Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    2011, Vol. 5 Issue (3) : 366-373    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-011-0101-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Experimental investigation and design of aluminum columns with longitudinal welds
Yun WU1(), Qilin ZHANG2
1. Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China; 2. College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 Download: PDF(494 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of longitudinally welded aluminum alloy I-section columns subjected to pure axial compression. The specimens were fabricated using 6061-T6 heat-treated aluminum alloy. The test program included 20 column tests which were separated into 2 test series of different types of welding sections. Each test series contained 10 columns. All the specimens were welded using the Tungsten Inert Gas welding method. The length of the specimens ranged from 442 to 2433 mm in order to obtain a column curve for each test series. The observed failure mode for the column tests includes mainly flexural buckling around the minor axis and the major axis by applying support except for one column (ZP1217-1) which buckled in the local zone and some columns which failed in the weld. The test strengths were compared with the design strengths predicted by the European Code and China Code for aluminum structures. The purpose of this paper is to present the tests results of two typically longitudinally welded I-section columns, and to check the accuracy of the design rules in the current specifications.

Keywords aluminum alloy      longitudinal weld      heat-affected zone (HAZ)      reduced strength zone (RSZ)      buckling      column      experimental study     
Corresponding Author(s): WU Yun,Email:wuyun360@163.com   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Yun WU,Qilin ZHANG. Experimental investigation and design of aluminum columns with longitudinal welds[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 2011, 5(3): 366-373.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-011-0101-2
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2011/V5/I3/366
Fig.1  Specimens in the first batch
Fig.2  Specimens in the second batch
Fig.3  HAZ and RSZ in butt welded joints
Fig.4  Stress-strain curves in the second batch
specimenAL1AL2AL3WELD1WELD2WELD3HAZ1HAZ2HAZ3
Eo/GPa69.366.363.872.771.669.462.064.353.0
σ0.2/MPa314.6312.1322.4100.0105.4108.7143.2100.0108.5
σu/MPa331.1324.3334.8237.4234.5253.7197.0196.0190.7
n56.867.167.54.64.64.79.55.15.6
Tab.1  Experiment results of material properties
alloy and temperproductfiller metalparent metal propertiesproperties of weakest material in reduced strength zone
tensile strength/MPatensile yield strength /MPaelongation percent in 50 mmComp. yield strength /MPatensile strength, /MPatensile yield strength, /MPaelongation percentComp. yield strengh /MPa
5456-H3211/2in.plate545636023617.123826913616.0130
5154-H341/2in.plate515428120417.720323110025.0a106
6061-T61/2in.plate404331629619.629023612310.0a121
Tab.2  Average material properties of welded specimens
Fig.5  Two typically welded I-section specimens
(a)T-shape welded specimen (b) P-shape welded specimen
Fig.6  Bilateral edge hinge support
length/mmPL0442PL0884PL1217PL1326PL2433TL0442TL0737TL1178TL1217TL2028
actual, L282724105711662273282577101810571868
calculating, L0442884121713262433442737117812172028
number2222222222
Tab.3  Specimen dimensions for welded cross-section of members
specimen (1)length L /mm (2)width b/mm (3)thick- ness t/mm (4)extent of RSZ br/mm (5)Ar/A = 2brt/bta (6)effective slenderness ratio KL/rb (7)failure load P/kN (8)column stress measured fc = P/A(MPa) (9)ηHAZcalculated measured (12)
measured (10)calculated (11)
5154-H34, welded with 5154
1-A2951913151.0040.022.592.50.4990.5221.04
1-C2246410150.4839.676.5123.80.6700.7711.15
1-G269251200.0040.157.3194.0
1-H246641100.0040.0120.0177.1
1-E31110212150.3043.9174.9140.30.7600.8571.13
1-K3111021300.0043.1234.3184.2
1-F60910212150.3089.590.375.40.9160.8570.94
1-L6091021100.0092.295.282.0
5456-H321, welded with 5456
2-A3001913191.0040.227.9113.10.5320.5481.03
2-C2345110190.7440.073.2142.60.6720.6660.99
2-J289511200.0040.1135.3213.1-
2-G272191200.0039.947.4211.1-
2-B373199191.0069.912.772.30.5220.5481.05
2-D326518190.7469.842.1102.50.7360.6660.91
2-H478191200.0070.331.1138.3-
2-E3118912190.4243.5179.8162.80.7560.8101.07
2-K311891300.0042.2243.0214.8-
2-F6098912190.4287.289.983.60.8290.8100.98
2-L609891300.0083.9112.8100.9-
6061-T6, welded with 4043
3-A2592511181.0040.131.2110.00.4430.4180.94
3-B2647611180.4840.0166.2190.00.7650.7210.94
3-F259191100.0039.853.3249.3-
3-C3947610180.4869.882.1110.80.7890.7210.92
3-G445761100.0070.0117.5140.2-
3-D31112712180.2944.7312.4203.90.8270.8311.00
3-H3111271200.0043.5388.0246.5-
3-E60912712180.2991.5120.181.90.8560.8310.97
3-J6091271200.0085.6150.096.1-
Tab.4  Properties of longitudinally welded columns
Fig.7  Arrangement of the measure points, unit: mm
Fig.8  A typical load versus strain curve (zp884-1)
P-shapeweld(1)λ (2)λˉ (3)Pexp /kN (4)Pexp?PCHINA (5)Pexp?PEC9 (6)T-shape weld (7)λ (8)λˉ (9)Pexp/kN (10)Pexp?PCHINA (11)Pexp?PEC9 (12)
PL0442300.5595291.01.271.28TL0442300.5595246.01.051.07
PL0442R300.5595299.41.301.32TL0442R300.5595260.71.121.13
PL1217*300.5595223.30.970.98TL1217*300.5595244.61.051.06
PL1217R*300.5595228.61.001.01TL1217R*300.5595228.20.980.99
PL0884601.119214.31.331.35TL0737500.9325195.71.021.03
PL0884R601.119227.11.411.43TL0737R500.9325185.20.970.98
PL2433*601.119>216.21.351.36TL2028*500.9325238.71.251.26
PL2433R*601.119242.91.511.53TL2028R*500.9325>198.31.041.05
PL1326901.6785108.01.191.20TL1178801.492121.41.121.13
PL1326R901.6785108.41.201.20TL1178R801.492129.41.191.20
Mean, Pm-1.251.27Mean, Pm-1.081.09
COV, VP-0.1610.165COV, VP-0.0860.085
Tab.5  Comparison of test strengths with design strengths
Fig.9  Flexural buckling
(a) around the minor axis (b) around the major axis
Fig.10  Local buckling (ZP1217-1)
Fig.11  Failure in the weld (ZP1217-1)
Fig.12  The results comparison of the test and the design
1 A A. Aluminum design manual. Washington (DC): The Aluminum Association, 2005
2 BS 8118: Part 1: British Standards: Structural use of aluminium-Part 1: Code of practice for design, BSI Standards, London, 1991
3 BS EN 1999–1-1:2007, Eurocode 9: Design of aluminium structures-Part 1–1: General structural rules, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2007
4 Xin J. Study on Resistance of Uniaxial Symmetrical Aluminum Alloy Compression Members. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2005 (in Chinese)
5 Wu Y G. Study on Local Buckling of Aluminium Elements And Flexural-Torsional Buckling of Aluminium Beams. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006 (in Chinese)
6 Zhang Z. Study on Stability Capacity of Aluminium Beam-Columns. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006 (in Chinese)
7 Guo X N. Theoretical and Experimental Research on Aluminum Alloy Structure Members. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006 (in Chinese)
8 GB2651–89. Method of tensile test for welded joint , 1989 (in Chinese)
9 GB/T 4340–1999. Metallic vickers hardness test , 1999 (in Chinese)
10 GB 2649–89. Methods of sampling for mechanical properties tests of welded joint , 1989 (in Chinese)
11 GB2652–89. Methods of tensile tests for weld and deposited metal , 1989 (in Chinese)
12 Ramberg W, Osgood W R. Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters, NACA Techn No902, 1943
13 Brungraber R J, Clark J W. Strength of welded aluminium columns. Transaction of ASCE , 1962, 127(2): 202-225
14 GB50429–2007. Code for design of aluminium structures , 2007 (in Chinese)
15 Mazzolani F M. Aluminium alloy structures (2nd edition). London: E&Fn Spon, 1995
16 Wu Y, Zhang Q L. Experimental study on residual stresses of welded aluminium members.Steel Structure , 2007, 22(92): 29-32
[1] Feng YU, Cheng QIN, Shilong WANG, Junjie JIANG, Yuan FANG. Stress-strain relationship of recycled self-compacting concrete filled steel tubular column subjected to eccentric compression[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(3): 760-772.
[2] Yasmin MURAD, Wassel AL BODOUR, Ahmed ASHTEYAT. Seismic retrofitting of severely damaged RC connections made with recycled concrete using CFRP sheets[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 554-568.
[3] Masoud ABEDINI, Azrul A. MUTALIB, Chunwei ZHANG, Javad MEHRMASHHADI, Sudharshan Naidu RAMAN, Roozbeh ALIPOUR, Tohid MOMENI, Mohamed H. MUSSA. Large deflection behavior effect in reinforced concrete columns exposed to extreme dynamic loads[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 532-553.
[4] Fei GAO, Zhiqiang TANG, Biao HU, Junbo CHEN, Hongping ZHU, Jian MA. Investigation of the interior RC beam-column joints under monotonic antisymmetrical load[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1474-1494.
[5] Sheng PENG, Chengxiang XU, Xiaoqiang LIU. Truss-arch model for shear strength of seismic-damaged SRC frame columns strengthened with CFRP sheets[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 1324-1337.
[6] Mohammad Reza AZADI KAKAVAND, Reza ALLAHVIRDIZADEH. Enhanced empirical models for predicting the drift capacity of less ductile RC columns with flexural, shear, or axial failure modes[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1251-1270.
[7] Mahdi IZADI, Khosrow BARGI. Improvement of mechanical behavior of buried pipelines subjected to strike-slip faulting using textured pipeline[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1105-1119.
[8] M. ANBARASU, Mahmud ASHRAF. Structural behavior of intermediate length cold-formed steel rack columns with C-stitches[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 937-949.
[9] Mounir Ait BELKACEM, Hakim BECHTOULA, Nouredine BOURAHLA, Adel Ait BELKACEM. Effect of axial load and transverse reinforcements on the seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 831-851.
[10] Vivian W. Y. TAM, Jianzhuang XIAO, Sheng LIU, Zixuan CHEN. Behaviors of recycled aggregate concrete-filled steel tubular columns under eccentric loadings[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 628-639.
[11] Hui ZHENG, Zhi FANG, Bin CHEN. Experimental study on shear behavior of prestressed reactive powder concrete I-girders[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 618-627.
[12] Y B SUDHIR SASTRY, B G KIROS, F HAILU, P R BUDARAPU. Impact analysis of compressor rotor blades of an aircraft engine[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 505-514.
[13] Gholamreza ABDOLLAHZADEH, Seyed Mostafa SHABANIAN. Experimental and numerical analysis of beam to column joints in steel structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 642-661.
[14] Fatiha IGUETOULENE, Youcef BOUAFIA, Mohand Said KACHI. Non linear modeling of three-dimensional reinforced and fiber concrete structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(4): 439-453.
[15] Mengfei QU,Qiang XIE,Xinwen CAO,Wen ZHAO,Jianjun HE,Jiang JIN. Model test of stone columns as liquefaction countermeasure in sandy soils[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 481-487.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed