Please wait a minute...
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN 2095-0179

ISSN 2095-0187(Online)

CN 11-5981/TQ

Postal Subscription Code 80-969

2018 Impact Factor: 2.809

Front. Chem. Sci. Eng.    2023, Vol. 17 Issue (5) : 617-633    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-022-2258-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Denitrification performance and sulfur resistance mechanism of Sm–Mn catalyst for low temperature NH3-SCR
Junlin Xie1,3, Yanli Ye1,3, Qinglei Li1,3, Tianhong Kang1,3, Sensheng Hou1,3, Qiqi Jin1,3, Feng He1,3, De Fang1,2()
1. State Key Laboratory of Silicate Materials for Architectures, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
2. Center for Materials Research and Analysis, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3. School of Materials Science and Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
 Download: PDF(8106 KB)   HTML
 Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks
Abstract

MnOx and Sm–Mn catalysts were prepared with the coprecipitation method, and they showed excellent activities and sulfur resistances for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 between 50 and 300 °C in the presence of excess oxygen. 0.10Sm–Mn catalyst indicated better catalytic activity and sulfur resistance. Additionally, the Sm doping led to multi-aspect impacts on the phases, morphology structures, gas adsorption, reactions process, and specific surface areas. Therefore, it significantly enhances the NO conversion, N2 selectivity, and sulfur resistance. Based on various experimental characterization results, the reaction mechanism of catalysts and the effect of SO2 on the reaction process about the catalysts were extensively explored. For 0.10Sm–Mn catalyst, manganese sulfate and sulfur ammonium cannot be generated broadly under the influence of SO2 and the amount of surface adsorbed oxygen. The Bronsted acid sites strengthen significantly due to the addition of SO2, enhancing the sulfur resistance of the 0.10Sm–Mn catalyst.

Keywords MnOx      Sm–Mn      catalyst      NH3-SCR      sulfur resistance     
Corresponding Author(s): De Fang   
About author:

*These authors equally shared correspondence to this manuscript.

Online First Date: 03 March 2023    Issue Date: 28 April 2023
 Cite this article:   
Junlin Xie,Yanli Ye,Qinglei Li, et al. Denitrification performance and sulfur resistance mechanism of Sm–Mn catalyst for low temperature NH3-SCR[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 617-633.
 URL:  
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/10.1007/s11705-022-2258-8
https://academic.hep.com.cn/fcse/EN/Y2023/V17/I5/617
Fig.1  Performances of catalysts with different Sm content: (a) SCR activity; (b) N2 selectivity; (c) sulfur resistance at 160 °C.
Fig.2  XRD patterns of catalysts: (a) MnOx before poisoning; (b) MnOx after poisoning; (c) 0.10Sm–Mn before poisoning; (d) 0.10Sm–Mn after poisoning.
Fig.3  TG-DTG diagrams of MnOx and 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts: (a) MnOx before poisoning; (b) MnOx after poisoning; (c) 0.10Sm–Mn before poisoning; (d) 0.10Sm–Mn after poisoning.
SampleSurface atomic concentration/%Relative concentration ratios/%
MnSmSOβ/Oα+β
MnOx18.2416.77
MnOx-S27.592.4531.65
Sm–MnOx18.136.4951.12
Sm–MnOx-S14.875.684.6864.66
Tab.1  Surface atomic concentration and relative concentration ratios by XPS
Fig.4  O1s spectra of catalysts: (a) 0.10Sm–Mn after poisoning, (b) 0.10Sm–Mn before poisoning, (c) MnOx after poisoning, (d) MnOx before poisoning; S2p spectra of catalysts: (e) 0.10Sm–Mn after poisoning, (f) MnOx after poisoning.
Fig.5  SEM images of MnOx and 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts: (a) MnOx before poisoning; (b) MnOx after poisoning; (c) 0.10Sm–Mn before poisoning; (d) 0.10Sm–Mn after poisoning.
SampleSurface area/(m2·g–1)Pore volume/(cm3·g–1)Pore size/nm
(a)48.90.0102.189
(b)35.00.0012.176
(c)145.20.0892.224
(d)120.60.0792.188
Tab.2  Surface area and pore structure of MnOx and 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts before and after poisoning
Fig.6  NH3-TPD profiles of MnOx and 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts before and after poisoning.
Fig.7  H2-TPR profiles of MnOx and 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts before and after poisoning.
Fig.8  Adsorption of reaction gases on MnOx catalyst surface: (a) NH3; (b) NH3 and O2; (c) NH3, O2 and NO.
Fig.9  Adsorption of reaction gases on MnOx catalyst surface: (a) NO; (b) NO and O2; (c) NO, O2 and NH3.
Fig.10  Adsorption of reaction gases on 0.10Sm–Mn catalyst surface: (a) NH3; (b) NH3 and O2; (c) NH3, O2 and NO.
Fig.11  Adsorption of reaction gases on 0.10Sm–Mn catalyst surface: (a) NO; (b) NO and O2; (c) NO, O2 and NH3.
Fig.12  (a) DRIFT results of NH3 absorption for poisoned MnOx poisoned by SO2; (b) DRIFT results of NH3 absorption for poisoned 0.10Sm–Mn poisoned by SO2; (c) infrared spectra of NH3 absorption for 30 min of fresh (1) and SO2 poisoned (2) 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts.
Fig.13  (a) DRIFT results of NO absorption for poisoned MnOx poisoned by SO2; (b) DRIFT results of NO absorption for poisoned 0.10Sm–Mn poisoned by SO2; (c) infrared spectra of NO absorption for 30 min of fresh (1) and SO2 poisoned (2) 0.10Sm–Mn catalysts.
1 Z Peng, L H Chen, M H Sun, P Wu, C Cai, Z Deng, Y Li, W H Zheng, B L Su. Template-free synthesis of hierarchically macro-mesoporous Mn-TiO2 catalysts for selective reduction of NO with NH3. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(1): 43–49
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-017-1679-2
2 D Damma, D K Pappas, T Boningari, P G Smirniotis. Study of Ce, Sb, and Y exchanged titania nanotubes and superior catalytic performance for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2021, 287: 119939
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.119939
3 D Fang, K Qi, F X Li, F He, J L Xie. Excellent sulfur tolerance performance over Fe-SO4/TiO2 catalysts for NH3-SCR: influence of sulfation and Fe-based sulfates. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2022, 10(1): 107038
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.107038
4 W W Yang, F D Liu, L J Xie, Z H Lian, H He. Effect of V2O5 additive on the SO2 resistance of a Fe2O3/AC catalyst for NH3-SCR of NOx at low temperatures. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2016, 55(10): 2677–2685
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b04974
5 D Fang, F He, J L Xie, Z B Fu, J F Chen. Effects of atmospheres and precursors on MnOx/TiO2 catalysts for NH3-SCR at low temperature. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Materials Science Edition, 2013, 28(5): 888–892
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-013-0787-1
6 D Fang, J L Xie, H Hu, H Yang, F He, Z B Fu. Identification of MnOx species and Mn valence states in MnOx/TiO2 catalysts for low temperature SCR. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 271: 23–30
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.072
7 D Fang, F He, J L Xie. Characterization and performance of common alkali metals and alkaline earth metals loaded Mn/TiO2 catalysts for NOx removal with NH3. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(2): 319–331
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.01.004
8 S C Xiong, Y Peng, D Wang, N Huang, Q F Zhang, S J Yang, J J Chen, J H Li. The role of the Cu dopant on a Mn3O4 spinel SCR catalyst: improvement of low-temperature activity and sulfur resistance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 387: 124090
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124090
9 M Kantcheva. Identification, stability, and reactivity of NOx species adsorbed on titania-supported manganese catalysts. Journal of Catalysis, 2001, 204(2): 479–494
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2001.3413
10 X M Wu, X L Yu, X Y He, G H Jing. Insight into low-temperature catalytic NO reduction with NH3 on Ce-doped manganese oxide octahedral molecular sieves. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2019, 123(17): 10981–10990
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01048
11 B Thirupathi, G Smirniotis. Co-doping a metal (Cr, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Ce, and Zr) on Mn/TiO2 catalyst and its effect on the selective reduction of NO with NH3 at low-temperatures. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2011, 110: 195–206
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.001
12 S Roy, B Viswanath, M S Hegde, G Madras. Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Ti0.9M0.1O2-δ (M = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Cu). Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, 112(15): 6002–6012
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp7117086
13 J Yu, F Guo, Y L Wang, J H Zhu, Y Y Liu, F B Su, S Q Gao, G W Xu. Sulfur poisoning resistant mesoporous Mn-base catalyst for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2010, 95(1-2): 160–168
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.12.023
14 J Y Chen, P Fu, D F Lv, Y Chen, M L Fan, J L Wu, A Meshram, B Mu, X Li, Q B Xia. Unusual positive effect of SO2 on Mn-Ce mixed-oxide catalyst for the SCR reaction of NOx with NH3. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2021, 407: 127071
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127071
15 R B Jin, Y Liu, Y Wang, W L Cen, Z B Wu, H Q Wang, X L Weng. The role of cerium in the improved SO2 tolerance for NO reduction with NH3 over Mn-Ce/TiO2 catalyst at low temperature. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2014, 148-149: 582–588
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.09.016
16 W Lu, S P Cui, H X Guo, X Y Ma, L J Zhang. DRIFT and DFT study of cerium addition on SO2 of manganese-based catalysts for low temperature SCR. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2016, 421: 102–108
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2016.05.013
17 Z B Wu, R B Jin, H Q Wang, Y Liu. Effect of ceria doping on SO2 resistance of Mn/TiO2 for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperature. Catalysis Communications, 2009, 10(6): 935–939
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2008.12.032
18 L A Gan, K Z Li, W N Yang, J J Chen, Y Peng, J H Li. Core-shell-like structured α-MnO2@CeO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO: promoted activity and SO2 tolerance. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 391: 123473
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123473
19 C Chen, H D Xie, P W He, X Liu, C Yang, N Wang, C M Ge. Comparison of low-temperature catalytic activity and H2O/SO2 resistance of the Ce–Mn/TiO2 NH3-SCR catalysts prepared by the reverse co-precipitation, co-precipitation and impregnation method. Applied Surface Science, 2022, 571: 151285
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151285
20 W Lu, Z W Wang, Y X Liu, G S Guo, H X Dai, S P Cui, J G Deng. Support promotion effect on the SO2 and K+ co-poisoning resistance of MnO2/TiO2 for NH3-SCR of NO. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 416: 126117
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126117
21 Z C Han, Q B Yu, Z J Xue, K J Liu, Q Qin. Sm-doped manganese-based Zr–Fe polymeric pillared interlayered montmorillonite for low temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3 in metallurgical sintering flue gas. RSC Advances, 2018, 8(73): 42017–42024
https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09434A
22 D M Meng, W C Zhan, Y Guo, Y L Guo, L Wang, G Z Lu. A highly effective catalyst of Sm–MnOx for the NH3-SCR of NOx at low temperature: promotional role of Sm and its catalytic performance. ACS Catalysis, 2015, 5(10): 5973–5983
https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b00747
23 L J Liu, K Xu, S Su, L M He, M X Qing, H Y Chi, T Liu, S Hu, Y Wang, J Xiang. Efficient Sm modified Mn/TiO2 catalysts for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 at low temperature. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, 592: 117413
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117413
24 L Chen, J Yang, S Ren, Z C Chen, Y H Zhou, W Z Liu. Effects of Sm modification on biochar supported Mn oxide catalysts for low-temperature NH3-SCR of NO. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2021, 98: 234–243
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2021.07.003
25 D Fang, F He, X Q Liu, K Qi, J L Xie, F X Li, C Q Yu. Low temperature NH3-SCR of NO over an unexpected Mn-based catalyst: promotional effect of Mg doping. Applied Surface Science, 2018, 427: 45–55
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.088
26 D Fang, J L Xie, H Hu, Z Zhang, F He, Y Zheng, Q Zhang. Effects of precursors and preparation methods on the potassium deactivation of MnOx/TiO2 catalysts for NO removal. Fuel Processing Technology, 2015, 134: 465–472
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.03.001
27 D Fang, D Li, F He, J L Xie, C C Xiong, Y L Chen. Experimental and DFT study of the adsorption and activation of NH3 and NO on Mn-based spinels supported on TiO2 catalysts for SCR of NOx. Computational Materials Science, 2019, 160: 374–381
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.01.025
28 D Fang, S S Hou, Y Y Ye, Q Q Jin, F He, J L Xie. Insight into highly efficient FeOx catalysts for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx by NH3: experimental and DFT study. Applied Surface Science, 2022, 599: 153998
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153998
29 C J Powell. Calibrations and checks of the binding-energy scales of X-ray photoelectron spectrometers. Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 2022, 257: 146808
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2018.11.007
30 D Fang, F He, J L Xie, L H Xue. Calibration of binding energy positions with C1s for XPS results. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Materials Science Edition, 2020, 35(4): 711–718
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11595-020-2312-7
31 C Z Sun, H Liu, W Chen, D Z Chen, S H Yu, A N Liu, L Dong, S Feng. Insights into the Sm/Zr co-doping effects on N2 selectivity and SO2 resistance of a MnOx-TiO2 catalyst for the NH3-SCR reaction. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 347: 27–40
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.029
32 Z C Chen, S Ren, M M Wang, J Yang, L Chen, W Z Liu, Q C Liu, B Su. Insights into samarium doping effects on catalytic activity and SO2 tolerance of MnFeOx catalyst for low-temperature NH3-SCR reaction. Fuel, 2022, 321: 124113
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124113
33 G S Qi, R T Yang. Performance and kinetics study for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over MnOx-CeO2 catalyst. Journal of Catalysis, 2013, 217(2): 434–441
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(03)00081-2
34 L Q Mao, A T-Raissi, C Huang, N Z Muradov. Thermal decomposition of (NH4)2SO4 in presence of Mn3O4. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(10): 5822–5827
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.011
35 T K Tseng, H Chu, H H Hsu. Characterization of γ-alumina-supported manganese oxide as an incineration catalyst for trichloroethylene. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(1): 171–176
https://doi.org/10.1021/es0255960
36 R B Jin, Y Liu, Z B Wu, H Q Wang, T T Gu. Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over Mn–Ce oxides supported on TiO2 and Al2O3: a comparative study. Chemosphere, 2010, 78(9): 1160–1166
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.11.049
37 G S Qi, R T Yang. Characterization and FTIR studies of MnOx–CeO2 catalyst for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(40): 15738–15747
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048431h
38 M Mihaylov, K Chakarova, K Hadjiivanov. Formation of carbonyl and nitrosyl complexes on titania- and zirconia-supported nickel: FTIR spectroscopy study. Journal of Catalysis, 2004, 228(2): 273–281
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2004.08.039
39 C C Zhou, Y P Zhang, X L Wang, H T Xu, K Q Sun, K Shen. Influence of the addition of transition metals (Cr, Zr, Mo) on the properties of MnOx–FeOx catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx by ammonia. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2013, 392: 319–324
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.002
40 I Atribak, B Azambre, A B Lopez, A Garcia-Garcia. Effect of NOx adsorption/desorption over ceria-zirconia catalysts on the catalytic combustion of model soot. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2009, 92(1–2): 126–137
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.07.015
41 W S Kijlstra, D S Brands, E K Poels, A Bliek. Kinetics of the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over MnOx/Al2O3 catalysts at low temperatures. Catalysis Today, 1999, 50(1): 133–140
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00470-2
42 W S Kijlstra, D S Brands, H I Smit, E K Poels, A Bliek. Mechanism of the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over MnOx/Al2O3. Journal of Catalysis, 1997, 171(1): 208–218
https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1997.1788
43 K I Hadjiivanov. Identification of neutral and charged NxOy surface species by IR spectroscopy. Catalysis Reviews, 2007, 42(1): 71–144
44 W C Wang, G McCool, N Kapur, G Yuan, B Shan, M Nguyen, U M Graham, B H Davis, G Jacobs, K Cho, X K Hao. Mixed-phase oxide catalyst based on Mn-mullite (Sm, Gd)Mn2O5 for NO oxidation in diesel exhaust. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 832–835
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225091
45 L J Yan, Y Y Liu, K W Zha, H R Li, L Y Shi, D S Zhang. Scale-activity relationship of MnOx-FeOy nanocage catalysts derived from Prussian blue analogues for low-temperature NO reduction: experimental and DFT studies. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(3): 2581–2593
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15527
46 S Liu, X D Wu, D Weng, R Rui. NOx-assisted soot oxidation on Pt–Mg/Al2O3 catalysts: magnesium precursor, Pt particle size, and Pt–Mg interaction. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2012, 51(5): 2271–2279
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie202239c
47 P G Smirniotis, P M Sreekanth, D A Penna, R G Jenkins. Manganese oxide catalysts supported on TiO2, Al2O3, and SiO2: a comparison for low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(19): 6436–6443
https://doi.org/10.1021/ie060484t
48 W Ren, B Zhao, Y Q Zhuo, C Chen. Catalytic mechanism of NaY zeolite supported FeSO4 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NOx. In: Qi H, Zhao B, eds. 7th International Symposium on Coal Combustion. Berlin: Springer, 2012, 357–362
49 E M Holmgreen, M Yung, Y U S Ozkan. Pd-based sulfated zirconia prepared by a single step sol–gel procedure for lean NOx reduction. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2007, 270(1–2): 101–111
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2007.01.030
[1] Xin Chen, Liang Luo, Shihong Huang, Xingbo Ge, Xiuyun Zhao. Heterometallic cluster-based organic frameworks as highly active electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reaction: a density functional theory study[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(5): 570-580.
[2] Zihuan Yu, Haiqing Yan, Chaonan Wang, Zheng Wang, Huiqin Yao, Rong Liu, Cheng Li, Shulan Ma. Oxygen-deficient MoOx/Ni3S2 heterostructure grown on nickel foam as efficient and durable self-supported electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(4): 437-448.
[3] Junjun Cheng, Yitao Zhao, Guohao Xu, Peng Zhang, Xuedong Zhu, Fan Yang. ZnxZr/HZSM-5 as efficient catalysts for alkylation of benzene with carbon dioxide[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(4): 404-414.
[4] Lihong Chen, Ruxin Deng, Shaoshi Guo, Zihuan Yu, Huiqin Yao, Zhenglong Wu, Keren Shi, Huifeng Li, Shulan Ma. Synergistic effect of V and Fe in Ni/Fe/V ternary layered double hydroxides for efficient and durable oxygen evolution reaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2023, 17(1): 102-115.
[5] Vinayak Hegde, Parimal Pandit, Pranita Rananaware, Varsha P. Brahmkhatri. Sulfonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica catalyst with different morphology for biodiesel production[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(8): 1198-1210.
[6] Kumar Siddharth, Yian Wang, Jing Wang, Fei Xiao, Gabriel Sikukuu Nambafu, Usman Bin Shahid, Fei Yang, Ernest Pahuyo Delmo, Minhua Shao. Platinum on nitrogen doped graphene and tungsten carbide supports for ammonia electro-oxidation reaction[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 930-938.
[7] Shitong Cui, Jun Ge. Diffusion process in enzyme–metal hybrid catalysts[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 921-929.
[8] Ping Zhang, Yi-Han Li, Li Chen, Mao-Jie Zhang, Yang Ren, Yan-Xu Chen, Zhi Hu, Qi Wang, Wei Wang, Liang-Yin Chu. Hierarchical porous metal-organic frameworks/polymer microparticles for enhanced catalytic degradation of organic contaminants[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(6): 939-949.
[9] Pingle Liu, Yu Liu, Yang Lv, Wei Xiong, Fang Hao, Hean Luo. Zinc modification of Ni-Ti as efficient NixZnyTi1 catalysts with both geometric and electronic improvements for hydrogenation of nitroaromatics[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(4): 461-474.
[10] Xiangyu Liu, Yanling Pan, Peng Zhang, Yilin Wang, Guohao Xu, Zhaojie Su, Xuedong Zhu, Fan Yang. Alkylation of benzene with carbon dioxide to low-carbon aromatic hydrocarbons over bifunctional Zn-Ti/HZSM-5 catalyst[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 384-396.
[11] Hongtao Xie, Qin Geng, Xiaoyue Liu, Jian Mao. Interface engineering for enhancing electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction of CoS/CeO2 heterostructures[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 376-383.
[12] Mengying Liu, Yun Xu, Yanjun Zhao, Zheng Wang, Dunyun Shi. Hydroxyl radical-involved cancer therapy via Fenton reactions[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(3): 345-363.
[13] Yingjie Zhao, Xinyue Wang, Xiahan Sang, Sixing Zheng, Bin Yang, Lecheng Lei, Yang Hou, Zhongjian Li. Spin polarization strategy to deploy proton resource over atomic-level metal sites for highly selective CO2 electrolysis[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 1772-1781.
[14] Tao Lin, Xiaoxun Ma. Development of an in-situ H2 reduction and moderate oxidation method for 3,5-dimethylpyridine hydrogenation in trickle bed reactor[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(12): 1807-1817.
[15] Reyila Abuduwayiti, Feng-Yun Ma, Xing Fan. Catalytic hydrogenation of insoluble organic matter of CS2/Acetone from coal over mesoporous HZSM-5 supported Ni and Ru[J]. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng., 2022, 16(10): 1505-1513.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed