Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering

ISSN 2095-2201

ISSN 2095-221X(Online)

CN 10-1013/X

Postal Subscription Code 80-973

2018 Impact Factor: 3.883

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng.    2021, Vol. 15 Issue (4) : 79    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-021-1435-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Removal of arsenic by pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetland
Yaocheng Fan1,2, Tiancui Li1,2, Deshou Cun1,2, Haibing Tang1,2, Yanran Dai1, Feihua Wang1, Wei Liang1()
1. State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
 Download: PDF(1739 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

• VFCWs are effective for the treatment of arsenic-containing wastewater.

• Arsenic removal did not affect the removal of nutrients, except for TP in CW500.

• Arsenic removal was highest when the temperature peaked and the reed was in bloom.

• Substrate accumulation contributed more to arsenic removal than plant absorption.

Four pilot-scale Vertical Flow Constructed Wetlands (VFCWs) filled with gravel and planted with Phragmites australis were operated for seven months in the field to study the efficiency of arsenic removal in contaminated wastewater. The average arsenic removal efficiency by the VFCWs was 52.0%±20.2%, 52.9%±21.3%, and 40.3%±19.4% at the theoretical concentrations of 50 μg/L (CW50), 100 μg/L (CW100), and 500 μg/L (CW500) arsenic in the wastewater, respectively. The results also showed no significant differences in the removal efficiency for conventional contaminants (nitrogen, phosphorus, or chemical oxygen demand) between wastewater treatments that did or did not contain arsenic (P>0.05), except for phosphorus in CW500. The highest average monthly removal rate of arsenic occurred in August (55.9%–74.5%) and the lowest in November (7.8%–15.5%). The arsenic removal efficiency of each VFCW was positively correlated with temperature (P<0.05). Arsenic accumulated in both substrates and plants, with greater accumulation associated with increased arsenic concentrations in the influent. The maximum accumulated arsenic concentrations in the substrates and plants at the end of the experiment were 4.47 mg/kg and 281.9 mg/kg, respectively, both present in CW500. The translocation factor (TF) of arsenic in the reeds was less than 1, with most of the arsenic accumulating in the roots. The arsenic mass balance indicated that substrate accumulation contributed most to arsenic removal (19.9%–30.4%), with lower levels in plants (3.8%–9.5%). In summary, VFCWs are effective for the treatment of arsenic-containing wastewater.

Keywords Constructed wetland      Arsenic      Removal efficiency      Mass balance     
Corresponding Author(s): Wei Liang   
Issue Date: 14 May 2021
 Cite this article:   
Yaocheng Fan,Tiancui Li,Deshou Cun, et al. Removal of arsenic by pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetland[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(4): 79.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/10.1007/s11783-021-1435-1
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fese/EN/Y2021/V15/I4/79
Fig.1  Schematic diagram (a) and field picture (b, in August) of the vertical flow constructed wetland (VFCW).
Parameter Influent Effluent
CW0 CW50 CW100 CW500
T (℃) 24.5±5.9 24.5±6.5 24.5±6.5 24.4±6.6 24.4±6.6
DO (mg/L) 5.05±1.61 2.04±0.38 1.95±0.39 1.85±0.49 1.66±0.48
Cond (μS/cm) 604.0±56.1 607.0±80.4 585.7±81.9 584.5±68.1 608.7±72.1
pH 7.40±0.11 7.41±0.12 7.40±0.11 7.43±0.10 7.39±0.11
ORP (mV) 248.0±51.1 −258.9±25.4 −266.4±18.4 −268.2±17.5 −265.1±20.0
Arsenic (μg/L) a) 1.8±0.5 24.6±11.2 47.1±22.7 285.7±108.2
TN (mg/L) 24.4±2.7 9.94±2.56 9.19±1.77 9.64±1.72 10.37±1.61
TP (mg/L) 1.06±0.08 0.49±0.19 0.49±0.12 0.52±0.14 0.66±0.14
NH4+-N (mg/L) 14.6±0.9 9.20±2.43 8.55±1.82 9.03±1.77 9.58±1.56
NO3-N (mg/L) 9.59±2.42 0.67±0.35 0.61±0.25 0.58±0.23 0.60±0.29
COD (mg/L) 98.5±5.8 22.4±6.9 19.8±6.3 22.0±6.1 23.4±7.7
Tab.1  Characteristics of influent and effluent water in the VFCWs (mean±SD)
VFCWs TN TP NH4+-N NO3-N COD
CW0 59.7±10.9 52.5±19.8 39.4±16.4 92.3±4.7 77.8±7.2
CW50 61.5±8.1 51.1±13.1 40.7±12.3 92.8±3.6 79.5±6.8
CW100 59.5±8.6 49.3±14.5 37.2±12.9 93.3±3.6 77.2±6.4
CW500 57.6±7.9 42.4±14.2 33.6±11.8 93.8±3.1 76.2±7.9
Tab.2  Removal efficiency (%) of nitrogen, phosphorus, and COD in the VFCWs during the entire experiment (mean±SD)
Month Arsenic removal efficiency (%) Effluent water temperature (℃)
CW50 CW100 CW500 CW50 CW100 CW500
May 47.5±13.5 45.9±13.1 44.3±9.1 21.6±1.0 21.7±1.0 21.7±0.9
June 54.2±8.5 60.2±6.1 51.8±3.8 27.4±1.3 27.5±1.3 27.5±1.5
July 64.5±5.3 61.2±4.9 42.8±14.5 30.1±2.6 30.2±2.6 30.3±2.7
August 72.5±6.7 74.5±9.6 55.9±19.8 31.9±0.7 31.8±0.6 31.8±0.6
September 59.6±8.3 62.4±7.3 49.6±4.7 27.1±2.2 27.0±2.2 26.8±2.4
October 55.2±10.4 57.6±14.1 37.7±18.1 21.5±2.9 21.4±2.9 21.2±3.0
November 15.5±16.4 15.0±18.5 7.8±8.8 13.9±5.0 13.5±5.1 13.5±4.8
Tab.3  Monthly changes in arsenic removal efficiency and effluent water temperature in the VFCWs (mean±SD)
Fig.2  Arsenic removal in VFCWs during the entire experiment. Stable change level was the result of Change-Point Analysis of arsenic removal efficiency.
Fig.3  Correlation coefficients between effluent water parameters and removal efficiencies of arsenic (n = 93). The lower triangular matrix shows the numerical values of the correlation coefficients, and the upper triangular matrix shows the correlation coefficients by different sizes and colors of the circles (only P<0.05 are displayed). RAs: Removal efficiencies of As, ORP: Oxidation-reduction potential, Cond: Conductivity, DO: Dissolved oxygen, T: Temperature.
Fig.4  Regression analysis between effluent water temperature and removal efficiencies of arsenic with different concentrations.
Fig.5  Total arsenic concentrations in the VFCW substrates. (a) different months in layer 0–5 cm, (b) different layers at the end of the experiment.
Fig.6  Dry biomass of the different plant parts in the VFCWs.
VFCWs Shoot number Flower number Bloom rate (%)
CW0 632 96 15.2
CW50 587 115 19.6
CW100 521 43 8.3
CW500 507 20 3.9
Tab.4  Shoot number, flower number, and bloom rate in each VFCW at the end of the experiment
Fig.7  Total arsenic concentrations in the different organs of plants in the VFCWs. (a) before the experiment, (b) at the end of the experiment.
VFCWs Bioconcentration factor (BCF) Translocation factor (TF)
CW50 388.8 0.39
CW100 354.9 0.16
CW500 207.8 0.06
Tab.5  Arsenic bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) for Phragmites australis in each VFCW
Fig.8  Arsenic mass balance in VFCWs.
1 D G Ahoulé, F Lalanne, J Mendret, S Brosillon, A H Maïga (2015). Arsenic in African waters: A review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 226(9): 302
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2558-4
2 C O Akinbile, Haque A M M (2012). Arsenic contamination in irrigation water for rice production in Bangladesh: A review. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 7: 331–349
https://doi.org/10.3923/tasr.2012.331.349
3 D L Alonso, S Latorre, E Castillo, P F Brandao (2014). Environmental occurrence of arsenic in Colombia: A review. Environmental Pollution, 186: 272–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.009
4 American Public Health Association (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health
5 P Arroyo, G Ansola, L E S D Miera (2013). Effects of substrate, vegetation and flow on arsenic and zinc removal efficiency and microbial diversity in constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 51: 95–103
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.12.013
6 E Avigliano, M Leisen, R Romero, B Carvalho, G Velasco, M Vianna, F Barra, A V Volpedo (2017). Fluvio-marine travelers from South America: Cyclic amphidromy and freshwater residency, typical behaviors in Genidens barbus inferred by otolith chemistry. Fisheries Research, 193: 184–194
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2017.04.011
7 G Bonanno, R Lo Giudice (2010). Heavy metal bioaccumulation by the organs of Phragmites australis (common reed) and their potential use as contamination indicators. Ecological Indicators, 10(3): 639–645
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.11.002
8 S Buddhawong, P Kuschk, J Mattusch, A Wiessner, U Stottmeister (2005). Removal of arsenic and zinc using different laboratory model wetland systems. Engineering in Life Sciences, 5(3): 247–252
https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.200520076
9 J Bundschuh, M I Litter, F Parvez, G Roman-Ross, H B Nicolli, J S Jean, C W Liu, D Lopez, M A Armienta, L R Guilherme, A G Cuevas, L Cornejo, L Cumbal, R Toujaguez (2012). One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: A review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. Science of the Total Environment, 429: 2–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.024
10 C Corroto, A Iriel, A F Cirelli, A L P Carrera (2019). Constructed wetlands as an alternative for arsenic removal from reverse osmosis effluent. Science of the Total Environment, 691: 1242–1250
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.234
11 T Dasgupta, S A Hossain, A A Meharg, A H Price (2004). An arsenate tolerance gene on chromosome 6 of rice. New Phytologist, 163(1): 45–49
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01109.x
12 J B Gorme, M C Maniquiz, S Lee, L H Kim (2012). Seasonal changes of plant biomass at a constructed wetland in a livestock watershed area. Desalination and Water Treatment, 45(1–3): 136–143
https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.692020
13 S He, X Wang, X Wu, Y Yin, L Q Ma (2020). Using rice as a remediating plant to deplete bioavailable arsenic from paddy soils. Environment International, 141: 105799
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105799
14 M Khaska, C Le Gal La Salle, P Verdoux, R Boutin (2015). Tracking natural and anthropogenic origins of dissolved arsenic during surface and groundwater interaction in a post-closure mining context: Isotopic constraints. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 177–178: 122–135
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.03.008
15 C R Lage, A Nayak, C H Kim (2006). Arsenic ecotoxicology and innate immunity. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 46(6): 1040–1054
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icl048
16 T Li, Y Fan, D Cun, X Song, Y Dai, F Wang, C Wu, W Liang (2020). Treatment performance and microbial response to dibutyl phthalate contaminated wastewater in vertical flow constructed wetland mesocosms. Chemosphere, 246: 125635
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125635
17 S Liu, Y Hou, G Sun (2013). Synergistic degradation of pyrene and volatilization of arsenic by cocultures of bacteria and a fungus. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 7(2): 191–199
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0470-3
18 K Lizama-Allende, T D Fletcher, G Sun (2011). Removal processes for arsenic in constructed wetlands. Chemosphere, 84(8): 1032–1043
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.022
19 K Lizama-Allende, T D Fletcher, G Sun (2012). The effect of substrate media on the removal of arsenic, boron and iron from an acidic wastewater in planted column reactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 179: 119–130
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.10.069
20 K Lizama-Allende, J Jaque, G Ayala, E Montes-Atenas, Leiva (2018). Arsenic removal using horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: A sustainable alternative for arsenic-rich acidic waters. Water (Basel), 10(10): 1447
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101447
21 K Lizama-Allende, D T Mccarthy, T D Fletcher (2014). The influence of media type on removal of arsenic, iron and boron from acidic wastewater in horizontal flow wetland microcosms planted with Phragmites australis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 246: 217–228
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.02.035
22 H Lu, J Li, X Liu, Z Yu, R Liu (2019). Removal of fluoride and arsenic by a hybrid constructed wetland system. Chemistry & Biodiversity, 16(7): e1900078
https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.201900078
23 H Mochizuki (2019). Arsenic neurotoxicity in humans. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 20(14): 3418
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143418
24 M F Naujokas, B Anderson, H Ahsan, H V Aposhian, J H Graziano, C Thompson, W A Suk (2013). The broad scope of health effects from chronic arsenic exposure: update on a worldwide public health problem. Environmental Health Perspectives, 121(3): 295–302
https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205875
25 N R Nicomel, K Leus, K Folens, P Van Der Voort, G Du Laing (2015). Technologies for arsenic removal from water: current status and future perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(1): ijerph13010062
26 K B Payne, T M Abdel-Fattah (2005). Adsorption of arsenate and arsenite by iron-treated activated carbon and zeolites: Effects of pH, temperature, and ionic strength. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 40(4): 723–749
https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-200048254
27 X Qi, T Li, F Wang, Y Dai, W Liang (2018). Removal efficiency and enzymatic mechanism of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) by constructed wetlands. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 25(23): 23009–23017
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2384-5
28 K Z Rahman, A Wiessner, P Kuschk, M Van Afferden, J Mattusch, R A Müller (2011). Fate and distribution of arsenic in laboratory-scale subsurface horizontal-flow constructed wetlands treating an artificial wastewater. Ecological Engineering, 37(8): 1214–1224
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.016
29 K Z Rahman, A Wiessner, P Kuschk, M Van Afferden, J Mattusch, R A Müller (2014). Removal and fate of arsenic in the rhizosphere of Juncus effusus treating artificial wastewater in laboratory-scale constructed wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 69: 93–105
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.050
30 W Ren, D Ni, Y Liu, G Yang, H Zhang, L Zhao, Y Wang (2019). Accumulation and transportation of arsenic to wetland plant Typha angustifolia L. in the herbaceous plants grown in arsenic-contaminated habitat. Research of Environmental Science and Pollution, 32(5): 848–856 (in Chinese)
31 L Rodríguez-Lado, G Sun, M Berg, Q Zhang, H Xue, Q Zheng, C A Johnson (2013). Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout China. Science, 341(6148): 866–868
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1237484
32 M Roy, A K Giri, S Dutta, P Mukherjee (2015). Integrated phytobial remediation for sustainable management of arsenic in soil and water. Environment International, 75: 180–198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.010
33 J P Schwindaman, J W Castle, J H Jr Rodgers (2014). Fate and distribution of arsenic in a process-designed pilot-scale constructed wetland treatment system. Ecological Engineering, 68: 251–259
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.049
34 A P Singh, R K Goel, T Kaur (2011). Mechanisms pertaining to arsenic toxicity. Toxicology International, 18(2): 87–93
https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-6580.84258
35 R Singh, S Singh, P Parihar, V P Singh, S M Prasad (2015). Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 112: 247–270
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.009
36 C Singhakant, T Koottatep, J Satayavivad (2009a). Enhanced arsenic removals through plant interactions in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 44(2): 163–169
https://doi.org/10.1080/10934520802539780
37 C Singhakant, T Koottatep, J Satayavivad (2009b). Fractional analysis of arsenic in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands with different length to depth ratios. Water Science and Technology, 60(7): 1771–1778
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.543
38 L H Soares Guimarães, F R Segura, L Tonani, M R Von-Zeska-Kress, J L Rodrigues, L A Calixto, F F Silva, B L Batista (2019). Arsenic volatilization by Aspergillus sp. and Penicillium sp. isolated from rice rhizosphere as a promising eco-safe tool for arsenic mitigation. Journal of Environmental Management, 237: 170–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.060
39 State Environmental Protection Administration (2002). Methods for monitoring and analysis of water and wastewater, 4rd edn. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press (in Chinese)
40 S Su, X Zeng, L Bai, X Jiang, L Li (2010). Bioaccumulation and biovolatilisation of pentavalent arsenic by Penicillin janthinellum, Fusarium oxysporum and Trichoderma asperellum under laboratory conditions. Current Microbiology, 61(4): 261–266
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-010-9605-6
41 G X Sun, P N Williams, A M Carey, Y G Zhu, C Deacon, A Raab, J Feldmann, R M Islam, A A Meharg (2008). Inorganic arsenic in rice bran and its products are an order of magnitude higher than in bulk grain. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(19): 7542–7546
https://doi.org/10.1021/es801238p
42 S E Sundberg-Jones, S M Hassan (2007). Macrophyte sorption and bioconcentration of elements in a pilot constructed wetland for flue gas desulfurization wastewater treatment. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 183(1–4): 187–200
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9368-2
43 N Tanne, R Xu, M Zhou, P Zhang, X Wang, X Wen (2019). Influence of pore size and membrane surface properties on arsenic removal by nanofiltration membranes. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 13(2): 19
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-019-1105-8
44 W Taylor (2000). Change-point analyzer 2.0 shareware program. Libertyville: Taylor Enterprises
45 USEPA (1996). Method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils. Revision 2. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency
46 H Wang, Y Li, S Zhang, D Li, X Liu, W Wang, L Liu, Y Wang, L Kang (2020). Effect of influent feeding pattern on municipal tailwater treatment during A sulfur-based denitrification constructed wetland. Bioresource Technology, 315: 123807
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123807
47 A Wiessner, K Z Rahman, P Kuschk, M Kastner, M Jechorek (2010). Dynamics of sulphur compounds in horizontal sub-surface flow laboratory-scale constructed wetlands treating artificial sewage. Water Research, 44(20): 6175–6185
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.044
48 M Wu, Q Li, X Tang, Z Huang, L Lin, M Scholz (2014a). Arsenic(V) removal in wetland filters treating drinking water with different substrates and plants. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 94(6): 618–638
https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2013.864647
49 S Wu, P Kuschk, H Brix, J Vymazal, R Dong (2014b). Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: A nitrogen and organic matter targeted review. Water Research, 57: 40–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.020
50 S Y Zhang, P N Williams, J Luo, Y G Zhu (2017a). Microbial mediated arsenic biotransformation in wetlands. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(1): 1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0893-y
51 Z Zhang, H S Moon, S C B Myneni, P R Jaffé (2017b). Phosphate enhanced abiotic and biotic arsenic mobilization in the wetland rhizosphere. Chemosphere, 187: 130–139
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.096
52 J Y Zhao, H M Guo (2013). Study on arsenic removal in the simulating constructed wetland. Advanced Materials Research, 777: 386–389
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.777.386
[1] Xiangyu Yang, Qiang He, Fucheng Guo, Xiaobo Liu, Yi Chen. Translocation and biotoxicity of metal (oxide) nanoparticles in the wetland-plant system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 138-.
[2] Yanxiao Si, Fang Zhang, Hong Chen, Guanghe Li, Haichuan Zhang, Dun Liu. Effect of current density on groundwater arsenite removal performance using air cathode electrocoagulation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(6): 112-.
[3] Mengqing Ge, Tao Lin, Kemei Zhou, Hong Chen, Hang Xu, Hui Tao, Wei Chen. Characteristics and removal mechanism of the precursors of N-chloro-2,2-dichloroacetamide in a drinking water treatment process at Taihu Lake[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(5): 93-.
[4] Weichuan Qiao, Rong Li, Tianhao Tang, Achuo Anitta Zuh. Removal, distribution and plant uptake of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) in a simulated constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(2): 20-.
[5] Yanqing Duan, Aijuan Zhou, Xiuping Yue, Zhichun Zhang, Yanjuan Gao, Yanhong Luo, Xiao Zhang. Acceleration of the particulate organic matter hydrolysis by start-up stage recovery and its original microbial mechanism[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2021, 15(1): 12-.
[6] Sana Ullah, Xuejun Guo, Xiaoyan Luo, Xiangyuan Zhang, Yameng Li, Ziyu Liang. The coupling of sand with ZVI/oxidants achieved proportional and highly efficient removal of arsenic[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(6): 94-.
[7] Wenrui Guo, Yue Wen, Yi Chen, Qi Zhou. Sulfur cycle as an electron mediator between carbon and nitrate in a constructed wetland microcosm[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(4): 57-.
[8] Xiaoming Wan, Mei Lei, Tongbin Chen. Review on remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated soil[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2020, 14(2): 24-.
[9] Zhenfeng Han, Ying Miao, Jing Dong, Zhiqiang Shen, Yuexi Zhou, Shan Liu, Chunping Yang. Enhanced nitrogen removal and microbial analysis in partially saturated constructed wetland for treating anaerobically digested swine wastewater[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(4): 52-.
[10] Weihua Wang, Wanfeng Zhang, Hong Liang, Dawen Gao. Occurrence and fate of typical antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants in Harbin, North-east China[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(3): 34-.
[11] Mei Lei, Ziping Dong, Ying Jiang, Philip Longhurst, Xiaoming Wan, Guangdong Zhou. Reaction mechanism of arsenic capture by a calcium-based sorbent during the combustion of arsenic-contaminated biomass: A pilot-scale experience[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(2): 24-.
[12] Xiaohui Wang, Shuai Du, Tao Ya, Zhiqiang Shen, Jing Dong, Xiaobiao Zhu. Removal of tetrachlorobisphenol A and the effects on bacterial communities in a hybrid sequencing biofilm batch reactor-constructed wetland system[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2019, 13(1): 14-.
[13] Ping He, Guangxue Wu, Rui Tang, Peilun Ji, Shoujun Yuan, Wei Wang, Zhenhu Hu. Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43 and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 9-.
[14] Si-Yu Zhang, Paul N. Williams, Jinming Luo, Yong-Guan Zhu. Microbial mediated arsenic biotransformation in wetlands[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(1): 1-.
[15] Mengchuan Shui, Feng Ji, Rui Tang, Shoujun Yuan, Xinmin Zhan, Wei Wang, Zhenhu Hu. Impact of roxarsone on the UASB reactor performance and its degradation[J]. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(6): 4-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed