Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (3) : 518-527    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-1926-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Synthesis of zeolite Na-P1 from coal fly ash produced by gasification and its application as adsorbent for removal of Cr(VI) from water
Yixin Zhang1,3, Lu Zhou2, Liqing Chen2, Yang Guo2, Fanhui Guo2, Jianjun Wu2(), Baiqian Dai4()
1. National Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Purification, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
2. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
3. School of Chemistry, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
4. Department of Chemical Engineering, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
 Download: PDF(1127 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The coal fly ash produced by gasification is estimated to be over 80 million ton per year in China by 2021. It has mainly been disposed as solid waste by landfill. There is lack of study focused on its utilization. In this paper, the coal fly ash produced by gasification was at first analyzed and then applied to synthesize zeolite as an adsorbent. The effects of synthesis conditions on the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of zeolite were investigated. The results from X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscope indicated that the crystallinity of the synthesized zeolite is the most important factor to affect the CEC. When the synthesized zeolite with the highest CEC (275.5 meq/100 g) was used for the adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution, the maximum adsorption capacity for Cr(VI) was found to be 17.924 mg/g. The effects of pH, contact time and initial concentration on the adsorption of Cr(VI) were also investigated. The adsorption kinetics and isotherms can be well described by the pseudo-second-order model and Langmuir isotherm model, respectively.

Keywords coal fly ash      gasification      zeolite      Na-P1      chromium(VI)     
Corresponding Author(s): Jianjun Wu,Baiqian Dai   
Just Accepted Date: 13 April 2020   Online First Date: 28 May 2020    Issue Date: 10 May 2021
 Cite this article:   
Yixin Zhang,Lu Zhou,Liqing Chen, et al. Synthesis of zeolite Na-P1 from coal fly ash produced by gasification and its application as adsorbent for removal of Cr(VI) from water[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(3): 518-527.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-020-1926-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2021/V15/I3/518
Compound SiO2 Al2O3 Fe2O3 CaO MgO K2O NaO TiO2 Others
Content/% 51.86 18.38 7.94 7.52 3.5 2.42 1.95 1.04 5.39
Tab.1  The major chemical compounds in the coal fly ash produced by gasification process (wt-%, dry basis)
Fig.1  The XRD pattern of the coal fly ash produced by gasification (Q-quartz, M-mullite).
Fig.2  SEM of the coal fly ash produced by gasification.
Fig.3  The particle size distribution of the coal fly ash produced by gasification.
Fig.4  Effect of operation conditions on the CEC of synthesized zeolite: Three of four conditions (NaOH/coal fly ash ratio 1.1, alkali fusion temperature 550°C, hydrothermal treatment temperature 100°C, and hydrothermal treatment time 12 h) is kept constant while changing (a) NaOH/coal fly ash ratio, (b) alkali fusion temperature, (c) hydrothermal treatment temperature, and (d) hydrothermal treatment time.
Fig.5  The XRD patterns of synthesized zeolite with different CECs (P: zeolite Na-P1).
Fig.6  The SEM images of synthesized zeolite with different CEC. (a) CEC= 89.0 mmol/100 g, (b) CEC= 146.5 mmol/100 g, (c) CEC= 178.1 mmol/100 g, (d) CEC= 219.6 mmol/100 g, (e) CEC= 254.3 mmol/100 g, (f) CEC= 275.5 mmol/100 g.
Fig.7  Effect of pH on the adsorption of Cr(VI) (initial Cr(VI) concentration 100 mg/L, adsorbent dose 5 g/L, and contact time 120 min).
Fig.8  Effect of contact time on the adsorption of Cr(VI) with different initial concentration (pH 3, adsorbent dose 5 g/L).
Fig.9  Pseudo-second order model plots for the adsorption of Cr(VI) with different initial concentration (pH 3, adsorbent dose 5 g/L).
Initial concentration /(mg·L?1) R2 k qe/(mg·L?1)
20 0.999 0.122 3.764
50 0.999 0.025 9.151
70 0.999 0.014 12.309
100 0.999 0.020 15.482
150 0.999 0.011 16.829
Tab.2  The constants and correlation coefficients of pseudo-second order model plots for the adsorption of Cr(VI) with different initial concentration.
Fig.10  Effect of initial Cr(VI) concentration on the adsorption of Cr(VI) by synthesized zeolite (adsorbent dose 5 g/L, contact time 120 min, pH 3).
Fig.11  Langmuir isotherm plots for the adsorption of Cr(VI) (pH 3, contact time 120 min, adsorbent dose 5 g/L).
Fig.12  Freundlich isotherm plots for the adsorption of Cr(VI) (adsorbent dose 5 g/L, contact time 120 min, pH 3).
Langmuir constants Freundlich constants
b qmax/(mg·g−1) R2 Kf n R2
0.515 17.924 0.999 4.470 3.562 0.888
Tab.3  The constants and correlation coefficients of Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm plots for the adsorption of Cr(VI)
No. Raw material of adsorbent Adsorption test Ref.
Adsorbent dose/(g·L?1) Initial Cr(VI) concentration /(mg·L?1) Contact time Temperature /°C pH Adsorption capacity/(mg·g?1)
1 Coal fly ash from gasification 5 100 2 h 20 3 17.924 This study
2 Ash gourd peel powder 6 75–350 40–60 min 28 1 18.7 [45]
3 Red mud 10 9.6×10?4?9.6×10?3 24 h 30 2 35.66 [46]
4 Distillery sludge 6?10 10 105 min ? 3 5.7 [47]
5 Chitosan 13 30 ? 24.85 3 7.94 [48]
6 Peat moss 1 500 120 min ? ? 29.0 [49]
Tab.4  A comparison of the adsorption capacity for Cr(VI) between the synthesized zeolite in this study and some other low-cost adsorbents with different raw material
1 Y Zhang, J Wu, Y Wang, Z Miao, C Si, X Shang, N Zhang. Effect of hydrothermal dewatering on the physico-chemical structure and surface properties of Shengli lignite. Fuel, 2016, 164: 128–133
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.055
2 M A Kronbauer, M Izquierdo, S Dai, F B Waanders, N J Wagner, M Mastalerz, J C Hower, M L S Oliveira, S Taffarel, D Bizani, L F O Silva. Geochemistry of ultra-fine and nano-compounds in coal gasification ashes: A synoptic view. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 456-457: 95–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.066
3 A J Minchener. Coal gasification for advanced power generation. Fuel, 2005, 84(17): 2222–2235
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.08.035
4 R S Blissett, N A Rowson. A review of the multi-component utilisation of coal fly ash. Fuel, 2012, 97: 1–23
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.024
5 M S Gustin, K Ladwig. An assessment of the significance of mercury release from coal fly ash. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2004, 54(3): 320–330
https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470900
6 S K Choi, S Lee, Y K Song, H S Moon. Leaching characteristics of selected Korean fly ashes and its implications for the groundwater composition near the ash disposal mound. Fuel, 2002, 81(8): 1083–1090
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00006-6
7 M Ahmaruzzaman. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2010, 36(3): 327–363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.11.003
8 X Querol, N Moreno, J C Umaña, A Alastuey, E Hernández, A López-Soler, F Plana. Synthesis of zeolites from coal fly ash: An overview. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2002, 50(1): 413–423
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-5162(02)00124-6
9 Z T Yao, X S Ji, P K Sarker, J H Tang, L Q Ge, M S Xia, Y Q Xi. A comprehensive review on the applications of coal fly ash. Earth-Science Reviews, 2015, 141: 105–121
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.016
10 M Vyšvařil, P Bayer. Immobilization of heavy metals in natural zeolite-blended cement pastes. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 151: 162–169
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.363
11 A Shanableh, A Kharabsheh. Stabilization of Cd, Ni and Pb in soil using natural zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1996, 45(2-3): 207–217
https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(95)00093-3
12 I Ali, M Asim, T A Khan. Low cost adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 113: 170–183
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.028
13 P Kunecki, R Panek, M Wdowin, W Franus. Synthesis of faujasite (FAU) and tschernichite (LTA) type zeolites as a potential direction of the development of lime Class C fly ash. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 2017, 166: 69–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.minpro.2017.07.007
14 M Wdowin, M Franus, R Panek, L Badura, W Franus. The conversion technology of fly ash into zeolites. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2014, 16(6): 1217–1223
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0719-6
15 X Querol, J C Umaña, F Plana, A Alastuey, A Lopez-Soler, A Medinaceli, A Valero, M J Domingo, E Garcia-Rojo. Synthesis of zeolites from fly ash at pilot plant scale. Examples of potential applications. Fuel, 2001, 80(6): 857–865
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00156-3
16 A Molina, C Poole. A comparative study using two methods to produce zeolites from fly ash. Minerals Engineering, 2004, 17(2): 167–173
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2003.10.025
17 J Bai, W Li, B Li. Characterization of low-temperature coal ash behaviors at high temperatures under reducing atmosphere. Fuel, 2008, 87(4-5): 583–591
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.02.010
18 G P Huffman, F E Huggins, G R Dunmyre. Investigation of the high-temperature behaviour of coal ash in reducing and oxidizing atmospheres. Fuel, 1981, 60(7): 585–597
https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(81)90158-7
19 Y Zhang, J Dong, F Guo, Z Shao, J Wu. Zeolite synthesized from coal fly ash produced by a gasification process for Ni2+ removal from water. Minerals (Basel), 2018, 8(3): 116
https://doi.org/10.3390/min8030116
20 S Xia, Z Song, P Jeyakumar, S M Shaheen, J Rinklebe, Y S Ok, N Bolan, H Wang. A critical review on bioremediation technologies for Cr(VI)-contaminated soils and wastewater. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 49(12): 1027–1078
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1564526
21 R Jobby, P Jha, A K Yadav, N Desai. Biosorption and biotransformation of hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere, 2018, 207: 255–266
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.050
22 F Fu, Q Wang. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 2011, 92(3): 407–418
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011
23 S Bo, W Ren, C Lei, Y Xie, Y Cai, S Wang, J Gao, Q Ni, J Yao. Flexible and porous cellulose aerogels/zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) hybrids for adsorption removal of Cr(IV) from water. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2018, 262: 135–141
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2018.02.022
24 M Visa, A M Chelaru. Hydrothermally modified fly ash for heavy metals and dyes removal in advanced wastewater treatment. Applied Surface Science, 2014, 303: 14–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.02.025
25 N Koukouzas, C Vasilatos, G Itskos, I Mitsis, A Moutsatsou. Removal of heavy metals from wastewater using CFB-coal fly ash zeolitic materials. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1-3): 581–588
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.126
26 K Ojha, N C Pradhan, A N Samanta. Zeolite from fly ash synthesis and characterization. Bulletin of Materials Science, 2004, 27(6): 555–564
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707285
27 Y Zhang, Y Guo, Y Jiang, F Guo, X Zhao, J Wu. The mechanism of the ash fusion characteristics of gasification coke affected by SiO2/Al2O3 ratio and CaO content in blending coals. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization. Online (Bergheim), 2019, doi:10.1080/19392699.2019.1675647
28 X Shang, K Hou, J Wu, Y Zhang, J Liu, J Qi. The influence of mineral matter on moisture adsorption property of Shengli lignite. Fuel, 2016, 182: 749–753
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.05.128
29 Y Zhang, J Dong, F Guo, X Chen, J Wu, Z Miao, L Xiao. Effects of the evolutions of coal properties during nitrogen and MTE drying processes on the spontaneous combustion behavior of Zhaotong lignite. Fuel, 2018, 232: 299–307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.05.169
30 F Li, Q Liu, M Li, Y Fang. Understanding fly-ash formation during fluidized-bed gasification of high-silicon-aluminum coal based on its characteristics. Energy, 2018, 150: 142–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.02.137
31 N Moreno, X Querol, J Andres, K Stanton, M Towler, H Nugteren, M Janssen-Jurkovicova, R Jones. Physico-chemical characteristics of European pulverized coal combustion fly ashes. Fuel, 2005, 84(11): 1351–1363
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.06.038
32 S Rayalu, S U Meshram, M Z Hasan. Highly crystalline faujasitic zeolites from fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 77(1-3): 123–131
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(00)00212-0
33 N Shigemoto, H Hayashi, K Miyaura. Selective formation of Na-X zeolite from coal fly ash by fusion with sodium hydroxide prior to hydrothermal reaction. Journal of Materials Science, 1993, 28(17): 4781–4786
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00414272
34 H Kazemian, Z Naghdali, T Ghaffari Kashani, F Farhadi. Conversion of high silicon fly ash to Na-P1 zeolite: Alkaline fusion followed by hydrothermal crystallization. Advanced Powder Technology, 2010, 21(3): 279–283
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2009.12.005
35 Y Liu, C Yan, J Zhao, Z Zhang, H Wang, S Zhou, L Wu. Synthesis of zeolite P1 from fly ash under solvent-free conditions for ammonium removal from water. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 202: 11–22
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.128
36 A M Yusof, N A Malek. Removal of Cr(VI) and As(V) from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified zeolite Y. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 162(2-3): 1019–1024
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.134
37 F A Cotton, G Wilkinson. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. 5th ed. New York: Wiley, 1998, 29–32
38 C E Barrera-Diaz, V Lugo-Lugo, B Bilyeu. A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr(VI) reduction. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 223-224: 1–12
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.054
39 B Dhal, H N Thatoi, N N Das, B D Pandey. Chemical and microbial remediation of hexavalent chromium from contaminated soil and mining/metallurgical solid waste: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 250-251: 272–291
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.01.048
40 Y B Onundi, A A Mamun, M F A Khatib, Y M Ahmed. Adsorption of copper, nickel and lead ions from synthetic semiconductor industrial wastewater by palm shell activated carbon. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 7(4): 751–758
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326184
41 M Rao, A V Parwate, A G Bhole. Removal of Cr6+ and Ni2+ from aqueous solution using bagasse and fly ash. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2002, 22(7): 821–830
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00011-9
42 Y S Ho, G McKay. Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochemistry, 1999, 34(5): 451–465
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(98)00112-5
43 S Kocaoba, Y Orhan, T Akyüz. Kinetics and equilibrium studies of heavy metal ions removalby use of natural zeolite. Desalination, 2007, 214(1-3): 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.09.023
44 O E Abdel Salam, N A Reiad, M M ElShafei. A study of the removal characteristics of heavy metals from wastewater by low-cost adsorbents. Journal of Advanced Research, 2011, 2(4): 297–303
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.01.008
45 K M Sreenivas, M B Inarkar, S V Gokhale, S S Lele. Re-utilization of ash gourd (Benincasa hispida) peel waste for chromium (VI) biosorption: Equilibrium and column studies. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2014, 2(1): 455–462
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.01.017
46 V K Gupta, M Gupta, S Sharma. Process development for the removal of lead and chromium from aqueous solutions using red mud-an aluminium industry waste. Water Research, 2001, 35(5): 1125–1134
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00389-4
47 K Selvaraj, S Manonmani, S Pattabhi. Removal of hexavalent chromium using distillery sludge. Bioresource Technology, 2003, 89(2): 207–211
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00062-2
48 Y A Aydın, N D Aksoy. Adsorption of chromium on chitosan: Optimization, kinetics and thermodynamics. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 151(1-3): 188–194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.010
49 J K McLellan, C A Rock. Pretreating landfill leachate with peat to remove metals. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1988, 37(1): 203–215
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226492
[1] Yun Liu, Jiangyuan Qu, Xuehui Wu, Kai Zhang, Yuan Zhang. Reaction kinetics and internal diffusion of Zhundong char gasification with CO2[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 373-383.
[2] Yuexin Hou, Xiaoyun Li, Minghui Sun, Chaofan Li, Syed ul Hasnain Bakhtiar, Kunhao Lei, Shen Yu, Zhao Wang, Zhiyi Hu, Lihua Chen, Bao-Lian Su. The effect of hierarchical single-crystal ZSM-5 zeolites with different Si/Al ratios on its pore structure and catalytic performance[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 269-278.
[3] Baoyu Liu, Qiaowen Mu, Jiajin Huang, Wei Tan, Jing Xiao. Fabrication of titanosilicate pillared MFI zeolites with tailored catalytic activity[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 772-782.
[4] Xingling Zhao, Jun Xu, Feng Deng. Solid-state NMR for metal-containing zeolites: from active sites to reaction mechanism[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 159-187.
[5] Rongxin Zhang, Peinan Zhong, Hamidreza Arandiyan, Yanan Guan, Jinmin Liu, Na Wang, Yilai Jiao, Xiaolei Fan. Using ultrasound to improve the sequential post-synthesis modification method for making mesoporous Y zeolites[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 275-287.
[6] Bastian Reiprich, Tobias Weissenberger, Wilhelm Schwieger, Alexandra Inayat. Layer-like FAU-type zeolites: A comparative view on different preparation routes[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 127-142.
[7] Simona Colantonio, Lorenzo Cafiero, Doina De Angelis, Nicolò M. Ippolito, Riccardo Tuffi, Stefano Vecchio Ciprioti. Thermal and catalytic pyrolysis of a synthetic mixture representative of packaging plastics residue[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 288-303.
[8] Darui Wang, Hongmin Sun, Wei Liu, Zhenhao Shen, Weimin Yang. Hierarchical ZSM-5 zeolite with radial mesopores: Preparation, formation mechanism and application for benzene alkylation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 248-257.
[9] Zhaoqi Ye, Hongbin Zhang, Yahong Zhang, Yi Tang. Seed-induced synthesis of functional MFI zeolite materials: Method development, crystallization mechanisms, and catalytic properties[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 143-158.
[10] Hao Xu, Chi Lei, Qinming Wu, Qiuyan Zhu, Xiangju Meng, Daniel Dai, Stefan Maurer, Andrei-Nicolae Parvulescu, Ulrich Müller, Fengshou Xiao. Organosilane surfactant-assisted synthesis of mesoporous SSZ-39 zeolite with enhanced catalytic performance in the methanol-to-olefins reaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 267-274.
[11] Xuantao Wu, Jie Wang. Intrinsic kinetics and external diffusion of catalytic steam gasification of fine coal char particles under pressurized and fluidized conditions[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 415-426.
[12] Olga A. Ponomareva, Polina A. Shaposhnik, Marina V. Belova, Boris A. Kolozhvari, Irina I. Ivanova. Novel method for the preparation of Cs-containing FAU(Y) catalysts for aniline methylation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 70-76.
[13] Veselina Georgieva, Richard Retoux, Valerie Ruaux, Valentin Valtchev, Svetlana Mintova. Detection of CO2 and O2 by iron loaded LTL zeolite films[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 94-102.
[14] Jian Zhang, Liang Wang, Yanyan Ji, Fang Chen, Feng-Shou Xiao. Mesoporous zeolites for biofuel upgrading and glycerol conversion[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(1): 132-144.
[15] Alexander B. Koven, Shitang S. Tong, Ramin R. Farnood, Charles Q. Jia. Alkali-thermal gasification and hydrogen generation potential of biomass[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(3): 369-378.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed