Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2014, Vol. 8 Issue (4) : 625-633    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-014-0479-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Polarization signature from the FengYun-3 Microwave Humidity Sounder
Xiaolei ZOU1,*(),Xu CHEN1,2,Fuzhong WENG3
1. Center of Data Assimilation for Research and Application, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2. Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Florida State University, FL 32306, USA
3. National Environmental Satellite, Data & Information Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, MD 20740, USA
 Download: PDF(1320 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Microwave Humidity Sounders (MHS) onboard NOAA-15, -16, -17, -18, -19, and EUMETSAT MetOp-A/B satellites provide radiance measurements at a single polarization state at any of five observed frequencies. The Microwave Humidity Sounder (MWHS) onboard the FengYun-3 (FY-3) satellite has a unique instrument design that provides dual polarization measurements at 150 GHz. In this study, the MWHS polarization signal was investigated using observed and modeled data. It is shown that the quasi-polarization brightness temperatures at 150 GHz display a scan angle dependent bias. Under calm ocean conditions, the polarization difference at 150 GHz becomes non-negligible when the scan angle varies from 10° to 45° and reaches a maximum when the scan angle is about 30°. Also, the polarization state is sensitive to surface parameters such as surface wind speed. Under clear-sky conditions, the differences between horizontal and vertical polarization states at 150 GHz increase with decreasing surface wind speed. Therefore, the polarization signals from the cross-track scanning microwave measurements at window channels contain useful information about surface parameters. In addition, the availability of dual polarization measurements allows a one-to-one conversion from antenna brightness temperature to sensor brightness temperature if a cross-polarization spill-over exists.

Keywords Microwave Humidity Sounder (MWHS)      polarization      remote sensing      surface properties     
Corresponding Author(s): Xiaolei ZOU   
Online First Date: 14 November 2014    Issue Date: 13 January 2015
 Cite this article:   
Xiaolei ZOU,Xu CHEN,Fuzhong WENG. Polarization signature from the FengYun-3 Microwave Humidity Sounder[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(4): 625-633.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-014-0479-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2014/V8/I4/625
Channel 1 2 3 4 5
MWHS 150 h 150 v 183.31±1 v 183.31±3 v 183.31±7 v
MHS 89.0 v 157.0 v 183.31±1 h 183.31±3 h 190.31 v
Tab.1  Frequency and polarization differences between MWHS and MHS channels
Fig.1  Variations of sensor brightness temperatures of quasi-horizontal polarization ( T b Q h , dashed line) and quasi-vertical polarization ( T b Q v , solid line) channels at a frequency of 150.0 GHz (e) with scan angle using a middle latitude winter profile over ocean
Fig.2  Sensor brightness temperature difference between quasi-horizontal and vertical polarization channels ( Δ T b = T b Q h - T b Q v ) with frequency of 150 GHz at different scan angles shown in Fig. 1
Fig.3  Scatter plots of MWHS channels 1 and 2 sensor brightness temperatures at the 1st (a), 23rd (b), 49th (c), and 98th (d) FOVs, of which the scan angles are 53.35°, 29.15°, 0.55°, and 53.35°, respectively, during 0000 UTC March 1 to 1800 UTC April 14, 2011 only for data with surface wind speed less than 3 m?s-1.
Fig.4  Sensor brightness temperature differences between MWHS channels 1 and 2 ( Δ T a = T a Q h - T a Q v , red circles), mean difference (blue curve), and data counts (gray bar) from (a) model simulations and (b) observations within 45N-50N with collocated surface wind speed less than 3 m?s-1. All data from 0000 UTC March 1 to 1800 UTC April 14, 2011 are used.
Fig.5  Latitudinal dependence of (a)-(b) mean and (c)-(d) standard deviation of the sensor brightness temperature differences between MWHS channels 1 and 2 for MWHS observations (left panels) and simulated sensor brightness temperature difference (right panels) from 0000 UTC March 1 to 1800 UTC April 14, 2011
Fig.6  Scatter plots of brightness temperature differences between MWHS/FY-3B channels 1 and 2 at FOV 20 for observations on ascending orbits in March 2011 in clear-sky conditions within three arbitrarily chosen domains: (a) 30N–40N, 170W–130W, (b) 40S–30S, 140W–100W, and (c) 60S–50S, 180W–140W. The mean (thick solid) and standard deviation (vertical thin line) calculated at a wind speed interval of 3 m?s-1 are also shown.
Fig.7  Variation of the (a) mean and (b) standard deviation of the sensor brightness temperature difference between horizontal and vertical polarization states at 150 GHz frequency with surface wind speed, using data within 30N–40N and 130W–170W under clear-sky conditions in March 2011. The first to tenth FOVs are indicated by filled circles in (a) and solid lines in (b) and FOVs 11–20 by open circles in (a) and dotted lines in (b).
1 Bauer P, Schluessel P (1993). Rainfall, total water, ice water, and water vapor over sea from polarized microwave simulations and special sensor Microwave/Imager data. J Geophys Res, D, Atmospheres, 98(D11): 20737–20759
https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD01577
2 Choudhury B J, Major E R, Smith E A, Becker F (1992). Atmospheric effects on SMMR and SSM/1 37 GHz polarization difference over the sahel. Int J Remote Sens, 13(18): 3443–3463
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169208904133
3 Dai L, Che T (2009). Cross-platform calibration of SMMR, SSM/I and AMSR-E passive microwave brightness temperature. In: Proceedings of SPIE 7841, Sixth International Symposium on Digital Earth: Data Processing and Applications, 7841(03) DOI: 10.1117/12.873150
4 Derksen C, Walker A, LeDrew E, Goodison B (2003). Combining SMMR and SSM/I data for time series analysis of central north American snow water equivalent. J Hydrometeorol, 4(2): 304–316
https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2003)4<304:CSAIDF>2.0.CO;2
5 Gloersen P, Cavalieri D J, Chang A T C, Wilheit T T, Campbell W J, Johannessen O M, Katsaros K B, Kunzi K F, Ross D B, Staelin D, Windsor E P L, Barath F T, Gudmandsen P, Langham E, Ramseier R O (1984). A summary of results from the first NIMBUS 7 SMMR observations. J Geophys Res, D, Atmospheres, 89(D4): 5335–5344
https://doi.org/10.1029/JD089iD04p05335
6 Goodrum G, Kidwell K B, Winston W (2009). NOAA KLM User’s Guide. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
7 Gu S, Guo Yang, Wang Z, Lu N (2012). Calibration analyses for sounding channels of MWHS onboard FY-3A. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 50(12): 4885–4891
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2214391
8 Guan L, Zou X, Weng F, Li G (2011). Assessments of FY-3A Microwave Humidity Sounder (MWHS) measurements using NOAA-18 Microwave Humidity Sounder (MHS). J Geophys Res, 116(D10): D10106
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015412
9 Han Y, Delst P V, Liu Q, Weng F, Yan B, Treadon, Derber J (2006). JCSDA Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM)-Version 1. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS122: 40
10 Hollinger J P, Peirce J L, Poe G A (1990). SSM/I instrument evaluation. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 28(5): 781–790
https://doi.org/10.1109/36.58964
11 Lei L, Zou J, Mao Z (2008). Improving ocean surface wind speed retrieval from SSM/I data by channel combinations. In: Proceeding of SPIE Remote Sensing of Clouds and the Atmosphere7017(16) DOI: 10.1117/12.799763
12 Liu Q, Weng F, English S J (2011). An improved fast microwave water emissivity model. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 49(4): 1238–1250
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2010.2064779
13 Mitnik L M, Mitnik M L (2010). AMSR-E advanced wind speed retrieval algorithm and its application to marine weather systems. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2010 IEEE International, 3224–3227
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5649563
14 Rosenkranz P W (1992). Rough-sea microwave emissivities measured with the SSM/I. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 30(5): 1081–1085
https://doi.org/10.1109/36.175345
15 Ruf C S (1998). Constraints on the polarization purity of a stokes microwave radiometer. Radio Sci, 33(6): 1617–1639
https://doi.org/10.1029/98RS02773
16 Sasaki Y, Asanuma I, Muneyama K, Naito G, Suzuki T (1987). The dependence of sea-surface microwave emission on wind speed, frequency, incidence angle, and polarzation over the frequency range from 1 to 40 GHz. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 25(2): 138–146
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1987.289813
17 Shibata A (2006). A wind speed retrieval algorithm by combining 6 and 10 GHz data from Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer: Wind speed inside hurricanes. J Oceanogr, 62(3): 351–359
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-006-0060-8
18 Thompson D R, Elfouhaily T M, Chapron B (1998). Polarization ratio for microwave backscattering from the ocean surface at low to moderate incidence angles. In: Proceeding of Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1998 IEEE International, 3: 1671–1673 DOI: 10.1109/IGARSS.1998.692411
19 Wang X, Zou X (2012). Quality assessments of Chinese FengYun-3B Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS) measurements. IEEE Transcation on Gescience and Remote Sensing, 50(12): 4875–4884
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2196438
20 Wang X, Zou X, Weng F, You R (2012). An assessment of the FY-3A microwave temperature sounder using the NCEP numerical weather prediction model. IEEE Transcation on Gescience and Remote Sensing, 50(12): 4860–4874
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2200687
21 Weng F, Yang H, Zou X (2013). On convertibility from antenna to sensor brightness temperature for ATMS. IEEE transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 10(4): 771–775
22 Wentz F J (1991). A simplified wind vector algorithm for satellite scatteromete. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 8(5): 697–704
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1991)008<0697:ASWVAF>2.0.CO;2
23 Wentz F J (1997). A well-calibrated ocean algorithm for special sensor microwave / imager. J Geophys Res, 102(C4): 8703–8718
https://doi.org/10.1029/96JC01751
24 Wilheit T T (1979). A model for the microwave emissivity of the ocean’s surface as a function of wind speed. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron, 17(4): 244–249
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGE.1979.294653
25 Yang H, Weng F, Lv L, Lu N, Liu G, Bai M, Qian Q, He J, Xu H (2011). The FengYun-3 Microwave Radiation Imager on-orbit verification. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 49(11): 4552–4560
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2148200
26 Zhang P, Yang J, Dong C, Lu N, Yang Z, Shi J (2009). General introduction on payloads, ground segment and data application of Fengyun 3A. Front Earth Sci China, 3(3): 367–373
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-009-0036-2
27 Zou X, Ma Y, Qin Z (2012a). FengYun-3B Microwave Humidity Sounder (MWHS) data noise characterization and filtering using principle component analysis. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 50(12): 4892–4902
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2202122
28 Zou X, Wang X, Weng F, Li G (2012b). Assessments of Chinese FengYun Microwave Temperature Sounder (MWTS) measurements for weather and climate applications. J Atmos Ocean Technol, 28(10): 1206–1227
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00023.1
30 Zou X, Zhao J, Weng F, Qin Z (2012c). Detection of radio-frequency interference signal over land from FY-3B Microwave Radiation Imager (MWRI). IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens, 50(12): 4994– 5003
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2191792
[1] Conghui LI, Lili LIN, Zhenbang HAO, Christopher J. POST, Zhanghao CHEN, Jian LIU, Kunyong YU. Developing a USLE cover and management factor (C) for forested regions of southern China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(3): 660-672.
[2] Emre ÇOLAK, Filiz SUNAR. Spatial pattern analysis of post-fire damages in the Menderes District of Turkey[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 446-461.
[3] Jianhong LIU, Clement ATZBERGER, Xin HUANG, Kejian SHEN, Yongmei LIU, Lei WANG. Modeling grass yields in Qinghai Province, China, based on MODIS NDVI data—an empirical comparison[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 413-429.
[4] Shan LIU, Fengli ZHANG, Shiying WEI, Qingbo LIU, Na LIU, Yun SHAO, Steven J. BURIAN. Building damage mapping based on Touzi decomposition using quad-polarimetric ALOS PALSAR data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 401-412.
[5] Xia LEI, Jiayi PAN, Adam DEVLIN. An ultraviolet to visible scheme to estimate chromophoric dissolved organic matter absorption in a Case-2 water from remote sensing reflectance[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 384-400.
[6] Tong LI, Huadong GUO, Li ZHANG, Chenwei NIE, Jingjuan LIAO, Guang LIU. Simulation of Moon-based Earth observation optical image processing methods for global change study[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 236-250.
[7] Kaiguo FAN, Huaguo ZHANG, Jianjun LIANG, Peng CHEN, Bojian XU, Ming ZHANG. Analysis of ship wake features and extraction of ship motion parameters from SAR images in the Yellow Sea[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 588-595.
[8] Ying XIONG, Fen PENG, Bin ZOU. Spatiotemporal influences of land use/cover changes on the heat island effect in rapid urbanization area[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 614-627.
[9] Shichao CUI, Kefa ZHOU, Rufu DING, Guo JIANG. Estimation of copper concentration of rocks using hyperspectral technology[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 563-574.
[10] Igor Appel. Uncertainty in satellite remote sensing of snow fraction for water resources management[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 711-727.
[11] Donal O’Leary III, Dorothy Hall, Michael Medler, Aquila Flower. Quantifying the early snowmelt event of 2015 in the Cascade Mountains, USA by developing and validating MODIS-based snowmelt timing maps[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(4): 693-710.
[12] Xiaochen WANG, Yun SHAO, Wei TIAN, Kun LI. On the classification of mixed floating pollutants on the Yellow Sea of China by using a quad-polarized SAR image[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 373-380.
[13] Zhen LI, Jinghu PAN. Spatiotemporal changes in vegetation net primary productivity in the arid region of Northwest China, 2001 to 2012[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 108-124.
[14] Mohamed Abd Salam EL-VILALY, Kamel DIDAN, Stuart E. MARSH, Willem J.D. VAN LEEUWEN, Michael A. CRIMMINS, Armando Barreto MUNOZ. Vegetation productivity responses to drought on tribal lands in the four corners region of the Southwest USA[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(1): 37-51.
[15] Duanyang XU, Alin SONG, Xiao SONG. Assessing the effect of desertification controlling projects and policies in northern Shaanxi Province, China by integrating remote sensing and farmer investigation data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(4): 689-701.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed