Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Earth Science

ISSN 2095-0195

ISSN 2095-0209(Online)

CN 11-5982/P

Postal Subscription Code 80-963

2018 Impact Factor: 1.205

Front. Earth Sci.    2014, Vol. 8 Issue (1) : 150-162    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-013-0397-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Embodied exergy-based assessment of energy and resource consumption of buildings
Jing MENG1,2, Zhi LI2(), Jiashuo LI2, Ling SHAO2, Mengyao HAN2, Shan GUO2
1. College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2. State Key Laboratory for Turbulence and Complex Systems, College of Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
 Download: PDF(300 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

As an effective approach to achieve a more unified and scientific assessment, embodied exergy-based analysis is devised to assess the energy and resource consumption of buildings. A systematic accounting of the landmark buildings in E-town, Beijing is performed, on the basis of raw project data in the Bill of Quantities (BOQ) and the most recent embodied exergy intensities for the Chinese economy in 2007 with 135 industrial sectors. The embodied exergy of the engineering structure of the case buildings is quantified as 4.95E+14 J, corresponding to an intensity of 8.25E+09 J/m2 floor area. Total exergy of 51.9% and 28.8% are embodied in the steel and concrete inputs, respectively, due to the fact that the case buildings are structured of reinforced-concrete. The fossil fuel source (coal, crude oil, and natural gas) is predominant among four categories of natural resources (fossil fuel, biological, mineral, and environmental), accounting for 89.9% of the embodied exergy, with coal as the dominant energy resource (75.5%). The material accounts for 89.5% of the embodied exergy, in contrast to 9.0%, 1.4%, and 0.1% for manpower, energy, and equipment respectively. This result indicates that great attention should be given to the use of various materials vs. their value of their contribution.

Keywords energy      resources      exergy analysis      green building      ecological assessment     
Corresponding Author(s): Zhi LI   
Issue Date: 05 March 2014
 Cite this article:   
Jing MENG,Zhi LI,Jiashuo LI, et al. Embodied exergy-based assessment of energy and resource consumption of buildings[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(1): 150-162.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/10.1007/s11707-013-0397-4
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fesci/EN/Y2014/V8/I1/150
Fig.1  The layout for the six case buildings.
Item Sector code Sector contents
Manpower
Manpower 95 Construction
Material
Grit
Cobble stone
Peastone
9 Mining of non-ferrous metal ores
Hemp cut
Flax silk
27 Spinning and weaving of hemp and tiffany
Timber
Wood pattern plate
Wood stay brace
32 Processing of timbers, manufacture of wood, bamboo, rattan, palm and straw products
Petroleum asphalt
Paint solvent
37 Processing of petroleum and nuclear fuel
Polyurethane waterproofing coating
SBS elastic bitumen
JS-compound waterproof coating
Rubber watertight strip
Water swelling water stop
P-type rubber strip
Antirust coating
Boiled oil
Acetone
Preservative
Ethylene diamine
Acid resistant paint
Acid resistant paint thinner
Fireproof coating
Thin steel structure fireproof coating
42 Manufacture of paints, printing inks, pigments and similar products
Polyurethane 43 Manufacture of synthetic materials
SBS modified asphalt felt coiled material
E44 epoxy resin
Ethyl acetate
401 glue
All-purpose adhesive
Sealant
Primer
Toluene
Waterproof powder
Binder
Adhensive agent
Cobalt dryer
44 Manufacture of special chemical products
Glass fiber sheet
Polyester cloth
Glass fibre cloth
Wood shell nosing line
47 Manufacture of chemical fiber
Ethylene propylene rubber
Rubber slab
48 Manufacture of rubber
Polyurethane foam plastic
Extruded polystyrene board
Foam plastic
Plastic?sheath
Compound polyethylene foaming composites
Plastic fall pipe
Plastic rainwater funnel
49 Manufacture of plastic
Lime
Cement
50 Manufacture of cement, lime and plaster
Civil air defense concrete airtight door
Civil air defense concrete hanged-plate door
Pre-mixed percolation resistance concrete
Trench cover
Pre-mixed concrete
Pre-mixed peastone concrete
Mortar
Caulking paste
Gas concrete
Haydite concrete hollow block
Elastic caulking paste
51 Manufacture of products of cement and plaster
Building block 52 Manufacture of brick, stone and other building materials
Low-E glass
Frame glass door
Tempering laminated rubber glass
53 Manufacture of glass and its products
Rockwool 55 Manufacture of fire-resistant materials
Reinforced bar
Steel plate
Hot-dip galvanized angel steel
59 Rolling of steel
Steel civil air defense airtight door
Steel beam
Aluminum alloy glass door
Aluminum heat insulation break bridge profile
Aluminum alloy shutter
Solid aluminum panel
Aluminum alloy barrier shutter
Bird-preventing net
Revolving door
Steel roof truss
Window frame
Cast iron water elbow
Floor spring
Door pull
Galvanizing fixing part
Back-bolt
U-shape
Stainless handing tool
Stainless bolt
Embedded member
Hot-dip galvanized steel keel
Hot-dip galvanized steel structure keel
Stainless drain tank
Solid aluminum panel
Steel keel
Bolt
Screw
Fluorocarbon painted aluminum profile keel
Expansion bolt
Pad block
Taper thread sleeve
Galvanized iron wire
Steel net
Iron and steel article
Embedded iron member
Electrode
Galvanizing mild steel wire mesh
Wire gauze
Aluminum profile keel
Core pulling rivet
Spring
Galvanized-iron
63 Manufacture of metal products
Water 94 Production and distribution of water
Reinforced bar transport 97 Transport via road
Energy
Electricity 92 Production and supply of electric power and heat power
Equipment
Machinery
Trencher
Vibration machine
Truck
69 Manufacture of special purpose machinery for mining, metallurgy and construction
Tab.1  Social inputs inventory associated with input-output sectors of the engineering structure
Sector code Full name Abbreviation name
9 Mining of non-ferrous metal ores Non-ferrous metal
27 Spinning and weaving of hemp and tiffany Weaving products
32 Processing of timbers, manufacture of wood, bamboo, rattan, palm and straw products Wood products
37 Processing of petroleum and nuclear fuel Petroleum
42 Manufacture of paints, printing inks, pigments and similar products Paints
43 Manufacture of synthetic materials Synthetic materials
44 Manufacture of special chemical products Chemical
47 Manufacture of chemical fiber Chemical fiber
48 Manufacture of rubber Rubber
49 Manufacture of plastic Plastic
50 Manufacture of cement, lime and plaster Cement
51 Manufacture of products of cement and plaster Cement products
52 Manufacture of brick, stone and other building materials Brick
53 Manufacture of glass and its products Glass
55 Manufacture of fire-resistant materials Fire-resistant materials
59 Rolling of steel Rolling of steel
63 Manufacture of metal products Metal
69 Manufacture of special purpose machinery for mining, metallurgy and construction Machinery
92 Production and supply of electric power and heat power Electricity
94 Production and distribution of water Water
95 Construction Construction
97 Transport via road Transport
Tab.2  The full and abbreviated names of related input-output sectors
Sector code Sector contents Fossil fuels Biological resources Minerals Environmental resources
Coal Crude oil Natural gas Agricultural products Forestry products Stock products Fishery products Ferrous metals Non-ferrous metals Non-metal mineral Hydropower
9 Non-ferrous metal 2.95E+10 9.92E+09 3.31E+09 1.92E+09 2.75E+08 2.33E+07 1.74E+07 1.38E+08 2.65E+09 7.67E+08 1.57E+09
27 Weaving products 2.06E+10 6.10E+09 2.03E+09 5.33E+10 1.70E+08 1.59E+08 2.06E+07 5.15E+07 1.78E+07 9.43E+08 8.07E+08
32 Wood products 2.61E+10 5.36E+09 1.79E+09 6.16E+09 1.10E+10 2.37E+07 1.83E+07 8.31E+07 2.41E+07 9.36E+08 8.97E+08
37 Petroleum 2.10E+10 6.75E+10 2.25E+10 1.45E+09 1.51E+08 1.50E+07 1.12E+07 1.42E+08 2.10E+07 4.44E+08 1.03E+09
42 Paints 3.93E+10 1.56E+10 5.21E+09 6.61E+09 3.59E+08 3.59E+07 3.29E+07 1.12E+08 5.75E+07 2.42E+09 1.37E+09
43 Synthetic materials 3.59E+10 2.86E+10 9.53E+09 2.12E+09 2.30E+08 1.91E+07 1.16E+07 1.04E+08 3.69E+07 2.18E+09 1.39E+09
44 Chemical 5.23E+10 1.25E+10 4.18E+09 5.38E+09 1.36E+09 4.69E+07 2.15E+07 1.12E+08 7.42E+07 3.69E+09 1.52E+09
47 Chemical fiber 3.42E+10 2.45E+10 8.16E+09 4.68E+09 2.53E+08 2.35E+07 1.20E+07 9.42E+07 3.23E+07 1.60E+09 1.37E+09
48 Rubber 3.15E+10 1.14E+10 3.80E+09 3.66E+09 5.12E+09 3.33E+07 1.46E+07 1.51E+08 3.98E+07 1.28E+09 1.11E+09
49 Plastic 3.12E+10 1.49E+10 4.96E+09 2.94E+09 3.55E+08 2.59E+07 1.31E+07 9.13E+07 3.52E+07 1.64E+09 1.30E+09
50 Cement 7.63E+10 5.87E+09 1.96E+09 2.33E+09 3.20E+08 1.99E+07 1.27E+07 1.39E+08 2.75E+07 5.92E+09 1.75E+09
51 Cement products 5.69E+10 7.68E+09 2.56E+09 2.12E+09 3.10E+08 2.13E+07 1.38E+07 2.41E+08 2.61E+07 4.33E+09 1.37E+09
52 Brick 7.50E+10 9.37E+09 3.12E+09 2.26E+09 3.43E+08 2.24E+07 1.42E+07 1.36E+08 3.17E+07 8.54E+09 1.37E+09
53 Glass 6.10E+10 1.02E+10 3.41E+09 2.32E+09 3.63E+08 2.13E+07 1.33E+07 1.29E+08 3.52E+07 6.43E+09 1.30E+09
55 Fire-resistant materials 5.22E+10 6.20E+09 2.07E+09 2.30E+09 2.85E+08 2.16E+07 1.69E+07 1.50E+08 8.27E+07 7.43E+09 1.08E+09
59 Rolling of steel 5.95E+10 7.41E+09 2.47E+09 1.60E+09 2.12E+08 1.91E+07 1.31E+07 1.92E+09 5.21E+07 7.67E+08 1.44E+09
63 Metal 4.07E+10 6.04E+09 2.01E+09 2.17E+09 4.01E+08 2.50E+07 1.82E+07 7.08E+08 1.13E+08 1.02E+09 1.43E+09
69 Machinery 3.33E+10 5.57E+09 1.86E+09 1.90E+09 2.85E+08 2.28E+07 1.51E+07 6.29E+08 6.32E+07 6.57E+08 1.17E+09
92 Electricity 1.17E+11 8.54E+09 2.84E+09 1.44E+09 2.03E+08 1.57E+07 1.10E+07 1.10E+08 3.08E+07 3.58E+08 1.01E+10
94 Water 3.16E+10 4.46E+09 1.49E+09 1.49E+09 1.55E+08 1.65E+07 1.20E+07 7.71E+07 1.99E+07 3.87E+08 2.32E+09
95 Construction 3.49E+10 7.53E+09 2.51E+09 2.99E+09 4.84E+08 2.30E+07 1.71E+07 3.92E+08 5.04E+07 2.97E+09 1.02E+09
97 Transport 1.23E+10 1.43E+10 4.75E+09 2.28E+09 2.14E+08 2.11E+07 1.70E+07 8.25E+07 1.64E+07 2.92E+08 4.85E+08
Tab.3  The related input-output sectors and corresponding embodied exergy intensities for the structure engineering (unit: J/1E+04?CNY) (source: Chen and Chen, 2010)
Sector code Sector contents Fossil fuels Biological resources Minerals Environmental resources
Coal Crude oil Natural gas Agricultural products Forestry products Stock products Fishery products Ferrous metals Non-ferrous metals Non-metal mineral Hydropower
9 Non-ferrous metal 1.15E+11 3.86E+10 1.29E+10 1.92E+09 2.75E+08 2.33E+07 1.74E+07 1.38E+08 2.65E+09 7.67E+08 17E+09
27 Weaving products 3.09E+08 9.15E+07 3.05E+07 5.33E+10 1.70E+08 1.59E+08 2.06E+07 5.15E+07 1.78E+07 9.43E+08 8.07E+08
32 Wood products 1.75E+12 3.60E+11 1.20E+11 6.16E+09 1.10E+10 2.37E+07 1.83E+07 8.31E+07 2.41E+07 9.36E+08 8.97E+08
37 Petroleum 2.66E+08 8.53E+08 2.84E+08 1.45E+09 1.51E+08 1.50E+07 1.12E+07 1.42E+08 2.10E+07 4.44E+08 1.03E+09
42 Paints 4.40E+11 1.75E+11 5.83E+10 6.61E+09 3.59E+08 3.59E+07 3.29E+07 1.12E+08 5.75E+07 2.42E+09 1.37E+09
43 Synthetic materials 2.74E+12 2.18E+12 7.28E+11 2.12E+09 2.30E+08 1.91E+07 1.16E+07 1.04E+08 3.69E+07 2.18E+09 1.39E+09
44 Chemical 5.91E+12 1.41E+12 4.73E+11 5.38E+09 1.36E+09 4.69E+07 2.15E+07 1.12E+08 7.42E+07 3.69E+09 1.52E+09
47 Chemical fiber 6.08E+09 4.36E+09 1.45E+09 4.68E+09 2.53E+08 2.35E+07 1.20E+07 9.42E+07 3.23E+07 1.60E+09 1.37E+09
48 Rubber 4.66E+11 1.69E+11 5.63E+10 3.66E+09 5.12E+09 3.33E+07 1.46E+07 1.51E+08 3.98E+07 1.28E+09 1.11E+09
49 Plastic 8.04E+11 3.84E+11 1.28E+11 2.94E+09 3.55E+08 2.59E+07 1.31E+07 9.13E+07 3.52E+07 1.64E+09 1.30E+09
50 Cement 2.58E+12 1.98E+11 6.62E+10 2.33E+09 3.20E+08 1.99E+07 1.27E+07 1.39E+08 2.75E+07 5.92E+09 1.75E+09
51 Cement products 1.07E+14 1.45E+13 4.83E+12 2.12E+09 3.10E+08 2.13E+07 1.38E+07 2.41E+08 2.61E+07 4.33E+09 1.37E+09
52 Brick 1.30E+10 1.62E+09 5.40E+08 2.26E+09 3.43E+08 2.24E+07 1.42E+07 1.36E+08 3.17E+07 8.54E+09 1.37E+09
53 Glass 6.25E+12 1.05E+12 3.49E+11 2.32E+09 3.63E+08 2.13E+07 1.33E+07 1.29E+08 3.52E+07 6.43E+09 1.30E+09
55 Fire-resistant materials 9.92E+07 1.18E+07 3.93E+06 2.30E+09 2.85E+08 2.16E+07 1.69E+07 1.50E+08 8.27E+07 7.43E+09 1.08E+09
59 Rolling of steel 2.03E+14 2.52E+13 8.42E+12 1.60E+09 2.12E+08 1.91E+07 1.31E+07 1.92E+09 5.21E+07 7.67E+08 1.44E+09
63 Metal 6.20E+12 9.21E+11 3.06E+11 2.17E+09 4.01E+08 2.50E+07 1.82E+07 7.08E+08 1.13E+08 1.02E+09 1.43E+09
69 Machinery 4.41E+11 7.38E+10 2.47E+10 1.90E+09 2.85E+08 2.28E+07 1.51E+07 6.29E+08 6.32E+07 6.57E+08 1.17E+09
92 Electricity 5.87E+12 4.29E+11 1.43E+11 1.44E+09 2.03E+08 1.57E+07 1.10E+07 1.10E+08 3.08E+07 3.58E+08 1.01E+10
94 Water 8.81E+11 1.24E+11 4.15E+10 1.49E+09 1.55E+08 1.65E+07 1.20E+07 7.71E+07 1.99E+07 3.87E+08 2.32E+09
95 Construction 2.93E+13 6.32E+12 2.11E+12 2.99E+09 4.84E+08 2.30E+07 1.71E+07 3.92E+08 5.04E+07 2.97E+09 1.02E+09
97 Transport 5.42E+10 6.30E+10 2.09E+10 2.28E+09 2.14E+08 2.11E+07 1.70E+07 8.25E+07 1.64E+07 2.92E+08 4.85E+08
Total 3.74E+14 5.36E+13 1.79E+13 1.42E+13 2.84E+12 1.43E+11 9.63E+10 7.50E+12 3.19E+11 1.51E+13 9.75E+12
Tab.4  The embodied exergy of the structure engineering (unit: J)
Fig.2  The components of embodied exergy of structure engineering of buldings.
Fig.3  The components of the four categories of accounted natural resources evaluated by exergy.
Fig.4  The components of the 37 kinds of accounted natural resources evaluated by exergy.
Fig.5  The components of the four sources in terms of materials, equipment, energy and manpower of embodied exergy.
1 AEM (1983). Agricultural Economic Manual. Beijing: Agriculture Press (in Chinese)
2 C W Bullard, P S Penner, D A Pilati (1978). Net energy analysis: handbook for combining process and input-output analysis. Resour Energy, 1(3): 267–313
https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0572(78)90008-7
3 CESY (2008). China Energy Statistical Yearbook (2008). Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House (in Chinese)
4 CEY (2008). China Economic Yearbook (2008). Beijing: China Economic Yearbook Press (in Chinese)
5 Y Chang, R J Ries, Y Wang (2010). The embodied energy and environmental emissions of construction projects in China: an economic input-output LCA model. Energy Policy, 38(11): 6597–6603
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.06.030
6 Y Chang, R J Ries, Y Wang (2011). The quantification of the embodied impacts of construction projects on energy, environment, and society based on I-O LCA. Energy Policy, 39(10): 6321–6330
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.033
7 G Chen, Z Qi (2007). Systems account of societal exergy utilization: China 2003. Ecol Modell, 208(2 – 4): 102–118
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.04.017
8 G Q Chen (2005). Exergy consumption of the earth. Ecol Modell, 184(2–4): 363–380
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.10.015
9 G Q Chen (2006). Scarcity of exergy and ecological evaluation based on embodied exergy. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 11(4): 531–552
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2004.11.009
10 G Q Chen, H Chen, Z M Chen, B Zhang, L Shao, S Guo, S Y Zhou, M M Jiang (2011a). Low-carbon building assessment and multi-scale input-output analysis. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 16(1): 583–595
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.02.026
11 G Q Chen, Z M Chen (2010). Carbon emissions and resources use by Chinese economy 2007: a 135-sector inventory and input-output embodiment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 15(11): 3647–3732
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.12.024
12 G Q Chen, Z Li, Z M Chen, B Zhang, H Chen, L Shao, S Guo (2010). Systems Carbon Metrics for Building. Beijing: Xinhua Press (in Chinese)
13 G Q Chen, L Shao, Z M Chen, Z Li, B Zhang, H Chen, Z Wu (2011b). Low-carbon assessment for ecological wastewater treatment by a constructed wetland in Beijing. Ecol Eng, 37(4): 622–628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.12.027
14 G Q Chen, Q Yang, Y H Zhao (2011c). Renewability of wind power in China: a case study of nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emission by a plant in Guangxi. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15(5): 2322–2329
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.007
15 G Q Chen, Q Yang, Y H Zhao, Z F Wang (2011d). Nonrenewable energy cost and greenhouse gas emissions of a 1.5MW solar power tower plant in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 15(4): 1961–1967
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.12.014
16 CSY (2008). China Statistical Yearbook (2008). Beijing: China Statistical Publishing House (in Chinese)
17 J Dai, B Fath, B Chen (2012). Constructing a network of the social-economic consumption system of China using extended exergy analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16(7): 4796–4808
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.027
18 M K Dixit, J L Fernández-Solís, S Lavy, C H Culp (2012). Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: a review paper. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16(6): 3730–3743
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.021
19 W Eichhammer, T Fleiter, B Schlomann, S Faberi, M Fioretto, N Piccioni, S Lechtenböhmer, G Resch (2009). Study on the energy savings potentials in EU member states, candidate countries and EEA countries. Final Report
20 J-y Fang, G G Wang, G-h Liu, S-l Xu (1998). Forest biomass of China: an estimate based on the biomass-volume relationship. Ecol Appl, 8(4): 1084–1091
21 P Gonçalves, A R Gaspar, M G Silva (2012). Energy and exergy-based indicators for the energy performance assessment of a hotel building. Energy Build, 52(0): 181–188
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.06.011
22 J L Hau, B R Bakshi (2004). Promise and problems of emergy analysis. Ecol Modell, 178(1–2): 215–225
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.12.016
23 T J Kotas (1985). The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis. Lodon: Butterworth Publishers
24 M Lenzen, G Treloar (2002). Embodied energy in buildings: wood versus concrete–reply to Börjesson and Gustavsson. Energy Policy, 30(3): 249–255
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00142-2
25 W Leontief (1970). Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev Econ Stat, 52(3): 262–271
https://doi.org/10.2307/1926294
26 D Li, J Zhu, E C M Hui, B Y P Leung, Q Li (2011). An emergy analysis-based methodology for eco-efficiency evaluation of building manufacturing. Ecol Indic, 11(5): 1419–1425
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.03.004
27 J S Li, A Alsaed, T Hayat, G Chen (2014). Energy and carbon emission review for Macao’s gaming industry. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 29: 744–753
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.09.001
28 J S Li, G Q Chen (2013). Energy and greenhouse gas emissions review for Macao. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 22: 23–32
29 J S Li, G Q Chen, T M Lai, B Ahmad, Z M Chen, L Shao, X Ji (2013). Embodied greenhouse gas emissions by Macao. Energy Policy, 59: 819–833
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.042
30 J S Li, N Duan, S Guo, L Shao, C Lin, J Wang, J Hou, Y Hou, J Meng, M Han (2012). Renewable resource for agricultural ecosystem in China: ecological benefit for biogas by-product for planting. Ecol Inform, 12: 101–110
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.05.004
31 G Y Liu, Z F Yang, B Chen, Y Zhang (2011). Ecological network determination of sectoral linkages, utility relations and structural characteristics on urban ecological economic system. Ecol Modell, 222(15): 2825–2834
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.04.034
32 M Liu, B Li, R Yao (2010). A generic model of exergy assessment for the environmental impact of building lifecycle. Energy Build, 42(9): 1482–1490
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.03.018
33 H J Liu (1999). Study on approaches for estimation heat value of municipal solid waste. Environmental Sanitation Engineering, 3: 004
34 V Martinaitis, D Bieksa, V Miseviciute (2010). Degree-days for the exergy analysis of buildings. Energy Build, 42(7): 1063–1069
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.01.019
35 F Meillaud, J B Gay, M T Brown (2005). Evaluation of a building using the emergy method. Sol Energy, 79(2): 204–212
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.11.003
36 B Metz (2007). Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press
37 MNCC (Ministry of National Construction of China) (2006). Green Building Evaluation Standard. Beijing: The State Council of the People’s Republic of China
38 H T Odum (1983). System Ecology: An Introduction. New York: Wiely
39 H T Odum (1996). Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making. New York: Wiley
40 R M Pulselli, E Simoncini, F M Pulselli, S Bastianoni (2007). Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability. Energy Build, 39(5): 620–628
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.10.004
41 M A Rosen, I Dincer, M Kanoglu (2008). Role of exergy in increasing efficiency and sustainability and reducing environmental impact. Energy Policy, 36(1): 128–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.006
42 P Sakulpipatsin, L C M Itard, H J van der Kooi, E C Boelman, P G Luscuere (2010). An exergy application for analysis of buildings and HVAC systems. Energy Build, 42(1): 90–99
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.07.015
43 M Schweiker, M Shukuya (2010). Comparative effects of building envelope improvements and occupant behavioural changes on the exergy consumption for heating and cooling. Energy Policy, 38(6): 2976–2986
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.035
44 E Sciubba (2001). Beyond thermoeconomics? The concept of extended exergy accounting and its application to the analysis and design of thermal systems. Exergy. Int J, 1(2): 68–84
45 J Szargut (2005). Exergy method: technical and ecological applications. Wit Pr/Computational Mechanics
46 J Szargut, D Morris (1985). Calculation of the standard chemical exergy of some elements and their compounds, based upon sea water as the datum level substance. Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical sciences, 33(5–6): 293–305
47 J Szargut, D R Morris, F R Steward (1988). Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes. New York: Hemisphere
48 M Tolga Balta, Y Kalinci, A Hepbasli (2008). Evaluating a low exergy heating system from the power plant through the heat pump to the building envelope. Energy Build, 40(10): 1799–1804
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.03.008
49 H Torío, A Angelotti, D Schmidt (2009). Exergy analysis of renewable energy-based climatisation systems for buildings: a critical view. Energy Build, 41(3): 248–271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.10.006
50 D Ürge-Vorsatz, A Novikova (2008). Potentials and costs of carbon dioxide mitigation in the world’s buildings. Energy Policy, 36(2): 642–661
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.009
51 L Vukotic, R A Fenner, K Symons (2010). Assessing embodied energy of building structural elements. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability, 163(3): 147–158
52 G Wall (1977). Exergy: a useful concept within resource accounting. Institute of Theoretical Physics. Report No. 77-42.2013.
53 G Wall, M Gong (2001). On exergy and sustainable development—Part 1: conditions and concepts. Exergy. Int J, 1(3): 128–145
54 T H Wang (2005). China: Building a Resource-Efficient Society. China Development Forum 2005. Beijing
55 D Yeo, R D Gabbai (2011). Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy Build, 43(8): 2028–2033
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.04.014
56 C T Yucer, A Hepbasli (2011). Thermodynamic analysis of a building using exergy analysis method. Energy Build, 43(2–3): 536–542
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.10.019
57 J B Zhou (2008). Embodied Ecological Elements Accounting of National Economy. Dissertation for Ph.D Degree. Beijing: Peking University (in Chinese)
58 S Y Zhou, H Chen, S C Li (2010). Resources use and greenhouse gas emissions in urban economy: ecological input–output modeling for Beijing 2002. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 15(10): 3201–3231
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.11.026
[1] Mengjuan LIU, Lin DENG, Wei HUANG, Wanchen WU. The impact of vertical resolution on the simulation of Typhoon Lekima (2019) by a cloud-permitting model[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2022, 16(1): 158-174.
[2] Ying LIU, Xudong WU, Xudong SUN, Chenghe GUAN, Bo ZHANG, Xiaofang WU. Exports-driven primary energy requirements and the structural paths of Chinese regions[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(4): 803-815.
[3] KuoRay MAO, Qian ZHANG, Yongji XUE, Nefratiri WEEKS. Toward a socio-political approach to water management: successes and limitations of IWRM programs in rural north-western China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(2): 268-285.
[4] Jing MING, Xiawei LIAO, Xu ZHAO. Grey water footprint for global energy demands[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2020, 14(1): 201-208.
[5] Jingwei CUI, Rukai ZHU, Zhiguo MAO, Shixiang LI. Accumulation of unconventional petroleum resources and their coexistence characteristics in Chang7 shale formations of Ordos Basin in central China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 575-587.
[6] Yingxia CHEN, Tingting WANG, Faming FANG, Guixu ZHANG. A pan-sharpening method based on the ADMM algorithm[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(3): 656-667.
[7] Xianglin WEI, Yuewei DUAN, Yongxue LIU, Song JIN, Chao SUN. Onshore-offshore wind energy resource evaluation based on synergetic use of multiple satellite data and meteorological stations in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2019, 13(1): 132-150.
[8] Li LI, Xinyuan WANG, Lei LUO, Yanchuang ZHAO, Xin ZONG, Nabil BACHAGHA. Mapping of wind energy potential over the Gobi Desert in Northwest China based on multiple sources of data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2018, 12(2): 264-279.
[9] Wendong WEI, Xudong WU, Xiaofang WU, Qiangmin XI, Xi JI, Guoping LI. Regional study on investment for transmission infrastructure in China based on the State Grid data[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2017, 11(1): 162-183.
[10] Qun’ou JIANG,Chengcai TANG,Jinyan ZHAN,Wei ZHANG,Feng WU. Environmental cost and pollution risk caused by the industrial transfer in Qinghai Province[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(3): 362-374.
[11] Chen CHEN, Meirong SU, Zhifeng YANG, Gengyuan LIU. Evaluation of the environmental impact of the urban energy lifecycle based on lifecycle assessment[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(1): 123-130.
[12] Alexey Voinov, Tatiana Filatova. Pricing strategies in inelastic energy markets: can we use less if we can’t extract more?[J]. Front. Earth Sci., 2014, 8(1): 3-17.
[13] Xi JI, Zhanming CHEN, Jinkai LI. Embodied energy consumption and carbon emissions evaluation for urban industrial structure optimization[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2014, 8(1): 32-43.
[14] Qiuwen CHEN, Jing LI, Ruonan LI, Wenda WEI, Liming WANG. River basin water resource compensation characteristics by set pair analysis: the Dongjiang example[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2014, 8(1): 64-69.
[15] Cong DONG, Guohe HUANG, Qian TAN, Yanpeng CAI. Coupled planning of water resources and agricultural land-use based on an inexact-stochastic programming model[J]. Front Earth Sci, 2014, 8(1): 70-80.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed