Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front. Struct. Civ. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (1) : 99-108    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0721-0
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Cement mortar with enhanced flexural strength and durability-related properties using in situ polymerized interpenetration network
Qing LIU, Renjun LIU, Qiao WANG, Rui LIANG, Zongjin LI, Guoxing SUN()
Joint Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Applied Physics and Materials Engineering, University of Macao, Macao SAR 999078, China
 Download: PDF(3816 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The low flexural strength and high brittleness of cementitious materials impair their service life in building structures. In this study, we developed a new polymer-modified mortar by in situ polymerization of acrylamide (AM) monomers during the cement setting, which enhanced the flexural and durable performances of mortars. The mechanical properties, micro-and-pore structures, hydrated products, interactions between cement hydrates and polyacrylamide (PAM), and durability-related properties of the mortars were investigated comprehensively. Mortars with 5% PAM exhibited the best performance in terms of flexural strength among all the mixtures. The mechanical strength of cement pastes modified by in situ polymerization of AM monomers was significantly superior to those modified by PAM. The chemical interactions between the polymer molecules and cement hydrates together with the formation of polymer films glued the cement hydrates and polymers and resulted in an interpenetrating network structure, which strengthened the flexural strength. Reductions in porosity and calcium hydroxide content and improvement in capillary water absorption were achieved with the addition of PAM. Finally, the chloride resistance was significantly enhanced with the incorporation of PAM.

Keywords acrylamide      in situ polymerization      interaction      porosity      durability     
Corresponding Author(s): Guoxing SUN   
Just Accepted Date: 26 January 2021   Online First Date: 05 March 2021    Issue Date: 12 April 2021
 Cite this article:   
Qing LIU,Renjun LIU,Qiao WANG, et al. Cement mortar with enhanced flexural strength and durability-related properties using in situ polymerized interpenetration network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 99-108.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s11709-021-0721-0
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y2021/V15/I1/99
composition percentage (wt%)
MgO 1.85
Al2O3 4.32
SiO2 20.19
SO4 4.46
K2O 0.59
CaO 65.52
Fe2O3 3.07
Tab.1  Chemical composition of cement
mix ID cement (kg/m3) sand (kg/m3) water (kg/m3) PAM (kg/m3)
RF 500 1350 300 0
PAM1 500 1350 300 5
PAM3 500 1350 300 15
PAM5 500 1350 300 25
Tab.2  Mix proportions
Fig.1  Schematic for calculation of chloride ion penetration depth. S is the area enclosed by the solid red line; d is the half width of the sample; h is the chloride penetration depth.
Fig.2  Mechanical properties of mortars. (a) Effect of PAM on compressive strength; (b) effect of PAM on flexural strength.
Fig.3  Mechanical properties of cement pastes (W/C = 0.4) modified by in situ polymerization of AM monomers and by PAM. (a) Compressive strength; (b) flexural strength. P03 and P06 denote cement paste with 0.3% and 0.6% PAM by in situ polymerization, respectively. PAM03 and PAM06 denote cement paste with 0.3% and 0.6% PAM, respectively.
Fig.4  SEM microstructure of mortars: (a) control mixture; (b) mortars with 5% PAM; (c) mortars with 5% PAM; (d) enlarged images of (a); (e) enlarged images of (b); (f) EDS of point in image (c).
Fig.5  FTIR spectra of 28 d hydrated cement and cement containing 1%, 3%, and 5% of PAM.
Fig.6  (a) TGA weight loss curves of samples at 28 d; (b) Enlarged image between 380°C and 450°C of (a).
Fig.7  XRD patterns for cement with 0, 1%, 3%, and 5% PAM at 28 d.
Fig.8  Pore size distribution of blank mortar and PAM-modified mortars: (a) cumulative pore volume against pore width; (b) BET surface area and pore volume against content of PAM.
Fig.9  Water absorption of mortars: (a) increase in water absorption against time; (b) capillary absorption coefficient against content of PAM.
Fig.10  Chloride penetration depth of mortars exposed to 3% sodium chloride solution.
1 Y Mohammadi, R Carkon-Azad, S P Singh, S K Kaushik. Impact resistance of steel fibrous concrete containing fibres of mixed aspect ratio. Construction & Building Materials, 2009, 23(1): 183–189
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.002
2 J Li, Y X Zhang. Evolution and calibration of a numerical model for modelling of hybrid-fibre ECC panels under high-velocity impact. Composite Structures, 2011, 93(11): 2714–2722
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.05.033
3 Y Ding, D Li, Y Zhang, C Azevedo. Experimental investigation on the composite effect of steel rebars and macro fibers on the impact behavior of high performance self-compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 2017, 136: 495–505
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.073
4 L Soufeiani, S N Raman, M Z B Jumaat, U J Alengaram, G Ghadyani, P Mendis. Influences of the volume fraction and shape of steel fibers on fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to dynamic loading–A review. Engineering Structures, 2016, 124: 405–417
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.029
5 X Chen, G Zhu, M Zhou, J Wang, Q Chen. Effect of organic polymers on the properties of slag-based geopolymers. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 167: 216–224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.031
6 W E Brooks. Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Microsilica Concrete Bridge Deck Overlay at Link River Bridge, Experimental Features Project 98–01. Oregon: Oregon Department of Transportation, 2000
7 R Gagnç. Reinforced concrete bridge deck repair using a thin bonded overlay: Results from the Cosmos bridge experimental repair. In: International RILEM TC 193-RLS Workshop on Bonded Concrete Overlays. Stockholm: RILEM Publications SARL, 2004, 67–82
8 L Agavriloaie, S Oprea, M Barbuta, F Luca. Characterisation of polymer concrete with epoxy polyurethane acryl matrix. Construction & Building Materials, 2012, 37: 190–196
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.037
9 M S S Ribeiro, A F Gonçalves, F A B Branco. Styrene-butadiene polymer action on compressive and tensile strengths of cement mortars. Materials and Structures, 2008, 41(7): 1263–1273
https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9324-z
10 Q Liu, R Liang, Z J Li, S Y Guo, G X Sun. Mechanical strong and durable cement mortars reinforced by controlling the polymer phase size. Materials Research Express, 2019, 6(7): 075203
https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab117b
11 M Lidmila, P Tesárek, T Plachy, Z Prošek, V Nežerka, J Topič. Composite material based on cement and PVA: Evolution of mechanical properties during first 28 days. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 1054: 215–220
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.215
12 T Yaowarat, S Horpibulsuk, A Arulrajah, M Mirzababaei, A S A Rashid. Compressive and flexural strength of polyvinyl alcohol-modified pavement concrete using recycled concrete aggregates. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2018, 30(4): 04018046
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002233
13 S Papaioannou, R Argyropoulou, C Kalogiannidou, G Melidis, L Papadopoulou, I Evelzaman, M Argyropoulou. Mechanical and adhesion properties of polymer-modified cement mortars in relation with their microstructure. Journal of Adhesion, 2019, 95(2): 126–145
https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2017.1406348
14 Q Liu, W Liu, Z J Li, S J Guo, G X Sun. Ultra-lightweight cement composites with excellent flexural strength, thermal insulation and water resistance achieved by establishing interpenetrating network. Construction & Building Materials, 2020, 250: 118923
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118923
15 M K Joo, B C Lho. Evaluation of properties of polymer-modified mortar with CSA. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 2015, 19(1): 35–44
https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2015.19.1.035
16 L Li, R Wang, Q Lu. Influence of polymer latex on the setting time, mechanical properties and durability of calcium sulfoaluminate cement mortar. Construction & Building Materials, 2018, 169: 911–922
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.005
17 P P Bansal, R Sidhu. Mechanical and durability properties of fluoropolymer modified cement mortar. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2017, 63(3): 317–327
18 J Monteny, N De Belie, E Vincke, W Verstraete, L Taerwe. Chemical and microbiological tests to simulate sulfuric acid corrosion of polymer-modified concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 2001, 31(9): 1359–1365
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00565-8
19 ASTM D790–10. Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2010
20 Z Sun, Q Xu. Micromechanical analysis of polyacrylamide-modified concrete for improving strengths. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008, 490(1–2): 181–192
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.026
21 R Yan. Water Soluble Macromolecular. Beijing: Chemistry Industry Press, 2003, 86–87
22 J Schulze. Influence of water-cement ratio and cement content on the properties of polymer-modified mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, 29(6): 909–915
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00060-5
23 R Wang, P M Wang, X G Li. Physical and mechanical properties of styrene–butadiene rubber emulsion modified cement mortars. Cement and Concrete Research, 2005, 35(5): 900–906
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.07.012
24 Z Lu, X Zhou, J Zhang. Study on the performance of a new type of water-repellent admixture for cement mortar. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(11): 2015–2019
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.019
25 U S Rai, R K Singh. Effect of polyacrylamide on the different properties of cement and mortar. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2005, 392(1–2): 42–50
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.050
[1] Jianzhuang XIAO, Nv HAN, Yan LI, Zhongsen ZHANG, Surendra P. SHAH. Review of recent developments in cement composites reinforced with fibers and nanomaterials[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 1-19.
[2] Qian-Qing ZHANG, Shan-Wei LIU, Ruo-Feng FENG, Jian-Gu QIAN, Chun-Yu CUI. Finite element prediction on the response of non-uniformly arranged pile groups considering progressive failure of pile-soil system[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 961-982.
[3] Reza KHADEMI ZAHEDI, Pouyan ALIMOURI, Hooman KHADEMI ZAHEDI, Mohammad SHISHESAZ. Investigating peak stresses in fitting and repair patches of buried polyethylene gas pipes[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 147-168.
[4] Nishant SHARMA, Kaustubh DASGUPTA, Arindam DEY. Optimum lateral extent of soil domain for dynamic SSI analysis of RC framed buildings on pile foundations[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 62-81.
[5] Zhi QIAO, Zuanfeng PAN, Weichen XUE, Shaoping MENG. Experimental study on flexural behavior of ECC/RC composite beams with U-shaped ECC permanent formwork[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1271-1287.
[6] Xudong SHAO, Lu DENG, Junhui CAO. Innovative steel-UHPC composite bridge girders for long-span bridges[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 981-989.
[7] Maryam ZANDIYEHVAKILI, Isa HOJAT, Mehdi MAHMUDI. The role of geometrical features in the architectural- structural interaction: Some case studies of the Iranian ancient architecture[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 716-724.
[8] Hamid Taghavi GANJI, Mohammad ALEMBAGHERI, Mohammad Houshmand KHANEGHAHI. Evaluation of seismic reliability of gravity dam-reservoir-inhomogeneous foundation coupled system[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 701-715.
[9] Farhoud KALATEH. Dynamic failure analysis of concrete dams under air blast using coupled Euler-Lagrange finite element method[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 15-37.
[10] S.A. GHAHARI, E. GHAFARI, L. ASSI. Pore structure of cementitious material enhanced by graphitic nanomaterial: a critical review[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 137-147.
[11] Priyanka GHOSH, S. RAJESH, J. SAI CHAND. Linear and nonlinear elastic analysis of closely spaced strip foundations using Pasternak model[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(2): 228-243.
[12] Jenny LIU,Sheng ZHAO,Anthony MULLIN. Laboratory assessment of Alaska aggregates using Micro-Deval test[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 27-34.
[13] Nazim Abdul NARIMAN. Influence of fluid-structure interaction on vortex induced vibration and lock-in phenomena in long span bridges[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 363-384.
[14] L. P. SINGH,A. GOEL,S. K. BHATTACHARYYA,G. MISHRA. Quantification of hydration products in cementitious materials incorporating silica nanoparticles[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(2): 162-167.
[15] Jiu-jiang WU,Yan LI,Qian-gong CHENG,Hua WEN,Xin LIANG. A simplified method for the determination of vertically loaded pile-soil interface parameters in layered soil based on FLAC3D[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(1): 103-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed