Please wait a minute...
Quantitative Biology

ISSN 2095-4689

ISSN 2095-4697(Online)

CN 10-1028/TM

Postal Subscription Code 80-971

Quant. Biol.    2021, Vol. 9 Issue (3) : 255-266    https://doi.org/10.15302/J-QB-021-0264
REVIEW
High-throughput experimental methods for investigating biomolecular condensates
Taoyu Chen1, Qi Lei1, Minglei Shi2, Tingting Li1()
1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China
2. MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics; Bioinformatics Division and Center for Synthetic & Systems Biology, TNLIST; School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
 Download: PDF(2523 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Background: The concept of biomolecular condensate was put forward recently to emphasize the ability of certain cellular compartments to concentrate molecules and comprise proteins and nucleic acids with specific biological functions, from ribosome genesis to RNA splicing. Due to their unique role in biological processes, it is crucial to investigate their compositions, which is a primary determinant of condensate properties.

Results: Since a wide range of macromolecules comprise biomolecular condensates, it is necessary for researchers to investigate them using high-throughput methodologies while low-throughput experiments are not efficient enough. These high-throughput methods usually purify interacting protein libraries from condensates before being scanned in mass spectrometry. It is possible to extract organelles as a whole for specific condensates for further analysis, however, most condensates do not have a distinguishable marker or are sensitive to shear force to be extracted as a whole. Affinity tagging allows a comprehensive view of interacting proteins of target molecule yet only proteins with strong bonds may be pulled down. Proximity labeling serves as a complementary method to label more dynamic proteins with weaker interactions, increasing sensitivity while decreasing specificity. Image-based fluorescent screening takes another path by scanning images automatically to illustrate the condensing state of biomolecules within membraneless organelles, which is a unique feature unlike the previous mass spectrometry-based methods.

Conclusion: This review presents a rough glimpse into high-throughput methodologies for biomolecular condensate investigation to encourage usage of bioinformatic tools by researchers in relevant fields.

Keywords biomolecular condensates      high-throughput      phase separation      interaction     
Corresponding Author(s): Tingting Li   
Just Accepted Date: 12 July 2021   Online First Date: 02 September 2021    Issue Date: 29 September 2021
 Cite this article:   
Taoyu Chen,Qi Lei,Minglei Shi, et al. High-throughput experimental methods for investigating biomolecular condensates[J]. Quant. Biol., 2021, 9(3): 255-266.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/qb/EN/10.15302/J-QB-021-0264
https://academic.hep.com.cn/qb/EN/Y2021/V9/I3/255
Fig.1  An overview of common high-throughput strategies to investigate biomolecular condensates.
Affinity tags Chemical composition Size Ref.
Protein A staphylococcal protein A 42 kDa [ 27]
LacZ β-galactosidase 130 kDa [ 27]
His-tag 2?10 consecutive histones, usually 6 310?1550 Da [ 28]
BCCP Biotin-carboxy carrier protein 120 kDa [ 29]
SBP Straptavidin-biotin Peptide 4.5 kDa [ 30]
TAP-tag Protein A and calmodulin-binding peptide (CBP) separated by tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease cleavage site 21 kDa [ 31]
Flag-HA tag Flag and hemagglutinin glued together 5 kDa [ 32]
Tab.1  Overview of common protein affinity tags
Fig.2  Protein-centric proximity labeling and RNA-centric ribonucleoprotein complex mapping.
1 S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. , Rosen, M. K. Banani. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2017, 18 : 285– 298
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.7
2 J. R. , Nunnari, J. Friedman. Mitochondrial form and function. Nature, 2014, 505 : 335– 343
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12985
3 E. Guo, C. Y., E. Manteiga, R. J., M. Henninger, H. J., K. Sabari, V. B.. Pol II phosphorylation regulates a switch between transcriptional and splicing condensates. Nature, 2019, 572 : 543– 548
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1464-0
4 D. Tripathi, Y. V., T. Ellis, M. J., F. Shen, A. Z.. The nuclear-retained noncoding RNA MALAT1 regulates alternative splicing by modulating SR splicing factor phosphorylation. Mol. Cell, 2010, 39 : 925– 938
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.011
5 T. Pederson. The nucleolus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2011, 3 : a000638–
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000638
6 F. M., van Koningsbruggen, S., Navascués, J. , Lamond, A. I. Boisvert. The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2007, 8 : 574– 585
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2184
7 S., Gladfelter, A. , Mittag, T. Alberti. Considerations and challenges in studying liquid-liquid phase separation and biomolecular condensates. Cell, 2019, 176 : 419– 434
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.035
8 P. Brangwynne, R. C., S. Eckmann, A C.. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science, 2009, 324 : 1729– 1732
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172046
9 A. , Weber, S. C. Peng. Evidence for and against liquid-liquid phase separation in the nucleus. Noncoding RNA, 2019, 5 : 50–
https://doi.org/10.3390/ncrna5040050
10 A. A., Weber, C. A. , Jülicher, F. Hyman. Liquid-liquid phase separation in biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 2014, 30 : 39– 58
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100913-013325
11 T. McSwiggen, S. D., S. Hansen, B. A., K. Teves. Evidence for DNA-mediated nuclear compartmentalization distinct from phase separation. eLife, 2019, 8 : e47098–
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47098
12 Q., Wang, X., Dou, Z., Yang, W., Huang, B., Lou, J. , Zhang, Z. Li. Protein databases related to liquid-liquid phase separation. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21 : 1– 16
13 I. A., Sturgill, D., Sung, M. H., Hager, G. L. , Dundr, M. Sawyer. Cajal body function in genome organization and transcriptome diversity. BioEssays, 2016, 38 : 1197– 1208
https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201600144
14 B. , Aebersold, R. Domon. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science, 2006, 312 : 212– 217
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124619
15 R. , Mann, M. Aebersold. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature, 2003, 422 : 198– 207
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01511
16 K., Huang, Q., Yu, C., Shen, B., Sevilla, C., Shi, M., Hermjakob, H., Chen, Y. , Li, T. You. PhaSepDB: a database of liquid-liquid phase separation related proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019, 48 : 354– 359
17 P. Mészáros. PhaSePro: the database of proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation. Nucleic Acids Res., 2020, 48 : D360– D367
18 Q., Peng, X., Li, Y., Tang, W., Zhu, J., Huang, J., Qi, Y. , Zhang, Z. Li. LLPSDB: a database of proteins undergoing liquid-liquid phase separation in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019, 48 : 320– 327
19 W., Guo, Y., Lin, S., Mei, B., Wu, Y., Jiang, P., Tan, X., Zhang, W., Chen, G., Peng, D. Ning. DrLLPS: a data resource of liquid-liquid phase separation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res., 2020, 48 : D288– D295
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1027
20 B., Lorenzo Gotor, N., Dhar, R., Cirillo, D., Baldrighi, M., Tartaglia, G. G. , Lehner, B. Bolognesi. A concentration-dependent liquid phase separation can cause toxicity upon increased protein expression. Cell Rep., 2016, 16 : 222– 231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.076
21 R. M. C., Chong, P. A., Tsang, B., Kim, T. H., Bah, A., Farber, P., Lin, H. , Forman-Kay, J. D. Vernon. Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. eLife, 2018, 7 : e31486–
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.31486
22 B., Chen, Z., Yu, C., Chen, T., Shi, M. , Li, T. Shen. Computational screening of biological phase-separating proteins. Genom. Proteom. Bioinfor., 2021, S1672-0229(21)00022-X–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.11.003
23 J. S., Lam, Y. W., Leung, A. K. L., Ong, S. E., Lyon, C. E., Lamond, A. I. , Mann, M. Andersen. Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature, 2005, 433 : 77– 83
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03207
24 P. Boke, A. E., J Ruer. Amyloid-like self-assembly of a cellular compartment. Cell, 2016, 166 : 637– 650
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.051
25 Hubstenberger. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol. Cell, 2017, 68 : 144– 157
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.003
26 A. S., Batalha, I. L. , Roque, A. C. Pina. Affinity tags in protein purification and peptide enrichment: an overview. Methods Mol. Biol., 2014, 1129 : 147– 168
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-977-2_14
27 Green, M. R. and Sambrook, J. (2012) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 4th Ed., New York City: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
28 W. Li, S. X., W. Rees, E. J., W. Xue, S. P.. New insights into the DT40 B cell receptor cluster using a proteomic proximity labeling assay. J. Biol. Chem., 2014, 289 : 14434– 14447
https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.529578
29 J. E. J. Jr. Cronan. Biotination of proteins in vivo. A post-translational modification to label, purify, and study proteins. J. Biol. Chem., 1990, 265 : 10327– 10333
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)86949-6
30 K. Terpe. Overview of tag protein fusions: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2003, 60 : 523– 533
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-002-1158-6
31 Y. Li. The tandem affinity purification technology: an overview. Biotechnol. Lett., 2011, 33 : 1487– 1499
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0592-x
32 J., Bénard, M., Ernoult-Lange, M., Minshall, N., Standart, N., Kress, M. , Weil, D. Ayache. P-body assembly requires DDX6 repression complexes rather than decay or Ataxin2/2L complexes. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2015, 26 : 2579– 2595
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-03-0136
33 X., Yang, C., Alexandrov, A., Grayhack, E. J., Behm-Ansmant, I. , Yu, Y. T. Ma. Pseudouridylation of yeast U2 snRNA is catalyzed by either an RNA-guided or RNA-independent mechanism. EMBO J., 2005, 24 : 2403– 2413
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600718
34 T. N., Havelka, W. A. , Kaplan, S. Tai. A broad-host-range vector system for cloning and translational lacZ fusion analysis. Plasmid, 1988, 19 : 175– 188
https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-619X(88)90037-6
35 K. Jønson, H. L., C Vikesaa. Molecular composition of IMP1 ribonucleoprotein granules. Mol. Cell. Proteomics, 2007, 6 : 798– 811
https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M600346-MCP200
36 Trinkle-Mulcahy. Recent advances in proximity-based labeling methods for interactome mapping. F1000 Res., 2019, 8 : F1000 Faculty Rev-135–
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16903.1
37 K. , Kotani, N. Honke. The enzyme-mediated activation of radical source reaction: a new approach to identify partners of a given molecule in membrane microdomains. J. Neurochem., 2011, 116 : 690– 695
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07027.x
38 D. Martell, J. J., L. Deerinck, K. T., E. Sancak, H. Y., Y Poulos. Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol., 2012, 30 : 1143– 1148
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2375
39 S., Li, J. , Ting, A. Y. Han. Proximity labeling: spatially resolved proteomic mapping for neurobiology. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 2018, 50 : 17– 23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.10.015
40 S. S., Martell, J. D., Kamer, K. J., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Mootha, V. K. , Ting, A. Y. Lam. Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat. Methods, 2015, 12 : 51– 54
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3179
41 L. Markmiller, Y. S., C. Soltanieh. Context-dependent and disease-specific diversity in protein interactions within stress granules. Cell, 2018, 172 : 590– 604
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.032
42 M. N., Harris, T. D., Shaughnessy, K. J. , Litt, G. J. Bobrow. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. Application to immunoassays. J. Immunol. Methods, 1989, 125 : 279– 285
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(89)90104-X
43 M. N., Shaughnessy, K. J. , Litt, G. J. Bobrow. Catalyzed reporter deposition, a novel method of signal amplification. II. Application to membrane immunoassays. J. Immunol. Methods, 1991, 137 : 103– 112
https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(91)90399-Z
44 J., Sweredoski, M. J., Moradian, A. , Belmont, A. S. Dopie. Tyramide signal amplification mass spectrometry (TSA-MS) ratio identifies nuclear speckle proteins. J. Cell Biol., 2020, 219 : e201910207–
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201910207
45 A. W., Balla, K. M., Bennett, E. J. , Troemel, E. R. Reinke. Identification of microsporidia host-exposed proteins reveals a repertoire of rapidly evolving proteins. Nat. Commun., 2017, 8 : 14023–
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14023
46 A. W., Mak, R., Troemel, E. R. , Bennett, E. J. Reinke. In vivo mapping of tissue- and subcellular-specific proteomes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Sci. Adv., 2017, 3 : e1602426–
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1602426
47 L. Chen, D. C., Y. Hu, Y. Y., A. Udeshi. Proteomic mapping in live Drosophila tissues using an engineered ascorbate peroxidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2015, 112 : 12093– 12098
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515623112
48 B. , Henikoff, S. van Steensel. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat. Biotechnol., 2000, 18 : 424– 428
https://doi.org/10.1038/74487
49 K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M. , Burke, B. Roux. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol., 2012, 196 : 801– 810
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201112098
50 Y. Youn, H. J., J. Dunham, D. R. W., I. Hong, W. M. S.. High-density proximity mapping reveals the subcellular organization of mRNA-associated granules and bodies. Mol. Cell, 2018, 69 : 517– 532
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2017.12.020
51 D. I., Jensen, S. C., Noble, K. A., Kc, B., Roux, K. H., Motamedchaboki, K. , Roux, K. J. Kim. An improved smaller biotin ligase for BioID proximity labeling. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2016, 27 : 1188– 1196
https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-12-0844
52 S. Ramanathan, H. M., J. Majzoub, G. K., R. Rao. RNA-protein interaction detection in living cells. Nat. Methods, 2018, 15 : 207– 212
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4601
53 C. Branon, A. T., D. Bosch, D. J., A. Sanchez, L. A., Y Udeshi. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol., 2018, 36 : 880– 887
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4201
54 F. Cho, C. K., D. Branon, W. T., K. Rajeev, A. S.. Split-TurboID enables contact-dependent proximity labeling in cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 2020, 117 : 12143– 12154
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1919528117
55 D. L. , Lamond, A. I. Spector. Nuclear speckles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2011, 3 : a000646–
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000646
56 A. H. , Lamond, A. I. Fox. Paraspeckles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol., 2010, 2 : a000687–
https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000687
57 A. West, E. J.. Structural, super-resolution microscopy analysis of paraspeckle nuclear body organization. J. Cell Biol., 2016, 214 : 817– 830
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201601071
58 S. Fei, T. S. J., S. Jadaliha, M. M.. Quantitative analysis of multilayer organization of proteins and RNA in nuclear speckles at super resolution. J. Cell Sci., 2017, 130 : 4180– 4192
https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.206854
59 J., Hermesh, O., Eliscovich, C., Nalpas, N., Franz-Wachtel, M., Maček, B. , Jansen, R. P. Mukherjee. β-Actin mRNA interactome mapping by proximity biotinylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2019, 116 : 12863– 12872
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820737116
60 M. Castello, W A.. Comprehensive identification of RNA-binding proteins by RNA interactome capture. Methods Mol. Biol., 2016, 131– 139
61 X., Guo, X., Yin, M., Tariq, M., Lai, Y., Kanwal, S., Zhou, J., Li, N., Lv, Y., Pulido-Quetglas, C. Bao. Capturing the interactome of newly transcribed RNA. Nat. Methods, 2018, 15 : 213– 220
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4595
62 M. D. Simon. Capture hybridization analysis of RNA targets (CHART). Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., 2013, 101 : 21.25.1– 21.25.16
63 J., Lander, E. S. , Guttman, M. Engreitz. RNA antisense purification (RAP) for mapping RNA interactions with chromatin. Methods Mol. Biol., 2015, 1262 : 183– 197
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2253-6_11
64 W., Cho, K. F., Cavanagh, P. E. , Ting, A. Y. Qin. Deciphering molecular interactions by proximity labeling. Nat. Methods, 2021, 18 : 133– 143
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01010-5
65 S., Simen, B., Myers, S. A., Carr, S. A., He, C. , Ting, A. Y. Han. RNA-protein interaction mapping via MS2- or Cas13-based APEX targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2020, 17 : 22068– 22079
66 Li, Y., Liu, S., Cao, L., Luo, Y., Du, H., Li, S. and You, F. (2021) CBRPP: a new RNA-centric method to study RNA-protein interactions. RNA Biol., doi:
67 W., Li, J., Zhu, X., Wang, X., Fan, L., Sun, W., Liao, L., Zhang, J., Li, X., Ye, J. Yi. CRISPR-assisted detection of RNA-protein interactions in living cells. Nat. Methods, 2020, 17 : 685– 688
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0866-0
68 X., Zheng, Y., Duan, Y., Liu, Y. , Zhong, W. Fang. Recent advances in design of fluorescence-based assays for high-throughput screening. Anal. Chem., 2019, 91 : 482– 504
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b05303
69 D., Battich, N. , Pelkmans, L. Berchtold. A systems-level study reveals regulators of membrane-less organelles in human cells. Mol. Cell, 2018, 72 : 1035– 1049. e5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.10.036
70 C. Wheeler, Q. E., M. Vu, Nostrand A., L. Einstein, A. J., L. DiSalvo, W M.. Pooled CRISPR screens with imaging on microraft arrays reveals stress granule-regulatory factors. Nat. Methods, 2020, 17 : 636– 642
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-0826-8
71 Lyon, A. S., Peeples, W. B. and Rosen, M. K. (2021) A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., doi:
[1] Shi Shuyu, Si Wen, Ouyang Xiaoyi, Wei Ping. Phase separation in synthetic biology[J]. Quant. Biol., 2021, 9(4): 378-399.
[2] Pavel Pronkin, Alexander Tatikolov. Molecular docking of cyanine and squarylium dyes with SARS-CoV-2 proteases NSP3, NSP5 and NSP12[J]. Quant. Biol., 2021, 9(4): 440-450.
[3] Xianyi Lian, Xiaodi Yang, Jiqi Shao, Fujun Hou, Shiping Yang, Dongli Pan, Ziding Zhang. Prediction and analysis of human-herpes simplex virus type 1 protein-protein interactions by integrating multiple methods[J]. Quant. Biol., 2020, 8(4): 312-324.
[4] Guojun Liu, Mikhail A. Bolkov, Irina A. Tuzankina, Irina G. Danilova. Identification of candidate disease genes in patients with common variable immunodeficiency[J]. Quant. Biol., 2019, 7(3): 190-201.
[5] Shashank Singh, Yang Yang, Barnabás Póczos, Jian Ma. Predicting enhancer-promoter interaction from genomic sequence with deep neural networks[J]. Quant. Biol., 2019, 7(2): 122-137.
[6] Yongxiao Yang, Wei Wang, Yuan Lou, Jianxin Yin, Xinqi Gong. Geometric and amino acid type determinants for protein-protein interaction interfaces[J]. Quant. Biol., 2018, 6(2): 163-174.
[7] Morihiro Hayashida, Noriyuki Okada, Mayumi Kamada, Hitoshi Koyano. Improving conditional random field model for prediction of protein-RNA residue-base contacts[J]. Quant. Biol., 2018, 6(2): 155-162.
[8] Zhijun Han, Gang Wei. Computational tools for Hi-C data analysis[J]. Quant. Biol., 2017, 5(3): 215-225.
[9] Krishna Choudhary, Fei Deng, Sharon Aviran. Comparative and integrative analysis of RNA structural profiling data: current practices and emerging questions[J]. Quant. Biol., 2017, 5(1): 3-24.
[10] Ze-Gang Wei, Shao-Wu Zhang, Fang Jing. Exploring the interaction patterns among taxa and environments from marine metagenomic data[J]. Quant. Biol., 2016, 4(2): 84-91.
[11] Ronak Y. Patel, Christian Garde, Gary D. Stormo. Determination of specificity influencing residues for key transcription factor families[J]. Quant. Biol., 2015, 3(3): 115-123.
[12] Yongchang Zheng,Masood ur Rehman Kayani,Ting F. Zhu. Rapid identification of multi-strain HBV infection in patient by high-throughput DNA sequencing[J]. Quant. Biol., 2015, 3(2): 103-106.
[13] Hammad Naveed, Jingdong J. Han. Structure-based protein-protein interaction networks and drug design[J]. Quant. Biol., 2013, 1(3): 183-191.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed