|
|
Porosity parameters in biomaterial science: Definition, impact, and challenges in tissue engineering |
Mehdi EBRAHIMI() |
Biomedical and Tissue Engineering, Prince Philip Dental Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China |
|
|
Abstract Porosity parameters are one of the structural properties of the extracellular microenvironment that have been shown to have a great impact on the cellular phenotype and various biological activities such as diffusion of fluid, initial protein adsorption, permeability, cell penetration and migration, ECM deposition, angiogenesis, and rate and pattern of new tissue formation. The heterogeneity of the study protocols and research methodologies do not allow reliable meta-analysis for definite findings. As such, despite the huge available literature, no generally accepted consensus is defined for the porosity requirements of specific tissue engineering applications. However, based on the biomimetic approach, the biological substitutes should replicate the 3D local microenvironment of the recipient site with matching porosity parameters to best support local cells during tissue regeneration. Ideally, the porosity of biomaterials should mimic the porosity of the substituting natural tissue and match the clinical requirements. Careful analysis of the impact of architectures (i.e., porosity) on biophysical, biochemical, and biological behaviors will support designing smart biomaterials with customized architectural and functional properties that are patient and defect site-specific.
|
Keywords
porosity
pore size
pore geometry
topography
tissue engineering
|
Corresponding Author(s):
Mehdi EBRAHIMI
|
Online First Date: 13 July 2021
Issue Date: 24 September 2021
|
|
1 |
N Trivedi, J Hollister-Lock, M D Lopez-Avalos, et al.. Increase in β-cell mass in transplanted porcine neonatal pancreatic cell clusters is due to proliferation of β-cells and differentiation of duct cells. Endocrinology, 2001, 142(5): 2115–2122
https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.142.5.8162
pmid: 11316779
|
2 |
Y A Mørch, I Donati, B L Strand, et al.. Effect of Ca2+, Ba2+, and Sr2+ on alginate microbeads. Biomacromolecules, 2006, 7(5): 1471–1480
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060010d
pmid: 16677028
|
3 |
M Ebrahimi. Extracellular matrix: The ideal natural fibrous nanocomposite products. In: A M Inamuddin, A Asiri, Mohammad, eds. Applications of Nanocomposite Materials in Orthopedics. Elsevier, 2019, 263–286
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813740-6.00014-4
|
4 |
M S Steinberg. ECM: Its nature, origin and function in cell aggregation. Experimental Cell Research, 1963, 30(2): 257–279
https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(63)90299-4
pmid: 13983727
|
5 |
N Mansouri, SamiraBagheri. The influence of topography on tissue engineering perspective. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2016, 61: 906–921
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.094
pmid: 26838922
|
6 |
A De Arcangelis, E Georges-Labouesse. Integrin and ECM functions: Roles in vertebrate development. Trends in Genetics, 2000, 16(9): 389–395
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02074-6
pmid: 10973067
|
7 |
G Chen, T Ushida, T Tateishi. Scaffold design for tissue engineering. Macromolecular Bioscience, 2002, 2(2): 67–77
https://doi.org/10.1002/1616-5195(20020201)2:2<67::AID-MABI67>3.0.CO;2-F
|
8 |
Q L Loh, C Choong. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: Role of porosity and pore size. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 2013, 19(6): 485–502
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437
pmid: 23672709
|
9 |
M Ebrahimi, M G Botelho, S V Dorozhkin. Biphasic calcium phosphates bioceramics (HA/TCP): Concept, physicochemical properties and the impact of standardization of study protocols in biomaterials research. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2017, 71: 1293–1312
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.039
pmid: 27987685
|
10 |
H Naderi, M M Matin, A R Bahrami. Critical issues in tissue engineering: Biomaterials, cell sources, angiogenesis, and drug delivery systems. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 2011, 26(4): 383–417
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328211408946
pmid: 21926148
|
11 |
F M Chen, L A Wu, M Zhang, et al.. Homing of endogenous stem/progenitor cells for in situ tissue regeneration: Promises, strategies, and translational perspectives. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(12): 3189–3209
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.032
pmid: 21300401
|
12 |
B K K Teo, S T Wong, C K Lim, et al.. Nanotopography modulates mechanotransduction of stem cells and induces differentiation through focal adhesion kinase. ACS Nano, 2013, 7(6): 4785–4798
https://doi.org/10.1021/nn304966z
pmid: 23672596
|
13 |
R A Pérez, J E Won, J C Knowles, et al.. Naturally and synthetic smart composite biomaterials for tissue regeneration. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2013, 65(4): 471–496
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.009
pmid: 22465488
|
14 |
D W Hutmacher. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(24): 2529–2543
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6
pmid: 11071603
|
15 |
C M Murphy, G P Duffy, A Schindeler, et al.. Effect of collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffold pore size on matrix mineralization and cellular behavior in different cell types. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2016, 104(1): 291–304
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35567
pmid: 26386362
|
16 |
M J Dalby, N Gadegaard, R O C Oreffo. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin-matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nature Materials, 2014, 13(6): 558–569
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3980
pmid: 24845995
|
17 |
R A Marklein, J A Burdick. Controlling stem cell fate with material design. Advanced Materials, 2010, 22(2): 175–189
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200901055
pmid: 20217683
|
18 |
A J Keung, S Kumar, D V Schaffer. Presentation counts: Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells by biophysical and material cues. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 2010, 26(1): 533–556
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104042
pmid: 20590452
|
19 |
K A Hing, B Annaz, S Saeed, et al.. Microporosity enhances bioactivity of synthetic bone graft substitutes. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2005, 16(5): 467–475
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-6988-1
pmid: 15875258
|
20 |
R A Perez, G Mestres. Role of pore size and morphology in musculo-skeletal tissue regeneration. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2016, 61: 922–939
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087
pmid: 26838923
|
21 |
A L Rosa, M M Beloti, R van Noort. Osteoblastic differentiation of cultured rat bone marrow cells on hydroxyapatite with different surface topography. Dental Materials, 2003, 19(8): 768–772
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(03)00024-1
pmid: 14511735
|
22 |
P Habibovic, H Yuan, C M van der Valk, et al.. 3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(17): 3565–3575
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.056
pmid: 15621247
|
23 |
M Rouahi, O Gallet, E Champion, et al.. Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2006, 78A(2): 222–235
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30682
pmid: 16628709
|
24 |
B Vagaská, L Bacáková, E Filová, et al.. Osteogenic cells on bio-inspired materials for bone tissue engineering. Physiological Research, 2010, 59(3): 309–322
https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.931776
pmid: 19681662
|
25 |
A Acarregui, A Murua, J L Pedraz, et al.. A perspective on bioactive cell microencapsulation. BioDrugs, 2012, 26(5): 283–301
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261887
pmid: 22715813
|
26 |
M P Ginebra, M Espanol, E B Montufar, et al.. New processing approaches in calcium phosphate cements and their applications in regenerative medicine. Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6(8): 2863–2873
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.036
pmid: 20123046
|
27 |
W Y Yeong, C K Chua, K F Leong, et al.. Rapid prototyping in tissue engineering: challenges and potential. Trends in Biotechnology, 2004, 22(12): 643–652
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.004
pmid: 15542155
|
28 |
M Ebrahimi, M Botelho, W Lu, et al.. Integrated approach in designing biphasic nanocomposite collagen/nBCP scaffolds with controlled porosity and permeability for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2020, 108(4): 1738–1753
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34518
pmid: 31750983
|
29 |
R W Goulet, S A Goldstein, M J Ciarelli, et al.. The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. Journal of Biomechanics, 1994, 27(4): 375–389
https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(94)90014-0
pmid: 8188719
|
30 |
V L Tsang, S N Bhatia. Three-dimensional tissue fabrication. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2004, 56(11): 1635–1647
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.05.001
pmid: 15350293
|
31 |
J K Sherwood, S L Riley, R Palazzolo, et al.. A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articular cartilage repair. Biomaterials, 2002, 23(24): 4739–4751
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00223-5
pmid: 12361612
|
32 |
K F Leong, C K Chua, N Sudarmadji, et al.. Engineering functionally graded tissue engineering scaffolds. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2008, 1(2): 140–152
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.11.002
pmid: 19627779
|
33 |
S Yang, K F Leong, Z Du, et al.. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part II. Rapid prototyping techniques. Tissue Engineering, 2002, 8(1): 1–11
https://doi.org/10.1089/107632702753503009
pmid: 11886649
|
34 |
W Pompe, H Worch, M Epple, et al.. Functionally graded materials for biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2003, 362(1–2): 40–60
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00580-X
|
35 |
X Miao, D Sun. Graded/gradient porous biomaterials. Materials, 2009, 3(1): 26–47
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3010026
|
36 |
T B F Woodfield, C A Van Blitterswijk, J De Wijn, et al.. Polymer scaffolds fabricated with pore-size gradients as a model for studying the zonal organization within tissue-engineered cartilage constructs. Tissue Engineering, 2005, 11(9–10): 1297–1311
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.1297
pmid: 16259586
|
37 |
J V Karpiak, Y Ner, A Almutairi. Density gradient multilayer polymerization for creating complex tissue. Advanced Materials, 2012, 24(11): 1466–1470
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103501
pmid: 22318771
|
38 |
Y Zhu, H Wu, S Sun, et al.. Designed composites for mimicking compressive mechanical properties of articular cartilage matrix. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2014, 36: 32–46
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.003
pmid: 24793172
|
39 |
S H Oh, I K Park, J M Kim, et al.. In vitro and in vivo characteristics of PCL scaffolds with pore size gradient fabricated by a centrifugation method. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(9): 1664–1671
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.024
pmid: 17196648
|
40 |
I Bružauskaitė, D Bironaitė, E Bagdonas, et al.. Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: Different scaffold pore sizes-different cell effects. Cytotechnology, 2016, 68(3): 355–369
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4
pmid: 26091616
|
41 |
F Causa, P A Netti, L Ambrosio. A multi-functional scaffold for tissue regeneration: The need to engineer a tissue analogue. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(34): 5093–5099
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.030
pmid: 17675151
|
42 |
H J Sung, C Meredith, C Johnson, et al.. The effect of scaffold degradation rate on three-dimensional cell growth and angiogenesis. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(26): 5735–5742
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.01.066
pmid: 15147819
|
43 |
V Karageorgiou, D Kaplan. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(27): 5474–5491
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002
pmid: 15860204
|
44 |
S J Hollister. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nature Materials, 2005, 4(7): 518–524
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1421
pmid: 16003400
|
45 |
A Macchetta, I G Turner, C R Bowen. Fabrication of HA/TCP scaffolds with a graded and porous structure using a camphene-based freeze-casting method. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5(4): 1319–1327
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.11.009
pmid: 19112055
|
46 |
H A Almeida, P J Bártolo. Topological optimisation of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Procedia Engineering, 2013, 59: 298–306
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.05.125
|
47 |
A Rainer, S M Giannitelli, D Accoto, et al.. Load-adaptive scaffold architecturing: a bioinspired approach to the design of porous additively manufactured scaffolds with optimized mechanical properties. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2012, 40(4): 966–975
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0465-4
pmid: 22109804
|
48 |
A G Mitsak, J M Kemppainen, M T Harris, et al.. Effect of polycaprolactone scaffold permeability on bone regeneration in vivo. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2011, 17(13–14): 1831–1839
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0560
pmid: 21395465
|
49 |
F J O’Brien, B A Harley, M A Waller, et al.. The effect of pore size on permeability and cell attachment in collagen scaffolds for tissue engineering. Technology and Health Care, 2007, 15(1): 3–17
https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2007-15102
pmid: 17264409
|
50 |
P J Emans, E J P Jansen, D van Iersel, et al.. Tissue-engineered constructs: The effect of scaffold architecture in osteochondral repair. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013, 7(9): 751–756
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.1477
pmid: 22438217
|
51 |
J X Lu, B Flautre, K Anselme, et al.. Role of interconnections in porous bioceramics on bone recolonization in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine, 1999, 10(2): 111–120
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008973120918
pmid: 15347932
|
52 |
B Otsuki, M Takemoto, S Fujibayashi, et al.. Pore throat size and connectivity determine bone and tissue ingrowth into porous implants: Three-dimensional micro-CT based structural analyses of porous bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(35): 5892–5900
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.013
pmid: 16945409
|
53 |
B Starly, E Yildirim, W Sun. A tracer metric numerical model for predicting tortuosity factors in three-dimensional porous tissue scaffolds. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2007, 87(1): 21–27
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.04.003
pmid: 17532090
|
54 |
J Hrabe, S Hrabetová, K Segeth. A model of effective diffusion and tortuosity in the extracellular space of the brain. Biophysical Journal, 2004, 87(3): 1606–1617
https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.103.039495
pmid: 15345540
|
55 |
J M Zalc, S C Reyes, E Iglesia. The effects of diffusion mechanism and void structure on transport rates and tortuosity factors in complex porous structures. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(14): 2947–2960
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.028
|
56 |
E A Botchwey, M A Dupree, S R Pollack, et al.. Tissue engineered bone: Measurement of nutrient transport in three-dimensional matrices. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2003, 67A(1): 357–367
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10111
pmid: 14517896
|
57 |
M M C G Silva, L A Cyster, J J A Barry, et al.. The effect of anisotropic architecture on cell and tissue infiltration into tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(35): 5909–5917
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.08.010
pmid: 16949666
|
58 |
B Dorj, J E Won, O Purevdorj, et al.. A novel therapeutic design of microporous-structured biopolymer scaffolds for drug loading and delivery. Acta Biomaterialia, 2014, 10(3): 1238–1250
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.002
pmid: 24239677
|
59 |
M Nikkhah, F Edalat, S Manoucheri, et al.. Engineering microscale topographies to control the cell–substrate interface. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(21): 5230–5246
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.03.079
pmid: 22521491
|
60 |
S M Lien, L Y Ko, T J Huang. Effect of pore size on ECM secretion and cell growth in gelatin scaffold for articular cartilage tissue engineering. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5(2): 670–679
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.020
pmid: 18951858
|
61 |
C M Murphy, F J O’Brien. Understanding the effect of mean pore size on cell activity in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Cell Adhesion & Migration, 2010, 4(3): 377–381
https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.4.3.11747
pmid: 20421733
|
62 |
Y Zhao, K Tan, Y Zhou, et al.. A combinatorial variation in surface chemistry and pore size of three-dimensional porous poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds modulates the behaviors of mesenchymal stem cells. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2016, 59: 193–202
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.017
pmid: 26652364
|
63 |
S Nehrer, H A Breinan, A Ramappa, et al.. Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. Biomaterials, 1997, 18(11): 769–776
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00001-X
pmid: 9177854
|
64 |
J J Klawitter, J G Bagwell, A M Weinstein, et al.. An evaluation of bone growth into porous high density polyethylene. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1976, 10(2): 311–323
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820100212
pmid: 1254618
|
65 |
P Y Huri, B A Ozilgen, D L Hutton, et al.. Scaffold pore size modulates in vitro osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Biomedical Materials, 2014, 9(4): 045003
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/9/4/045003
pmid: 24945873
|
66 |
L G Sicchieri, G E Crippa, P T de Oliveira, et al.. Pore size regulates cell and tissue interactions with PLGA-CaP scaffolds used for bone engineering. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2012, 6(2): 155–162
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.422
pmid: 21446054
|
67 |
S Kujala, J Ryhänen, A Danilov, et al.. Effect of porosity on the osteointegration and bone ingrowth of a weight-bearing nickel-titanium bone graft substitute. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(25): 4691–4697
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00359-4
pmid: 12951012
|
68 |
T H Kim, S H Oh, E B Kwon, et al.. In vitro evaluation of osteogenesis and myogenesis from adipose-derived stem cells in a pore size gradient scaffold. Macromolecular Research, 2013, 21(8): 878–885
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-013-1099-1
|
69 |
C M Murphy, M G Haugh, F J O’Brien. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(3): 461–466
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063
pmid: 19819008
|
70 |
T C Lim, K S Chian, K F Leong. Cryogenic prototyping of chitosan scaffolds with controlled micro and macro architecture and their effect on in vivo neo-vascularization and cellular infiltration. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2010, 94A(4): 1303‒1311
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32747
|
71 |
J W Lee, G Ahn, J Y Kim, et al.. Evaluating cell proliferation based on internal pore size and 3D scaffold architecture fabricated using solid freeform fabrication technology. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2010, 21(12): 3195–3205
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-010-4173-7
pmid: 20981473
|
72 |
T Mygind, M Stiehler, A Baatrup, et al.. Mesenchymal stem cell ingrowth and differentiation on coralline hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(6): 1036–1047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.003
pmid: 17081601
|
73 |
E Tsuruga, H Takita, H Itoh, et al.. Pore size of porous hydroxyapatite as the cell-substratum controls BMP-induced osteogenesis. Journal of Biochemistry, 1997, 121(2): 317–324
https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a021589
pmid: 9089406
|
74 |
S M M Roosa, J M Kemppainen, E N Moffitt, et al.. The pore size of polycaprolactone scaffolds has limited influence on bone regeneration in an in vivo model. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2010, 92A(1): 359–368
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32381
pmid: 19189391
|
75 |
S F Hulbert, F A Young, R S Mathews, et al.. Potential of ceramic materials as permanently implantable skeletal prostheses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1970, 4(3): 433–456
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820040309
pmid: 5469185
|
76 |
F A Akin, H Zreiqat, S Jordan, et al.. Preparation and analysis of macroporous TiO2 films on Ti surfaces for bone-tissue implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 57(4): 588–596
https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4<588::AID-JBM1206>3.0.CO;2-Y
pmid: 11553890
|
77 |
G Akay, M A Birch, M A Bokhari. Microcellular polyHIPE polymer supports osteoblast growth and bone formation in vitro. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(18): 3991–4000
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.086
pmid: 15046889
|
78 |
M C von Doernberg, B von Rechenberg, M Bohner, et al.. In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(30): 5186–5198
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.051
pmid: 16790273
|
79 |
A I Itälä, H O Ylänen, C Ekholm, et al.. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001, 58(6): 679–683
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1069
pmid: 11745521
|
80 |
S Sánchez-Salcedo, D Arcos, M Vallet-Regí. Upgrading calcium phosphate scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Key Engineering Materials, 2008, 377: 19–42
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.377.19
|
81 |
S J Simske, R A Ayers, T A Bateman. Porous materials for bone engineering. Materials Science Forum, 1997, 250: 151–182
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.250.151
|
82 |
H J Kim, U J Kim, G Vunjak-Novakovic, et al.. Influence of macroporous protein scaffolds on bone tissue engineering from bone marrow stem cells. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(21): 4442–4452
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.013
pmid: 15701373
|
83 |
B B Mandal, S C Kundu. Cell proliferation and migration in silk fibroin 3D scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(15): 2956–2965
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.02.006
pmid: 19249094
|
84 |
S H Oh, T H Kim, G I Im, et al.. Investigation of pore size effect on chondrogenic differentiation of adipose stem cells using a pore size gradient scaffold. Biomacromolecules, 2010, 11(8): 1948–1955
https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100199m
pmid: 20690707
|
85 |
P Duan, Z Pan, L Cao, et al.. The effects of pore size in bilayered poly(lactide-co-glycolide) scaffolds on restoring osteochondral defects in rabbits. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014, 102(1): 180–192
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34683
pmid: 23637068
|
86 |
A Penk, Y Förster, H A Scheidt, et al.. The pore size of PLGA bone implants determines the de novo formation of bone tissue in tibial head defects in rats. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2013, 70(4): 925–935
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24541
pmid: 23165861
|
87 |
F M Klenke, Y Liu, H Yuan, et al.. Impact of pore size on the vascularization and osseointegration of ceramic bone substitutes in vivo. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008, 85A(3): 777–786
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31559
pmid: 17896777
|
88 |
T Hausner, R Schmidhammer, S Zandieh, et al.. Nerve regeneration using tubular scaffolds from biodegradable polyurethane. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplementum, 2007, 100: 69–72
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-72958-8_15
pmid: 17985549
|
89 |
A Bozkurt, R Deumens, C Beckmann, et al.. In vitro cell alignment obtained with a Schwann cell enriched microstructured nerve guide with longitudinal guidance channels. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(2): 169–179
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.09.017
pmid: 18922575
|
90 |
N Yuan, W Tian, L Sun, et al.. Neural stem cell transplantation in a double-layer collagen membrane with unequal pore sizes for spinal cord injury repair. Neural Regeneration Research, 2014, 9(10): 1014–1019
https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.133160
pmid: 25206753
|
91 |
M Lee, B M Wu, J C Y Dunn. Effect of scaffold architecture and pore size on smooth muscle cell growth. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008, 87A(4): 1010–1016
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31816
pmid: 18257081
|
92 |
B A C Harley, H D Kim, M H Zaman, et al.. Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions. Biophysical Journal, 2008, 95(8): 4013–4024
https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.107.122598
pmid: 18621811
|
93 |
I V Yannas. Tissue regeneration by use of collagen–glycosaminoglycan copolymers. Clinical Materials, 1992, 9(3–4): 179–187
https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(92)90098-E
pmid: 10149968
|
94 |
T Knight, J Basu, E A Rivera, et al.. Fabrication of a multi-layer three-dimensional scaffold with controlled porous micro-architecture for application in small intestine tissue engineering. Cell Adhesion & Migration, 2013, 7(3): 267–274
https://doi.org/10.4161/cam.24351
pmid: 23563499
|
95 |
G C Reilly, A J Engler. Intrinsic extracellular matrix properties regulate stem cell differentiation. Journal of Biomechanics, 2010, 43(1): 55–62
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.009
pmid: 19800626
|
96 |
B A Harley, J H Leung, E C C M Silva, et al.. Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. Acta Biomaterialia, 2007, 3(4): 463–474
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2006.12.009
pmid: 17349829
|
97 |
M Y Kim, D J Li, L K Pham, et al.. Microfabrication of high-resolution porous membranes for cell culture. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 452: 460–469
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.034
pmid: 24567663
|
98 |
H I Chang, Y Wang. Cell responses to surface and architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds. In: Eberli D, ed. Regenerative Medicine and Tissue Engineering: Cells and Biomaterials.Croatia: InTech, 2011, 569–588
|
99 |
S R Peyton, Z I Kalcioglu, J C Cohen, et al.. Marrow-derived stem cell motility in 3D synthetic scaffold is governed by geometry along with adhesivity and stiffness. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2011, 108(5): 1181–1193
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23027
pmid: 21449030
|
100 |
M Zhang, D Methot, V Poppa, et al.. Cardiomyocyte grafting for cardiac repair: Graft cell death and anti-death strategies. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 2001, 33(5): 907–921
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmcc.2001.1367
pmid: 11343414
|
101 |
J S Lee, H D Cha, J H Shim, et al.. Effect of pore architecture and stacking direction on mechanical properties of solid freeform fabrication-based scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2012, 100A(7): 1846–1853
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34149
pmid: 22488723
|
102 |
A Phadke, Y S Hwang, S H Kim, et al.. Effect of scaffold microarchitecture on osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. European Cells & Materials, 2013, 25: 114–129
https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v025a08
pmid: 23329467
|
103 |
X Liu, M N Rahaman, Q Fu. Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13–93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(1): 4889–4898
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.029
pmid: 22922251
|
104 |
Q Fu, M N Rahaman, B S Bal, et al.. In vitro cellular response to hydroxyapatite scaffolds with oriented pore architectures. Materials Science and Engineering C, 2009, 29(7): 2147–2153
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2009.04.016
|
105 |
K M Brouwer, W F Daamen, N van Lochem, et al.. Construction and in vivo evaluation of a dual layered collagenous scaffold with a radial pore structure for repair of the diaphragm. Acta Biomaterialia, 2013, 9(6): 6844–6851
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.003
pmid: 23499986
|
106 |
E S Sanzana, M Navarro, M P Ginebra, et al.. Role of porosity and pore architecture in the in vivo bone regeneration capacity of biodegradable glass scaffolds. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2014, 102(6): 1767–1773
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34845
pmid: 23813739
|
107 |
P Yilgor, R A Sousa, R L Reis, et al.. 3D plotted PCL scaffolds for stem cell based bone tissue engineering. Macromolecular Symposia, 2008, 269(1): 92–99
https://doi.org/10.1002/masy.200850911
|
108 |
C G Jeong, S J Hollister. Mechanical and biochemical assessments of three-dimensional poly(1,8-octanediol-co-citrate) scaffold pore shape and permeability effects on in vitro chondrogenesis using primary chondrocytes. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2010, 16(12): 3759–3768
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0103
pmid: 20666604
|
109 |
C M Bidan, K P Kommareddy, M Rumpler, et al.. Geometry as a factor for tissue growth: Towards shape optimization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2013, 2(1): 186–194
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200159
pmid: 23184876
|
110 |
G C Jr Engelmayr, G D Papworth, S C Watkins, et al.. Guidance of engineered tissue collagen orientation by large-scale scaffold microstructures. Journal of Biomechanics, 2006, 39(10): 1819–1831
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.020
pmid: 16043186
|
111 |
C M Nelson, R P Jean, J L Tan, et al.. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005, 102(33): 11594–11599
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0502575102
pmid: 16049098
|
112 |
M Rumpler, A Woesz, J W C Dunlop, et al.. The effect of geometry on three-dimensional tissue growth. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface, 2008, 5(27): 1173–1180
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0064
pmid: 18348957
|
113 |
A Scarano, M Degidi, V Perrotti, et al.. Experimental evaluation in rabbits of the effects of thread concavities in bone formation with different titanium implant surfaces. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2014, 16(4): 572–581
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12033
pmid: 23305450
|
114 |
U Ripamonti, L C Roden, L F Renton. Osteoinductive hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants. Biomaterials, 2012, 33(15): 3813–3823
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.050
pmid: 22364700
|
115 |
A A Zadpoor. Bone tissue regeneration: The role of scaffold geometry. Biomaterials Science, 2015, 3(2): 231–245
https://doi.org/10.1039/C4BM00291A
pmid: 26218114
|
116 |
F P W Melchels, B Tonnarelli, A L Olivares, et al.. The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(11): 2878–2884
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.023
pmid: 21288567
|
117 |
J Wu, Q Zhao, J Sun, et al.. Preparation of poly(ethylene glycol) aligned porous cryogels using a unidirectional freezing technique. Soft Matter, 2012, 8(13): 3620
https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sm07411g
|
118 |
S Jia, L Liu, W Pan, et al.. Oriented cartilage extracellular matrix-derived scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2012, 113(5): 647–653
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.12.009
pmid: 22265894
|
119 |
A Arora, A Kothari, D S Katti. Pore orientation mediated control of mechanical behavior of scaffolds and its application in cartilage-mimetic scaffold design. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2015, 51: 169–183
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.033
pmid: 26256472
|
120 |
J M Sobral, S G Caridade, R A Sousa, et al.. Three-dimensional plotted scaffolds with controlled pore size gradients: Effect of scaffold geometry on mechanical performance and cell seeding efficiency. Acta Biomaterialia, 2011, 7(3): 1009–1018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.003
pmid: 21056125
|
121 |
A Salerno, D Guarnieri, M Iannone, et al.. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone tissue three-dimensional poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffold on human mesenchymal stem cells invasion, proliferation, and differentiation in vitro. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2010, 16(8): 2661–2673
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0494
pmid: 20687813
|
122 |
S W Choi, Y Zhang, Y Xia. Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering: The importance of uniformity in pore size and structure. Langmuir, 2010, 26(24): 19001–19006
https://doi.org/10.1021/la104206h
pmid: 21090781
|
123 |
H A Declercq, T Desmet, P Dubruel, et al.. The role of scaffold architecture and composition on the bone formation by adipose-derived stem cells. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2014, 20(1–2): 434–444
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0179
pmid: 23998529
|
124 |
K A Hing. Bioceramic bone graft substitutes: Influence of porosity and chemistry. International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology, 2005, 2(3): 184–199
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02020.x
|
125 |
P Chen, J Tao, S Zhu, et al.. Radially oriented collagen scaffold with SDF-1 promotes osteochondral repair by facilitating cell homing. Biomaterials, 2015, 39: 114–123
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.049
pmid: 25477178
|
126 |
E L W de Mulder, G Hannink, N Verdonschot, et al.. Effect of polyurethane scaffold architecture on ingrowth speed and collagen orientation in a subcutaneous rat pocket model. Biomedical Materials, 2013, 8(2): 025004
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/8/2/025004
pmid: 23385628
|
127 |
J Lee, S Shanbhag, N A Kotov. Inverted colloidal crystals as three-dimensional microenvironments for cellular co-cultures. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2006, 16(35): 3558
https://doi.org/10.1039/b605797g
|
128 |
W T Godbey, B S S Hindy, M E Sherman, et al.. A novel use of centrifugal force for cell seeding into porous scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(14): 2799–2805
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.056
pmid: 14962558
|
129 |
J R Mauney, J Blumberg, M Pirun, et al.. Osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells on partially demineralized bone scaffolds in vitro. Tissue Engineering, 2004, 10(1–2): 81–92
https://doi.org/10.1089/107632704322791727
pmid: 15009933
|
130 |
A Nieponice, L Soletti, J Guan, et al.. Development of a tissue-engineered vascular graft combining a biodegradable scaffold, muscle-derived stem cells and a rotational vacuum seeding technique. Biomaterials, 2008, 29(7): 825–833
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.10.044
pmid: 18035412
|
131 |
H Liu, K Roy. Biomimetic three-dimensional cultures significantly increase hematopoietic differentiation efficacy of embryonic stem cells. Tissue Engineering, 2005, 11(1–2): 319–330
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11.319
pmid: 15738685
|
132 |
L Meinel, R Fajardo, S Hofmann, et al.. Silk implants for the healing of critical size bone defects. Bone, 2005, 37(5): 688–698
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.010
pmid: 16140599
|
133 |
B S Chang, C K Lee, K S Hong, et al.. Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(12): 1291–1298
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00030-2
pmid: 10811311
|
134 |
M I Gariboldi, S M Best. Effect of ceramic scaffold architectural parameters on biological response. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2015, 3: 151
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2015.00151
pmid: 26501056
|
135 |
M S Lord, M Foss, F Besenbacher. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today, 2010, 5(1): 66–78
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2010.01.001
|
136 |
B Annaz, K A Hing, M Kayser, et al.. Porosity variation in hydroxyapatite and osteoblast morphology: A scanning electron microscopy study. Journal of Microscopy, 2004, 215(Pt 1): 100–110
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2720.2004.01354.x
pmid: 15230881
|
137 |
D D Deligianni, N D Katsala, P G Koutsoukos, et al.. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials, 2001, 22(1): 87–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5
pmid: 11085388
|
138 |
A Bignon, J Chouteau, J Chevalier, et al.. Effect of micro- and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2003, 14(12): 1089–1097
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JMSM.0000004006.90399.b4
pmid: 15348502
|
139 |
G Zhao, A L Raines, M Wieland, et al.. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials, 2007, 28(18): 2821–2829
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.02.024
pmid: 17368532
|
140 |
K Anselme, P Linez, M Bigerelle, et al.. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(15): 1567–1577
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00042-9
pmid: 10885729
|
141 |
K Anselme, M Bigerelle, B Noel, et al.. Qualitative and quantitative study of human osteoblast adhesion on materials with various surface roughnesses. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2000, 49(2): 155–166
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200002)49:2<155::AID-JBM2>3.0.CO;2-J
pmid: 10571901
|
142 |
J Isaac, J C Hornez, D Jian, et al.. β-TCP microporosity decreases the viability and osteoblast differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2008, 86A(2): 386–393
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31644
pmid: 17969032
|
143 |
Y Takahashi, Y Tabata. Effect of the fiber diameter and porosity of non-woven PET fabrics on the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of Biomaterials Science: Polymer Edition, 2004, 15(1): 41–57
https://doi.org/10.1163/156856204322752228
pmid: 15027842
|
144 |
P Kasten, I Beyen, P Niemeyer, et al.. Porosity and pore size of β-tricalcium phosphate scaffold can influence protein production and osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells: An in vitro and in vivo study. Acta Biomaterialia, 2008, 4(6): 1904–1915
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.017
pmid: 18571999
|
145 |
J Malmström, E Adolfsson, A Arvidsson, et al.. Bone response inside free-form fabricated macroporous hydroxyapatite scaffolds with and without an open microporosity. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2007, 9(2): 79–88
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00031.x
pmid: 17535331
|
146 |
D D Deligianni, N D Katsala, P G Koutsoukos, et al.. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials, 2001, 22(1): 87–96
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5
pmid: 11085388
|
147 |
S W S Laurie, L B Kaban, J B Mulliken, et al.. Donor-site morbidity after harvesting rib and iliac bone. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1984, 73(6): 933–938
https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198406000-00014
pmid: 6374708
|
148 |
S Ruijtenberg, S van den Heuvel. Coordinating cell proliferation and differentiation: Antagonism between cell cycle regulators and cell type-specific gene expression. Cell Cycle, 2016, 15(2): 196–212
https://doi.org/10.1080/15384101.2015.1120925
pmid: 26825227
|
149 |
A Satyanarayana, P Kaldis. Mammalian cell-cycle regulation: Several Cdks, numerous cyclins and diverse compensatory mechanisms. Oncogene, 2009, 28(33): 2925–2939
https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.170
pmid: 19561645
|
150 |
B Boward, T Wu, S Dalton. Control of cell fate through cell cycle and pluripotency networks. Stem Cells, 2016, 34(6): 1427–1436
https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.2345
pmid: 26889666
|
151 |
J Cao, M Spielmann, X Qiu, et al.. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature, 2019, 566(7745): 496–502
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0969-x
pmid: 30787437
|
152 |
D H Kim, S B Khatau, Y Feng, et al.. Actin cap associated focal adhesions and their distinct role in cellular mechanosensing. Scientific Reports, 2012, 2(1): 555
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00555
pmid: 22870384
|
153 |
R P Martins, J D Finan, F Guilak, et al.. Mechanical regulation of nuclear structure and function. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2012, 14(1): 431–455
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124638
pmid: 22655599
|
154 |
S Dupont, L Morsut, M Aragona, et al.. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature, 2011, 474(7350): 179–183
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10137
pmid: 21654799
|
155 |
G Halder, S Dupont, S Piccolo. Transduction of mechanical and cytoskeletal cues by YAP and TAZ. Nature Reviews: Molecular Cell Biology, 2012, 13(9): 591–600
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3416
pmid: 22895435
|
156 |
R Janoštiak, A C Pataki, J Brábek, et al.. Mechanosensors in integrin signaling: The emerging role of p130Cas. European Journal of Cell Biology, 2014, 93(10–12): 445–454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2014.07.002
pmid: 25062607
|
157 |
J Zhang, D Barbieri, H ten Hoopen, et al.. Microporous calcium phosphate ceramics driving osteogenesis through surface architecture. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2015, 103(3): 1188–1199
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35272
pmid: 25044678
|
158 |
P Habibovic, T M Sees, M A van den Doel, et al.. Osteoinduction by biomaterials: Physicochemical and structural influences. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2006, 77A(4): 747–762
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30712
pmid: 16557498
|
159 |
K Rechendorff, M B Hovgaard, M Foss, et al.. Enhancement of protein adsorption induced by surface roughness. Langmuir, 2006, 22(26): 10885–10888
https://doi.org/10.1021/la0621923
pmid: 17154557
|
160 |
I O Smith, X H Liu, L A Smith, et al.. Nanostructured polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechno-logy, 2009, 1(2): 226–236
https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.26
pmid: 20049793
|
161 |
X Liu, P X Ma. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2004, 32(3): 477–486
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ABME.0000017544.36001.8e
pmid: 15095822
|
162 |
S Li, J R De Wijn, J Li, et al.. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate scaffold with high permeability/porosity ratio. Tissue Engineering, 2003, 9(3): 535–548
https://doi.org/10.1089/107632703322066714
pmid: 12857421
|
163 |
Y Li, S T Yang. Effects of three-dimensional scaffolds on cell organization and tissue development. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering; BBE, 2001, 6(5): 311–325
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02932999
|
164 |
R A Perez, J H Kim, J O Buitrago, et al.. Novel therapeutic core–shell hydrogel scaffolds with sequential delivery of cobalt and bone morphogenetic protein-2 for synergistic bone regeneration. Acta Biomaterialia, 2015, 23: 295–308
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.002
pmid: 26054564
|
165 |
R A Perez, S J Seo, J E Won, et al.. Therapeutically relevant aspects in bone repair and regeneration. Materials Today, 2015, 18(10): 573–589
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.06.011
|
166 |
O Oliviero, M Ventre, P A Netti. Functional porous hydrogels to study angiogenesis under the effect of controlled release of vascular endothelial growth factor. Acta Biomaterialia, 2012, 8(9): 3294–3301
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.019
pmid: 22641106
|
167 |
A Artel, H Mehdizadeh, Y C Chiu, et al.. An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2011, 17(17–18): 2133–2141
https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0571
pmid: 21513462
|
168 |
Y Kuboki, Q M Jin, H Takita. Geometry of carriers controlling phenotypic expression in BMP-induced osteogenesis and chondrogenesis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 2001, 83A(Suppl 1): S105–S115
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200100002-00005
pmid: 11314788
|
169 |
B Feng, Z Jinkang, W Zhen, et al.. The effect of pore size on tissue ingrowth and neovascularization in porous bioceramics of controlled architecture in vivo. Biomedical Materials, 2011, 6(1): 015007
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/6/1/015007
pmid: 21206002
|
170 |
V Mouriño, J P Cattalini, A R Boccaccini. Metallic ions as therapeutic agents in tissue engineering scaffolds: An overview of their biological applications and strategies for new developments. Journal of the Royal Society: Interface, 2012, 9(68): 401–419
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0611
pmid: 22158843
|
171 |
H Yamasaki, H Sakai. Osteogenic response to porous hydroxyapatite ceramics under the skin of dogs. Biomaterials, 1992, 13(5): 308–312
https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(92)90054-R
pmid: 1318086
|
172 |
C Klein, K de Groot, W Chen, et al.. Osseous substance formation induced in porous calcium phosphate ceramics in soft tissues. Biomaterials, 1994, 15(1): 31–34
https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90193-7
pmid: 8161654
|
173 |
U Ripamonti. Bone induction in nonhuman primates. An experimental study on the baboon. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991, (269): 284–294
pmid: 1864050
|
174 |
L Wang, B Zhang, C Bao, et al.. Ectopic osteoid and bone formation by three calcium-phosphate ceramics in rats, rabbits and dogs. PLoS One, 2014, 9(9): e107044
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107044
pmid: 25229501
|
175 |
R Z LeGeros. Calcium phosphate-based osteoinductive materials. Chemical Reviews, 2008, 108(11): 4742–4753
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800427g
pmid: 19006399
|
176 |
M P Lutolf, J A Hubbell. Synthetic biomaterials as instructive extracellular microenvironments for morphogenesis in tissue engineering. Nature Biotechnology, 2005, 23(1): 47–55
https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1055
pmid: 15637621
|
177 |
G Wei, P X Ma. Partially nanofibrous architecture of 3D tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(32): 6426–6434
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.012
pmid: 19699518
|
178 |
H Yuan, H Fernandes, P Habibovic, et al.. Osteoinductive ceramics as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010, 107(31): 13614–13619
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003600107
pmid: 20643969
|
179 |
U Ripamonti. The morphogenesis of bone in replicas of porous hydroxyapatite obtained from conversion of calcium carbonate exoskeletons of coral. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: American Volume, 1991, 73(5): 692–703
https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199173050-00007
pmid: 1675218
|
180 |
M Espanol, R A Perez, E B Montufar, et al.. Intrinsic porosity of calcium phosphate cements and its significance for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomaterialia, 2009, 5(7): 2752–2762
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.03.011
pmid: 19357005
|
181 |
A M C Barradas, H Yuan, C A van Blitterswijk, et al.. Osteoinductive biomaterials: current knowledge of properties, experimental models and biological mechanisms. European Cells & Materials, 2011, 21: 407–429, discussion 429
https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v021a31
pmid: 21604242
|
182 |
A Hoppe, N S Güldal, A R Boccaccini. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials, 2011, 32(11): 2757–2774
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.004
pmid: 21292319
|
183 |
P Y Wang, L R Clements, H Thissen, et al.. High-throughput characterisation of osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells using pore size gradients on porous alumina. Biomaterials Science, 2013, 1(9): 924–932
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3bm60026b
pmid: 32481961
|
184 |
A Papadimitropoulos, S A Riboldi, B Tonnarelli, et al.. A collagen network phase improves cell seeding of open-pore structure scaffolds under perfusion. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 2013, 7(3): 183–191
https://doi.org/10.1002/term.506
pmid: 22095721
|
185 |
M Bohner, F Baumgart. Theoretical model to determine the effects of geometrical factors on the resorption of calcium phosphate bone substitutes. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(17): 3569–3582
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.032
pmid: 15020131
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|