Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2025, Vol. 19 Issue (1) : 5    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-025-1925-7
Self-driven phosphate enrichment by hydrogel beads for nutrient recovery
Zeou Dou, Yixuan Huang, Xing Xie()
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA
 Download: PDF(3095 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

The enrichment of phosphate is necessary for high-efficiency nutrient recovery from wastewater through struvite precipitation. However, the majority of current nutrient enrichment processes focus on membrane-based technologies driven by external energy input. Here, the phosphate enrichment by negatively charged Poly(sodium acrylate) hydrogel beads as the self-driven dewatering agent under different conditions was investigated. The phosphate rejection decreased as its concentration increased but retained 56.9% even in 10 mmol/L PO43− solution, which is well beyond the phosphate concentration in typical wastewater concentrates. Phosphate was concentrated 3.6 folds with a recovery of 70% using ~1 wt% of hydrogel beads in 0.5 mmol/L phosphate solution. The effects of the pH, ionic strength of the nutrient stream, and the swelling ratio of hydrogels on the rejection of phosphate were investigated. In addition, the hydrogel beads removed 100% of nickel ions during the dewatering of the phosphate solution (0.5 mmol/L Ni2+ and 0.5 mmol/L PO43−), presenting an opportunity for simultaneous phosphate enrichment and purification during the pretreatment for nutrient recovery from wastewater. This study demonstrated that the spontaneous dewatering process utilizing ion-selective hydrogels is promising for nutrient enrichment to promote recovery efficiency.

Keywords Nutrient recovery      Hydrogel      Ion selectivity      Phosphate      Separation     
Corresponding Author(s): Xing Xie   
Issue Date: 29 October 2024
 Cite this article:   
Zeou Dou,Yixuan Huang,Xing Xie. Self-driven phosphate enrichment by hydrogel beads for nutrient recovery[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2025, 19(1): 5.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-025-1925-7
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2025/V19/I1/5
Medium Concentration (mmol/L) pH
H3PO4 3 2.41
H3PO4 + NaH2PO4 1.5 + 1.5 2.74
NaH2PO4 3 5.04
NaH2PO4 + Na2HPO4 1.5 + 1.5 7.1
Na2HPO4 3 9.12
Na2HPO4 + Na3PO4 1.5 + 1.5 11.12
Na3PO4 3 11.25
Tab.1  Characteristics of the phosphate media
Fig.1  Swelling ratio of PSA beads in media of different concentrations of NaCl at different pH values.
Fig.2  Performance of the PSA beads on phosphate rejection. (a) Phosphate rejection and the comparison between Debye length and the mesh size of the swelling hydrogel in media containing different concentrations of phosphate (pH around 5). (b) Phosphate rejection and the comparison between Debye length and the mesh size of the swelling hydrogel under different pH (3 mmol/L phosphate). (c) Phosphate rejection and the mesh size evolution along the swelling of the PSA beads (pH around 5, 3 mmol/L phosphate, effective Debye length 11.08 nm).
Fig.3  Concentration factor and recovery rate of phosphate feed solution plotted against volume ratio for experiment with: (a) 1–5 PSA beads swelling at pH 5.2 for 3 h; (b) 1–5 PSA beads swelling at pH 8.3 for 3 h; and (c) 3–15 PSA beads swelling at pH 8.3 for 0.5 h.
Fig.4  The performance of the PSA beads over 4 cycles of experiments. (a) Swelling ratio; (b) phosphate rejection.
Fig.5  Phosphate and nickel concentrations before and after PSA bead absorption (pH = 5.5, volume ratio = 1.8). Nickel concentration is non-detectable in the residual solution. The error bar for the phosphate concentration in the residual solution shows the standard deviation of results from three independent experiments.
1 A Achilli, T Y Cath, E A Marchand, A E Childress. (2009). The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes. Desalination, 239(1−3): 10–21
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.02.022
2 T Canal, N A Peppas. (1989). Correlation between mesh size and equilibrium degree of swelling of polymeric networks. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 23(10): 1183–1193
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820231007
3 W Chen, Q Wang, J Chen, Q Zhang, X Zhao, Y Qian, C Zhu, L Yang, Y Zhao, X Y Kong. et al.. (2020). Improved ion transport and high energy conversion through hydrogel membrane with 3D interconnected nanopores. Nano Letters, 20(8): 5705–5713
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01087
4 W Chen, T Wang, Z Dou, X Xie. (2021). Microalgae harvesting by self-driven 3D microfiltration with rationally designed Porous Superabsorbent Polymer (PSAP) beads. Environmental Science & Technology, 55(22): 15446–15455
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04907
5 L Cumbal, A K Sengupta. (2005). Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated Iron(III) oxide nanoparticles: role of Donnan membrane effect. Environmental Science & Technology, 39(17): 6508–6515
https://doi.org/10.1021/es050175e
6 Z Darban, S Shahabuddin, R Gaur, I Ahmad, N Sridewi. (2022). Hydrogel-based adsorbent material for the effective removal of heavy metals from wastewater: a comprehensive review. Gels, 8(5): 263
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050263
7 L E de-Bashan, Y Bashan. (2004). Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997–2003). Water Research, 38(19): 4222–4246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.07.014
8 Z Dou, T Wang, W Chen, B Lin, H Dong, W Sun, X Xie. (2020). Self-driven membrane filtration by core-shell polymer composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry. A, Materials for Energy and Sustainability, 8(31): 15942–15950
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA03617J
9 M L Gerardo, M P Zacharof, R W Lovitt. (2013). Strategies for the recovery of nutrients and metals from anaerobically digested dairy farm sludge using cross-flow microfiltration. Water Research, 47(14): 4833–4842
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.04.019
10 C González-Morales, B Fernández, F J Molina, D Naranjo-Fernández, A Matamoros-Veloza, M A Camargo-Valero. (2021). Influence of pH and temperature on struvite purity and recovery from anaerobic digestate. Sustainability, 13(19): 10730
https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910730
11 L F Gudeman, N A Peppas. (1995). pH-sensitive membranes from poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(acrylic acid) interpenetrating networks. Journal of Membrane Science, 107(3): 239–248
https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(95)00120-7
12 J F Hallas, C L Mackowiak, A C Wilkie, W G Harris. (2019). Struvite phosphorus recovery from aerobically digested municipal wastewater. Sustainability, 11(2): 376
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020376
13 R W Holloway, A E Childress, K E Dennett, T Y Cath. (2007). Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Research, 41(17): 4005–4014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.054
14 O Ichihashi, K Hirooka. (2012). Removal and recovery of phosphorus as struvite from swine wastewater using microbial fuel cell. Bioresource Technology, 114: 303–307
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.124
15 O Lahav, M Telzhensky, A Zewuhn, Y Gendel, J Gerth, W Calmano, L Birnhack. (2013). Struvite recovery from municipal-wastewater sludge centrifuge supernatant using seawater NF concentrate as a cheap Mg(II) source. Separation and Purification Technology, 108: 103–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.002
16 Y Li, T Xu, Z Ouyang, X Lin, H Liu, Z Hao, P Yang. (2009). Micromorphology of macromolecular superabsorbent polymer and its fractal characteristics. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 113(6): 3510–3519
https://doi.org/10.1002/app.30323
17 J Lin, N Chen, Y Pan. (2013). Arsenic incorporation in synthetic struvite (NH4MgPO4·6H2O): a synchrotron XAS and single-crystal EPR study. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(22): 12728–12735
https://doi.org/10.1021/es402710y
18 N Ma, A A Rouff. (2012). Influence of pH and oxidation state on the interaction of arsenic with struvite during mineral formation. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(16): 8791–8798
https://doi.org/10.1021/es300864t
19 B K Mayer, L A Baker, T H Boyer, P Drechsel, M Gifford, M A Hanjra, P Parameswaran, J Stoltzfus, P Westerhoff, B E Rittmann. (2016). Total value of phosphorus recovery. Environmental Science & Technology, 50(13): 6606–6620
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b01239
20 B Otieno, C K Funani, S M Khune, J Kabuba, P Osifo. (2023). Struvite recovery from anaerobically digested waste-activated sludge: a short review. Journal of Materials Research, 38(16): 3815–3826
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-023-01108-4
21 N A Peppas, E W Merrill. (1976). Poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels: reinforcement of radiation-crosslinked networks by crystallization. Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Chemistry Edition, 14(2): 441–457
https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1976.170140215
22 M Pizzol, J C R Smart, M Thomsen. (2014). External costs of cadmium emissions to soil: a drawback of phosphorus fertilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84: 475–483
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.080
23 B E Rittmann, B Mayer, P Westerhoff, M Edwards. (2011). Capturing the lost phosphorus. Chemosphere, 84(6): 846–853
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.02.001
24 A A Rouff, K M Juarez. (2014). Zinc interaction with struvite during and after mineral formation. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(11): 6342–6349
https://doi.org/10.1021/es500188t
25 S Sarkar, A K Sengupta, P Prakash. (2010). The Donnan membrane principle: opportunities for sustainable engineered processes and materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(4): 1161–1166
https://doi.org/10.1021/es9024029
26 A Sendrowski, T H Boyer. (2013). Phosphate removal from urine using hybrid anion exchange resin. Desalination, 322: 104–112
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.05.014
27 C S Shepsko, H Dong, A K Sengupta. (2019). Treated municipal wastewater reuse: a holistic approach using hybrid ion exchange (HIX) with concurrent nutrient recovery and CO2 sequestration. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 7(10): 9671–9679
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b01357
28 C Tang, Z Liu, C Peng, L Y Chai, K Kuroda, M Okido, Y X Song. (2019). New insights into the interaction between heavy metals and struvite: struvite as platform for heterogeneous nucleation of heavy metal hydroxide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 365: 60–69
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.02.034
29 A Triger, J S Pic, C Cabassud. (2012). Determination of struvite crystallization mechanisms in urine using turbidity measurement. Water Research, 46(18): 6084–6094
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.08.030
30 A J Ward, K Arola, E Thompson Brewster, C M Mehta, D J Batstone. (2018). Nutrient recovery from wastewater through pilot scale electrodialysis. Water Research, 135: 57–65
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.021
31 M Xie, L D Nghiem, W E Price, M Elimelech. (2013). A forward osmosis–membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(23): 13486–13493
https://doi.org/10.1021/es404056e
32 M Xie, L D Nghiem, W E Price, M Elimelech. (2014). Impact of organic and colloidal fouling on trace organic contaminant rejection by forward osmosis: role of initial permeate flux. Desalination, 336: 146–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.12.037
33 M Xie, H K Shon, S R Gray, M Elimelech. (2016). Membrane-based processes for wastewater nutrient recovery: technology, challenges, and future direction. Water Research, 89: 210–221
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.11.045
34 W Xue, T Tobino, F Nakajima, K Yamamoto. (2015). Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry. Water Research, 69: 120–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.007
35 T Yan, Y Ye, H Ma, Y Zhang, W Guo, B Du, Q Wei, D Wei, H H Ngo. (2018). A critical review on membrane hybrid system for nutrient recovery from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 348: 143–156
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.166
36 A Zarebska, D R Nieto, K V Christensen, B Norddahl. (2014). Ammonia recovery from agricultural wastes by membrane distillation: fouling characterization and mechanism. Water Research, 56: 1–10
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.02.037
37 J Zhang, Q She, V W C Chang, C Y Tang, R D Webster. (2014). Mining nutrients (N, K, P) from urban source-separated urine by forward osmosis dewatering. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(6): 3386–3394
https://doi.org/10.1021/es405266d
38 Y Zhang, E Desmidt, A Van Looveren, L Pinoy, B Meesschaert, B van der Bruggen. (2013). Phosphate separation and recovery from wastewater by novel electrodialysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(11): 5888–5895
https://doi.org/10.1021/es4004476
39 Y Zhang, S Paepen, L Pinoy, B Meesschaert, B van der Bruggen. (2012). Selectrodialysis: fractionation of divalent ions from monovalent ions in a novel electrodialysis stack. Separation and Purification Technology, 88: 191–201
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2011.12.017
40 Z P Zhao, L Xu, X Shang, K Chen. (2013). Water regeneration from human urine by vacuum membrane distillation and analysis of membrane fouling characteristics. Separation and Purification Technology, 118: 369–376
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2013.07.021
[1] Qian He, Junkai Gao, Zhongzhi Chen, Yuanjing Ding, Mengsheng Xia, Pengtao Xu, Yan Chen. Preparation of wood-based hydrogel membranes for efficient purification of complex wastewater using a reconstitution strategy[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(7): 84-.
[2] Shuting Zhuang, Jianlong Wang. Cesium removal from radioactive wastewater by adsorption and membrane technology[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 38-.
[3] Yuyao Zhang, Litao Jia, Jin Zhao, Xuming Liu, Shuyu Dong, Chuanyang Liu, Yuanyuan Cui. Directional amine-based solvent extraction for simultaneous enhanced water recovery, salt separation and effective descaling from hypersaline brines[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(3): 32-.
[4] Tianwei Zhang, Juanye Dao, Jinsong Wang, Yuzhong Guo, Rundong Wan, Chengping Li, Xian Zhou, Zhengfu Zhang. Highly efficient recovery of waste LiNixCoyMnzO2 cathode materials using a process involving pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(2): 25-.
[5] Chengchao Xiao, Liqing Yan, Haiping Gao, Zeou Dou, Xing Xie, Yongsheng Chen. Selective separation and recovery of Co(II) and Ni(II) from lithium-ion battery using Cyanex 272 adsorptive membrane[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(12): 148-.
[6] Wen-Tao Tang, Yihang Xiao, Yang-Fan Deng, Yunkai TAN, Guang-Hao Chen, Tianwei HAO. Model and experiment-based evaluation of seawater-based urine phosphorus recovery (SUPR) process[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2024, 18(11): 141-.
[7] Wei Zhang, Huaqiang Chu, Libin Yang, Xiaogang You, Zhenjiang Yu, Yalei Zhang, Xuefei Zhou. Technologies for pollutant removal and resource recovery from blackwater: a review[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(7): 83-.
[8] Qian Li, Zhaoyang Hou, Xingyuan Huang, Shuming Yang, Jinfan Zhang, Jingwei Fu, Yu-You Li, Rong Chen. Methanation and chemolitrophic nitrogen removal by an anaerobic membrane bioreactor coupled partial nitrification and Anammox[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 68-.
[9] Huan Xi, Fanlu Min, Zhanhu Yao, Jianfeng Zhang. Facile fabrication of dolomite-doped biochar/bentonite for effective removal of phosphate from complex wastewaters[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(6): 71-.
[10] Zeou Dou, Maria Vitoria Bini Farias, Wensi Chen, Dongjing He, Yuhang Hu, Xing Xie. Highly degradable chitosan-montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposite hydrogel for controlled fertilizer release[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 53-.
[11] Shuang Zhang, Shuai Liang, Yifan Gao, Yang Wu, Xia Huang. Nonpolar cross-stacked super-aligned carbon nanotube membrane for efficient wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(3): 30-.
[12] Hanqing Fan, Yuxuan Huang, Ngai Yin Yip. Advancing ion-exchange membranes to ion-selective membranes: principles, status, and opportunities[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(2): 25-.
[13] Lijuan Gu, Hailong Lu. Semi-clathrate hydrate based carbon dioxide capture and separation techniques[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(12): 144-.
[14] Aihua Zhang, Shihao Fang, Huan Xi, Jianke Huang, Yongfu Li, Guangyuan Ma, Jianfeng Zhang. Highly efficient and selective removal of phosphate from wastewater of sea cucumber aquaculture for microalgae culture using a new adsorption-membrane separation-coordinated strategy[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(10): 120-.
[15] Abdul Halim, Lusi Ernawati, Maya Ismayati, Fahimah Martak, Toshiharu Enomae. Bioinspired cellulose-based membranes in oily wastewater treatment[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(7): 94-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed