Please wait a minute...
Protein & Cell

ISSN 1674-800X

ISSN 1674-8018(Online)

CN 11-5886/Q

Postal Subscription Code 80-984

2018 Impact Factor: 7.575

Prot Cell    2010, Vol. 1 Issue (10) : 927-934    https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-010-0114-y      PMID: 21204019
COMMUNICATION
A transcription assay for EWS oncoproteins in Xenopus oocytes
King Pan Ng, Felix Cheung, Kevin A.W. Lee()
Department of Biology, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon Hong Kong, China
 Download: PDF(282 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Aberrant chromosomal fusion of the Ewing's sarcoma oncogene (EWS) to several different cellular partners produces the Ewing's family of oncoproteins (EWS-fusion-proteins, EFPs) and associated tumors (EFTs). EFPs are potent transcriptional activators, dependent on the N-terminal region of EWS (the EWS-activation-domain, EAD) and this function is thought to be central to EFT oncogenesis and maintenance. Thus EFPs are promising therapeutic targets, but detailed molecular studies will be pivotal for exploring this potential. Such studies have so far largely been restricted to intact mammalian cells while recent evidence has indicated that a mammalian cell-free transcription system may not support bona fide EAD function. Therefore, the lack of manipulatable assays for the EAD presents a significant barrier to progress. Using Xenopus laevis oocytes we describe a plasmid-based micro-injection assay that supports efficient, bona fide EAD transcriptional activity and hence provides a new vehicle for molecular dissection of the EAD.

Keywords EWS/ATF1      Ewing's sarcoma      microinjection      Xenopus oocytes      transcription      EWS-activation domain     
Corresponding Author(s): Lee Kevin A.W.,Email:bokaw@ust.hk   
Issue Date: 01 October 2010
 Cite this article:   
King Pan Ng,Felix Cheung,Kevin A.W. Lee. A transcription assay for EWS oncoproteins in Xenopus oocytes[J]. Prot Cell, 2010, 1(10): 927-934.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/pac/EN/10.1007/s13238-010-0114-y
https://academic.hep.com.cn/pac/EN/Y2010/V1/I10/927
Fig.1  Structures of EWS/ATF1 (EFPs), EAD, and experimental activators and reporters.
(A) Structure of EWS/ATF1 (EFPs). The Ewing's family of oncoproteins (EFPs) contains the N-terminal region of the Ewing's sarcoma oncogene (EWS) fused to various transcription factor partners (). All EFPs contain at least EWS residues 1-264 (the EWS-activation-domain, EAD) and a sequence-specific DNA binding domain from distinct partners. EWS/ATF1 is a typical EFP and contains EWS residues 1-325 fused to the C-terminal region of ATF1 (ΔATF1, residues 66-271), including the DNA binding (bZIP) domain (). EWS/ATF1 is a potent constitutive activator of ATF-dependent promoters () dependent on the EAD and the bZIP domain of ATF1. (B) Primary structure of the EAD. The EAD contains multiple degenerate hexapeptide repeats (DHRs, purple boxes) with consensus sequence SYGQQS. DHR degeneracy is indicated by the % occurrence of conserved residues including the absolutely conserved Tyr residue (red). Seven additional Tyr residues (dark gray boxes) are also present. Spaces between DHRs are generally only a few residues except in two cases (white boxes) of 12 and 25 residues, respectively. Several SH2 binding sites (YxxP, black circle) and SH3 binding sites (PxxP, open triangle) are indicated. (C) Structure of experimental activators and reporters. EZA contains the intact EAD (EWS residues 1-245), ΔATF1 and the zta bZIP domain (), ZΔE is equivalent to EZA but lacks the EAD. N3Z contains residues 1-166 of the EAD but is otherwise equivalent to EZA. Several Tyr residues within DHRs (purple boxes in N3Z) that are critical for transcriptional activation in mammalian cells () are shown. N3ZA and N3ZI are essentially the same as N3Z except that the Tyr residues highlighted (see materials and methods for precise coordinates) are changed to Ala (N3ZA, blue) or Isoleucine (N3ZI, orange). eN3Z corresponds to N3Z with EGFP fused to the N terminus and likewise for eN3ZA and eN3ZI (not shown). Expression vectors pSVEZA (), pZΔE (), pN3Z, pN3ZA and pN3ZI () were described elsewhere. All expression vectors were derived from pSG424 () containing the SV40 early promoter and polyadenylation signals for expression in oocytes. All proteins contained the KT3 epitope PPPEPET () at the C-terminus.
Fig.1  Structures of EWS/ATF1 (EFPs), EAD, and experimental activators and reporters.
(A) Structure of EWS/ATF1 (EFPs). The Ewing's family of oncoproteins (EFPs) contains the N-terminal region of the Ewing's sarcoma oncogene (EWS) fused to various transcription factor partners (). All EFPs contain at least EWS residues 1-264 (the EWS-activation-domain, EAD) and a sequence-specific DNA binding domain from distinct partners. EWS/ATF1 is a typical EFP and contains EWS residues 1-325 fused to the C-terminal region of ATF1 (ΔATF1, residues 66-271), including the DNA binding (bZIP) domain (). EWS/ATF1 is a potent constitutive activator of ATF-dependent promoters () dependent on the EAD and the bZIP domain of ATF1. (B) Primary structure of the EAD. The EAD contains multiple degenerate hexapeptide repeats (DHRs, purple boxes) with consensus sequence SYGQQS. DHR degeneracy is indicated by the % occurrence of conserved residues including the absolutely conserved Tyr residue (red). Seven additional Tyr residues (dark gray boxes) are also present. Spaces between DHRs are generally only a few residues except in two cases (white boxes) of 12 and 25 residues, respectively. Several SH2 binding sites (YxxP, black circle) and SH3 binding sites (PxxP, open triangle) are indicated. (C) Structure of experimental activators and reporters. EZA contains the intact EAD (EWS residues 1-245), ΔATF1 and the zta bZIP domain (), ZΔE is equivalent to EZA but lacks the EAD. N3Z contains residues 1-166 of the EAD but is otherwise equivalent to EZA. Several Tyr residues within DHRs (purple boxes in N3Z) that are critical for transcriptional activation in mammalian cells () are shown. N3ZA and N3ZI are essentially the same as N3Z except that the Tyr residues highlighted (see materials and methods for precise coordinates) are changed to Ala (N3ZA, blue) or Isoleucine (N3ZI, orange). eN3Z corresponds to N3Z with EGFP fused to the N terminus and likewise for eN3ZA and eN3ZI (not shown). Expression vectors pSVEZA (), pZΔE (), pN3Z, pN3ZA and pN3ZI () were described elsewhere. All expression vectors were derived from pSG424 () containing the SV40 early promoter and polyadenylation signals for expression in oocytes. All proteins contained the KT3 epitope PPPEPET () at the C-terminus.
Fig.2  EAD-mediated trans-activation in oocytes.
(A) The germinal vesicle of unfertilised stage VI oocytes was injected with 2 ng of a Cat reporter plasmid (pZ7E4TCAT) containing seven zta binding sites either alone (control) or in the presence of 2 ng of vector (pSVEZA) expressing EZA (+EZA) containing the intact EAD. Cat assays were performed 40 h post-injection and an autoradiogram of the CAT assay is shown (c, chloramphenicol; ac, acetylated chloramphenicol). Each sample in the Cat assay shows the activity from three injected oocytes pooled together. (B) Oocytes were injected with 2 ng of a Luciferase reporter (pZ7Luc) containing seven zta binding sites and expression plasmids (2 ng) for EZA and Z?E or pGL3 (an SV40 promoter-Luciferase reporter). Luciferase reporter activity (kRLU/sec±SEM) was determined for individual oocytes and the mean values are shown (see Table 1 Exp#1) for uninjected oocytes (U), pZ7Luc alone, EZA, Z?E and pGL3. Western blot using KT3 antibody (left hand side) shows expression levels for EZA and ZΔE. Extract equivalent to 7 oocytes (derived from a total of 34 oocytes) was loaded on the gel.
Fig.2  EAD-mediated trans-activation in oocytes.
(A) The germinal vesicle of unfertilised stage VI oocytes was injected with 2 ng of a Cat reporter plasmid (pZ7E4TCAT) containing seven zta binding sites either alone (control) or in the presence of 2 ng of vector (pSVEZA) expressing EZA (+EZA) containing the intact EAD. Cat assays were performed 40 h post-injection and an autoradiogram of the CAT assay is shown (c, chloramphenicol; ac, acetylated chloramphenicol). Each sample in the Cat assay shows the activity from three injected oocytes pooled together. (B) Oocytes were injected with 2 ng of a Luciferase reporter (pZ7Luc) containing seven zta binding sites and expression plasmids (2 ng) for EZA and Z?E or pGL3 (an SV40 promoter-Luciferase reporter). Luciferase reporter activity (kRLU/sec±SEM) was determined for individual oocytes and the mean values are shown (see Table 1 Exp#1) for uninjected oocytes (U), pZ7Luc alone, EZA, Z?E and pGL3. Western blot using KT3 antibody (left hand side) shows expression levels for EZA and ZΔE. Extract equivalent to 7 oocytes (derived from a total of 34 oocytes) was loaded on the gel.
activatorNo. oocytesLuc. activityfold activity
Exp. #1uninjected40.27±0.01-
pZ7Luc alone170.34±0.02-
GL311102±29-
EZA1559±18174
ZΔE262.8±0.38
Exp. #2N3Z2086±19254
N3ZA20background1
Exp. #3N3Z656±12165
eN3Z5125±41368
Exp. #4eN3Z1078±17229
GL310214±58-
Exp. #5eN3Z1041±15121
eN3ZA10background1
eN3ZI10background1
Tab.1  Data summary
Fig.3  Analysis of activator levels and EAD activity in individual oocytes.
For pGL3 control reporter (blue bars, average activity 214±58 kRLU/sec) and activation of Z7Luc by eN3Z (green bars, average 78±17 kRLU/sec) the activity detected in ten individual oocytes is shown. The corresponding level of eN3Z expression for each oocyte (detected by Western blot using αEFGP JL8 antibody) is shown below the activity graph. Expression levels for eN3ZA and eN3ZI in individual oocytes (detected using αEFGP) is shown for the same experiment as eN3Z. eN3ZA and eN3ZI yield only background signals for trans-activation (Fig. 3C).
Fig.3  Analysis of activator levels and EAD activity in individual oocytes.
For pGL3 control reporter (blue bars, average activity 214±58 kRLU/sec) and activation of Z7Luc by eN3Z (green bars, average 78±17 kRLU/sec) the activity detected in ten individual oocytes is shown. The corresponding level of eN3Z expression for each oocyte (detected by Western blot using αEFGP JL8 antibody) is shown below the activity graph. Expression levels for eN3ZA and eN3ZI in individual oocytes (detected using αEFGP) is shown for the same experiment as eN3Z. eN3ZA and eN3ZI yield only background signals for trans-activation (Fig. 3C).
Fig.4  Analysis of N3Z and EGFP-N3Z proteins.
(A) Transcriptional activity of N3Z and N3ZA in mammalian cells was detected by Cat assay using the Z7Cat reporter. Western blot analysis using KT3 antibody shows activator expression levels. DNA binding activity was detected by gel mobility shift assay (right hand side). Extracts from transfected cells were incubated with 1ng of labeled probe containing a single zta binding site. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and detected by autoradiography. Positions of unbound DNA probe and DNA-protein complexes are indicated to the right. The presence of excess competitor oligonucleotide (100 ng) containing a functional (wt) or mutated (mt) zta binding site is indicated. (B) Transcriptional activity (kRLU/sec±SEM) of N3Z and derivatives in oocytes was determined as described in Fig. 2 using the Z7Luc reporter. The figure shows the individual data for each injected oocyte (left hand plot) and the mean values with S.E.M. (right hand side, see Table 1 Exp#2). (C) Transcriptional activity of EGFP-N3Z derivative (eN3Z) and mutants eN3ZA and eN3ZI was determined in mammalian cells by Cat assay using the Z7Cat reporter (left hand side). A Western blot using αEGFP antibody JL8 (Clontech) shows activator expression levels. The right hand graph shows the activity of eN3Z in oocytes using the Z7Luc reporter (mean values and SEM are shown, see Table 1 Exps#3-5). eN3ZA and eN3ZI both gave only background activity (b).
Fig.4  Analysis of N3Z and EGFP-N3Z proteins.
(A) Transcriptional activity of N3Z and N3ZA in mammalian cells was detected by Cat assay using the Z7Cat reporter. Western blot analysis using KT3 antibody shows activator expression levels. DNA binding activity was detected by gel mobility shift assay (right hand side). Extracts from transfected cells were incubated with 1ng of labeled probe containing a single zta binding site. DNA-protein complexes were resolved on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and detected by autoradiography. Positions of unbound DNA probe and DNA-protein complexes are indicated to the right. The presence of excess competitor oligonucleotide (100 ng) containing a functional (wt) or mutated (mt) zta binding site is indicated. (B) Transcriptional activity (kRLU/sec±SEM) of N3Z and derivatives in oocytes was determined as described in Fig. 2 using the Z7Luc reporter. The figure shows the individual data for each injected oocyte (left hand plot) and the mean values with S.E.M. (right hand side, see Table 1 Exp#2). (C) Transcriptional activity of EGFP-N3Z derivative (eN3Z) and mutants eN3ZA and eN3ZI was determined in mammalian cells by Cat assay using the Z7Cat reporter (left hand side). A Western blot using αEGFP antibody JL8 (Clontech) shows activator expression levels. The right hand graph shows the activity of eN3Z in oocytes using the Z7Luc reporter (mean values and SEM are shown, see Table 1 Exps#3-5). eN3ZA and eN3ZI both gave only background activity (b).
1 Arvand, A., and Denny, C.T. (2001). Biology of EWS/ETS fusions in Ewing’s family tumors. Oncogene 20, 5747–5754 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204598
2 Azuma, M., Embree, L.J., Sabaawy, H., and Hickstein, D.D. (2007). Ewing sarcoma protein Ewsr1 maintains mitotic integrity and proneural cell survival in the zebra fish embryo. PLoS ONE 10, e979.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000979
3 Bachmaier, R., Aryee, D.N.T., Jug, G., Kauer, M., Kreppel, M., Lee, K.A.W., and Kovar, H. (2009). O-GlcNAcylation is involved in the transcriptional activity of EWS-FLI1 in Ewing’s sarcoma. Oncogene 28, 1280–1284 .
doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.484
4 Brown, A.D., Lopez-Terrada, D., Denny, C.T., and Lee, K.A.W. (1995). Promoters containing ATF-binding sites are de-regulated in tumour-derived cell lines that express the EWS/ATF1 oncogene. Oncogene 10, 1749–1756 .
5 Carey, M., Kolman, J., Katz, D.A., Gradoville, L., Barberis, L., and Miller, G. (1992). Transcriptional synergy by the Epstein-Barr virus transactivator ZEBRA. J Virol 66, 4803–4813 .
6 Davis, I.J., Kim, J.J., Ozsolak, F., Widlund, H.R., Rozenblatt-Rosen, O., Granter, S.R., Du, J., Fletcher, J.A., Denny, C.T., Lessnick, S.L., . (2006). Oncogenic MITF dysregulation in clear cell sarcoma: defining the MiT family of human cancers. Cancer Cell 9, 473–484 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.021
7 Feng, L., and Lee, K.A.W. (2001). A repetitive element containing a critical tyrosine residue is required for transcriptional activation by the EWS/ATF1 oncogene. Oncogene 20, 4161–4168 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204522
8 Goldin, A.L. (1992). Maintenance of Xenopus laevis and oocyte injection. Methods Enzymol 207, 266–279 .
doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(92)07017-I
9 Guille, M. (1999). Microinjection into Xenopus oocytes and embryos. Methods Mol Biol 127, 111–123 .
doi: 10.1385/1-59259-678-9:111
10 Gurdon, J.B., and Wakefield, L. (1986). Microinjection of Amphibian Oocytes and Eggs for the Analysis of Transcription. Microinjection and Organelle Transplantation Techniques. Academic Press Inc. , pp 269–299 .
11 Gurdon, J.B., and Wickens, M.P. (1983). The use of Xenopus oocytes for the expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol 101, 370–386 .
doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(83)01028-9
12 Janknecht, R. (2005). EWS-ETS oncoproteins: the linchpins of Ewing tumors. Gene 363, 1–14 .
13 Jones, N.C., Richter, J.D., Weeks, D.L., and Smith, L.D. (1983). Regulation of adenovirus transcription by an E1a gene in microinjected Xenopus laevis oocytes. Mol Cell Biol 3, 2131–2142 .
14 Kim, J., Lee, J.M., Branton, P.E., and Pelletier, J. (1999). Modification of EWS/WT1 functional properties by phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96, 14300–14305 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14300
15 Kim, J., Lee, J.M., Branton, P.E., and Pelletier, J. (2000). Modulation of EWS/WT1 activity by the v-Src protein tyrosine kinase. FEBS Lett 474, 121–128 .
doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)01590-8
16 Kim, J., and Pelletier, J. (1999). Molecular genetics of chromosome translocations involving EWS and related family members. Physiol Genomics 1, 127–138 .
17 Kovar, H., Aryee, D., and Zoubek, A. (1999). The Ewing family of tumors and the search for the Achilles’ heel. Curr Opin Oncol 11, 275–284 .
doi: 10.1097/00001622-199907000-00007
18 Krajewski, W., and Lee, K.A.W. (1994). A monomeric derivative of the cellular transcription factor CREB functions as a constitutive activator. Mol Cell Biol 14, 7204–7210 .
19 Law, W.J., Cann, K.L., and Hicks, G.G. (2006). TLS, EWS and TAF15: a model for transcriptional integration of gene expression. Brief Funct Genomics Proteomics 5, 8–14 .
doi: 10.1093/bfgp/ell015
20 Li, K.K.C., and Lee, K.A.W. (2000). Transcriptional activation by the Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS) oncogene can be cis-repressed by the EWS RNA-binding domain. J Biol Chem 275, 23053–23058 .
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M002961200
21 MacArthur, H., and Walter, G. (1984). Monoclonal antibodies specific for the carboxy terminus of simian virus 40 large T antigen. J Virol 52, 483–491 .
22 Masson, N., Ellis, M., Goodbourn, S., and Lee, K.A.W. (1992). Cyclic AMP response element-binding protein and the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A are present in F9 embryonal carcinoma cells but are unable to activate the somatostatin promoter. Mol Cell Biol 12, 1096–1106 .
23 Ng, K.P., Li, K.K.C., and Lee, K.A.W. (2009). In vitro activity of the EWS oncogene transcriptional activation domain. Biochemistry 48, 2849–2857 .
doi: 10.1021/bi802366h
24 Ng, K.P., Potikyan, G., Savene, R.O., Denny, C.T., Uversky, V.N., and Lee, K.A.W. (2007). Multiple aromatic side chains within a disordered structure are critical for transcription and transforming activity of EWS family oncoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 479–484 .
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0607007104
25 Olsen, R.J., and Hinrichs, S.H. (2001). Phosphorylation of the EWS IQ domain regulates transcriptional activity of the EWS/ATF1 and EWS/FLI1 fusion proteins. Oncogene 20, 1756–1764 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204268
26 Pan, S., Ming, K.Y., Dunn, T.A., Li, K.K.C., and Lee, K.A.W. (1998). The EWS/ATF1 fusion protein contains a dispersed activation domain that functions directly. Oncogene 16, 1625–1631 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201671
27 Prieur, A., Tirode, F., Cohen, P., and Delattre, O. (2004). EWS/FLI-1 silencing and gene profiling of Ewing cells reveal downstream oncogenic pathways and a crucial role for repression of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3. Mol Cell Biol 24, 7275–7283 .
doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.16.7275-7283.2004
28 Ribeiro, A., Brown, A.D., and Lee, K.A.W. (1994). An in vivo assay for members of the CREB family of transcription factors. J Biol Chem 269, 31124–31128 .
29 Rual, J.F., Venkatesan, K., Hao, T., Hirozane-Kishikawa, T., Dricot, A., Li, N., Berriz, G.F., Gibbons, F.D., Dreze, M., Ayivi-Guedehoussou, N., . (2005). Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173–1178 .
doi: 10.1038/nature04209
30 Sadowski, I., and Ptashne, M. (1989). A vector for expressing GAL4(1-147) fusions in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 17, 7539.
doi: 10.1093/nar/17.18.7539
31 Zhou, H., and Lee, K.A.W. (2001). An hsRPB4/7-dependent yeast assay for trans-activation by the EWS oncogene. Oncogene 20, 1519–1524 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204135
32 Zucman, J., Delattre, O., Desmaze, C., Epstein, A.L., Stenman, G., Speleman, F., Fletchers, C.D.M., Aurias, A., and Thomas, G. (1993). EWS and ATF-1 gene fusion induced by t(12;22) translocation in malignant melanoma of soft parts. Nat Genet 4, 341–345 .
doi: 10.1038/ng0893-341
[1] Mona Teng, Stanley Zhou, Changmeng Cai, Mathieu Lupien, Housheng Hansen He. Pioneer of prostate cancer: past, present and the future of FOXA1[J]. Protein Cell, 2021, 12(1): 29-38.
[2] Qian Zheng, Peipei Liu, Ge Gao, Jiapei Yuan, Pengfeng Wang, Jinliang Huang, Leiming Xie, Xinping Lu, Fan Di, Tanjun Tong, Jun Chen, Zhi Lu, Jisong Guan, Geng Wang. Mitochondrion-processed TERC regulates senescence without affecting telomerase activities[J]. Protein Cell, 2019, 10(9): 631-648.
[3] Pengcheng Yang, Li Hou, Xianhui Wang, Le Kang. Core transcriptional signatures of phase change in the migratory locust[J]. Protein Cell, 2019, 10(12): 883-901.
[4] Jianying Guo, Dacheng Ma, Rujin Huang, Jia Ming, Min Ye, Kehkooi Kee, Zhen Xie, Jie Na. An inducible CRISPR-ON system for controllable gene activation in human pluripotent stem cells[J]. Protein Cell, 2017, 8(5): 379-393.
[5] Chao Zhong, Jinfang Zhu. Transcriptional regulators dictate innate lymphoid cell fates[J]. Protein Cell, 2017, 8(4): 242-254.
[6] Qianqian Liang,Chen Xu,Xinyun Chen,Xiuya Li,Chao Lu,Ping Zhou,Lianhua Yin,Ruizhe Qian,Sifeng Chen,Zhendong Ling,Ning Sun. The roles of Mesp family proteins: functional diversity and redundancy in differentiation of pluripotent stem cells and mammalian mesodermal development[J]. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(8): 553-561.
[7] Jun Cao,Zhengyu Luo,Qingyu Cheng,Qianlan Xu,Yan Zhang,Fei Wang,Yan Wu,Xiaoyuan Song. Three-dimensional regulation of transcription[J]. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(4): 241-253.
[8] Liping Deng,Ruotong Ren,Jun Wu,Keiichiro Suzuki,Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmote,Guang-Hui Liu. CRISPR/Cas9 and TALE: beyond cut and paste[J]. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(3): 157-159.
[9] Joo-Man Park,Seong-Ho Jo,Mi-Young Kim,Tae-Hyun Kim,Yong-Ho Ahn. Role of transcription factor acetylation in the regulation of metabolic homeostasis[J]. Protein Cell, 2015, 6(11): 804-813.
[10] Xiaomin Song,Sheng Wang,Lin Li. New insights into the regulation of Axin function in canonical Wnt signaling pathway[J]. Protein Cell, 2014, 5(3): 186-193.
[11] Xuejuan Wang, Jianye Wang, Zhenrui Ding, Jinhua Ji, Qianqian Sun, Gang Cai. Structural flexibility and functional interaction of Mediator Cdk8 module[J]. Prot Cell, 2013, 4(12): 911-920.
[12] Junbing Wu, Shengyi Peng, Rong Wu, Yumin Hao, Guangju Ji, Zengqiang Yuan. Generation of Calhm1 knockout mouse and characterization of calhm1 gene expression[J]. Prot Cell, 2012, 3(6): 470-480.
[13] Jigang Li, William Terzaghi, Xing Wang Deng. Genomic basis for light control of plant development[J]. Prot Cell, 2012, 3(2): 106-116.
[14] Priyanka Sathe, Li Wu. The network of cytokines, receptors and transcription factors governing the development of dendritic cell subsets[J]. Prot Cell, 2011, 2(8): 620-630.
[15] Christopher L. Brooks, Wei Gu. The impact of acetylation and deacetylation on the p53 pathway[J]. Prot Cell, 2011, 2(6): 456-462.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed