Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering

ISSN 2095-2430

ISSN 2095-2449(Online)

CN 10-1023/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-968

2018 Impact Factor: 1.272

Front Arch Civil Eng Chin    0, Vol. Issue () : 304-314    https://doi.org/10.1007/s01709-011-0123-9
Review
Sustainability of steel structures: towards an integrated approach to life-time engineering design
Raffaele LANDOLFO(), Lucrezia CASCINI, Francesco PORTIOLI
Department of Constructions Mathematical Methods in Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Naples 40-80138, Italy
 Download: PDF(556 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Nowadays, the construction sector is more and more oriented toward the promotion of sustainability in all its activities. The goal to achieve is the optimization of performances, over the whole life-cycle, with respect to environmental, economic and social requirements. According to the latest advances, the concept of sustainability applied to constructions covers a number of branches such as life-cycle costing, ecology, durability and even structural design. Several procedures and design tools have been implemented in the framework of international research. Indeed the current trend in civil engineering research is moving towards life-time engineering, with the aim to implement integrated methodologies to consider as a whole all the sustainability requirements according to time-dependent multi-performance-based design approaches. Following a general introduction of the concept of sustainability applied to constructions, this paper presents an overview of life-time engineering methodologies according to the current state-of-the-art. In particular the methods currently received by International Standards are discussed. A special focus is devoted to the durability design of metal structures with respect to the degradation phenomena able to impair the structural capacity over time. Finally a proposal towards an integrated approach to life-time engineering design of steel structures and needs for further advances are presented.

Keywords sustainability      life-time engineering      performance based design      durability      metal structures     
Corresponding Author(s): LANDOLFO Raffaele,Email:landolfo@unina.it   
Issue Date: 05 September 2011
 Cite this article:   
Lucrezia CASCINI,Francesco PORTIOLI,Raffaele LANDOLFO. Sustainability of steel structures: towards an integrated approach to life-time engineering design[J]. Front Arch Civil Eng Chin, 0, (): 304-314.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/10.1007/s01709-011-0123-9
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fsce/EN/Y0/V/I/304
Fig.1  Percentage of the total waste generated in the EU-27 by Economic Sector (a); construction waste sorted by type (b)
societyenvironmenteconomy
mechanical resistance and stabilityenergy economy and heat retentionreduced operational costs,
safety in case of fireimproved air and water quality,reduced maintenance costs and increase revenue
safety in usereduced water consumptionlife-cycle economy
protection against noisereduced waste disposal….
structural resistanceenergy efficiency
serviceabilityreduced environmental impacts
durabilityoptimization in the use of raw materials
robustness
enhanced safety and reliability
aesthetic
hygiene, health and environment
Tab.1  An overview of life-time engineering requirements
Fig.2  A sketch of life-time engineering concept
Fig.3  A schematic representation of the result of an analysis. The environmental impacts can be represented as CO emitted per each stage of the life-cycle
Fig.4  A representation of reliability-based life-cycle costing (adapted by Frangopol & Estes [])
Fig.5  Formal representation of the deterioration of structural capacity over time
Fig.6  The flowchart for the proposed approach to the durability design of metal structures
Fig.7  The three dimension of life-time engineering according to an integrated approach
Fig.8  The flowchart for the proposed approach to the durability design of metal structures
Fig.9  A formal representation of ideal positive and negative solutions and the relative distances according to the TOPSIS method
1 Bruntlan G, ed. Our Common Future: the World Commission on Environment and Development. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. UN Document Symbol. A/42/427 . 1987
2 European Commission. Communication from the Commission “A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: a European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development (Commission’s proposal to the Gothenburg European Council)”. Communication reference number: /* COM/2001/0264 final */ . 2001
3 European Commission. Towards a Thematic Strategy on the Urban Environment. Communication reference number: /* COM/2004/060 final */ . 2004
4 European Commission. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development into EU Policies: 2009 Review of the European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. Communication reference number: /* COM/2009/0400 final */ . 2009
5 European Commission. A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Communication reference number: /* COM/2010/2020 final */ . 2010
6 Council of the European Union. Renewed EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Official Journal of the European Union C 300 E/487 . 2006
7 Ledoux L, Lock G , Wolf P, Hauschil W, eds. Measuring Progress towards a More Sustainable Europe, 2007 Monitoring Report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy, Eurostat Statistical Books. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2007
8 Bolla V, Hauschild W, Hoffmeister O, Jung D, Lock G, Pavlovic A, Scheller A, Tronet V. Sustainable Development in the European Union, 2009 Monitoring Report of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities , 2009
9 European Commission. Europe in Figures–Eurostat Yearbook 2010. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010
10 Eurostat. Environmental Statistics and Accounts in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010
11 Burgan B A, Sansom M R. Sustainable steel construction. Journal of Constructional Steel Research , 2006, 62(11): 1178–1183
doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.029
12 Landolfo R. Introduction to life-time engineering. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Blok R, Gervásio H, Veljkovic M, Plewako Z, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Silva L S. Sustainability of Constructions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sustainability of Constructions . Lisbon: Multicomp, Ldaa, 2007
13 Landolfo R, Ungureanu V. Life-time structural engineering. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Blok R, Gervásio H, Veljkovic M, Plewako Z, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Silva L S, Haller P. Sustainability of Constructions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Seminar on Sustainability of Constructions. Dresden , 2008
14 Landolfo R. Durability Design of Metal Structures. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Veljkovic M, Borg R P. Sustainable Construction—a Life Cycle Approach in Engineering International Training School. Malta , 2010
15 Cascini L. Atmospheric corrosion and durability design of metal structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Naples: University of Naples Federico II, 2009
16 Landolfo R. Life-time Structural Engineering: Design for Durability, Life-cycle Performance, Maintenance and Deconstruction. Malta , 2011 (In press)
17 Sarja A, Bamforth P, Caccavelli D, Chevalier J, Durucan S. Lifetime Thematic Network: Lifetime Engineering of Buildings and Civil Infrastructures. Project number: G1RT-CT-2002-05082-Deliverable 3.1 Generic Description of Lifetime Engineering. 2005, available at: http://lifetime.vtt.fi/lifetime_deliverable_3_1.pdf
18 EN 1990. Eurocode: Basis of Structural Design. Brussels: CEN, 2002
19 European Union. Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the Approximation of Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Relating to Construction Products. Official Journal of the European Union L 040, 11/02/1989 P. 0012–0026. CELEX number: 31989L0106 . Brussels: European Union, 1998
20 European Union. Council Directive 2006/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2006 on Energy End-use Efficiency and Energy Services and Repealing Council Directive 93/76/EEC (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union L 114 . Brussels: European Union, 2006, 64–85
21 ISO 14040:2006. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework. Genève, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization , 2006
22 ISO 14044:2006. Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Requirements and Guidelines. Genève, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization , 2006
23 Blok R, Bikad D, Kontoleon K, Giarma C, Gervasio H. Life Cycle Assessment-general Methodology. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Blok R, Gervásio H, Veljkovic M, Plewako Z, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Silva L S. Sustainability of Constructions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sustainability of Constructions. Lisbon: Multicomp, Ldaa , 2007
24 Blok R, van Egmond E, Glaumann M, Gervasio H. General Framework for Sustainability Evaluation of The Built Environment. In: Summary Report of the Cooperative Activities Integrated Approach towards Sustainable Constructions. Volume: 1. Malta , 2011 (In press)
25 Dattilo C A. Sustainable construction: life cycle analysis as a supporting tool for structural design. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Naples: University of Naples Federico II, 2011
26 Gervasio H, Da Silva L. State-of-the-art on LCA. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Blok R, Gervásio H, Veljkovic M, Plewako Z, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Silva L S. Sustainability of Constructions. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Sustainability of Constructions . Lisbon: Multicomp, Ldaa, 2007
27 Gervásio H. Sustainable design and integral life-cycle analysis of bridges. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree . Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra, 2010
28 Khasreen M M, Banfill P F G, Menzies G F. Life-Cycle Assessment and the Environmental Impact of Buildings: a Review. Sustainability , 2009, 1(3): 674–701
doi: 10.3390/su1030674
29 Frangopol D M, Estes A C. Life-Cycle Evaluation and Condition Assessment of Structures, Chapter 36 in Structural Engineering Handbook, Second Edition. CRC Press , 2005, 36–1–36–51
30 ISO 15686–5:2008. Buildings and Constructed Assets. Service-life Planning. Part 5: Life-cycle Costing. Genève, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization , 2008
31 Langdon D. Towards a Common European Methodology for Life Cycle Costing (LCC)–Literature Review, 2007.
32 Frangopol D M, Lin K Y, Estes A C. Life cycle cost design of deteriorating structures. Journal of Structural Engineering , 1997, 123(10): 1390–1401
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:10(1390)
33 Frangopol, D M, Kong J S, Gharaibeh S.Reliability-based life-cycle management of highway bridges. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering , 2001, 15(1): 27–34
34 Cho H N, Frangopol D M, Ang A H S, eds. Life-Cycle Cost and Performance of Civil Infrastructure Systems. London: Taylor & Francis Group. 2007
35 Biondini F, Frangopol D M, eds. Life-Cycle Civil Engineering, Set of Book and CD-ROM. London: CRC Press. 2008
36 EN 1993–1-1. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1–1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings, 2005, Brussels: CEN
37 JCSS-Joint Committee on Structural Safety. Probabilistic Model Code. Part 1: Basis of Design. 12th draft. JCCS , 2000. Available online at: www.jcss.ethz.ch
38 ISO 13823:2008. General Principles on the Design of Structures for Durability. Genève: International Organization for Standardization , 2008
39 Sarja A, Vesikari E, eds. Durability Design of Concrete Structures. RILEM Report of TC. 130-CSL. RILEM Report Series 14. E&FN Spon, Chapman & Hall . 1996, 165
40 Vesikari E, Landolfo R. Service Life Prediction Methods Referred to by Eurocode 0. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Vesikari E, Hechler O. Life-time Structural Engineering: Design for Durability, Life-cycle Performance, Maintenance and Deconstruction. Malta 2011 (In press)
41 Landolfo R, Vesikari E. Service Life Design Methods for Civil Engineering Structures. In: Bragan?a L, Koukkari H, Landolfo R, Ungureanu V, Vesikari E, Hechler O. Life-time Structural Engineering: Design for Durability, Life-cycle Performance, Maintenance and Deconstruction. Malta , 2011 (In press)
42 Sarja A. Lifecon Deliverable D2.1. Reliability Based Methodology for Lifetime Management of Structures. Finland , 2004
43 Sarja A. Predictive and Optimised Life Cycle Management. Buildings and Infrastructures. London and New York: Taylor and Francis, 2006
44 Biondini F, Bontempi F, Frangopol D M, Malerba P G. Probabilistic service life assessment and maintenance planning of concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering , 2006, 132(5): 810
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:5(810)
45 Fib- Fédération Internationale du Béton. Model Code for Service Life Design Bulletin 34. Stuttgard: fib , 2006
46 Albrecht P, Hall T T. Atmospheric corrosion resistance of structural steels. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering , 2003, 15(1): 2–24
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(2)
47 Klinesmith D E, McCuen R, Albrecht P. Effect of environmental condition on corrosion rate. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering , 2007, 19(2): 121–129
doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:2(121)
48 Park C H, Nowak A S. Lifetime reliability model for steel girder bridges. In: Safety of Bridges . London: Thomas Telford Publishing, 1997
49 Kaiser J R, Nowak A S. Capacity loss due to corrosion in steel-girder bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering , 1989, 115(6): 1525–1537
50 Kühn B, Luki? M, Nussbaumer A, Günther H P, Helmerich R, Herion S, Kolstein M H, Walbridge S, Androic B, Dijkstra O, Bucak ?. Assessment of Existing Steel Structures: Recommendations for Estimation of Remaining Fatigue Life. EUR Scientific and Technical Research Series. Luxemburg: Office for Official Publication of the European Committee , 2008, 89
51 EN 1993–1-9. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1–9: Fatigue . Brussels: CEN, 2005,
52 ENV 1993–1-4. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1–4: General Rules–Supplementary Rules for Stainless Steel . Brussels: CEN, 1996,
53 EN 1993–1-5. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures. Part 1–5: Plated Structural Elements . Brussels: CEN 2004,
54 Czarnecki A A, Nowak A S. Time variant reliability profiles for steel girder bridges. Structural Safety , 2008, 30(1): 49–64
doi: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.05.002
55 Cascini L R, Portioli F. An integrated approach to durability design of steel structures against atmospheric corrosion. Key Engineering Materials , 2008, 385–387: 657–660
56 Landolfo R, Cascini L, Portioli F. Modeling of Metal Structure Corrosion Damage: a State of the Art Report. Sustainability 2010. 2010, 2: 2163–2175
57 Landolfo R, Cascini L, D’Aniello M, Portioli F. On the effects of fatigue and corrosion degradation of metal railway bridges: an integrated approach for the assessment of the residual life. Costruzioni Metalliche , 2011, 6: 37–46 (in Italian)
58 ISO 9223:1992. Corrosion of Metals and Alloys. Corrosivity of Atmospheres. Classification . Brussels: CEN, 1992
59 ISO 9224:1992. Corrosion of Metals and Alloys. Corrosivity of Atmospheres. Guiding Values for the Corrosivity Categories . Brussels: CEN, 1992
60 ISO 9225:1992. Corrosion of Metals and Alloys. Corrosivity of Atmospheres. Measurement of pollution . Brussels: CEN, 1992
61 ISO 9226:1992. Corrosion of Metals and Alloys. Corrosivity of Atmospheres. Determination of corrosion rate of standard specimens for the evaluation of corrosivity . Brussels: CEN, 1992
62 Kucera V. Mapping effects on materials in Manual mapping critical load. ICP Materials Coordination Centre, Sweden , 2004. Available online at: http://icpmapping.org
63 Portioli F, Cascini L, Ungureanu V. Multi-criteria decision making methods in refurbishment, deconstruction and demolition of existing structures. In: Proceeding of International Symposium on Sustainable Construction. A Life-cycle Approach in Engineering. COST Action C25, Malta , 23–25July, 2010, 177–184
64 Caterino N, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E, Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Cosenza E. Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for seismic structural retrofitting. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering , 2009, 24(6): 432–445
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00599.x
[1] Osama A MOHAMED, Rania AL-KHATTAB, Waddah AL-HAWAT. Resistance to acid degradation, sorptivity, and setting time of geopolymer mortars[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 781-791.
[2] Wafaa Mohamed SHABAN, Khalid ELBAZ, Mohamed AMIN, Ayat gamal ASHOUR. A new systematic firefly algorithm for forecasting the durability of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 329-346.
[3] Nguyen-Trong HO, Viet Quoc DANG, Minh-Hieu NGUYEN, Chao-Lung HWANG, Trong-Phuoc HUYNH. Fresh and hardened properties of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete containing fly ash and rice husk ash: Influence of fiber type and content[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 1621-1632.
[4] Shan E ALI, Rizwan AZAM, Muhammad Rizwan RIAZ, Mohamed ZAWAM. Effect of fineness of ash on pozzolanic properties and acid resistance of sugarcane bagasse ash replaced cement mortars[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2022, 16(10): 1287-1300.
[5] Ali NEMATZADEH, Burcu AYTEKIN, Ali MARDANI-AGHABAGLOU. Effect of mineral additives and permeability reducing admixtures having different action mechanisms on mechanical and durability performance of cementitious systems[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 1277-1291.
[6] Khashayar JAFARI, Fatemeh HEIDARNEZHAD, Omid MOAMMER, Majid JARRAH. Experimental investigation on freeze−thaw durability of polymer concrete[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 1038-1046.
[7] Jianzhuang XIAO, Nv HAN, Yan LI, Zhongsen ZHANG, Surendra P. SHAH. Review of recent developments in cement composites reinforced with fibers and nanomaterials[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 1-19.
[8] Qing LIU, Renjun LIU, Qiao WANG, Rui LIANG, Zongjin LI, Guoxing SUN. Cement mortar with enhanced flexural strength and durability-related properties using in situ polymerized interpenetration network[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 99-108.
[9] Emmanuel Owoichoechi MOMOH, Adelaja Israel OSOFERO. Recent developments in the application of oil palm fibers in cement composites[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2020, 14(1): 94-108.
[10] Zhi QIAO, Zuanfeng PAN, Weichen XUE, Shaoping MENG. Experimental study on flexural behavior of ECC/RC composite beams with U-shaped ECC permanent formwork[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(5): 1271-1287.
[11] Xudong SHAO, Lu DENG, Junhui CAO. Innovative steel-UHPC composite bridge girders for long-span bridges[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 981-989.
[12] Stella O. OBAZEE-IGBINEDION, Oludare OWOLABI. Pavement sustainability index for highway infrastructures: A case study of Maryland[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 192-200.
[13] Jenny LIU, Sheng ZHAO, Anthony MULLIN. Laboratory assessment of Alaska aggregates using Micro-Deval test[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 27-34.
[14] Jie HAN,Jun GUO. Geosynthetics used to stabilize vegetated surfaces for environmental sustainability in civil engineering[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 56-65.
[15] Roberto T. LEON,Yu GAO. Resiliency of steel and composite structures[J]. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 239-253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed