Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2022, Vol. 16 Issue (5) : 61    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-022-1540-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Numerical simulation of benzene transport in shoreline groundwater affected by tides under different conditions
Mahsa Kheirandish1, Chunjiang An1(), Zhi Chen1, Xiaolong Geng2, Michel Boufadel2
1. Department of Building, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
2. Center for Natural Resources, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark NJ 07102, USA
 Download: PDF(6164 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● An approach for assessing the transport of benzene on the beach was proposed.

● The behavior of benzene in the subsurface of the beach was impacted by tide.

● Tidal amplitude influenced the travel speed and the benzene biodegradation.

● Hydraulic conductivity had the impact on plume residence time and biodegradation.

● Plume dispersed and concentration decreased due to high longitudinal dispersivity.

The release and transport of benzene in coastal aquifers were investigated in the present study. Numerical simulations were implemented using the SEAM3D, coupled with GMS, to study the behavior of benzene in the subsurface of tidally influenced beaches. The transport and fate of the benzene plume were simulated, considering advection, dispersion, sorption, biodegradation, and dissolution on the beach. Different tide amplitudes, aquifer characteristics, and pollutant release locations were studied. It was found that the tide amplitude, hydraulic conductivity, and longitudinal dispersivity were the primary factors affecting the fate and transport of benzene. The tidal amplitude influenced the transport speed and percentage of biodegradation of benzene plume in the beach. A high tidal range reduced the spreading area and enhanced the rate of benzene biodegradation. Hydraulic conductivity had an impact on plume residence time and the percentage of contaminant biodegradation. Lower hydraulic conductivity induced longer residence time in each beach portion and a higher percentage of biodegradation on the beach. The plume dispersed and the concentration decreased due to high longitudinal dispersivity. The results can be used to support future risk assessment and management for the shorelines impacted by spill and leaking accidents. Modeling the heterogeneous beach aquifer subjected to tides can also be further explored in the future study.

Keywords Numerical simulation      Benzene      Transport and fate      Shoreline      Groundwater      Tide     
Corresponding Author(s): Chunjiang An   
Issue Date: 10 March 2022
 Cite this article:   
Mahsa Kheirandish,Chunjiang An,Zhi Chen, et al. Numerical simulation of benzene transport in shoreline groundwater affected by tides under different conditions[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(5): 61.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-022-1540-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2022/V16/I5/61
Fig.1  (a) The front view of the model grid. The leaking location is 110 m from the seaside and 50 m in the shoreline, and the groundwater table is 2 m below the surface. (b) The schematic diagram of the three-dimensional model grid. (c) The plan view of the leaking location on x = 50 m with the contaminant concentration contours at t = 0.
Scenario Tide amplitude (m) Longitudinal dispersivity (m) Hydraulic conductivity (m/h)
1 1 0.3 1.8
2 2 0.3 1.8
3 3 0.3 1.8
4 0 0.3 1.8
5 1 0.3 3.6
6 1 0.3 0.9
7 1 0.6 1.8
8 1 0.1 1.8
Tab.1  Characteristics of the numerical experiments and different scenarios that are analyzed in this study
Definition Unit Value
Porosity / 0.3
Hydraulic conductivity m/h 1.8
Specific storage 1/m 10−4
Vertical anisotropy / 10
Horizontal anisotropy / 1
Longitudinal dispersivity m 0.3
Tab.2  Physical parameters used in the numerical simulations
Microbial properties Units Value
Distribution coefficient of benzene m3/g 3.6 × 10−8
Initial mass fraction of benzene / 0.05
Solubility of benzene mg/L 1780
Inhibition coefficient of NO3-O2 g/m3 0.6
Stoichiometric coefficient for oxygen consumption based on complete mineralization mg of O2/mg of S 3.47
Stoichiometric coefficient for oxygen consumption during the complete mineralization of biomass mg of O2/mgof X 1.56
Stoichiometric coefficient for nitrogen consumption during the complete mineralization of biomass mg of N/mg of X 0.15
Dissolved rate 1/d 0.05
Tab.3  Microbial parameters used in numerical model
Fig.2  Evaluated aerobic biodegradation of benzene and simulation results using SEAM3D and models developed by other studies (Chen et al., 1992; El-Kadi, 2001; Essaid et al., 1995; Geng et al., 2017). The experimental results were reported in Chen et al. (1992).
Fig.3  Velocity vectors and flow condition. (a) Case 4 (no tide). (b) Case 1 (A = 1 m). (c) Case 2 (A = 2 m). d) Case 3 (A = 3 m).
Fig.4  Concentration contour in base scenario (A = 1). (a) Fate and transport of the benzene after 7, 30 and 90 d. (b) Oxygen consume due to microbial degradation after 7, 30 and 90 d. (c) Nutrient concentration in domain after 7, 30 and 90 d.
Fig.5  Tide effect on the concentration of benzene in time at a different location: (a) Tide effect on different scenarios (Case 1, 2, 3 and 4) at x = 60 m (10 m after source point), (b) Tide effect on case 1, 2, 4 at x = 130 (80 m after the benzene release source), (c) Benzene concentration at x = 130 for case 3 (due to the small amount of benzene concentration in this location the graph has been shown separately).
Fig.6  Spreading area of the benzene plume after 15 d affected by different tide amplitude for the first scenario; the area shrinks due to an increase in the tide amplitude.
Fig.7  Effect of hydraulic conductivity on plume concentration during the specific time: (a) concentration versus time at x = 60 m (10 m after benzene released). (b) and (c) plume concentration versus time at x = 130 (80 m after point source).
Fig.8  Plume transport after 30 d. (a) Hydraulic conductivity 0.9 m/h (case 6). (b) Hydraulic conductivity 1.8 m/h (case 1). (c) Hydraulic conductivity 3.6 m/h (case 5).
Fig.9  Effect of longitudinal dispersivity on benzene concentration during the time. (a) Concentration of benzene 10 m after the point source. (b) Concentration of benzene 80 m after releasing contaminant.
1 M P Anderson, W W Woessner, R J Hunt(2015). Applied groundwater modeling: Simulation of flow and advective transport, 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier
2 Z Asif, Z Chen. A life cycle based air quality modeling and decision support system (LCAQMS) for sustainable mining management. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2020, 35( 2): 103– 117
3 R M Atlas, T C Hazen. Oil biodegradation and bioremediation: A tale of the two worst spills in US history. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45( 16): 6709– 6715
https://doi.org/10.1021/es2013227
4 O Babamiri, A Vanaei, X Guo, P Wu, A Richter, K T W Ng. Numerical simulation of water quality and self-purification in a mountainous river using QUAL2KW. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2021, 37( 1): 26– 35
5 Bailey J, Ollis D (1986). Biochemical engineering fundamentals. New York: McGraw-Hill
6 J Bear, A H D Cheng(2010). Modeling groundwater flow and contaminant transport (Vol. 23). Springer Science & Business Media
7 D Bhosale, C Kumar(2002) Simulation of seawater intrusion in Ernakulam coast. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Hydrology and Watershed Management, Hyderabad, 390–399
8 H Bi, C An, X Chen, E Owens, K Lee. Investigation into the oil removal from sand using a surface washing agent under different environmental conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, 275 : 111232–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111232
9 M C Boufadel, X Geng, J Short. Bioremediation of the Exxon Valdez oil in Prince William sound beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 2016, 113( 1–2): 156– 164
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.08.086
10 M C Boufadel, M T Suidan, A D Venosa. A numerical model for density-and-viscosity-dependent flows in two-dimensional variably saturated porous media. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1999, 37( 1–2): 1– 20
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(98)00164-8
11 M C Boufadel, M T Suidan, A D Venosa. Tracer studies in laboratory beach simulating tidal influences. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2006, 132( 6): 616– 623
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:6(616
12 T D Brock, M T Madigan, M Martinko, J J(2003).Biology of microorganisms, 10th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
13 A Brovelli, X Mao, D Barry. Numerical modeling of tidal influence on density-dependent contaminant transport. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43( 10): W10426–
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005173
14 Y M Chen, L M Abriola, P J Alvarez, P J Anid, T M Vogel. Modeling transport and biodegradation of benzene and toluene in sandy aquifer material: Comparisons with experimental measurements. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28( 7): 1833– 1847
https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR00667
15 Z K Chen, C An, M C Boufadel, E Owens, Z Chen, K Lee, Y Cao, M Cai. Use of surface-washing agents for the treatment of oiled shorelines: Research advancements, technical applications and future challenges. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 391 : 123565–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123565
16 N Colombani, M Mastrocicco, H Prommer, C Sbarbati, M Petitta. Fate of arsenic, phosphate and ammonium plumes in a coastal aquifer affected by saltwater intrusion. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2015, 179 : 116– 131
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.06.003
17 A I El-Kadi. Modeling hydrocarbon biodegradation in tidal aquifers with water-saturation and heat inhibition effects. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2001, 51( 1–2): 97– 125
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(01)00119-X
18 H I Essaid, B A Bekins, E M Godsy, E Warren, M J Baedecker, I M Cozzarelli. Simulation of aerobic and anaerobic biodegradation processes at a crude oil spill site. Water Resources Research, 1995, 31( 12): 3309– 3327
https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR02567
19 H I Essaid, I M Cozzarelli, R P Eganhouse, W N Herkelrath, B A Bekins, G N Delin. Inverse modeling of BTEX dissolution and biodegradation at the Bemidji, MN crude-oil spill site. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 2003, 67( 1–4): 269– 299
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00034-2
20 X Geng, M C Boufadel, F Cui. Numerical modeling of subsurface release and fate of benzene and toluene in coastal aquifers subjected to tides. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2017, 551 : 793– 803
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.039
21 X Geng, M C Boufadel, K Lee, S Abrams, M Suidan. Biodegradation of subsurface oil in a tidally influenced sand beach: Impact of hydraulics and interaction with pore water chemistry. Water Resources Research, 2015, 51( 5): 3193– 3218
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016870
22 X Geng, MC Boufadel, K Lee, C An (2020a). Characterization of pore water flow in 3-D heterogeneous permeability fields. Geophys Res Lett, 47(3): e2019GL086879
23 Geng X, Michael HA, Boufadel MC, Molz FJ, Gerges F, Lee K (2020b) Heterogeneity affects intertidal flow topology in coastal beach aquifers. Geophys Res Lett, 47(17): e2020GL089612
24 L He, Y Li, F Zhu, X Sun, H Herrmann, T Schaefer, Q Zhang, S Wang. Insight into the mechanism of the OH-induced reaction of ketoprofen: A combined DFT simulation and experimental study. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2020, 35( 2): 128– 137
25 J Heiss (2011). Intertidal mixing zone dynamics and swash induced infiltration in a sandy beach aquifer, Cape Henlopen, Delaware. Dissertation for the Ph. D Degree Delaware: University of Delaware
26 J Heiss, H A Michael. Saltwater-freshwater mixing dynamics in a sandy beach aquifer over tidal, spring-neap, and seasonal cycles. Water Resources Research, 2014, 50( 8): 6747– 6766
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015574
27 Y Jiang, B Xi, R Li, M Li, Z Xu, Y Yang, S Gao. Advances in Fe(III) bioreduction and its application prospect for groundwater remediation: A review. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2019, 13( 6): 89–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1173-9
28 M Khaska, C Le Gal La Salle, J Lancelot, A S T E R team, A Mohamad, P Verdoux, A Noret, R Simler. Origin of groundwater salinity (current seawater vs. saline deep water) in a coastal karst aquifer based on Sr and Cl isotopes. Case study of the La Clape massif (southern France). Applied Geochemistry, 2013, 37 : 212– 227
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.07.006
29 M Kheirandish, H Rahimi, M Kamaliardakani, R Salim. Obtaining the effect of sewage network on groundwater quality using MT3DMS code: Case study on Bojnourd plain. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 2020, 11 : 100439–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100439
30 U Lathashri, A Mahesha. Predictive simulation of seawater intrusion in a tropical coastal aquifer. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2016, 142( 12): D4015001–
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0001037
31 J G Leahy, R R Colwell. Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 1990, 54( 3): 305– 315
32 K Lee, M C Boufadel, B Chen, J Foght, P Hodson, S Swanson, A Venosa. Expert panel report on the behaviour and environmental impacts of crude oil released into aqueous environments. Royal Society of Canada, 2015, Ottawa : ON–
33 C Li, L Yan, Y Li, D Zhang, M Bao, L Dong. TiO2@palygorskite composite for the efficient remediation of oil spills via a dispersion-photodegradation synergy. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2021, 15( 4): 72–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1365-3
34 H Li, M C Boufadel. Long-term persistence of oil from the Exxon Valdez spill in two-layer beaches. Nature Geoscience, 2010, 3( 2): 96– 99
https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo749
35 Y Liu, J J Jiao, X Luo. Effects of inland water level oscillation on groundwater dynamics and land-sourced solute transport in a coastal aquifer. Coastal Engineering, 2016, 114 : 347– 360
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.04.021
36 Z Liu, J Liu, Q Zhu, W Wu. The weathering of oil after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: Insights from the chemical composition of the oil from the sea surface, salt marshes and sediments. Environmental Research Letters, 2012, 7( 3): 035302–
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/035302
37 G Lu, T P Clement, C Zheng, T H Wiedemeier. Natural attenuation of BTEX compounds: Model development and field-scale application. Ground Water, 1999, 37( 5): 707– 717
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01163.x
38 S W Mehl, M C Hill (2001). User guide to the Link-AMG (LMG) package for solving matrix equations using an algebraic multigrid solver. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 01–177. Reston. USGS: Virginia
39 J Ordieres-Meré, J Ouarzazi, Johra B El, B Gong. Predicting ground level ozone in Marrakesh by machine-learning techniques. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2020, 36( 2): 93– 106
40 A Ramakrishnan, L Blaney, J Kao, R D Tyagi, T C Zhang, R Y Surampalli. Emerging contaminants in landfill leachate and their sustainable management. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73( 3): 1357– 1368
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3489-x
41 C Robinson, B Gibbes, H Carey, L Li. Salt-freshwater dynamics in a subterranean estuary over a spring-neap tidal cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2007, 112( C9): C09007–
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JC003888
42 F Santos, M DeCastro, M Gómez-Gesteira, I Álvarez. Differences in coastal and oceanic SST warming rates along the Canary upwelling ecosystem from 1982 to 2010. Continental Shelf Research, 2012, 47 : 1– 6
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2012.07.023
43 C Sbarbati, N Colombani, M Mastrocicco, R Aravena, M Petitta. Performance of different assessment methods to evaluate contaminant sources and fate in a coastal aquifer. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2015, 22( 20): 15536– 15548
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4731-0
44 D Schulze-Makuch. Longitudinal dispersivity data and implications for scaling behavior. Ground Water, 2005, 43( 3): 443– 456
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0051.x
45 N Shrestha, J Wang. Water quality management of a cold climate region watershed in changing climate. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2020, 35( 1): 56– 80
46 J Torlapati, M C Boufadel. Evaluation of the biodegradation of Alaska North Slope oil in microcosms using the biodegradation model BIOB. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2014, 5 : 212–
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00212
47 F A Uraizee, A D Venosa, M T Suidan. A model for diffusion controlled bioavailability of crude oil components. Biodegradation, 1997, 8( 5): 287– 296
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008293024768
48 Z Wang, C An, X Chen, K Lee, B Zhang, Q Feng. Disposable masks release microplastics to the aqueous environment with exacerbation by natural weathering. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 417 : 126036–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126036
49 M A Widdowson, F J Molz, L D Benefield. A numerical transport model for oxygen-and nitrate-based respiration linked to substrate and nutrient availability in porous media. Water Resources Research, 1988, 24( 9): 1553– 1565
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i009p01553
50 Z Xu, J Chai, Y Wu, R Qin. Transport and biodegradation modeling of gasoline spills in soil-aquifer system. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 74( 4): 2871– 2882
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4311-0
51 A Zhai, X Ding, L Liu, Q Zhu, G Huang. Total phosphorus accident pollution and emergency response study based on geographic information system in Three Gorges Reservoir area. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2020a, 14( 3): 46–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1223-3
52 A Zhai, X Ding, Y Zhao, W Xiao, B Lu. Improvement of instantaneous point source model for simulating radionuclide diffusion in oceans under nuclear power plant accidents. Journal of Environmental Informatics, 2020b, 36( 2): 133– 145
https://doi.org/10.3808/jei.201700380
53 Y Zhao, L Lin, M Hong. Nitrobenzene contamination of groundwater in a petrochemical industry site. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2019, 13( 2): 29–
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1107-6
[1] Kaixuan Zheng, Xingshen Luo, Yiqi Tan, Zhonglei Li, Hongtao Wang, Tan Chen, Li Zhao, Liangtong Zhan. Passive convergence-permeable reactive barrier (PC-PRB): An effective configuration to enhance hydraulic performance[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 156-.
[2] Ziyue Yin, Qing Lin, Shaohui Xu. Using hydrochemical signatures to characterize the long-period evolution of groundwater information in the Dagu River Basin, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 105-.
[3] Yi Qian, Weichuan Qiao, Yunhao Zhang. Toxic effect of sodium perfluorononyloxy-benzenesulfonate on Pseudomonas stutzeri in aerobic denitrification, cell structure and gene expression[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 100-.
[4] Ruijie Li, Mengmeng Zhou, Shilong He, Tingting Pan, Jing Liu, Jiabao Zhu. Deciphering the effect of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate on up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treatment of synthetic sulfate-containing wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 91-.
[5] Lina Gan, Kezhi Li, Hejingying Niu, Yue Peng, Jianjun Chen, Yuandong Huang, Junhua Li. Simultaneous removal of NOx and chlorobenzene on V2O5/TiO2 granular catalyst: Kinetic study and performance prediction[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 70-.
[6] Minxiang Wang, Lili Yang, Xiaoyun Liu, Zheng Wang, Guorui Liu, Minghui Zheng. Hexachlorobutadiene emissions from typical chemical plants[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 60-.
[7] Zhengqing Cai, Xiao Zhao, Jun Duan, Dongye Zhao, Zhi Dang, Zhang Lin. Remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic chemicals using stabilized nanoparticles: Lessons from the past two decades[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(5): 84-.
[8] Wei Fan, Qi Li, Mingxin Huo, Xiaoyu Wang, Shanshan Lin. Transport of bacterial cell (E. coli) from different recharge water resources in porous media during simulated artificial groundwater recharge[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 63-.
[9] Yu Jiang, Beidou Xi, Rui Li, Mingxiao Li, Zheng Xu, Yuning Yang, Shaobo Gao. Advances in Fe(III) bioreduction and its application prospect for groundwater remediation: A review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(6): 89-.
[10] Gaoling Wei, Jinhua Zhang, Jinqiu Luo, Huajian Xue, Deyin Huang, Zhiyang Cheng, Xinbai Jiang. Nanoscale zero-valent iron supported on biochar for the highly efficient removal of nitrobenzene[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 61-.
[11] Yongsheng Zhao, Lin Lin, Mei Hong. Nitrobenzene contamination of groundwater in a petrochemical industry site[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 29-.
[12] Bo Zhang, Xilai Zheng, Tianyuan Zheng, Jia Xin, Shuai Sui, Di Zhang. The influence of slope collapse on water exchange between a pit lake and a heterogeneous aquifer[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 20-.
[13] Jun Li, Wentao Li, Gan Luo, Yan Li, Aimin Li. Effect of nitrobenzene on the performance and bacterial community in an expanded granular sludge bed reactor treating high-sulfate organic wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 6-.
[14] Xiaotu Liu, Heidelore Fiedler, Wenwen Gong, Bin Wang, Gang Yu. Potential sources of unintentionally produced PCB, HCB, and PeCBz in China: A preliminary overview[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 1-.
[15] Wenchao Jiang, Ping Tang, Shuguang Lu, Xiang Zhang, Zhaofu Qiu, Qian Sui. Enhanced reductive degradation of carbon tetrachloride by carbon dioxide radical anion-based sodium percarbonate/ Fe(II)/formic acid system in aqueous solution[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 6-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed