Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Materials Science

ISSN 2095-025X

ISSN 2095-0268(Online)

CN 11-5985/TB

Postal Subscription Code 80-974

2018 Impact Factor: 1.701

Front. Mater. Sci.    2024, Vol. 18 Issue (3) : 240699    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-024-0699-3
In vitro evaluation of Zn–10Mg–xHA composites with the core–shell structure
Zeqin Cui1,2(), Qifeng Hu1,2, Jianzhong Wang3(), Lei Zhou1,2, Xiaohu Hao1,2, Wenxian Wang1,2, Weiguo Li4, Weili Cheng1, Cheng Chang5
1. College of Materials Science and Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
2. Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering, Taiyuan 030000, China
3. State Key Laboratory of Porous Metal Materials, Northwest Institute for Non-ferrous Metal Research, Xi’an 710016, China
4. Engineering Training Center, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China
5. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Modern Surface Engineering Technology, National Engineering Laboratory of Modern Materials Surface Engineering Technology, Institute of New Materials, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510651, China
 Download: PDF(5813 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

Zinc-based composites represent promising materials for orthopedic implants owing to their adjustable degradation rates and excellent biocompatibility. In this study, a series of Zn–10Mg–xHA (x = 0–5 wt.%) composites with the core–shell structure were prepared through spark plasma sintering, and their microstructural, mechanical, and in vitro properties were systematically evaluated. Results showed that the doped hydroxyapatite (HA) is concentrated at the outer edge of the MgZn2 shell layer. The compression strength of the Zn‒10Mg‒HA composite gradually decreased with the increase of the HA content, while its corrosion rate decreased initially and then increased. The corrosion resistance of the composite with the addition of 1 wt.% HA was improved compared to that of Zn–10Mg–0HA. However, the further increase of the HA content beyond 1 wt.% resulted in a faster degradation of the composite. Moreover, the Zn–10Mg–1HA composite significantly enhanced the activity of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. Based on such findings, it is revealed that the composite containing 1 wt.% HA exhibits superior overall properties and is anticipated to serve as a promising candidate for bone implant materials.

Keywords zinc-based composite      hydroxyapatite      mechanical property      in vitro degradation behavior      biocompatibility     
Corresponding Author(s): Zeqin Cui,Jianzhong Wang   
Issue Date: 10 September 2024
 Cite this article:   
Zeqin Cui,Qifeng Hu,Jianzhong Wang, et al. In vitro evaluation of Zn–10Mg–xHA composites with the core–shell structure[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2024, 18(3): 240699.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foms/EN/10.1007/s11706-024-0699-3
https://academic.hep.com.cn/foms/EN/Y2024/V18/I3/240699
Fig.1  Sample preparation: (a) temperature?time and pressure?time curves for SPS; (b) photographs of sintered samples.
Fig.2  Schematic illustration of a dynamic simulation device.
Sample Theoretical density/(g·cm?3) Actual density/(g·cm?3) Relative density/%
ZM?0HA 5.45 5.37 98.5 ± 0.372
ZM?1HA 5.41 5.32 98.3 ± 0.098
ZM?3HA 5.33 5.18 97.2 ± 0.254
ZM?5HA 5.26 5.07 96.4 ± 0.116
Tab.1  Theoretical, actual, and relative densities of tested samples
Fig.3  Microstructures and elemental distributions of samples: (a) morphologies of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA; (b) element distributions of ZM?0HA and ZM?3HA.
Position Zn content/at.% Mg content/at.%
P1 97.2 2.8
P2 68.1 31.9
P3 3.7 96.3
Tab.2  Elemental scanning analysis results of Zn and Mg for the core?shell structure
Fig.4  Microstructures and compositional analyses: (a) backscattering topography of the ZM–1HA composite; (b) energy spectrum analysis of the core–shell structure in the amplified region of Panel (a); (c) scanning results of the white straight line in the shell region of Panel (b); (d) XRD patterns of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA.
Fig.5  Mechanical properties of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples: (a) elastic moduli; (b) microhardness values; (c) compression properties; (d)(e)(f) load?displacement curves for matrix, shell, and core.
Fig.6  Fracture images of samples: (a) ZM?0HA; (b) ZM?1HA; (c) ZM?3HA; (d) ZM?5HA.
Fig.7  Electrochemical and dynamic degradation behaviors of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples: (a) polarization curves; (b) Nyquist plots; (c) average corrosion rates under different durations; (d) average corrosion rates after static and dynamic immersions for 7 d.
Composite Ecorr/V Jcorr/(μA·cm?2) CRp/(mm·year?1)
ZM?0HA ?1.364 ± 0.015 14.576 ± 1.376 0.274 ± 0.043
ZM?1HA ?1.334 ± 0.033 10.990 ± 2.813 0.206 ± 0.014
ZM?3HA ?1.384 ± 0.004 17.507 ± 1.670 0.329 ± 0.068
ZM?5HA ?1.345 ± 0.007 19.355 ± 0.994 0.362 ± 0.075
Tab.3  Corrosion properties of samples derived from the electrochemical test
Fig.8  Morphology observation and microstructures of samples after dynamic immersion: (a) surface morphologies of samples; (b) surface microstructures of samples after 30 d of immersion for ZM?0HA (b1) and ZM?1HA (b2); (c) microstructures of corrosion products on sample surfaces with corresponding EDS scans of ZM?0HA (c1)(c2) and ZM?1HA (c3)(c4); (d) XRD pattern of the degradation product.
Fig.9  Corrosion morphologies of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples after immersion for 7 and 30 d.
Fig.10  The 7-d immersion test results of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples: (a) variations of the pH values with the immersion time; (b) a schematic diagram of the hydrogen collection; (c) variations of the hydrogen evolution volumes with the immersion time; (d) variations of the corrosion rates with the immersion time.
Fig.11  Schematic diagrams of the corrosion degradation mechanism for composites: (a) galvanic corrosion; (b) exchange of HA ions.
Fig.12  Live/dead fluorescent images of osteoblasts after culturing for 1, 3, and 5 d on surfaces of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples.
Fig.13  MTT results of osteoblasts after culturing for 1, 3, and 5 d on surfaces of ZM?0HA, ZM?1HA, ZM?3HA, and ZM?5HA samples (**p < 0.01).
1 F Witte . The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: a review.Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6(5): 1680–1692
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.02.028
2 N, Li Y F Zheng . Novel magnesium alloys developed for biomedical application: a review.Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2013, 29(6): 489–502
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.005
3 H T, Yang B, Jia Z C, Zhang et al.. Alloying design of biodegradable zinc as promising bone implants for load-bearing applications.Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 401
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14153-7
4 G K, Levy J, Goldman E Aghion . The prospects of zinc as a structural material for biodegradable implants — a review paper.Metals, 2017, 7(10): 402
https://doi.org/10.3390/met7100402
5 S X, Zhang X N, Zhang C L, Zhao et al.. Research on an Mg–Zn alloy as a degradable biomaterial.Acta Biomaterialia, 2010, 6(2): 626–640
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.06.028
6 M S, Song R C, Zeng Y F, Ding et al.. Recent advances in biodegradation controls over Mg alloys for bone fracture management: a review.Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2019, 35(4): 535–544
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.10.008
7 J, Kubásek D, Vojtěch I, Pospíšilová et al.. Microstructure and mechanical properties of the micrograined hypoeutectic Zn–Mg alloy.International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials, 2016, 23(10): 1167–1176
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-016-1336-7
8 C, Xiao L Q, Wang Y P, Ren et al.. Indirectly extruded biodegradable Zn–0.05wt%Mg alloy with improved strength and ductility: in vitro and in vivo studies.Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2018, 34(9): 1618–1627
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2018.01.006
9 S R, Dutta D, Passi P, Singh et al.. Ceramic and non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft material: a brief review.Irish Journal of Medical Science, 2015, 184(1): 101–106
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1199-8
10 R Z LeGeros . Calcium phosphate-based osteoinductive materials.Chemical Reviews, 2008, 108(11): 4742–4753
https://doi.org/10.1021/cr800427g
11 A K, Nayak M, Maity H, Barik et al.. Bioceramic materials in bone-implantable drug delivery systems: a review.Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, 2024, 95: 105524
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jddst.2024.105524
12 X H, Yu X Y, Tang S V, Gohil et al.. Biomaterials for bone regenerative engineering.Advanced Healthcare Materials, 2015, 4(9): 1268–1285
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201400760
13 R, Sergi D, Bellucci R T Jr, Candidato et al.. Bioactive Zn-doped hydroxyapatite coatings and their antibacterial efficacy against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus.Surface and Coatings Technology, 2018, 352: 84–91
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.08.017
14 J, Pinc E, Miklášová F, Průša et al.. Influence of processing on the microstructure and the mechanical properties of Zn/HA8 wt.% biodegradable composite. Manufacturing Technology, 2019, 19(5): 836–841
https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/381.2019/a/1213-2489/MT/19/5/836
15 H T, Yang X H, Qu W J, Lin et al.. In vitro and in vivo studies on zinc‒hydroxyapatite composites as novel biodegradable metal matrix composite for orthopedic applications.Acta Biomaterialia, 2018, 71: 200–214
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.007
16 Z, Zhen T F, Xi Y F Zheng . A review on in vitro corrosion performance test of biodegradable metallic materials.Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(8): 2283–2293
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62730-2
17 A, Oyane H M, Kim T, Furuya et al.. Preparation and assessment of revised simulated body fluids.Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2003, 65A(2): 188–195
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10482
18 C H, Cai R B, Song L X, Wang et al.. Effect of anodic T phase on surface micro-galvanic corrosion of biodegradable Mg–Zn–Zr–Nd alloys.Applied Surface Science, 2018, 462: 243–254
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.107
19 Y, Zhao Y H, Sun W W, Lan et al.. Self-assembled nanosheets on NiTi alloy facilitate endothelial cell function and manipulate macrophage immune response.Journal of Materials Science and Technology, 2021, 78: 110–120
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2020.10.054
20 X F, Gu L M, Zhang M J, Yang et al.. Fabrication by SPS and thermophysical properties of high volume fraction SiCp/Al matrix composites.Key Engineering Materials, 2006, 313: 171–176
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.313.171
21 S, Jaiswal R M, Kumar P, Gupta et al.. Mechanical, corrosion and biocompatibility behaviour of Mg–3Zn–HA biodegradable composites for orthopaedic fixture accessories.Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2018, 78: 442–454
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.030
22 K, Rezwan Q Z, Chen J J, Blaker et al.. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomaterials, 2006, 27(18): 3413–3431
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039
23 Z Y, Zhang D, Wang L X, Liang et al.. Corrosion resistance of Ca–P coating induced by layer-by-layer assembled polyvinylpyrrolidone/DNA multilayer on magnesium AZ31 alloy.Frontiers of Materials Science, 2021, 15(3): 391–405
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-021-0560-x
24 R H, Yao Y Y, Zhao S Y, Han et al.. Microstructure, mechanical properties, in vitro degradation behavior and in vivo osteogenic activities of Zn–1Mg–β-TCP composites for bone defect repair.Materials & Design, 2023, 225: 111494
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111494
25 H R, Zheng M F, Chen Z, Li et al.. Effects of MgO modified HA nanoparticles on the microstructure and properties of Mg–Zn–Zr/m-HA composites.Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 2017, 53(10): 1364–1376 (in Chinese)
https://doi.org/10.11900/0412.1961.2017.00249
26 J, Venezuela M S Dargusch . The influence of alloying and fabrication techniques on the mechanical properties, biodegradability and biocompatibility of zinc: a comprehensive review.Acta Biomaterialia, 2019, 87: 1–40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.035
27 Y H, Lao W W, Zhang X F, Xu et al.. Dynamic degradation behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy in artificial plasma.Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 2014, 43(5): 1242–1245
28 J, Kubásek D, Vojtěch E, Jablonská et al.. Structure, mechanical characteristics and in vitro degradation, cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and mutagenicity of novel biodegradable Zn–Mg alloys.Materials Science and Engineering C, 2016, 58: 24–35
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.015
29 J W, Lee B R, Park S Y, Oh et al.. Mechanistic study on the cut-edge corrosion behaviors of Zn–Al–Mg alloy coated steel sheets in chloride containing environments.Corrosion Science, 2019, 160: 108170
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2019.108170
30 H, Kabir K, Munir C, Wen et al.. Recent research and progress of biodegradable zinc alloys and composites for biomedical applications: biomechanical and biocorrosion perspectives.Bioactive Materials, 2021, 6(3): 836–879
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.09.013
31 S, Thomas N, Birbilis M S, Venkatraman et al.. Corrosion of zinc as a function of pH.Corrosion, 2012, 68(1): 015009
https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3676630
32 L, Zhang Z Y, He Y Q, Zhang et al.. Enhanced in vitro bioactivity of porous NiTi–HA composites with interconnected pore characteristics prepared by spark plasma sintering.Materials & Design, 2016, 101: 170–180
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.128
33 J, Ma N, Zhao D H Zhu . Bioabsorbable zinc ion induced biphasic cellular responses in vascular smooth muscle cells.Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 26661
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26661
34 Z H, Zhang D B, Liu Z Y, Chen et al.. Fabrication, in vitro and in vivo properties of β-TCP/Zn composites.Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2022, 913: 165223
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165223
[1] Chaiqiong Guo, Xuhong He, Xuanyu Liu, Yuhui Wang, Yan Wei, Ziwei Liang, Di Huang. A comprehensive review on surface modifications of black phosphorus using biological macromolecules[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2024, 18(2): 240689-.
[2] Hang Zhang, Shu Cai, Huanlin Zhang, Lei Ling, You Zuo, Hao Tian, Tengfei Meng, Guohua Xu, Xiaogang Bao, Mintao Xue. Hydroxyapatite/palmitic acid superhydrophobic composite coating on AZ31 magnesium alloy with both corrosion resistance and bacterial inhibition[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2024, 18(1): 240678-.
[3] Weiwei Lan, Mingbo Wang, Zhenjun Lv, Jun Li, Fuying Chen, Ziwei Liang, Di Huang, Xiaochun Wei, Weiyi Chen. Carbon nanotubes-reinforced polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite porous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2024, 18(1): 240675-.
[4] Wenjing Li, Ni Wu, Sai Che, Li Sun, Hongchen Liu, Guang Ma, Ye Wang, Chong Xu, Yongfeng Li. Polyurethane foam-supported three-dimensional interconnected graphene nanosheets network encapsulated in polydimethylsiloxane to achieve significant thermal conductivity enhancement[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2023, 17(3): 230653-.
[5] Zaoming Wu, Qiang Li, Xiaofeng Yang. Research and development of nanocrystalline W/W-based materials: novel preparation approaches, formation mechanisms, and unprecedented excellent properties[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2023, 17(1): 230634-.
[6] Ziming Liao, Jingxuan Li, Yimeng Su, Fenyan Miao, Xiumei Zhang, Yu Gu, Jingjing Du, Ruiqiang Hang, Yan Wei, Weiyi Chen, Di Huang. Antibacterial hydroxyapatite coatings on titanium dental implants[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2023, 17(1): 230628-.
[7] Xiang SUN, Qing-Song YAO, Yu-Chao LI, Fen ZHANG, Rong-Chang ZENG, Yu-Hong ZOU, Shuo-Qi LI. Biocorrosion resistance and biocompatibility of Mg--Al layered double hydroxide/poly(L-lactic acid) hybrid coating on magnesium alloy AZ31[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2020, 14(4): 426-441.
[8] Lei CHANG, Xiangrui LI, Xuhui TANG, He ZHANG, Ding HE, Yujun WANG, Jiayin ZHAO, Jingan LI, Jun WANG, Shijie ZHU, Liguo WANG, Shaokang GUAN. Micro-patterned hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin coatings on Mg--Zn--Y--Nd--Zr alloys for better corrosion resistance and cell behavior guidance[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2020, 14(4): 413-425.
[9] Chengzhi YANG, Shikun CHEN, Huilan SU, Haoyue ZHANG, Jianfei TANG, Cuiping GUO, Fang SONG, Wang ZHANG, Jiajun GU, Qinglei LIU. Biocompatible, small-sized and well-dispersed gold nanoparticles regulated by silk fibroin fiber from Bombyx mori cocoons[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2019, 13(2): 126-132.
[10] Xiao-Jing JI, Qiang CHENG, Jing WANG, Yan-Bin ZHAO, Zhuang-Zhuang HAN, Fen ZHANG, Shuo-Qi LI, Rong-Chang ZENG, Zhen-Lin WANG. Corrosion resistance and antibacterial effects of hydroxyapatite coating induced by polyacrylic acid and gentamicin sulfate on magnesium alloy[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2019, 13(1): 87-98.
[11] Zhicun WANG, Xiaoman HAN, Yixi WANG, Kenan MEN, Lin CUI, Jianning WU, Guihua MENG, Zhiyong LIU, Xuhong GUO. Facile preparation of low swelling, high strength, self-healing and pH-responsive hydrogels based on the triple-network structure[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2019, 13(1): 54-63.
[12] Feng LI, Yang LIU, Xu-Bo LI. Dynamic recrystallization behavior of AZ31 magnesium alloy processed by alternate forward extrusion[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2017, 11(3): 296-305.
[13] Xian-Ping WANG,Yi ZHANG,Yu XIA,Wei-Bing JIANG,Hui LIU,Wang LIU,Yun-Xia GAO,Tao ZHANG,Qian-Feng FANG. Enhanced micro-vibration sensitive high-damping capacity and mechanical strength achieved in Al matrix composites reinforced with garnet-like lithium electrolyte[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2017, 11(1): 75-81.
[14] Ming LI,Pan XIONG,Maosong MO,Yan CHENG,Yufeng ZHENG. Electrophoretic-deposited novel ternary silk fibroin/graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite coatings on titanium substrate for orthopedic applications[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2016, 10(3): 270-280.
[15] Yu-Hong ZOU,Rong-Chang ZENG,Qing-Zhao WANG,Li-Jun LIU,Qian-Qian XU,Chuang WANG,Zhiwei LIU. Blood compatibility of zinc–calcium phosphate conversion coating on Mg–1.33Li–0.6Ca alloy[J]. Front. Mater. Sci., 2016, 10(3): 281-289.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed