Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (11) : 142    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1742-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Multimedia distribution and health risk assessment of typical organic pollutants in a retired industrial park
Shijin Wu1, Zijing Xiang1, Daohui Lin1,2, Lizhong Zhu1,2()
1. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Organic Pollution Process and Control, Department of Environmental Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2. Zhejiang Ecological Civilization Academy, Anji 313300, China
 Download: PDF(3112 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

● A fine portrayal of organic pollutants in a retired industrial park is provided.

● Key factors affecting the spatial distribution of organic pollutants are unrevaled.

● Risk classification, grading, and management are reached based on risk assessment.

The overall cross-media risk evaluation of organic pollutants in retired industrial parks is insufficiently recognized. In this study, 11 semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and 27 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were measured in 531 soil and groundwater samples taken from a retired industrial park by coast in Zhejiang Province, China. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs), Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), benzene, and ethylbenzene were identified as the critical pollutants in the soil, while TPHs, 1,2-dichloropropane (1,2-DCP), toluene, benzo[a]anthracene (BaA), and benzo[b]fluoranthene (BbF) were identified as critical pollutants in the groundwater for exceeding China national standards. The spatial correlation between the concentrations of organic pollutants in soil and groundwater was explored by employing the Geodetector model. Based on the results of spatial interpolation, high-risk hotspots regarding soil and groundwater pollution were identified. Moreover, the possible harm to human health of the critical pollutants were also under evaluation. Among various critical pollutants, benzene, ethylbenzene, and DEHP in soil, and 1,2-DCP in groundwater, were the main contributors to the overall health risk of multimedia pollution. This study developed a comprehensive approach to assess the risks posed by specific organic toxicants in various environmental media. The findings of this work can serve as a valuable reference for future management strategies in retired industrial parks.

Keywords Organic pollutants      Retired industrial park      Spatial correlation      Health risk assessment     
Corresponding Author(s): Lizhong Zhu   
Issue Date: 15 November 2023
 Cite this article:   
Shijin Wu,Zijing Xiang,Daohui Lin, et al. Multimedia distribution and health risk assessment of typical organic pollutants in a retired industrial park[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(11): 142.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-023-1742-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2023/V17/I11/142
Fig.1  Locations of the study area and soil and groundwater sampling sites.
Critical pollutants Detection frequency (%) Max (mg/kg) Min (mg/kg) Screening value (mg/kg) Over-standard rate (%) Maximum exceedance multiple
Soil TPHs 62.0 9980 ND 826 2.1 12.1
DEHP 24.1 92.2 ND 42 0.19 2.20
Benzene 2.82 3.04 ND 1 0.19 3.04
Ethylbenzene 2.64 20.8 ND 7.2 0.19 2.89
Groundwater TPHs 100 7.40E + 00 0.01 6.00E–01b) 19.4 12.3
BbF 75.8 3.44E–02 ND 8.00E–03 a) 23.2 3.30
BaA 53.2 1.11E–02 ND 3.80E–03 a) 43.6 2.31
Toluene 3.23 1.56E + 00 ND 1.40E + 00 a) 1.61 1.11
1,2-DCP 1.61 7.98E–01 ND 6.00E–02 a) 1.61 13.3
Tab.1  Summary statistics of critical pollutants measured in the soil and groundwater samples
Fig.2  Spatial distributions of the interpolated concentrations of critical pollutants in soil.
Fig.3  Correlations between pollutant concentrations and environmental indicators in (a) soil and (b) groundwater of the industrial park. Note: ** indicates correlation significance at 0.01 level (p < 0.01); * indicates correlation significance at 0.05 level (p < 0.05).
Fig.4  Spatial distributions of interpolated concentrations of critical pollutants in the groundwater of the industrial park.
Scenarios Site Pollutants Soil   Groundwater   CRT
CRois CRdcs CRpis CRiiv1   CRiiv2  
Sensitive scenario S21 Benzene       3.47E−06        
Ethylbenzene       3.07E−06        
1,2-DCP       3.34E−08        
BaA 3.84E−08 1.59E−08 2.73E−10        
BbF 7.67E−08 3.19E−08 5.46E−10        
DEHP 7.16E−09 2.29E−09 1.46E−11        
Sum 1.22E−07 5.01E−08 8.33E−10 6.57E− 06       6.74E−06
S41(W21 ) Ethylbenzene         1.07E−08    
1,2-DCP         2.87E−06    
BbF         5.51E−14    
DEHP 5.01E−08 1.60E−08 1.02E−10 3.44E−15        
Sum 5.01E−08 1.60E−08 1.02E−10 3.44E−15   2.88E−06   3.01E−06
S81(W41) BaA         3.19E−13    
BbF         3.48E−14    
DEHP 1.65E−06 5.28E−07 3.35E−09        
Sum 1.65E−06 5.28E−07 3.35E−09   3.53E−13   2.18E−06
Non-sensitive scenario S21 Benzene       8.01E−07        
Ethylbenzene       7.09E−07        
1,2-DCP       7.71E−09        
BaA 1.09E−08 8.60E−09 1.43E−10        
BbF 2.19E−08 1.72E−08 2.87E−10        
DEHP 2.04E−09 1.23E−09 7.64E−12        
Sum 3.49E−08 2.70E−08 4.38E−10 1.52E−06       1.58E−06
Tab.2  Summary of cancer risks assessed for hotpot sites under the sensitive and non-sensitive scenarios
Site Pollutants Soil Groundwater HI
HQois HQdcs HQpis HQiiv1 HQiiv2
S21 Benzene 1.67E−01
Ethylbenzene 1.57E−03
1,2-DCP 1.38E−02
DEHP 4.00E−04 1.14E−04
Sum 4.00E−04 1.14E−04 1.85E−01 1.86E−01
S41(W21 ) Ethylbenzene 8.46E−04
1,2-DCP 4.84E−05
BbF 2.18E−01
DEHP 2.80E−03 7.97E−04
Sum 2.80E−03 7.97E−04 2.19E−01 2.23E−01
S81(W41) DEHP 9.21E−02 2.62E−02
Sum 9.21E−02 2.62E−02 1.18E−01
Tab.3  The calculated non-cancer risks for hotpot sites under the sensitive scenario
Critical pollutants RCVs (mg/kg) RCVg (mg/L)
Benzene 0.80 0.55
Toluene 1630 1840
Ethylbenzene 6.12 1.59
1,2-DCP 0.21 0.28
BaA 5.50 107
BbF 5.50 834
DEHP 42.3 69800
Tab.4  The calculated risk control values for the critical pollutants in soil (RCVs) and groundwater (RCVg) under the sensitive and non-sensitive scenarios
Fig.5  Remedial way under the sensitive scenario.
1 N Ashjar, B Keshavarzi, F Moore, N Soltani, P S Hooda, M R Mahmoudi. (2021). TPH and PAHs in an oil-rich metropolis in SW Iran: Implication for source apportionment and human health. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 28(1): 58–78
https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2021.2015285
2 R Chen, T Li, C Huang, Y Yu, L Zhou, G Hu, F Yang, L Zhang. (2021). Characteristics and health risks of benzene series and halocarbons near a typical chemical industrial park. Environmental Pollution, 289: 117893
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117893
3 L Cheng, W Wei, A Guo, C Zhang, K Sha, R Wang, K Wang, S Cheng. (2022). Health risk assessment of hazardous VOCs and its associations with exposure duration and protection measures for coking industry workers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379: 134919
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134919
4 L Han, L Qian, J Yan, R Liu, Y Du, M Chen. (2016). A comparison of risk modeling tools and a case study for human health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds in contaminated groundwater. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 23(2): 1234–1245
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5335-4
5 W Han, G Gao, J Geng, Y Li, Y Wang. (2018). Ecological and health risks assessment and spatial distribution of residual heavy metals in the soil of an e-waste circular economy park in Tianjin, China. Chemosphere, 197: 325–335
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.01.043
6 D Hou, A Al-Tabbaa, D O’Connor, Q Hu, Y G Zhu, L Wang, N Kirkwood, S Ok  Y, C Tsang  D, N S Bolan. et al.. (2023a). Sustainable remediation and redevelopment of brownfield sites. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 4: 271–286
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00404-1
7 Y HouY Li H TaoH Cao X LiaoX Liu (2023b). Three-dimensional distribution characteristics of multiple pollutants in the soil at a steelworks mega-site based on multi-source information. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 448: 130934
8 G Hu, H Liu, C Chen, J Li, H Hou, K Hewage, R Sadiq. (2021). An integrated geospatial correlation analysis and human health risk assessment approach for investigating abandoned industrial sites. Journal of Environmental Management, 293: 112891
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112891
9 F G Jenks. (1967). The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography, 7: 186–190
10 Y Jiang, S Chao, J Liu, Y Yang, Y Chen, A Zhang, H Cao. (2017). Source apportionment and health risk assessment of heavy metals in soil for a township in Jiangsu Province, China. Chemosphere, 168: 1658–1668
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.088
11 Y Jiang, Y Sun, L Zhang, X Wang. (2020). Influence factor analysis of soil heavy metal Cd based on the GeoDetector. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 34(6): 921–930
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01806-z
12 M Junaid, P P Jia, Y M Tang, W X Xiong, H Y Huang, P R Strauss, W G Li, D S Pei. (2018). Mechanistic toxicity of DEHP at environmentally relevant concentrations (ERCs) and ecological risk assessment in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Environmental Pollution, 242: 1939–1949
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.07.067
13 B Kang, D Wang, S Du. (2017). Source identification and degradation pathway of multiple persistent organic pollutants in groundwater at an abandoned chemical site in Hebei, China. Exposure and Health, 9(2): 135–141
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0228-4
14 S D Katz, H Chen, D M Fields, E C Beirne, P Keyes, G T Drozd, C Aeppli. (2022). Changes in chemical composition and copepod toxicity during petroleum photo-oxidation. Environmental Science & Technology, 56(9): 5552–5562
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c00251
15 M A I Khan, B Biswas, E Smith, R Naidu, M Megharaj. (2018). Toxicity assessment of fresh and weathered petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soil- a review. Chemosphere, 212: 755–767
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.094
16 S T Lee, C T Vu, C Lin, K S Chen. (2018). High occurrence of BTEX around major industrial plants in Kaohsiung, Taiwan (China). Environmental Forensics, 19(3): 206–216
https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2018.1475432
17 J Li, B Xi, W Cai, Y Yang, Y Jia, X Li, Y Lv, N Lv, H Huan, J Yang. (2017). Identification of dominating factors affecting vadose zone vulnerability by a simulation method. Scientific Reports, 7(1): 45955
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45955
18 J Liao, X Qian, F Liu, S Deng, H Lin, X Liu, C Wei. (2021). Multiphase distribution and migration characteristics of heavy metals in typical sandy intertidal zones: insights from solid-liquid partitioning. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 208: 111674
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111674
19 C Lin, C J Lee, W M Mao, F Nadim. (2009). Identifying the potential sources of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate contamination in the sediment of the Houjing River in southern Taiwan (China). Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(1): 270–275
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.082
20 MEEPRC (2014). National Soil Contamination Survey Report. Beijing: MEEPRC (in Chinese)
21 MEEPRC (2019). Technical Guidelines for Risk Assessment of Soil Contamination of Land for Construction. Beijing: MEEPRC (in Chinese)
22 Y Meng, W Liu, H Fiedler, J Zhang, X Wei, X Liu, M Peng, T Zhang. (2021). Fate and risk assessment of emerging contaminants in reclaimed water production processes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(5): 104
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1392-8
23 R Olawoyin. (2013). Exploration of the spatial-Composite Risk Index (CRI) for the characterization of toxicokinetics in petrochemical active areas. Chemosphere, 92(9): 1207–1213
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.04.045
24 L Pizzol, A Critto, P Agostini, A Marcomini. (2011). Regional risk assessment for contaminated sites. Part 2: Ranking of potentially contaminated sites. Environment International, 37(8): 1307–1320
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2011.05.010
25 W Qiao, R Li, T Tang, A A Zuh. (2021). Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(2): 20
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1312-3
26 H Ren, P Su, W Kang, X Ge, S Ma, G Shen, Q Chen, Y Yu, T An. (2022). Heterologous spatial distribution of soil polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and the primary influencing factors in three industrial parks. Environmental Pollution, 310: 119912
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119912
27 M O Rivett, G P Wealthall, R A Dearden, T A McAlary (2011). Review of unsaturated-zone transport and attenuation of volatile organic compound (VOC) plumes leached from shallow source zones. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 123(3–4): 130–156
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.12.013
28 State Council PRC (2016). State Council of China Soil Pollution Prevention and Cleanup Action Plan. Beijing: MEEPRC (in Chinese)
29 C Su, J Meng, Y Zhou, R Bi, Z Chen, J Diao, Z Huang, Z Kan, T Wang. (2022). Heavy metals in soils from intense industrial areas in South China: spatial distribution, source apportionment, and risk assessment. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 820536
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.820536
30 Y Sun, A Ding, X Zhao, W Chang, L Ren, Y Zhao, Z Song, D Hao, Y Liu, N Jin, D Zhang. (2022). Response of soil microbial communities to petroleum hydrocarbons at a multi-contaminated industrial site in Lanzhou, China. Chemosphere, 306: 135559
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135559
31 Y Teng, Q Zhou, X Miao, Y Chen. (2015). Assessment of soil organic contamination in a typical petrochemical industry park in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 22(13): 10227–10234
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4219-y
32 U C Ugochukwu, A Ochonogor, C M Jidere, C Agu, F Nkoloagu, J Ewoh, V U Okwu-Delunzu. (2018). Exposure risks to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by humans and livestock (cattle) due to hydrocarbon spill from petroleum products in Niger-delta wetland. Environment International, 115: 38–47
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.010
33 USEPA (2001). Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Vol. III−Part A: Process for Conducting Probabilistic Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency
34 USEPA (2011). Exposure Factors Handbook 2011. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency
35 USEPA (2023). Superfund Remedy Report, 15th ed. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency
36 I Verginelli, R Baciocchi. (2013). Role of natural attenuation in modeling the leaching of contaminants in the risk analysis framework. Journal of Environmental Management, 114: 395–403
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.035
37 M Wang, X Li, M Lei, L Duan, H Chen. (2022a). Human health risk identification of petrochemical sites based on extreme gradient boosting. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 233: 113332
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113332
38 Q Wang, J Bian, D Ruan, C Zhang. (2022b). Adsorption of benzene on soils under different influential factors: an experimental investigation, importance order and prediction using artificial neural network. Journal of Environmental Management, 306: 114467
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114467
39 Q Wang, K N Lv, A T Wang, X Liu, G Yin, J Wang, X Du, J Li, G Yuan. (2022c). Release of phthalate esters from a local landfill in the Tibetan Plateau: importance of soil particle-size specific association. Science of the Total Environment, 806: 151281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151281
40 Y Wang, S Wang, L Jiang, L Ma, X Li, M Zhong, W Zhang (2022d). Does the geographic difference of soil properties matter for setting up the soil screening levels in large countries like China? Environmental Science & Technology, 56(9): 5684–5693
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c08771
41 E Wcisło, J Bronder, A Bubak, E Rodríguez-Valdés, J L R Gallego. (2016). Human health risk assessment in restoring safe and productive use of abandoned contaminated sites. Environment International, 94: 436–448
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.028
42 B Wu, S Guo, L Zhang, S Wang, D Liu, Z Cheng, N Shi. (2022). Spatial variation of residual total petroleum hydrocarbons and ecological risk in oilfield soils. Chemosphere, 291: 132916
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132916
43 S Wu, S Zhou, H Bao, D Chen, C Wang, B Li, G Tong, Y Yuan, B Xu. (2019). Improving risk management by using the spatial interaction relationship of heavy metals and PAHs in urban soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 364: 108–116
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.094
44 L Xu, H Dai, L Skuza, S Wei. (2021). Comprehensive exploration of heavy metal contamination and risk assessment at two common smelter sites. Chemosphere, 285: 131350
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131350
45 W Zeng, X Wan, M Lei, G Gu, T Chen. (2022). Influencing factors and prediction of arsenic concentration in Pteris vittata: a combination of geodetector and empirical models. Environmental Pollution, 292: 118240
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118240
46 C Zhang, W Kuang, J Wu, J Liu, H Tian. (2021). Industrial land expansion in rural China threatens environmental securities. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 15(2): 29
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1321-2
47 F Zhang, Y Wang, X Liao. (2022). Recognition method for the health risks of potentially toxic elements in a headwater catchment. Science of the Total Environment, 839: 156287
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156287
48 S Zheng, J Wang, Y Zhuo, D Yang, R Liu. (2022). Spatial distribution model of DEHP contamination categories in soil based on Bi-LSTM and sparse sampling. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 229: 113092
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113092
49 M Zolfaghari, P Drogui, B Seyhi, S K Brar, G Buelna, R Dubé. (2014). Occurrence, fate and effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate in wastewater treatment plants: a review. Environmental Pollution, 194: 281–293
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2014.07.014
50 R Zuo, K Han, D Xu, Q Li, J Liu, Z Xue, X Zhao, J Wang. (2022). Response of environmental factors to attenuation of toluene in vadose zone. Journal of Environmental Management, 302: 113968
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113968
[1] FSE-23046-OF-WSJ_suppl_1 Download
[1] Yating Wei, Dong Hu, Chengsong Ye, Heng Zhang, Haoran Li, Xin Yu. Drinking water quality & health risk assessment of secondary water supply systems in residential neighborhoods[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 18-.
[2] Junmei Guo, Yuexing Wei, Junxing Yang, Tongbin Chen, Guodi Zheng, Tianwei Qian, Xiaona Liu, Xiaofei Meng, Mengke He. Cultivars and oil extraction techniques affect Cd/Pb contents and health risks in oil of rapeseed grown on Cd/Pb-contaminated farmland[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(7): 87-.
[3] Liang Cui, Ji Li, Xiangyun Gao, Biao Tian, Jiawen Zhang, Xiaonan Wang, Zhengtao Liu. Human health ambient water quality criteria for 13 heavy metals and health risk assessment in Taihu Lake[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 41-.
[4] Yang Zhang, Zheng Peng, Zhaomin Dong, Mujie Wang, Chen Jiang. Twenty years of achievements in China’s implementation of the Stockholm Convention[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 152-.
[5] Yanfeng Yang, Ruina Zhang, Ziyang Lou. Bioaerosol emissions variations in large-scale landfill region and their health risk impacts[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 158-.
[6] Yi Qian, Weichuan Qiao, Yunhao Zhang. Toxic effect of sodium perfluorononyloxy-benzenesulfonate on Pseudomonas stutzeri in aerobic denitrification, cell structure and gene expression[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 100-.
[7] Wei Mao, Lixun Zhang, Tianye Wang, Yichen Bai, Yuntao Guan. Fabrication of highly efficient Bi2WO6/CuS composite for visible-light photocatalytic removal of organic pollutants and Cr(VI) from wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 52-.
[8] Weichuan Qiao, Rong Li, Tianhao Tang, Achuo Anitta Zuh. Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 20-.
[9] Xinyi Hu, Ting Yang, Chen Liu, Jun Jin, Bingli Gao, Xuejun Wang, Min Qi, Baokai Wei, Yuyu Zhan, Tan Chen, Hongtao Wang, Yanting Liu, Dongrui Bai, Zhu Rao, Nan Zhan. Distribution of aromatic amines, phenols, chlorobenzenes, and naphthalenes in the surface sediment of the Dianchi Lake, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 66-.
[10] Xinjie Wang, Yang Li, Jian Zhao, Hong Yao, Siqi Chu, Zimu Song, Zongxian He, Wen Zhang. Magnetotactic bacteria: Characteristics and environmental applications[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 56-.
[11] Kubra Ulucan-Altuntas, Eyup Debik. Dechlorination of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) by Fe/Pd bimetallic nanoparticles: Comparison with nZVI, degradation mechanism, and pathways[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 17-.
[12] Lei Zheng, Xingbao Gao, Wei Wang, Zifu Li, Lingling Zhang, Shikun Cheng. Utilization of MSWI fly ash as partial cement or sand substitute with focus on cementing efficiency and health risk assessment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 5-.
[13] Hang Zhang, Shuo Chen, Haiguang Zhang, Xinfei Fan, Cong Gao, Hongtao Yu, Xie Quan. Carbon nanotubes-incorporated MIL-88B-Fe as highly efficient Fenton-like catalyst for degradation of organic pollutants[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 18-.
[14] Xinshu Jiang, Yingxi Qu, Liquan Liu, Yuan He, Wenchao Li, Jun Huang, Hongwei Yang, Gang Yu. PPCPs in a drinking water treatment plant in the Yangtze River Delta of China: Occurrence, removal and risk assessment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 27-.
[15] Bingbing XU, Qiujin XU, Cunzhen LIANG, Li LI, Lijia JIANG. Occurrence and health risk assessment of trace heavy metals via groundwater in Shizhuyuan Polymetallic Mine in Chenzhou City, China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2015, 9(3): 482-493.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed