 8
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2013.10.002
22 M Xia, T Li, L Xu, L Z Liu, C W de Silva. Fault diagnosis for rotating machinery using multiple sensors and convolutional neural networks. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2018, 23( 1): 101– 110
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2017.2728371
23 H Q Wang, S Li, L Y Song, L L Cui. A novel convolutional neural network based fault recognition method via image fusion of multi-vibration-signals. Computers in Industry, 2019, 105 : 182– 190
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.013
24 W F Gong, H Chen, Z H Zhang, M L Zhang, R H Wang, C Guan, Q Wang. A novel deep learning method for intelligent fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on improved CNN-SVM and multichannel data fusion. Sensors, 2019, 19( 7): 1693
https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071693
25 J J Wang, P L Fu, L B Zhang, R X Gao, R Zhao. Multilevel information fusion for induction motor fault diagnosis. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24( 5): 2139– 2150
https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2019.2928967
26 H P Chen, N Q Hu, Z Cheng, L Zhang, Y Zhang. A deep convolutional neural network based fusion method of two-direction vibration signal data for health state identification of planetary gearboxes. Measurement, 2019, 146 : 268– 278
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.093
27 M Azamfar, J Singh, I Bravo-Imaz, J Lee. Multisensor data fusion for gearbox fault diagnosis using 2-D convolutional neural network and motor current signature analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 144 : 106861
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106861
28 D Kolar, D Lisjak, M Pająk, D Pavković. Fault diagnosis of rotary machines using deep convolutional neural network with wide three axis vibration signal input. Sensors, 2020, 20( 14): 4017
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20144017
29 X S Yan, Z Sun, J J Zhao, Z G Shi, C A Zhang. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery equipped with multiple sensors using space-time fragments. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2019, 456 : 49– 64
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2019.05.036
30 Q Chao, J H Zhang, B Xu, H P Huang, M Pan. A review of high-speed electro-hydrostatic actuator pumps in aerospace applications: challenges and solutions. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2019, 141( 5): 050801
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4041582
31 J M Ma, J Chen, J Li, Q L Li, C Y Ren. Wear analysis of swash plate/slipper pair of axis piston hydraulic pump. Tribology International, 2015, 90 : 467– 472
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.05.010
32 J H Huang, Z Yan, L Quan, Y Lan, Y S Gao. Characteristics of delivery pressure in the axial piston pump with combination of variable displacement and variable speed. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 2015, 229( 7): 599– 613
https://doi.org/10.1177/0959651815578967
33 Q Chao, J F Tao, J B Lei, X L Wei, C L Liu, Y H Wang, L H Meng. Fast scaling approach based on cavitation conditions to estimate the speed limitation for axial piston pump design. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 16( 1): 176– 185
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-020-0616-0
34 R Chacon, M Ivantysynova. Virtual prototyping of axial piston machines: numerical method and experimental validation. Energies, 2019, 12( 9): 1674
https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091674
35 G E Dahl, T N Sainath, G E Hinton. Improving deep neural networks for LVCSR using rectified linear units and dropout. In: Proceedings of 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Vancouver: IEEE, 2013, 8609– 8613
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639346
36 L Stankovic, M Daković, T Thayaparan. Time–Frequency Signal Analysis with Applications. Boston: Artech House, 2013
37 Y LeCun, L Bottou, Y Bengio, P Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1998, 86( 11): 2278– 2324
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791
38 W Zhang, C H Li, G L Peng, Y H Chen, Z J Zhang. A deep convolutional neural network with new training methods for bearing fault diagnosis under noisy environment and different working load. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2018, 100 : 439– 453
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.022
39 X C Liu, Q C Zhou, J Zhao, H H Shen, X L Xiong. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery under noisy environment conditions based on a 1-D convolutional autoencoder and 1-D convolutional neural network. Sensors, 2019, 19( 4): 972
https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040972
40 S N Tang, Y Zhu, S Q Yuan, G P Li. Intelligent diagnosis towards hydraulic axial piston pump using a novel integrated CNN model. Sensors, 2020, 20( 24): 7152
https://doi.org/10.3390/s20247152
41 W L Jiang, C Y Wang, J Y Zou, S Q Zhang. Application of deep learning in fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Processes, 2021, 9( 6): 919
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9060919
[1] Xiaoluo YU, Yifan HUANGFU, Yang YANG, Minggang DU, Qingbo HE, Zhike PENG. Gear fault diagnosis using gear meshing stiffness identified by gearbox housing vibration signals[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(4): 57-.
[2] Junhui ZHANG, Yining SHEN, Minyao GAN, Qi SU, Fei LYU, Bing XU, Yuan CHEN. Multi-objective optimization of surface texture for the slipper/swash plate interface in EHA pumps[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(4): 48-.
[3] Yuan YIN, Weifeng HUANG, Decai LI, Qiang HE, Xiangfeng LIU, Ying LIU. Method for solving the nonlinear inverse problem in gas face seal diagnosis based on surrogate models[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(3): 33-.
[4] Long BAI, Fei XU, Xiao CHEN, Xin SU, Fuyao LAI, Jianfeng XU. A hybrid deep learning model for robust prediction of the dimensional accuracy in precision milling of thin-walled structural components[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(3): 32-.
[5] Long WEN, You WANG, Xinyu LI. A new automatic convolutional neural network based on deep reinforcement learning for fault diagnosis[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(2): 17-.
[6] Qun CHAO, Jianfeng TAO, Chengliang LIU, Zhengliang LI. Development of an analytical model to estimate the churning losses in high-speed axial piston pumps[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(2): 15-.
[7] Qun CHAO, Junhui ZHANG, Bing XU, Qiannan WANG, Fei LYU, Kun LI. Integrated slipper retainer mechanism to eliminate slipper wear in high-speed axial piston pumps[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2022, 17(1): 1-.
[8] Jie LIU, Kaibo ZHOU, Chaoying YANG, Guoliang LU. Imbalanced fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using autoencoder-based SuperGraph feature learning[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(4): 829-839.
[9] Xu WANG, Hongyang GU, Tianyang WANG, Wei ZHANG, Aihua LI, Fulei CHU. Deep convolutional tree-inspired network: a decision-tree-structured neural network for hierarchical fault diagnosis of bearings[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(4): 814-828.
[10] Xin ZHANG, Tao HUANG, Bo WU, Youmin HU, Shuai HUANG, Quan ZHOU, Xi ZHANG. Multi-model ensemble deep learning method for intelligent fault diagnosis with high-dimensional samples[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(2): 340-352.
[11] Qun CHAO, Jianfeng TAO, Junbo LEI, Xiaoliang WEI, Chengliang LIU, Yuanhang WANG, Linghui MENG. Fast scaling approach based on cavitation conditions to estimate the speed limitation for axial piston pump design[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(1): 176-185.
[12] Liang XUE, Jie LIU, Guilin WEN, Hongxin WANG. Efficient, high-resolution topology optimization method based on convolutional neural networks[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2021, 16(1): 80-96.
[13] Peng ZHOU, Zhike PENG, Shiqian CHEN, Yang YANG, Wenming ZHANG. Non-stationary signal analysis based on general parameterized time--frequency transform and its application in the feature extraction of a rotary machine[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(2): 292-300.
[14] Xuefeng CHEN, Shibin WANG, Baijie QIAO, Qiang CHEN. Basic research on machinery fault diagnostics: Past, present, and future trends[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2018, 13(2): 264-291.
[15] Shoudao HUANG, Xuan WU, Xiao LIU, Jian GAO, Yunze HE. Overview of condition monitoring and operation control of electric power conversion systems in direct-drive wind turbines under faults[J]. Front. Mech. Eng., 2017, 12(3): 281-302.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed