Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (5) : 55    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-024-2414-4
Synergistic effects and kinetics analysis for co-pyrolysis of vacuum residue and plastics
Chao Wang1, Xiaogang Shi1(), Aijun Duan1, Xingying Lan1, Jinsen Gao1, Qingang Xiong2()
1. State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Beijing 102249, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China
 Download: PDF(970 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

This study utilized a thermogravimetric analyzer to assess the thermal decomposition behaviors and kinetics properties of vacuum residue (VR) and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) polymers. The kinetic parameters were calculated using the Friedman technique. To demonstrate the interactive effects between LDPE and VR during the co-pyrolysis process, the disparity in mass loss and mass loss rate between the experimental and calculated values was computed. The co-pyrolysis curves obtained through estimation and experimentation exhibited significant deviations, which were influenced by temperature and mixing ratio. A negative synergistic interaction was observed between LDPE and VR, although this inhibitory effect could be mitigated or eliminated by reducing the LDPE ratio in the mixture and increasing the co-pyrolysis temperature. The co-pyrolysis process resulted in a reduction in carbon residue, which could be attributed to the interaction between LDPE and the heavy fractions, particularly resin and asphaltene, present in VR. These findings align with the pyrolysis behaviors exhibited by the four VR fractions. Furthermore, it was observed that the co-pyrolysis process exhibited lower activation energy as the VR ratio increased, indicating a continuous enhancement in the reactivity of the mixed samples during co-pyrolysis.

Keywords co-pyrolysis      heavy residual oil      polyethylene      thermogravimetric analysis      synergistic effects     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiaogang Shi,Qingang Xiong   
About author:

Li Liu and Yanqing Liu contributed equally to this work.

Just Accepted Date: 19 January 2024   Issue Date: 23 April 2024
 Cite this article:   
Chao Wang,Xiaogang Shi,Aijun Duan, et al. Synergistic effects and kinetics analysis for co-pyrolysis of vacuum residue and plastics[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(5): 55.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-024-2414-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2024/V18/I5/55
Density (20 °C)/ (g·cm–3)Kinematic viscosity (80 °C)/(mm2·s–1)CCRa)/ (wt %)Elemental analysis/(wt %)SARA content/(wt %)Heavy metal content/(μg·g–1)
CHNSOSaArReAsFeNiV
0.9566545.413.1186.611.30.610.531.439.626.42.613.631.829.6
Tab.1  Basic properties of VR
Fig.1  TG and DTG curves of LDPE, VR, and their mixture samples at 10 °C?min–1.
ExperimentalCalculatedDifference
a)Ts/°Cb)Tmax/°Cc)Tf/°Cd)DTGmax/ (wt % ·min–1)Residue mass/% DTGmax/ (wt % ·min–1)Residue mass/%DTGmax/ (wt % ·min–1)Residue mass/%
LDPE425.11478.35510.0236.330
VR247.39440.45520.406.7615.00
PE:VR (3:1)321.84483.64525.5424.701.2428.943.344.242.10
PE:VR (1:1)286.26482.47534.2420.664.2521.557.550.893.30
PE:VR (1:3)309.07478.28545.1212.99.7714.1511.971.252.20
Tab.2  Thermal decomposition characteristics for the pyrolysis of LDPE, VR and their blends
Fig.2  (a–c) Experimental and calculated TG-DTG curves of mixed samples at 10°C·min–1; (d) weight deviation value of mixture samples.
Fig.3  Comparison of the co-pyrolysis carbon residue with individual components.
ExperimentalCalculatedDifference
a)Ts/°Cb)Tmax/°Cc)Tf/°Cd)DTGmax/ (wt %·min–1)Residue mass/wt %Tmax/°CDTGmax/ (wt %·min–1)Residue mass/wt %Tmax/°CDTGmax/ (wt %·min–1)Residue mass/wt %
Sa211.6404.4481.57.162.20
Ar247.4438.1510.08.639.62
Re255.5458.3523.59.6731.64
Asp263.3459.5561.83.4972.60
LDPE:Sa225.4479.5520.513.770.55478.418.161.03?1.14.390.48
LDPE:Ar286.3482.9534.222.504.76477.419.805.32?5.5?2.70.56
LDPE:Re272.2483.4533.521.5711.5477.821.4615.78?5.6?0.114.28
LDPE:Asp366.5484.3558.622.9021.60478.119.4236.25?6.2?3.4814.65
Tab.3  Thermal decomposition characteristics for the pyrolysis of SARA in VR and their mixture with LDPE (1:1)
Fig.4  TG-DTG curves of SARA fractions at 10 °C·min–1.
Fig.5  Comparison between experimental and calculated TG-DTG curves of SARA fractions mixed LDPE (1:1) at 10 °C·min–1.
Fig.6  Weight deviation value of mixture samples of SARA fractions with LDPE in 1:1.
Conversion (α)LDPEMixed samplesVR
3:11:11:3
Ea/(kJ·mol–1)R2Ea/( kJ·mol–1)R2Ea/( kJ·mol–1)R2Ea/( kJ·mol–1)R2Ea/( kJ·mol–1)R2
0.1197.950.9902186.530.9621142.590.989389.340.976565.220.9648
0.2247.90.9927200.190.9737162.490.9963114.490.994968.200.9536
0.3243.970.9962210.280.9510184.40.9911139.310.9638106.620.9823
0.4231.950.9950203.290.9894178.210.9894133.000.9776130.640.9572
0.5241.440.9911189.580.9979162.610.9765165.310.9706159.570.9678
0.6233.340.9946192.260.9687165.970.9988186.920.9820196.980.9575
0.7218.000.9965182.710.9583171.270.9974193.550.9957214.660.9951
0.8203.160.9980200.910.9590184.920.9871201.570.9902231.120.9988
0.9205.570.9976192.360.9610190.950.9821229.220.9932282.490.9984
Average225.92195.35171.49161.41164.39
Tab.4  The kinetic parameters of LDPE, VR, and LDPE-VR mixed samples obtained by the Friedman method
1 L C Castañeda , J A D Muñoz , J Ancheyta . Combined process schemes for upgrading of heavy petroleum. Fuel, 2012, 100: 110–127
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.02.022
2 M Al-Samhan , J Al-Fadhli , A M Al-Otaibi , F Al-Attar , R Bouresli , M S Rana . Prospects of refinery switching from conventional to integrated: an opportunity for sustainable investment in the petrochemical industry. Fuel, 2022, 310: 122161
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122161
3 M S Rana , V Sámano , J Ancheyta , J A I Diaz . A review of recent advances on process technologies for upgrading of heavy oils and residua. Fuel, 2007, 86(9): 1216–1231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.08.004
4 O T Ore , F M Adebiyi . A review on current trends and prospects in the pyrolysis of heavy oils. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2021, 11(3): 1521–1530
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01099-0
5 M Kamkar , G Natale . A review on novel applications of asphaltenes: a valuable waste. Fuel, 2021, 285: 119272
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119272
6 J Li , H Hou , H Shen . A new insight into compatibility changing rules for inferior vacuum residue’s thermal cracking and hydrocracking process. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2022, 167: 105632
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105632
7 Y Che , Q Wang , J Huo , Y Tian . Determination of the sensitive fractions for vacuum residue high temperature fast pyrolysis. Fuel, 2021, 299: 120903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120903
8 G Xu , D Bai , C Xu , M He . Challenges and opportunities for engineering thermochemistry in carbon-neutralization technologies. National Science Review, 2023, 10(9): nwac217
https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac217
9 T Kaminski , M M Husein . Thermal cracking of atmospheric residue versus vacuum residue. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 181: 331–339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.10.014
10 J Zhao , L Ren , T Liu , L Dai , L Zhang , W Han , D Li . An insight into the evolution of sulfur species during the integration process of residue hydrotreating and delayed coking. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(28): 12719–12728
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c02036
11 B Xing , L Ye , J Liu , X Qin , W Yu , J Xie , L Hou , H Wang , Y Ji , D Lu , J Zhao , H Sun , H Ling . Reaction network of sulfur compounds in delayed coking process. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 422: 129903
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129903
12 A Safiri , J Ivakpour , F Khorasheh . Effect of operating conditions and additives on the product yield and sulfur content in thermal cracking of a vacuum residue from the abadan refinery. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(8): 5452–5457
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00919
13 A Zachariah , L Wang , S Yang , V Prasad , A de Klerk . Suppression of coke formation during bitumen pyrolysis. Energy & Fuels, 2013, 27(6): 3061–3070
https://doi.org/10.1021/ef400314m
14 L O Alemán-Vázquez , P Torres-Mancera , J A D Muñoz , J Ancheyta . Batch reactor study for partial upgrading of a heavy oil with a novel solid hydrogen transfer agent. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(12): 15714–15726
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01680
15 R Mishra , A Kumar , E Singh , S Kumar . Recent research advancements in catalytic pyrolysis of plastic waste. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2023, 11(6): 2033–2049
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c05759
16 N Li , H Liu , Z Cheng , B Yan , G Chen , S Wang . Conversion of plastic waste into fuels: a critical review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2022, 424: 127460
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127460
17 N Yan . Recycling plastic using a hybrid process. Science, 2022, 378(6616): 132–133
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade5658
18 Y Zhang , Z Fu , W Wang , G Ji , M Zhao , A Li . Kinetics, product evolution, and mechanism for the pyrolysis of typical plastic waste. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(1): 91–103
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c04915
19 S Lovett , F Berruti , L A Behie . Ultrapyrolytic upgrading of pPlastic wastes and plastics/heavy oil mixtures to valuable light gas products. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 1997, 36(11): 4436–4444
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie970109o
20 X Tan , C Zhu , Q Liu , T Ma , P Yuan , Z Cheng , W Yuan . Co-pyrolysis of heavy oil and low density polyethylene in the presence of supercritical water: the suppression of coke formation. Fuel Processing Technology, 2014, 118: 49–54
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2013.08.007
21 E Rodríguez , R Palos , A Gutiérrez , D Trueba , J M Arandes , J Bilbao . Towards waste refinery: Co-feeding HDPE pyrolysis waxes with VGO into the catalytic cracking unit. Energy Conversion and Management, 2020, 207: 112554
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112554
22 Q Zhang , Q Li , H Wang , Z Wang , Z Yu , L Zhang , W Huang , Y Fang . Experimental study on co-pyrolysis and gasification behaviors of petroleum residue with lignite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 343: 108–117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.02.098
23 I Muhammad , G Manos . Catalytic copyrolysis of heavy oil with polypropylene. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2022, 10(48): 15824–15837
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c04768
24 F J Passamonti , U Sedran . Recycling of waste plastics into fuels. LDPE conversion in FCC. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2012, 125: 499–506
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2012.06.020
25 E Rodríguez , A Gutiérrez , R Palos , F J Vela , M J Azkoiti , J M Arandes , J Bilbao . Co-cracking of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) and vacuum gasoil (VGO) under refinery conditions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382: 122602
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122602
26 T Schubert , M Lehner , T Karner , W Hofer , A Lechleitner . Influence of reaction pressure on co-pyrolysis of LDPE and a heavy petroleum fraction. Fuel Processing Technology, 2019, 193: 204–211
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.05.016
27 T Schubert , A Lechleitner , M Lehner , W Hofer . 4-Lump kinetic model of the co-pyrolysis of LDPE and a heavy petroleum fraction. Fuel, 2020, 262: 116597
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116597
28 P Sazandehchi , S Ovaysi . Experimental evaluation and kinetic modeling of thermal upgrading of iranian heavy crude oil. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2019, 58(28): 12586–12592
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01361
29 K G Burra , A K Gupta . Kinetics of synergistic effects in co-pyrolysis of biomass with plastic wastes. Applied Energy, 2018, 220: 408–418
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.117
30 H Merdun , Z B Laouge . Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses during co-pyrolysis of greenhouse wastes and coal by TGA. Renewable Energy, 2021, 163: 453–464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.08.120
31 K M Lu , W J Lee , W H Chen , T C Lin . Thermogravimetric analysis and kinetics of co-pyrolysis of raw/torrefied wood and coal blends. Applied Energy, 2013, 105: 57–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.12.050
32 S Biswas , P Mohanty , D K Sharma . Studies on synergism in the cracking and co-cracking of Jatropha oil, vacuum residue and high density polyethylene: kinetic analysis. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 106: 673–683
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.001
33 W Xia , S Wang , H Wang , T Xu . Thermal effects of asphalt SARA fractions, kinetic parameter calculation using isoconversional method and distribution models. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2021, 146(4): 1577–1592
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10152-9
34 G Félix , A Tirado , A Al-Muntaser , M Kwofie , M A Varfolomeev , C Yuan , J Ancheyta . SARA-based kinetic model for non-catalytic aquathermolysis of heavy crude oil. Journal of Petroleum Science Engineering, 2022, 216: 110845
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110845
35 J Zhang , J Liu , F Evrendilek , X Zhang , M Buyukada . TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS analyses of pyrolysis behaviors and products of cattle manure in CO2 and N2 atmospheres: kinetic, thermodynamic, and machine-learning models. Energy Conversion and Management, 2019, 195: 346–359
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.019
36 D P SerranoJ AguadoJ M EscolaJ M RodríguezL MorselliR Orsi. Thermal and catalytic cracking of a LDPE-EVA copolymer mixture. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2003, 68–69: 481–494
37 W Chen , S Shi , J Zhang , M Chen , X Zhou . Co-pyrolysis of waste newspaper with high-density polyethylene: synergistic effect and oil characterization. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016, 112: 41–48
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.005
38 N Mominou , S B Xian , X Jiaoliang . Studies on coprocessing vacuum residue oil with plastics using thermogravimetric analysis. Petroleum Science and Technology, 2009, 27(6): 588–596
https://doi.org/10.1080/10916460701857706
39 T A Vo , Q K Tran , H V Ly , B Kwon , H T Hwang , J Kim , S S Kim . Co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass and plastics: a comprehensive study on pyrolysis kinetics and characteristics. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 2022, 163: 105464
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105464
40 Z W Wang , K G Burra , T Z Lei , A K Gupta . Co-pyrolysis of waste plastic and solid biomass for synergistic production of biofuels and chemicals—a review. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2021, 84: 100899
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100899
41 F Bai , C Zhu , Y Liu , P Yuan , Z Cheng , W Yuan . Co-pyrolysis of residual oil and polyethylene in sub- and supercritical water. Fuel Processing Technology, 2013, 106: 267–274
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.07.031
42 M V Kok , K G Gul . Thermal characteristics and kinetics of crude oils and SARA fractions. Thermochimica Acta, 2013, 569: 66–70
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2013.07.014
43 L Jiang , Z Zhou , H Xiang , Y Yang , H Tian , J Wang . Characteristics and synergistic effects of co-pyrolysis of microalgae with polypropylene. Fuel, 2022, 314: 122765
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122765
44 D T Sekyere , J Zhang , Y Chen , Y Huang , M Wang , J Wang , N Niwamanya , A Barigye , Y Tian . Production of light olefins and aromatics via catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic. Fuel, 2023, 333: 126339
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126339
[1] Zhihan Zhang, Mengxiao Yu, Xiaoyu Zhang, Jinli Zhang, You Han. Non-isothermal kinetics and characteristics of calcium carbide nitridation reaction with calcium-based additives[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(4): 40-.
[2] Guiqin Bai, Jianzhong Xia, Bing Cao, Rui Zhang, Junquan Meng, Pei Li. Fabrication of high-performance pervaporation composite membrane for alkaline wastewater reclamation[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 709-719.
[3] Yong Luo, Yuhui Xie, Renjie Chen, Ruizhi Zheng, Hua Wu, Xinxin Sheng, Delong Xie, Yi Mei. A low-density polyethylene composite with phosphorus-nitrogen based flame retardant and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for enhanced electrical conductivity and acceptable flame retardancy[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1332-1345.
[4] Xiangchun Liu, Jun Hu, Ruilun Xie, Bin Fang, Ping Cui. Formation mechanism of solid product produced from co-pyrolysis of Pingdingshan lean coal with organic matter in Huadian oil shale[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 363-372.
[5] Xiangchun Liu, Ping Cui, Qiang Ling, Zhigang Zhao, Ruilun Xie. A review on co-pyrolysis of coal and oil shale to produce coke[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 504-512.
[6] Zhe Yang, Xiaoyu Huang, Jianqiang Wang, Chuyang Y. Tang. Novel polyethyleneimine/TMC-based nanofiltration membrane prepared on a polydopamine coated substrate[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 273-282.
[7] Ehsan Salehi, Fereshteh Soroush, Maryam Momeni, Aboulfazl Barati, Ali Khakpour. Chitosan/polyethylene glycol impregnated activated carbons: Synthesis, characterization and adsorption performance[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(4): 575-585.
[8] Xingfu SONG, Jingcai ZHAO, Yunzhao LI, Ze SUN, Jianguo YU. Thermal decomposition mechanism of ammonium sulfate catalyzed by ferric oxide[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2013, 7(2): 210-217.
[9] Jiquan MA, Junhong ZHAO, Zhongbin REN, Lei LI. Preparation and characterization of PVDF-PFSA flat sheet ultrafiltration membranes[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 301-310.
[10] Liuzhong LI, Aiyou HAO, Ruihua CHENG, Boping LIU. Gas phase ethylene polymerization over SiO2-supported organosilyl chromate UCC S-2 catalyst using a high-speed stirred-autoclave reactor[J]. Front Chem Sci Eng, 2011, 5(1): 89-95.
[11] ZHANG Mei, CUI Zhenyu, ZHU Baoku, HAN Gaige, XU Youyi, ZHANG Aiqing. Preparation and properties of gel membrane containing porous PVDF-HFP matrix and cross-linked PEG for lithium ion conduction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2008, 2(1): 89-94.
[12] CHEN Gufeng, ZHANG Yi, XU Jiarui, ZHU Yafei. Grafting of PEG400 onto the surface of LLDPE/SMA film[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2007, 1(2): 128-131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed