|
|
Resolution and contrast enhancements of optical microscope based on point spread function engineering |
Yue FANG, Cuifang KUANG, Ye MA, Yifan WANG, Xu LIU( ) |
State Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, Department of Optical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China |
|
|
Abstract Point spread function (PSF) engineering-based methods to enhance resolution and contrast of optical microscopes have experienced great achievements in the last decades. These techniques include: stimulated emission depletion (STED), time-gated STED (g-STED), ground-state depletion microscopy (GSD), difference confocal microscopy, fluorescence emission difference microscopy (FED), switching laser mode (SLAM), virtual adaptable aperture system (VAAS), etc. Each affords unique strengths in resolution, contrast, speed and expenses. We explored how PSF engineering generally could be used to break the diffraction limitation, and concluded that the common target of PSF engineering-based methods is to get a sharper PSF. According to their common or distinctive principles to reshape the PSF, we divided all these methods into three categories, nonlinear PSF engineering, linear PSF engineering, and linear-based nonlinear PSF engineering and expounded these methods in classification. Nonlinear effect and linear subtraction is the core techniques described in this paper from the perspective of PSF reconstruction. By comparison, we emphasized each method’s strengths, weaknesses and biologic applications. In the end, we promote an expectation of prospective developing trend for PSF engineering.
|
Keywords
super-resolution
optical imaging
point spread function (PSF) engineering
non-linear effects
linear subtraction
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Xu LIU
|
Issue Date: 24 June 2015
|
|
1 |
M Martinez-Corral, M T Caballero, E H K Stelzer, J Swoger. Tailoring the axial shape of the point spread function using the Toraldo concept. Optics Express, 2002, 10(1): 98–103
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.10.000098
pmid: 19424335
|
2 |
H Köhler. On Abbe’s theory of image formation in the microscope. Journal of Modern Optics, 1981, 28(12): 1691–1701
|
3 |
D Toomre, J Bewersdorf. A new wave of cellular imaging. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2010, 26(1): 285–314
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104048
pmid: 20929313
|
4 |
N Bloembergen. Nonlinear Optics. New York: Benjamin, 1965
|
5 |
S W Hell. Increasing the resolution of far-field fluorescence light microscopy by point-spread-function engineering. In: J R Lakowicz, ed. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York: Springer US, 2002, 361–426
|
6 |
S W Hell, J Wichmann. Breaking the diffraction resolution limit by stimulated emission: stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy. Optics Letters, 1994, 19(11): 780–782
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.19.000780
pmid: 19844443
|
7 |
S W Hell, M Kroug. Ground-state-depletion fluorscence microscopy: a concept for breaking the diffraction resolution limit. Applied Physics B, Lasers and Optics, 1995, 60(5): 495–497
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01081333
|
8 |
S E Irvine, T Staudt, E Rittweger, J Engelhardt, S W Hell. Direct light-driven modulation of luminescence from Mn-doped ZnSe quantum dots. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2008, 120(14): 2725–2728
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200705111
pmid: 18306194
|
9 |
M Hofmann, C Eggeling, S Jakobs, S W Hell. Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy at low light intensities by using reversibly photoswitchable proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(49): 17565–17569
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506010102
pmid: 16314572
|
10 |
M Bossi, V Belov, S Polyakova, S W Hell. Reversible red fluorescent molecular switches. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2006, 45(44): 7462–7465
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200602591
pmid: 17042053
|
11 |
X Hao, C Kuang, Y Li, X Liu. Reversible saturable optical transitions based fluorescence nanoscopy. Laser & Optoelectronic Progress, 2012, 49(3): 34–42
|
12 |
M Sauer. Reversible molecular photoswitches: a key technology for nanoscience and fluorescence imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(27): 9433–9434
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0504264102
pmid: 15983383
|
13 |
S W Hell, M Dyba, S Jakobs. Concepts for nanoscale resolution in fluorescence microscopy. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2004, 14(5): 599–609
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.08.015
pmid: 15464894
|
14 |
C Kuang, S Li, W Liu, X Hao, Z Gu, Y Wang, J Ge, H Li, X Liu. Breaking the diffraction barrier using fluorescence emission difference microscopy. Scientific Reports, 2013, 3: 1441
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01441
|
15 |
J N Farahani, M J Schibler, L A Bentolila. Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy: from theory to practice. Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education, 2010, 2: 1539–1547
|
16 |
S J Hewlett, T Wilson. Resolution enhancement in three-dimensional confocal microscopy. Machine Vision and Applications, 1991, 4(4): 233–242
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01815300
|
17 |
R Heintzmann, V Sarafis, P Munroe, J Nailon, Q S Hanley, T M Jovin. Resolution enhancement by subtraction of confocal signals taken at different pinhole sizes. Micron, 2003, 34(6-7): 293–300
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-4328(03)00054-4
pmid: 12932772
|
18 |
T Wilson, D K Hamilton. Difference confocal scanning microscopy. Optica Acta: International Journal of Optics, 1984, 31(4): 453–465
|
19 |
C J R Sheppard, C J Cogswell. Confocal microscopy with detector arrays. Journal of Modern Optics, 1990, 37(2): 267–279
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500349014550331
|
20 |
H Dehez, M Piché, Y D Koninck. High resolution imaging with TM01 laser beams. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2009, 7386: 738606
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.839483
|
21 |
H Dehez, M Piché, Y De Koninck. Resolution and contrast enhancement in laser scanning microscopy using dark beam imaging. Optics Express, 2013, 21(13): 15912–15925
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.015912
pmid: 23842378
|
22 |
Y Fang, Y Wang, C Kuang, X Liu. Enhancing the resolution and contrast in CW-STED microscopy. Optics Communications, 2014, 322: 169–174
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2014.02.042
|
23 |
X Hao, C Kuang, Z Gu, S Li, J Ge, X Liu. Optical super-resolution by subtraction of time-gated images. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(6): 1001–1003
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.001001
pmid: 23503287
|
24 |
M H Horrocks, M Palayret, D Klenerman, S F Lee. The changing point-spread function: single-molecule-based super-resolution imaging. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2014, 141(6): 577–585
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00418-014-1186-1
pmid: 24509806
|
25 |
J Pawley. Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy. Berlin: Springer, 2010
|
26 |
M F Juette, T J Gould, M D Lessard, M J Mlodzianoski, B S Nagpure, B T Bennett, S T Hess, J Bewersdorf. Three-dimensional sub-100 nm resolution fluorescence microscopy of thick samples. Nature Methods, 2008, 5(6): 527–529
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1211
pmid: 18469823
|
27 |
R N Zahreddine, R H Cormack, C J Cogswell. Simultaneous quantitative depth mapping and extended depth of field for 4D microscopy through PSF engineering. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012, 8227: 822705
|
28 |
M Martínez-Corral. Point spread function engineering in confocal scanning microscopy. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2003, 5182: 112–122
|
29 |
S W Hell. Toward fluorescence nanoscopy. Nature Biotechnology, 2003, 21(11): 1347–1355
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt895
pmid: 14595362
|
30 |
J Keller. Optimal de-excitation patterns for RESOLFT-microscopy. 2006
|
31 |
Y Ding, P Xi, Q Ren. Hacking the optical diffraction limit: review on recent developments of fluorescence nanoscopy. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2011, 56(18): 1857–1876
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4502-3
|
32 |
S W Hell, S Jakobs, L Kastrup. Imaging and writing at the nanoscale with focused visible light through saturable optical transitions. Applied Physics A, Materials Science & Processing, 2003, 77(7): 859–860
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-003-2292-4
|
33 |
G Vicidomini, A Schönle, H Ta, K Y Han, G Moneron, C Eggeling, S W Hell. STED nanoscopy with time-gated detection: theoretical and experimental aspects. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8(1): e54421
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054421
pmid: 23349884
|
34 |
G Vicidomini, G Moneron, K Y Han, V Westphal, H Ta, M Reuss, J Engelhardt, C Eggeling, S W Hell. Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating. Nature Methods, 2011, 8(7): 571–573
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1624
pmid: 21642963
|
35 |
Y Wang, C Kuang, Z Gu, Y Xu, S Li, X Hao, X Liu. Time-gated stimulated emission depletion nanoscopy. Optical Engineering (Redondo Beach, Calif), 2013, 52(9): 093107-1–093107-8
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.52.9.093107
|
36 |
G Boyer, V Sarafis. Two pinhole superresolution using spatial filters. Optik-International Journal for Light and Electron Optics, 2001, 112(4): 177–179
https://doi.org/10.1078/0030-4026-00033
|
37 |
I J Cox, C J R Sheppard, T Wilson. Reappraisal of arrays of concentric annuli as superresolving filters. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1982, 72(9): 1287–1291
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.72.001287
|
38 |
I J Cox, C J R Sheppard. Information capacity and resolution in an optical system. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 1986, 3(8): 1152–1158
https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.3.001152
|
39 |
Y Wang, C Kuang, Z Gu, X Liu. Image subtraction method for improving lateral resolution and SNR in confocal microscopy. Optics & Laser Technology, 2013, 48: 489–494
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optlastec.2012.11.018
|
40 |
H Okugawa. A new imaging method for confocal microscopy. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2008, 6860: 68600K-1–68600K-7
|
41 |
A Gasecka, A Daradich, H Dehez, M Piché, D Côté. Resolution and contrast enhancement in coherent anti-Stokes Raman-scattering microscopy. Optics Letters, 2013, 38(21): 4510–4513
https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.38.004510
pmid: 24177132
|
42 |
Y Xue, C Kuang, S Li, Z Gu, X Liu. Sharper fluorescent super-resolution spot generated by azimuthally polarized beam in STED microscopy. Optics Express, 2012, 20(16): 17653–17666
https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.017653
pmid: 23038317
|
43 |
S Li, C Kuang, X Hao, Y Wang, J Ge, X Liu. Enhancing the performance of fluorescence emission difference microscopy using beam modulation. Journal of Optics, 2013, 15(12): 125708–125715
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/15/12/125708
|
44 |
X Hao, C Kuang, T Wang, X Liu. Effects of polarization on the de-excitation dark focal spot in STED microscopy. Journal of Optics, 2010, 12(11): 115707
https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/12/11/115707
|
45 |
Z Rong, S Li, C Kuang, Y Xu, X Liu. Real-time super-resolution imaging by high-speed fluorescence emission difference microscopy. Journal of Modern Optics, 2014, 61(16): 1364–1371
https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2014.933272
|
46 |
A Chmyrov, J Keller, T Grotjohann, M Ratz, E d’Este, S Jakobs, C Eggeling, S W Hell. Nanoscopy with more than 100,000 ‘doughnuts’. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(8): 737–740
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2556
pmid: 23832150
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|