Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Optoelectronics

ISSN 2095-2759

ISSN 2095-2767(Online)

CN 10-1029/TN

Postal Subscription Code 80-976

Front. Optoelectron.    2015, Vol. 8 Issue (2) : 152-162    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-015-0479-x
REVIEW ARTICLE
Resolution and contrast enhancements of optical microscope based on point spread function engineering
Yue FANG, Cuifang KUANG, Ye MA, Yifan WANG, Xu LIU()
State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, Department of Optical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
 Download: PDF(2480 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Point spread function (PSF) engineering-based methods to enhance resolution and contrast of optical microscopes have experienced great achievements in the last decades. These techniques include: stimulated emission depletion (STED), time-gated STED (g-STED), ground-state depletion microscopy (GSD), difference confocal microscopy, fluorescence emission difference microscopy (FED), switching laser mode (SLAM), virtual adaptable aperture system (VAAS), etc. Each affords unique strengths in resolution, contrast, speed and expenses. We explored how PSF engineering generally could be used to break the diffraction limitation, and concluded that the common target of PSF engineering-based methods is to get a sharper PSF. According to their common or distinctive principles to reshape the PSF, we divided all these methods into three categories, nonlinear PSF engineering, linear PSF engineering, and linear-based nonlinear PSF engineering and expounded these methods in classification. Nonlinear effect and linear subtraction is the core techniques described in this paper from the perspective of PSF reconstruction. By comparison, we emphasized each method’s strengths, weaknesses and biologic applications. In the end, we promote an expectation of prospective developing trend for PSF engineering.

Keywords super-resolution      optical imaging      point spread function (PSF) engineering      non-linear effects      linear subtraction     
Corresponding Author(s): Xu LIU   
Issue Date: 24 June 2015
 Cite this article:   
Yue FANG,Cuifang KUANG,Ye MA, et al. Resolution and contrast enhancements of optical microscope based on point spread function engineering[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2015, 8(2): 152-162.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/10.1007/s12200-015-0479-x
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foe/EN/Y2015/V8/I2/152
Fig.1  (a) Schematic image of a point-like object (left) and two close point-like objects (right); (b) image of point-like objects of (a) taken with a conventional (confocal) microscopy; (c) targeted image of point-like objects of (a); (d) conventional (confocal) light microscope’s PSF’s profile and targeted PSF’s profile
Fig.2  Profiles (1)−(4) show the spatial region in which the molecules are allowed to be state A (fluorescent state), if the region is illuminated with a doughnut-shaped patterns focused by a standing wave of light which drives molecules from A (fluorescent state) to B (non-fluorescent state) with peak intensities I 0= 10Isat, 50Isat, 100 Isat?and?500I sat respectively whose corresponding cross section profiles are (i)−(iv) [30]
Fig.3  (a) Energy diagram of STED microscopes; (b) schematic representation of a STED microscope. A phase modulation mask is used to create a doughnut-shaped depletion beam overlapping the excitation laser beam
Fig.4  (a) Schematic representation of a difference confocal microscopy; (b) PSF profiles of conventional (large hole) microscopy system, confocal microscopy system and the subtractive result with α of 1/2
Fig.5  Principle of linear subtraction of a doughnut PSF from a solid PSF. (a) Solid PSF pattern; (b) doughnut-shaped PSF pattern by a 2π phase modulation; (c) subtractive of the doughnut-shaped PSF from the solid PSF with a proper factor; (d) profile curves of the solid PSF, the doughnut-shaped PSF and the subtractive PSF
Fig.6  PSFs of the confocal, the STED and the subtraction image (δ=0.5), and it can be seen the subtractive PSF is sharper than STED’s PSF [22]
Fig.7  (a) Confocal image of 20?nm fluorescence beads; (b) STED image; (c) subtraction of the confocal from the STED with δ of 0.5; (d) g-STED image; (e) subtraction image of the STED from the g-STED with ε of 0.08; (f) b′, c′, d′, e′: magnified view of the region indicated by white box in (b), (c), (d), (e)
1 M Martinez-Corral, M T Caballero, E H K Stelzer, J Swoger. Tailoring the axial shape of the point spread function using the Toraldo concept. Optics Express, 2002, 10(1): 98–103
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.10.000098 pmid: 19424335
2 H Köhler. On Abbe’s theory of image formation in the microscope. Journal of Modern Optics, 1981, 28(12): 1691–1701
3 D Toomre, J Bewersdorf. A new wave of cellular imaging. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2010, 26(1): 285–314
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104048 pmid: 20929313
4 N Bloembergen. Nonlinear Optics. New York: Benjamin, 1965
5 S W Hell. Increasing the resolution of far-field fluorescence light microscopy by point-spread-function engineering. In: J R Lakowicz, ed. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York: Springer US, 2002, 361–426
6 S W Hell, J Wichmann. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics Letters, 1994, 19(11): 780–782
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.19.000780 pmid: 19844443
7 S W Hell, M Kroug. Ground-state-depletion fluorscence microscopy: a concept for breaking the diffraction resolution limit. Applied Physics B, Lasers and Optics, 1995, 60(5): 495–497
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01081333
8 S E Irvine, T Staudt, E Rittweger, J Engelhardt, S W Hell. Direct light-driven modulation of luminescence from Mn-doped ZnSe quantum dots. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2008, 120(14): 2725–2728
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200705111 pmid: 18306194
9 M Hofmann, C Eggeling, S Jakobs, S W Hell. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(49): 17565–17569
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506010102 pmid: 16314572
10 M Bossi, V Belov, S Polyakova, S W Hell. Reversible red fluorescent molecular switches. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2006, 45(44): 7462–7465
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602591 pmid: 17042053
11 X Hao, C Kuang, Y Li, X Liu. Reversible saturable optical transitions based fluorescence nanoscopy. Laser & Optoelectronic Progress, 2012, 49(3): 34–42
12 M Sauer. Reversible molecular photoswitches: a key technology for nanoscience and fluorescence imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(27): 9433–9434
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504264102 pmid: 15983383
13 S W Hell, M Dyba, S Jakobs. Concepts for nanoscale resolution in fluorescence microscopy. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2004, 14(5): 599–609
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.08.015 pmid: 15464894
14 C Kuang, S Li, W Liu, X Hao, Z Gu, Y Wang, J Ge, H Li, X Liu. Breaking the diffraction barrier using fluorescence emission difference microscopy. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 1441
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01441
15 J N Farahani, M J Schibler, L A Bentolila. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy: from theory to practice. Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education, 2010, 2: 1539–1547
16 S J Hewlett, T Wilson. Resolution enhancement in three-dimensional confocal microscopy. Machine Vision and Applications, 1991, 4(4): 233–242
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01815300
17 R Heintzmann, V Sarafis, P Munroe, J Nailon, Q S Hanley, T M Jovin. Resolution enhancement by subtraction of confocal signals taken at different pinhole sizes. Micron, 2003, 34(6-7): 293–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-4328(03)00054-4 pmid: 12932772
18 T Wilson, D K Hamilton. Difference confocal scanning microscopy. Optica Acta: International Journal of Optics, 1984, 31(4): 453–465
19 C J R Sheppard, C J Cogswell. Confocal microscopy with detector arrays. Journal of Modern Optics, 1990, 37(2): 267–279
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349014550331
20 H Dehez, M Piché, Y D Koninck. High resolution imaging with TM01 laser beams. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009, 7386: 738606
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.839483
21 H Dehez, M Piché, Y De Koninck. Resolution and contrast enhancement in laser scanning microscopy using dark beam imaging. Optics Express, 2013, 21(13): 15912–15925
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.015912 pmid: 23842378
22 Y Fang, Y Wang, C Kuang, X Liu. Enhancing the resolution and contrast in CW-STED microscopy. Optics Communications, 2014, 322: 169–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2014.02.042
23 X Hao, C Kuang, Z Gu, S Li, J Ge, X Liu. Optical super-resolution by subtraction of time-gated images. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(6): 1001–1003
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001001 pmid: 23503287
24 M H Horrocks, M Palayret, D Klenerman, S F Lee. The changing point-spread function: single-molecule-based super-resolution imaging. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2014, 141(6): 577–585
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1186-1 pmid: 24509806
25 J Pawley. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Berlin: Springer, 2010
26 M F Juette, T J Gould, M D Lessard, M J Mlodzianoski, B S Nagpure, B T Bennett, S T Hess, J Bewersdorf. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nature Methods, 2008, 5(6): 527–529
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1211 pmid: 18469823
27 R N Zahreddine, R H Cormack, C J Cogswell. Simultaneous quantitative depth mapping and extended depth of field for 4D microscopy through PSF engineering. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012, 8227: 822705
28 M Martínez-Corral. Point spread function engineering in confocal scanning microscopy. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003, 5182: 112–122
29 S W Hell. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nature Biotechnology, 2003, 21(11): 1347–1355
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt895 pmid: 14595362
30 J Keller. Optimal de-excitation patterns for RESOLFT-microscopy. 2006
31 Y Ding, P Xi, Q Ren. Hacking the optical diffraction limit: review on recent developments of fluorescence nanoscopy. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(18): 1857–1876
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4502-3
32 S W Hell, S Jakobs, L Kastrup. Imaging and writing at the nanoscale with focused visible light through saturable optical transitions. Applied Physics A, Materials Science & Processing, 2003, 77(7): 859–860
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-003-2292-4
33 G Vicidomini, A Schönle, H Ta, K Y Han, G Moneron, C Eggeling, S W Hell. STED nanoscopy with time-gated detection: theoretical and experimental aspects. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(1): e54421
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054421 pmid: 23349884
34 G Vicidomini, G Moneron, K Y Han, V Westphal, H Ta, M Reuss, J Engelhardt, C Eggeling, S W Hell. Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating. Nature Methods, 2011, 8(7): 571–573
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1624 pmid: 21642963
35 Y Wang, C Kuang, Z Gu, Y Xu, S Li, X Hao, X Liu. Time-gated stimulated emission depletion nanoscopy. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif), 2013, 52(9): 093107-1–093107-8
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.52.9.093107
36 G Boyer, V Sarafis. Two pinhole superresolution using spatial filters. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2001, 112(4): 177–179
https://doi.org/10.1078/0030-4026-00033
37 I J Cox, C J R Sheppard, T Wilson. Reappraisal of arrays of concentric annuli as superresolving filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1982, 72(9): 1287–1291
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001287
38 I J Cox, C J R Sheppard. Information capacity and resolution in an optical system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986, 3(8): 1152–1158
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.3.001152
39 Y Wang, C Kuang, Z Gu, X Liu. Image subtraction method for improving lateral resolution and SNR in confocal microscopy. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 48: 489–494
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.11.018
40 H Okugawa. A new imaging method for confocal microscopy. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008, 6860: 68600K-1–68600K-7
41 A Gasecka, A Daradich, H Dehez, M Piché, D Côté. Resolution and contrast enhancement in coherent anti-Stokes Raman-scattering microscopy. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(21): 4510–4513
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.004510 pmid: 24177132
42 Y Xue, C Kuang, S Li, Z Gu, X Liu. Sharper fluorescent super-resolution spot generated by azimuthally polarized beam in STED microscopy. Optics Express, 2012, 20(16): 17653–17666
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.017653 pmid: 23038317
43 S Li, C Kuang, X Hao, Y Wang, J Ge, X Liu. Enhancing the performance of fluorescence emission difference microscopy using beam modulation. Journal of Optics, 2013, 15(12): 125708–125715
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/12/125708
44 X Hao, C Kuang, T Wang, X Liu. Effects of polarization on the de-excitation dark focal spot in STED microscopy. Journal of Optics, 2010, 12(11): 115707
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/12/11/115707
45 Z Rong, S Li, C Kuang, Y Xu, X Liu. Real-time super-resolution imaging by high-speed fluorescence emission difference microscopy. Journal of Modern Optics, 2014, 61(16): 1364–1371
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2014.933272
46 A Chmyrov, J Keller, T Grotjohann, M Ratz, E d’Este, S Jakobs, C Eggeling, S W Hell. Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ‘doughnuts’. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(8): 737–740
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2556 pmid: 23832150
[1] Wanjun GONG, Wenhui PAN, Ying HE, Meina HUANG, Jianguo ZHANG, Zhenyu GU, Dan ZHANG, Zhigang YANG, Junle QU. Super-resolution imaging of the dynamic cleavage of intercellular tunneling nanotubes[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2020, 13(4): 318-326.
[2] Nuo-Hua XIE, Ying CHEN, Huan YE, Chong LI, Ming-Qiang ZHU. Progress on photochromic diarylethenes with aggregation induced emission[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2018, 11(4): 317-332.
[3] Jacqueline GUNTHER, Stefan ANDERSSON-ENGELS. Review of current methods of acousto-optical tomography for biomedical applications[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(3): 211-238.
[4] Shaosheng DAI, Dezhou ZHANG, Junjie CUI, Xiaoxiao ZHANG, Jinsong LIU. Edge preserving super-resolution infrared image reconstruction based on L1- and L2-norms[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2017, 10(2): 189-194.
[5] Shaosheng DAI,Zhihui DU,Haiyan XIANG,Jinsong LIU. Reconstruction algorithm of super-resolution infrared image based on human vision processing mechanism[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2015, 8(2): 195-202.
[6] Kui ZHANG,Yongyou GENG,Yang WANG,Yiqun WU. Progress of super-resolution near-field structure and its application in optical data storage[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2014, 7(4): 475-485.
[7] Wen-Liang GONG, Zhe HU?§?, Chong LI, Guo-Feng ZHANG, Tao CHEN, Matthew. P. ALDRED, Zhen-Li HUANG, Ming-Qiang ZHU. Condensed state fluorescence switching of hexaarylbiimidazole-tetraphenylethene conjugate for super-resolution fluorescence nanolocalization[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(4): 458-467.
[8] Zhen WANG. Recent advances of optical imaging in animal stroke model[J]. Front Optoelec, 2013, 6(2): 134-145.
[9] Jia WANG, Qingyan WANG, Mingqian ZHANG. Development and prospect of near-field optical measurements and characterizations[J]. Front Optoelec, 2012, 5(2): 171-181.
[10] Yuzhang CHEN, Kecheng YANG, Xiaohui ZHANG, Min XIA, Wei LI. Modelling of beam propagation and its applications for underwater imaging[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2011, 4(4): 398-406.
[11] Xiaofei YANG, Qian LI, Xiaomin CHENG. Progress of super-resolution near-field structure in near-field optical storage technology[J]. Front Optoelec Chin, 2008, 1(3-4): 292-298.
[12] ZHOU Liwei. On the theory of temporal aberrations for dynamic electron optics[J]. Front. Optoelectron., 2008, 1(1-2): 50-57.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed